-
精品文档
专四作文样题
(2016
年发布
)
第一部分:原题
PART VI
[45
MIN]
Should
we
review
traditional
Chinese
characters
or
continue
using
simplified
characters?
This
has
been
an
intensely
discussed
question
for
years.
The
following
are
the
supporters'
and
opponents'
opinions.
Read
carefully the opinions
from both sides and write your response in about
200
words,
in
which
you
should
first
summarize
briefly
the
opinions
from
both
sides and give your
view on the issue.
Marks
will
be
awarded
for
content
relevance,
content
sufficiency,
organization
and
language
quality.
Failure
to
follow
the
above
instructions
may result in a loss of marks.
Yes
Traditional
characters,
which
date back to more than 2000 years
ago,
have
a
more
beautiful
appearance and a more reasonable
structure.
As
indicated
by
the
親
and
愛
examples,
traditional
characters
make
more
sense,
convey
traditional
values
and
can
therefore
represent
traditional
culture.
For
two
millennia,
Chinese
historical records and classic works
were
written
in
traditional
characters. To
be able to read them
and
inherit
traditional
cultures,
we
need
to
bring
traditional
characters
back. Politically, it is also necessary
to
restore
traditional
Chinese
characters.
Currently,
traditional
characters
are
still
in
use
in
Hong
Kong,
Taiwan
and
many
Chinese
communities
around
the
world.
Restoring
them
can
contribute
to
cross-Strait exchanges and national
reunifications
and
unite
Chinese
people around the world.
No
In
today’s
world,
efficiency
matters
most.
Traditional
characters,
which
usually
have
more
strokes
than
simplified
ones,
are
more
difficult
to
learn.
By
contrast,
simplified
characters
are
much easier to learn and use. Over
the
past
50
years,
lots
of
classic
texts
have
been
turned
into
simplified-character
versions, which
means
simplified
characters
can
also
promote
and
preserve
traditional
culture.
Constant
simplification
has
been
a
trend
in
the
evolution
of
Chinese
characters.
From
the
oracle
bones
script
of
3000
years
ago
to
traditional
characters,
the
Chinese
writing
system
has
always
been
slimming
down
for
better
communication.
WRITING
.
精品文档
第二部分:参考答案(
p>
1
)
写作指南
考生在下笔之前应先审题,
明确写作要求:针对
“
我们究竟是该恢复中文繁
体字还是继续使用简体汉字
”
这一热议话题,首先总结
正反方的意见,然后给出
个人观点。文章结构可安排如下:
<
/p>
第一段:简要概括赞同和反对恢复繁体字方和提倡使用简体字方的观点,
< br>
第二段:
表明自己的观点:
复兴繁体字是不明智的。直击正方观点漏洞,
分三点铺陈论证。繁体字在沟通交流上效率
不及简体字;繁体字可读性和可接
受性不强;保存传统文化和价值并不是只有恢复繁体字
这一种方式。
第三段:重申观点
——
恢复中文繁体字不是明智之举。
The
necessity
to
revive
traditional
Chinese
characters
has
aroused
an
increasingly
heated
discussion
for
decades.
Some
in
favor
of
it
hold
that
traditional Chinese
characters, with a more vivid and descriptive
appearance,
is
a
perfect
embodiment
of
traditional
culture
and
a
bond
for
cross-
Straits
exchanges
and
national
reunification
(
复兴
).
Some
are
against
it
for
its
complexity to write and
inefficiency to communicate, which can be
otherwise
avoided
by
simplified
characters.
Besides,
simplified
characters
can
also
serve
the
purpose
of
promoting
traditional
culture
and
this
simplified
writing
system is an irreversible
(
不可逆的
)
trend.
From my perspective
,
it's not wise to deliberately / intentionally
initiate a
renaissance of traditional
Chinese characters for following reasons:
First
and
foremost
,
words
and
language
are
tools
created
for
better
communication. In
this
sense,
efficiency
is of
utmost
importance
if
simplified
Chinese characters can perform the same
function of the traditional ones.
Secondly
,
readability
(
可读性
)
and
acceptability
are
potential
barriers
/
hindrance to the restoration
(
恢复
)
of traditional characters. Most of mainland
Chinese learn simplified characters
from their infancy / childhood. So it will be
hard for them to accept a totally
unfamiliar word system.
Last,
traditional
Chinese
characters
do
help
cultural
inheritance
(
传承
)
,
but it doesn't mean reviving it is the
sole
(
唯一的
)
way to
preserve traditional
culture and
values.
Taking the above factors into
consideration,
I think it is unwise to
revive
traditional Chinese characters.
(252
words)
.
精品文档
2016
年专四真题作文
第一部分:原题
PART VI
WRITING
[45
MIN]
Read
carefully
the
following
excerpt
on
term-
time
holiday
arguments
in
the Uk, and then write
your response in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which
you should:
?
Summarize the main message of the excerpt, and
then
?
Comment
on
whether
parents
should
take
children
out
of
school
for
holiday during term time in order to
save money.
You should support
yourself with information from the excerpt.
Marks
will
be
awarded
for
content
relevance,
content
sufficinecy,
organization and language quality,
failure to follow the above instruction may
result in a loss of marks.
Term-time holidays will be banned
Parents are to be banned
by Michael Gove, UK’s Education Secretary,
from taking their children out of
school to save money on holidays.
He
is
to
abolish
the
right
of
head
teachers
to
“authorise
absense”
from
the classroom, which
has been used to let families take term-time
breaks, and
will warn them they face
fines for their children not being at school.
“Any time out of school has the
potential to damage a child’s education,”
a senior source at the Department for
Education said this weekend. “That is
why
the
government
will
end
the
distinction
between
authorized
and
unauthorized absence.”
“This is part of the government’s wider
commitment to bring down truancy
(
['tru??
ns
?<
/p>
]
旷课
)
levels
in
our
schools.
There
will
also
be
stricter
penalties
(
['pen
?
lt
?
]
处罚
)
for
parents and
schools.”
The tough measures
on truancy are part of a wider attempt by Mr Gove
to make education more academically
rigorous and to tackle a culture in the
educational
establishment
which
he
believes
has
accepted
“excuses
for
failure”.
Russell
Hobby, the general secretary of the National
Association of Head
Teachers,
said
the
measure
would
discourage
parents
from
trying
to
put
pressure on heads to section term time
holidays. “ The high cost of holidays
outside of term time is still an issue
but
ultimately a child’s is more
important
than a holiday, he said.
.
精品文档
第二部分:参考答案
Which
Is More Important, Education or a Cheaper Holiday?
New
research
has
shown
that
almost
four
out
of
ten
parents
in
the
UK
have
taken
their
children
out
of
school
to
go
on
holidays.
Cost
is
the
main
reason given by parents for sacrificing
their children’s education. Parents are
to
be
banned,
however,
by
UK’s
Education
Authority,
from
taking
their
children out of school to go during
term time.
Should
local
authorities
stagger
school
holidays
to
enable
families
with
children
to
take
advantage
of
travel
bargains?
Or
is
it
wrong
for
parents
to
jeopardize their children’s education
for the sake of a cheaper holiday?
As
far
as I am concerned
,
education is more important.
Firstly,
chi
ldren’s education
must
come first.
A
cheap
holiday
during
the
school
season
shouldn’t
be
the
reason to
take a child out of school. Some parents are not
willing to sacrifice
or schedule their
lives in terms of their children’s needs. This
kind of attitude
w
ill
influence
their
children
deeply.
It’s
no
wonder
so
many
kids
are
not
interested in school and don’t take
their study seriously.
Secondly
, school isn’t
day
care
center.
It’s
an
educational
institution
that
needs
every
student
to
follow
its rules. Taking a child on holiday when school
is in session will disturb
the order of
the school.
Besides,
it is
disruptive for the child, because he will
have to catch up when he returns.
All
in
all,
taking
children
out
of
school
for
a
cheaper
holiday
is
irresponsible
behavior.
Those
parents
would
risk
being
fined
financially
and
morally. It’s not only kids that need
to grow up——
a lot of parents need to as
well.
(265 words)
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
上一篇:宾语和宾语补足语
下一篇:贸易术语变形及散货运输