-
这样写英文
Email
,对方会感觉你很有礼貌
,很有风度
一、投稿信
1. Dear Dr.
Defendi ML:
I am sending a manuscript
entitled “” by –
which I should like to
submit for possible publication
in the
journal of - .
Yours sincerely
2. Dear Dr. A:
Enclosed is a
manuscript entitled “” by sb, whi
ch we
are submitting for publication in the journal
of - . We have chosen this journal
because it deals with - . We believe that sth
would be of interest
to the journal’s
readers.
3. Dear Dr. A:
Please find enclosed for your review an
original research art
icle, “” by sb.
All authors have read
and approve this
version of the article, and due care has been
taken to ensure the integrity of the
work. No part of this paper has
published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of
interest exits in
the submission of
this manuscript, and we have attached to this
letter the signed letter granting us
permission to use Figure 1 from another
source.
We appreciate your
consideration of our manuscript, and we look
forward to receiving comments
from the
reviewers.
二、询问有无收到稿件
Dear Editors,
We
dispatched
our
manuscript
to
your
journal
on
3
August
2006
but
have
not,
as
yet,
receive
acknowledgement of their safe arrival.
We fear that may have been lost and should be
grateful if
you would let us know
whether or not you have received them. If not, we
will send our manuscript
again. Thank
you in advance for your help.
三、询问论文审查回音
Dear
Editors
,
It is
more than 12 weeks since I submitted our
manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your
journal. I have not yet received a
reply and am wondering whether you have reached a
decision. I
should appreciated your
letting me know what you have decided as soon as
possible.
四、关于论文的总体审查意见
1. This is a carefully done study and
the findings are of considerable interest. A few
minor revision
are list below.
2.
This
is
a
well-written
paper
containing
interesting
results
which
merit
publication.
For
the
benefit of the reader,
however, a number of points need clarifying and
certain statements require
further
justification. There are given below.
3.
Although
these
observation
are
interesting,
they
are
rather
limited
and
do
not
advance
our
knowledge of the subject sufficiently
to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that
the authors
try submitting their
findings to specialist journal such as
–
4. Although
this paper is good, it would be ever better if
some extra data were added.
5. This
manuscript is not suitable for publication in the
journal of
–
because the
main observation
it describe was
reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .
6. Please ask someone familiar with
English language to help you rewrite this paper.
As you will
see,
I
have
made
some
correction
at
the
beginning
of
the
paper
where
some
syntax
is
not
satisfactory.
7. We feel
that this potentially interesting study has been
marred by an inability to communicate
the
finding
correctly
in
English
and
should
like
to
suggest
that
the
authors
seek
the
advice
of
someone
with a good knowledge of English, preferable
native speaker.
8.
The
wording
and
style
of
some
section,
particularly
those
concerning
HPLC,
need
careful
editing. Attention should be paid to
the wording of those parts of the Discussion of
and Summary
which have been underlined.
9. Preliminary experiments only have
been done and with exception of that summarized in
Table 2,
none has been repeated. This
is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there
is so much variation
between assays.
10. The condition of incubation are
poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were
antibody used?
五、给编辑的回信
1. In reply to the referee’s main
criticism of paper, it is possible to say that
–
One minor point raised by
the referee concerns of the extra composition of
the reaction mixture in
Figure
1.
This
has
now
been
corrected.
Further
minor
changes
had
been
made
on
page
3,
paragraph
1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not
affect our interpretation of the result.
2. I have read
the referee’s
comments very carefully and conclude that the
paper has been rejected
on the sole
grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I
did not include a toxicity table in my
article although perhaps I should have
done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than
an error
or omission.
3.
Thank
you
for
your
letter
of
–
and
for
the
referee’s
comments
concerning
our
manuscript
entitled “”. We have studied their
comments carefully and have made correction which
we hope
meet with their approval.
4. I enclosed a revised manuscript
which includes a report of additional experiments
done at the
referee’s suggestion. You
will see that our original findings are
confirmed.
5. We are sending
the revised manuscript according to the comments
of the reviewers. Revised
portion are
underlined in red.
6. We found the
referee’s comments most helpful and have revised
the manuscript
7. We are
pleased to note the favorable comments of
reviewers in their opening sentence.
8.
Thank
you
for
your
letter.
I
am
very
pleased
to
learn
that
our
manuscript
is
acceptable
for
publication in Cancer Research with
minor revision.
9.
We
have
therefore
completed
a
further
series
of
experiments,
the
result
of
which
are
summarized in Table 5.
From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not
account.
10. We deleted the relevant
passage since they are not essential to the
contents of the paper.
11. I feel that
the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2
result from a misinterpretation
of the
data.
12. We would have include a non-
protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if
one had been
available.
13.
We
prefer
to
retain
the
use
of
Table
4
for
reasons
that
it
should
be
clear
from
the
new
paragraph inserted at
the end of the Results section.
14.
Although reviewer does not consider it is
important to measure the temperature of the cells,
we
consider it essential.
15. The running title has been changed
to “”.
16. The Materials and
Methods section now includes details for measuring
uptake of isotope and
assaying
hexokinase.
17. The concentration of
HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly
stated in the original
manuscript. This
has been rectified. The authors are grateful to
the referees for pointing out their
error.
18. As suggested by
both referees, a discussion of the possibility of
laser action on chromosome
has been
included (page16, paragraph 2).
19. We
included a new set of photographs with better
definition than those originally submitted
and to which a scale has been added.
20. Following the suggestion of the
referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.
21. Two further papers, published since
our original submission, have been added to the
text and
Reference section. These are:
22. We should like to thank the
referees for their helpful comments and hope that
we have now
produced a more balance and
better account of our work. We trust that the
revised manuscript is
acceptable for
publication.
23.
I
greatly
appreciate
both
your
help
and
that of
the
referees
concerning
improvement
to
this
paper. I hope that the
revised manuscript is now suitable for
publication.
24. I should like to
express my appreciation to you and the referees
for suggesting how to improve
our
paper.
25. I apologize for the delay in
revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing
an additional
experiment, as suggested
by referees.
邮件的开头
感谢读者是邮件开场白的好办法。
感
谢您的读者能让对方感到高兴,
特别是之后你有事
相求的情况下
会很有帮助。
Thank you for contacting us.
如果有人写信来询问公司的服务,
就可以使用这句句子开头。
向
他们对公司的兴趣表示感谢。
Thank
you for your prompt reply.
当一个客户或是同事很快就回
复了你的邮件,一定记得
要感谢他们。如果回复并不及时,只要将
“prompt”
除去即可,你还可以说,
“Thank
you for
getting back to
me
.”
Thank you for providing the requested i
nformation.
如果你询问某人一些信息,他们花了点
时间才发送给你,那就用这句句子表示你仍然对他们的付出表示感激。
Thank you for all
your assistance.
如果有人给了你特别的帮助,
那一定要感谢他们!
如果
你想对他们表示特别的感激,就用这
个句子,
“I truly appreciate … your
help
in resolving the
problem.” Thank you for raising your
concerns.
就算某个客户或是经理写邮件给你对你的工作提出了一定的质疑,你还是要感谢他们。
这样你能表现出你对他们的认真态度表示尊重及感激。
同时,
你也可以使用,
“Thank you for
your feedback.
”
在邮件的结尾
在邮件开头表示感谢一般是表示对
对方过去付出的感谢,
而在邮件结尾处表示感谢是对
将来的帮助
表示感谢。事先表示感谢,能让对方在行动时更主动更乐意。
Thank you for your kind cooperation.
如果你需要读者帮助你做某事,
那就先得表示感谢。
< br>
Thank you for
your attention to this matter.
与以上的类似,本句
包含了你对对方将来可能
的帮助表示感谢。
Thank you for your
understanding.
如果你写到任何会对读者产生负面影响的内容那就使
p>
用这句句子吧。