-
2005 Text 1
Everybody loves a
fat pay rise. Yet pleasure at your own can vanish
if you learn that a colleague has
been
given a bigger one. Indeed, if he has a reputation
for slacking, you might even be outraged. Such
behaviour is regarded as “all too
human”, with the underlying
assumption
that other
animals would not
be capable of this
finely developed sense of
grievance
. But a study by
Sarah Brosnan and Frans de Waal
of
Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, which has
just been published in Nature, suggests that it is
all
too monkey, as well.
The
researchers studied the behaviour of female brown
capuchin monkeys. They look cute. They
are good-natured, co-operative
creatures, and they share their food
tardily
. Above all, like
their female
human
counterpart
s,
they tend to pay much closer attention
to the value of “goods and services” than
males.
Such
characteristics make them perfect candidates for
Dr. Brosnan's and Dr. de waal's study. The
researchers spent two years teaching
their monkeys to exchange
token
s for food. Normally,
the monkeys
were happy enough to
exchange pieces of rock for slices of cucumber.
However, when two monkeys
were placed
in separate but adjoining chambers, so that each
could observe what the other was getting in
return for its rock, their behaviour
became markedly different.
In the world
of capuchins grapes are luxury goods (and much
preferable to cucumbers) So when
one
monkey was handed a grape in exchange for her
token, the second was
reluctant
to hand hers over
for a mere piece of cucumber. And if
one received a grape without having to provide her
token in
exchange at all, the other
either tossed her own token at the researcher or
out of the chamber, or refused
to
accept the slice of cucumber .Indeed, the mere
presence of a grape in the other chamber (without
an
actual monkey to eat it) was enough
to induce resentment in a female capuchin.
The researches suggest that capuchin
monkeys, like humans, are guided by social
emotions. In the
wild, they are a co-
operative, group-living species, Such co-operation
is likely to be stable only when
each
animal feels it is not being cheated. Feelings of
righteous
indignation
, it
seems, are not the
preserve of people
alone, Refusing a lesser reward completely makes
these feelings abundantly clear to
other members of the group. However,
whether such a sense of fairness evolved
independently in
capuchins and humans,
or whether it stems from the common ancestor that
the species had 35 million
years ago,
is, as yet, an unanswered question.
21.
In the opening paragraph, the author introduces
his topic by
[A]. posing a contrast.
[B]. justifying
an assumption.
[C]. making a comparison.
[D]. explaining a phenomenon.
22. The statement “it is
all too monkey” (Last line, paragraph l) implies
that
[A]. monkeys are also outraged by slack
rivals.
[B]. resenting unfairness is also
monkeys' nature.
[C]. monkeys, like humans,
tend to be jealous of each other.
[D]. no animals other than monkeys can
develop such emotions.
23.
Female capuchin monkeys were chosen for the
research most probably because they are
[A]. more
inclined to weigh what they get.
[B]. attentive
to researchers' instructions.
[C]. nice in
both appearance and temperament.
[D]. more generous than their male
companions
24. Dr. Brosnan
and Dr. de Waal have eventually found in their
study that the monkeys
[A]. prefer grapes to cucumbers.
[B]. can be taught to exchange things.
[C]. will not be co-operative if
feeling cheated.
[D]. are
unhappy when separated from others.
25. What can we infer from the last
paragraph?
[A]. Monkeys can be trained to develop
social emotions.
[B]. Human indignation
evolved from an uncertain source.
[C]. Animals
usually show their feelings openly as humans do.
[D]. Cooperation among monkeys remains
stable only in the wild.
21
题
[C]
难度
0.246
考察第一段的写作手法,明显用的
是猴和人之间的相似形的比较关系。关于
contrast
和<
/p>
compare
,
两者的词性不同。
p>
contrast
多用来进行对比,即不同事物之间的比较。而
p>
compare
多用于类比,即
同类事物之
间的比较。
A
选项
posing a contrast
意思是提出一个对比,<
/p>
但是请注意,
提出不代表对这个对比做出分析。
< br>而原文第一段明显是对人和猴子这个对比做出了分析,因此应该是
making
a comparison
,即对一
个对比做出了分析。
post
仅仅是
“
提
出
”
的意思,而原文中作者是通过做具体的对比而得出结论,<
/p>
所以,
“make”
这个词应该更准确。
而且,参考上面所说的
contrast
和
compare
的区别,更应该选
择
C
选项。
B
选项
justifying an
assumption
意思是证明一种假设,但是第一段的意思是人与猴子的比较,
p>
而不是什么假设。这个也是很强的干扰项。
D
选项
explaining a p
henomenon.
意思是解释一种现象,
但是文章第一段的
意思是人与猴之间的
比较,而不是在解释什么东西,只是进行一种比较罢了。
22
题
[B]
难度
0.368
区分度
.0.351
也是在把猴子和
人做类比,指出猴子与人一样都抱怨不公平
。
p>
A
选项
m
onke
y
s are also outraged by slack rivals.
p>
是说猴子也会由于懒惰的竞争者而愤怒。
但是,
猴子不是因为懒惰的人才愤怒,而是因为不公平。
C
p>
选项
m
onkey
s, like humans, tend to be jealous of each other
p>
的意思是猴子也和人一样嫉妒彼
此。但是从文章看出,中心思想是讨
论猴子对于公平的敏感性,因此
C
选项只是陈述了其中的一
p>
个现象而已,而不是体现了中心思想。文章中只提到了对于不公平所产生的愤怒感,但这个和
嫉
妒是两码事。这种题属于用小范围替代大范围的干扰项。
D
选项
more generous than their male companion
s
是说雌性猴子比雄性猴子更慷慨,大方。但
是从原文看出,文
章的意思是雌猴子更加注重她们获得的东西。文章的中心思想是说猴子对于公
平性的敏感
,因此与慷慨大方之类的没有关系。做题时要把握好中心思想,这样就容易排除选项
了<
/p>
23
题
[A]
难度
0.383
区分度
.0.437
这个是事实细节
题,答案是根据文章
第二段末和
第三段第一句话得到的,雌性的
猴子被选择做研
究,是因为她们更加注重她们获得的东西。
B
选项
attentive to
researchers'
instructions
意思是听研究人员的话,而问题
Female capuchin
m
onkey
s were
chosen for the research most probably because
则是指为什么雌性猴子被选择做研究,
由文章可看出,应该是由于雌猴子的
对公平的更强烈的敏感性。原文只是提到了雌性猴子之间比
较容易合作。
C
选项
nice in both appearance and temperament
是说在外表和脾气上都很好,这个基本上是命
题者编造的干扰项
,如果你明白了文章的大意的话,就不会选择这个答案了。因为整篇文章和外
表没有任何
联系的。而且题目问的是最主要的原因,所以
C
选项不予考虑。
D
选项
more generous
than their male companions
的意思是说比雄猴子更大方,
但是之所以选择
雌猴子是因为她们对公平性更敏感。
D
选项基本上和主题是背道而驰的,所以属于比较明显的干
扰项。
24
题
[C]
难度
0.805
区分度
.0.470
他们最终的发现
是什么,篇章最后两段反复重复,如果没有受到公平的话
。
A
选项
prefer grapes
to cucumbers
是说猴子比起葡萄来更喜欢黄瓜,
但
是这和题目根本没有关
系,属于搞笑类干扰项
....
原文中虽然提到过,但是算不上什么
“
最终的发
现
”
。
B
选项
can be taught
to exchange things
是说猴子能被训练得交换东西,这个就是太表面
的意思
了,但是和文章主题基本没关系嘛,文章的主题一定要把握好。
< br>
D
选项
are
unhappy when separated from others
说的是当她
们被分开时会不高兴,
但是原文中可
以看出,不高兴是因为她们
看到另外的猴子得到了更好的东西,而不是因为被分开。猴子哪里会
这么怕孤单
?
25
题
[B]
难度
0.584
区分度
.0.327
这篇文章第一段
和最后一段都出现一个词,
假设
为什么猴和人都有这种心理反应,这个问题没
有得以解决。
A
选项
M
onkey
s can be
trained to develop social emotions
意思与文章
的中心思想不符。文章是
想说明猴子对于公平的敏感性,而不是猴子能被训练具有社会性
的情感。而且这个选项在原文中
也没有依据,所谓的社会性情感原文没有提及。你从最后
一段的
as yet, an unanswered
question
可