-
美国
FDA
分析方法验证指南中英文对
照
I.
INTRODUCTION
This guidance provides recommendations
to applicants on submitting analyti
cal
procedures, validation data, and samples to
support the documentation of th
e
identity, strength, quality, purity, and potency
of drug substances and drug
products.
1.
绪论
本指南旨在为申请者提供建议,以帮助其提交分析方法,方法验证资料和样品用于支
持原
料药和制剂的认定,剂量,质量,纯度和效力方面的文件。
This guidance is intended to assist
applicants in assembling information,
submitting samples, and presenting data
to support analytical methodologies.
Th
e recommendations apply to drug
substances and drug products covered in new
dru
g applications
(
NDAs
), abbreviated new drug
applications (
ANDAs
),
biologics lic
ense applications
(
BLAs
), product license
applications (
PLAs
), and
supplements
to these applications.
本指南旨在帮助申请者收集资料,
递交样品并资料以支持分析方法。
p>
这些建议适用于
N
DA
,
ANDA
,
BLA
,
PLA
及其它们的补充中所涉及的原料药和制剂。
The principles also apply
to drug substances and drug products covered in
Type II drug master files
(
DMFs
). If a different
approach is chosen, the applic
ant is
encouraged to discuss the matter in advance with
the center with produc
t
jurisdiction to prevent the expenditure
of resources on preparing a submissi
on
that may later be determined to be unacceptable. <
/p>
这些原则同样适用于二类
DMF
所涉及的
原料药和制剂。如果使用了其它方法,鼓励申
请者事先和
FDA
药品评审中心的官员进行讨论,
以免出现这种情况,
那就是花了人力物力所
准备起来的递交资料后来发现是不可用的。
The principles of methods
validation described in this guidance apply to
a
ll types of analytical procedures.
However, the specific recommendations in
thi
s guidance may not be applicable to
certain unique analytical procedures for
pr
oducts such as biological,
biotechnological, botanical, or
radiopharmaceutical
drugs.
本
指南中所述的分析方法验证的原则适用于各种类型的分析方法。但是,本指南中特
定的建
议可能不适用于有些产品所用的特殊分析方法,
如生物药,
生物
技术药,
植物药或放
射性药物等。
For example, many bioassays are based
on animal challenge models, 39
immun
ogenicity assessments, or other
immunoassays that have unique features that
sho
uld be considered when submitting
analytical procedure and methods validation
i
nformation.
比如说,
许多生物分析是建立在动物挑战模式,
免疫原性评估或其它有着独特特性的免疫分
析基础上的,在递交分析方法和分析方法验证资料时需考虑这些独特的性质。
< br>
Furthermore, specific
recommendations for biological and immunochemical
te
sts that may be necessary for
characterization and quality control of many
drug
substances and drug products are
beyond the scope of this guidance document.
而且,许多原料药和制剂的界定和质量控制所需的生物和免疫化学检测并不在本指南
< br>的范围之内。
Although this
guidance does not specifically address the
submission of ana
lytical procedures and
validation data for raw materials, intermediates,
excipi
ents, container closure
components, and other materials used in the
production
of drug substances and drug
products, validated analytical procedures should
be
used to analyze these materials.
尽管本指南并不专门叙述原料,中间体,赋形剂,包装材料及原料药和制剂生产中所
用的其它物料的分析方法及分析方法验证资料的递交,
但是应该应用验证过
的分析方法来分
析检测这些物质。
For questions on appropriate validation
approaches for analytical procedur
es or
submission of information not addressed in this
guidance, applicants shou
ld consult
with the appropriate chemistry review staff at
FDA.
对于本指南中未提及的关于分析方法验证和资料提交方面的问题,请向
FDA
相关的化
学评审人员咨询。
This
guidance,
when
finalized,
will
replace
the
FDA
guidance
for
industry
on
S
ubmitting
Samples
and
Analytical
Data
for
Methods
Validation
(February
1987).
本指南,一旦定稿,将取代
FDA
于
1987
年
2
月份发布的工业指南:分析方法验证所需提
交的样
品和分析资料。
II.
BACKGROUND
Each
NDA and ANDA must include the analytical
procedures necessary to ensu
re the
identity, strength, quality, purity, and potency
of the drug substance a
nd drug product,
including bioavailability of the drug product (21
CFR 314.50(d)
(1) and 314.94(a)(9)(i)).
II.
背景
每个
NDA
和
ANDA
都必需包括必要的分析方法以确保原料药和制剂的认定,
剂量,
质量,
纯度和效力,还包括制剂的生物利用度
(21
CFR 314.50(d)(1)
和
314.94(a)(
9)(i))
。
FDA
验证文件现场备查,可以不与
DMF
一起交。
Data must be available to
establish that the analytical procedures used
in
testing meet proper standards of
accuracy and reliability (21 CFR 211.165(e)
a
nd 211.194(a)(2)).
必须要有资料来论
证所用的分析方法是符合一定的准确度和可靠性标准的。
Methods validation is the process of
demonstrating that analytical
procedu
res are suitable for their
intended use. The methods validation process for
ana
lytical procedures begins with the
planned and systematic collection by the
app
licant of the validation data to
support the analytical procedures.
分析方法
验证是论证某一分析方法适用于其用途的过程。分析方法的验证过程是从申
请者有计划地
系统性收集验证资料以支持分析方法开始的。
The
review chemist evaluates the analytical
procedures and validation dat
a
submitted in the NDA or ANDA.
审评化学家会对<
/p>
NDA
或
ANDA
中的分析方法和验证资料进行评审。
On request
from FDA, an NDA or ANDA applicant must submit
samples of drug
product, drug
substance, noncompendial reference standards, and
blanks so that
the applicant's drug
substance and drug product analytical procedures
can be ev
aluated by FDA laboratories
(21 CFR 314.50(e) and 314.94(a)(10)).
一
旦
FDA
有要求,则
NDA
或
ANDA
的申请者必须提交制剂,原料药,非药
典对照品和空
白以使
FDA
实验室能对
申请者所用分析方法进行评审
(21 CFR 314.50(e) and
314.94(a)(1
0))
。
The FDA laboratory analysis
demonstrates that the analytical procedures
ar
e reproducible by laboratory testing.
The review chemists and laboratory
analys
ts determine the suitability of
the analytical procedures for regulatory
purpos
es.
FDA
实验室的
分析会论证该分析方法在实验室内是可以重现的。
审评化学家和实验室分析家
会从法规的角度确定该分析方法的适用性。
FDA investigators inspect the
analytical laboratory testing sites to
ensur
e that the analytical procedures
used for release and stability testing comply
with current good manufacturing
practices (CGMPs) (21 CFR part 211) or good
lab
oratory practices (GLPs) (21 CFR
part 58), as appropriate.
FDA
检查官会对分析实验室进行检查确保用于放行和稳定性实验的分析方法符合现行
的
p>
GMP
(
21CFR part 211)
和
GLP (21 CFR part
58)
。
Each BLA and
PLA must include a full description of the
manufacturing meth
ods, including
analytical procedures, that demonstrate that the
manufactured pr
oduct meets prescribed
standards of safety, purity, and potency (21 CFR
601.2(a)
and 601.2(c)(1)(iv)).
< br>每个
BLA
和
PLA
都必须要有详细的生产工艺描述,包括分析方法,以说明所生产的产
品是符
合规定睥安全,纯充和效力标准的
(21 CFR 601.2(a) and
601.2(c)(1)(iv))
。
Data must be available to establish
that the analytical procedures used in
testing meet proper standards of accuracy and
reliability (21 CFR 81211.194(a)
(2)).
For BLAs, PLAs, and their supplements, the
analytical procedures and thei
r
validation are submitted as part of the license
application or supplement and
are
evaluated by the review committee.
必须要
有资料证明所用的分析方法是符合一定的准确度和可靠性要求的
(21 CFR 812
1
1.194(a)(2))
。对于
B
LA
,
PLA
及它们的补充,在所提交
的许可证申请中应当要有分析方法
和方法验证这部分的资料,审评委员会会对这部分资料
进行评审。
Representative samples
of the product must be submitted and summaries of
r
esults of tests performed on the lots
represented by the submitted sample must
be provided (21 CFR 601.2(a) and
601.2(c)(1)(vi)). The review committee chair
m
ay request analytical testing by CBER
laboratory analysts to evaluate the
appli
cant=s analytical procedures and
verify the test results.
需提供代表性样品及该样品所代表批号的检测结果总结
(21
CFR 601.2(a) and 601.2
(c)(1)(vi))
。
评审委员会主席会要求
CBER
< br>实验室的分析人员进行分析实验对申请者的分析
方法进行评估,并确认其分析结果
。
All analytical procedures
are of equal importance from a validation
perspe
ctive. In general, validated
analytical procedures should be used,
irrespective
of whether they are for
in-process, release, acceptance, or stability
testing.
Each quantitative analytical
procedure should be designed to minimize assay
va
riation.
从验证的角度来看,
< br>所有的分析方法有着同样的重要性。
一般来说,
应当要应
用已验证过的
分析方法,
而不论其是被用于过程控制,
放行,合格或稳定性实验。高等每个定量分析方法
时都应当要减少其分析
误差。
Analytical procedures
and validation data are submitted in the sections
of
the application on analytical
procedures and controls. Recommendations on
info
rmation to be submitted are
included in sections III through IX and XI of this
guidance. Information on submission of
the methods validation package to the
ND
A or ANDA and samples to the FDA
laboratories is provided in section X.
分析方法和验证资料应当摆在申请的分析方法和控制章节中提交。
本指南的第
III
到
I
X
章和
XI
章给出了所需提供资料方面的建议。
p>
向
FDA
实验室提供样品和递交
NDA
和
ANDA
中
p>
的分析方法验证资料的信息见第
X
章。
p>
III.
TYPES
OF
ANALYTICAL
PRO
CEDURES
A. Regulatory Analytical Procedure A
regulatory analytical procedure is th
e
analytical procedure used to evaluate a defined
characteristic of the drug su
bstance or
drug product. The analytical procedures in the
U.S. Pharmacopeia/Nat
ional Formulary
(USP/NF) are those legally recognized under
section 501(b) of t
he Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the Act) as the regulatory
analytical procedur
es for compendial
items. For purposes of determining compliance with
the Act, t
he regulatory analytical
procedure is used.
III
分析方法的类型
A.
法定分析方法
法定分析方法是被用来
评估原料药或制剂的特定性质的。
USP/NF
中的分析方法是
法定
的用于药典项目检测的分析方法。为了确认符合法规,需使用法定分析方法。
B. Alternative Analytical
Procedure
An alternative analytical
procedure is an analytical procedure proposed
by
the applicant for use instead of the
regulatory analytical procedure. A
valida
ted alternative analytical
procedure should be submitted only if it is shown
to
perform equal to or better than the
regulatory analytical procedure.
B.
替代分析方法
替代分析方法是申请者
提出用于代替法定分析方法的分析方法。只有当一替代分析方
法相当于或优于法定分析方
法时,才可以应用验证过的替代分析方法。
If an
alternative analytical procedure is submitted, the
applicant should
provide a rationale
for its inclusion and identify its use (e.g.,
release, stab
ility testing), validation
data, and comparative data to the regulatory
analyti
cal procedure.
如果提交了替
代分析方法,申请者还应当提供其理由,并标明其用途(如,放行,稳定性实
验),验证
资料及其与法定分析方法的对比资料。
C.
Stability-Indicating Assay
A
stability-indicating assay is a validated
quantitative analytical proced
ure that
can detect the changes with time in the pertinent
properties of the dr
ug substance and
drug product.
C.
稳定性指示分析
稳定性指示分析是能
检测出原料药或制剂的某些性质随着时间的延长而出现的变化的
定量分析方法。
A stability-indicating assay
accurately measures the active ingredients,
w
ithout interference from degradation
products, process impurities, excipients,
or other potential
impurities
。
稳定性指示
分析能不受降解产物,工艺杂质,赋形剂或其它潜在杂质的影响而准确测
定其中的活性成
分。
If an applicant submits a
non-stability-indicating analytical procedure
fo
r release testing, then an analytical
procedure capable of qualitatively and
qu
antitatively monitoring the
impurities, including degradation products, should
complement it. Assay analytical
procedures for stability studies should be
stab
ility-indicating, unless
scientifically justified.
如果申请者递交了用于放行检
测的非稳定性指示分析方法,则应当要有能定性和定量
地监测杂质,
包括降解产物,
的分析方法对其进行补充。
稳定性试验中所
用的含量分析方法
应当要有稳定性指示能力,除非有科学的理由能证明其合理性。
IV
.
REFERENCE
STANDARDS
A. Types of Standards A
reference standard (i.e., primary standard) may
be
obtained from the USP/NF or other
official sources (e.g., CBER, 21 CFR
610.20).
If there are questions on
whether a source of a standard would be considered
b
y FDA to be an official source,
applicants should contact the appropriate
chemi
stry review staff. When there is
no official source, a reference standard
shoul
d be of the highest possible
purity and be fully characterized.
IV
标准品
A
.标准品的类型
< br>可以从
USP/NF
处或其它官方
(
比如说,
CBER
,
21CFR 610.20)
获得标准品
(
也就是一级
对照品
)
。如果不能确定一标准品的来源是否会被
FDA
认为是官方来源
,申请者应当要向适
当的化学评审人员咨询。
如果没有官方来源
,
则被用来作标准品的物质应当要有尽可能高的
纯度,并得到充
分界定。
A working standard
(i.e., in-house or secondary standard) is a
standard th
at is qualified against and
used instead of the reference standard.
工作对照品
(
也就是内部标准品或二
级标准品
)
是根据一级对照品标定的,
并用来代替
一级对照品的。
B.
Certificate of Analysis
A certificate
of analysis (COA) for reference standards from
non-official
sources should be
submitted in the section of the application on
analytical pro
cedures and controls. For
standards from official sources, the user should
ensu
re the suitability of the reference
standard. The standard should be stored
cor
rectly and used within the
established use interval.
B
.分析报告单
对于非官方标准品,在申请的分析方法和控制章节中应当要提供该标准品的分析报告
单。
对于从官方获得的标准品,
用户应当要确保标准品的适用性
。
应当正确储存标准品并在
已确定的时间段内使用该标准品。<
/p>
C. Characterization of a
Reference Standard
Reference standards
from USP/NF and other official sources do not
require
further characterization. A
reference standard that is not obtained from an
off
icial source should be of the
highest purity that can be obtained by
reasonable
effort, and it should be
thoroughly characterized to ensure its identity,
stre
ngth, quality, purity, and potency.
C
.标准品的界定
< br>从
USP/NF
及其它官方来源获得的标准品是不需要进
一步界定的。
非官方对照品要有尽
可能高的纯度,并进行充分地
界定以确保其结构,剂量,质量,纯度和效力。
The
qualitative and quantitative analytical procedures
used to characteriz
e a reference
standard are expected to be different from, and
more extensive th
an, those used to
control the identity, strength, quality, purity,
and potency
of the drug substance or
the drug product. Analytical procedures used to
Draft
—
Not for
Implementation characterize a reference standard
should not rely sol
ely on
comparison testing to a previously designated
reference standard.
用于界定标准品的定性和定量分析方法应当
要不同于用于控制原料药或制剂的结构,剂量,
质量,
纯度和效
力的分析方法,
要比它们更深入。
用于标准品界定的分析方法不
应仅仅是和
先前的指定标准品进行比较实验。
Generally, this characterization
information should include:
A brief description of the manufacture
of the reference standard, if the
manufacturing process differs from that of the
drug substance. Any additional
purification procedures used in the
preparation of the reference standard
shoul
d be described.
一般来说,界定资料应当要包括:
标
准品的简单工艺描述,如果其生产工艺是否于其相应的原料药的话。应当要叙述制
备标准
品时所用的补充精制过程。
Legible
reproductions of the relevant spectra,
chromatograms, thin-layer c
hromatogram
(TLC) photographs or reproductions, and other
appropriate instrumen
tal recordings.
Data establishing purity. The data
should be obtained by usin
g appropriate
tests, such as TLC, gas chromatography (GC), high-
pressure liquid
chromatography (HPLC),
phase solubility analysis, appropriate
thermometric ana
lytical procedures, and
others as necessary.
相关光谱图,
色
谱图,
TLC
照片及其它仪器输出的清晰复印件。
建立纯度的资料。
应当
要应用适当的检测方法来获得
这些资料,比如说
TLC
,
GC
,
HPLC
,相溶解分析,适当的热分
析方法及其它必要的分析方法。
Appropriate chemical attribute
information, such as structural formula,
em
pirical formula, and molecular
weight. Information to substantiate the proof
of
structure should include appropriate
analytical tests, such as elemental
analy
sis, infrared spectrophotometry
(IR), ultraviolet spectrophotometry (UV),
nucle
ar magnetic resonance spectroscopy
(NMR), and mass spectrometry (MS), as well
a
s applicable functional group
analysis. Detailed interpretation of the test
dat
a in support of the claimed
structure should be provided.
适当的化学性质资料
,比如结构式,经验式和分子量等。结构确证资料应当要包括适
当的分析测试,比如元素
分析,
IR
,
UV,NMR
和
MS
,及适用的官能团分析。还应当要提供具<
/p>
体的结构解析资料。
A
physical description of the material, including
its color and physical f
orm.
Appropriate physical constants such as
melting range, boiling range,
ref
ractive index, dissociation
constants (pK values), and optical rotation.
A de
tailed description of
the analytical procedures used to characterize the
refere
nce standard.
物理性质的描述,包括颜色和物理形态。
适当的物理常数,比如说熔程,沸程,折射
率,离解常数
(
pK
值
)
和旋光度。用于界定标准品的
分析程序的详细叙述。
For
biotechnological/biological product reference
standards, the recommend
ations on
characterization information above may apply and
should be considered.
However,
additional and/or different tests would be
important to assess physic
ochemical
characteristics, structural characteristics,
biological activity, and
/or
immunochemical activity.
至于生物技术
< br>/
生物产品的标准品,应当要考虑上述建议,可能可以应用。然而,其它
确定物理化学性质,
结构特性,
生物活性和
p>
/
或免疫化学活性的补充检测和
/
或其它检测将是
非常重要的。
Physicochemical determinations may
include isoform, electrophoretic, and
l
iquid chromatographic patterns, as
well as spectroscopic profiles. Structural
c
haracterization may include a
determination of amino acid sequence, amino acid
composition, peptide map, and
carbohydrate structure. Biological and/or
immunoc
hemical activity should be
assessed using the same analytical procedures used
t
o determine product potency.
物理化学性质包括异构体,电泳和液相色谱行为及光谱性质等。结构界定可能包括氨
基酸序列,氨基酸组成,缩氨酸图和碳水结构。确定生物和
/
或
免疫化学活性的分析方法应
当要和用来确定产品效力的分析方法一样。
< br>
These can include animal-based,
cell culture-based, biochemical, or
ligand
/receptor-binding assays. While
these tests may be needed for complete
characte
rization of certain reference
standards, specific recommendations for
validatio
n of biological and
immunochemical tests are not contained in this
guidance doc
ument.
这些分析方法可以包
括基于动物的,细胞培养的,
生物化学的或配位体
/
接受体螯合的
分析方法。
如果这些检测需用于某些
标准品的界定,
生物和免疫化学检测的分析方法验证方
面的特殊
建议并不在本指南的范围之内。
V
.
METHODS
V
ALIDATION
FOR
I
NDs
For an investigational new drug,
sufficient information is required in
eac
h phase of an investigation to
ensure proper identification, quality, purity,
s
trength, and/or potency. The amount of
information on analytical procedures
and
methods validation necessary will
vary with the phase of the investigation
(21
CFR 312.23(a)(7)).
V
.
IND
中的分析方法验证
对于
IND
< br>而言,每个阶段的研究都需要有足够的资料以确保合适的认定,
质量,
纯度,剂
量和
/
或效力。
所需的分析方法和方法验证方面的资料会随着研究的阶段变化而变化
(21
C
FR
312.23(a)(7))
。
For general guidance on analytical
procedures and methods validation
infor
mation to be submitted for phase 1
studies, sponsors should refer to the FDA
gu
idance for industry on Content and
Format of Investigational New Drug
Applicati
ons (INDs) for Phase 1
Studies of Drugs, Including Well- Characterized,
Therape
utic, Biotechnology-Derived
Products (November 1995).
关于在第
1
阶段研究所需提交的分析方法和方法验证资料方面的指南,发起人可以参
考
FDA
的指南:药品(包括结构确定的,有疗
效的,生物技术产品)第
1
阶段研究的
IND
申请的内容和格式(
1995
年
11
月)。
General guidance regarding analytical
procedures and methods validation
in
formation to be submitted for phase 2
or phase 3 studies will be provided in
th
e FDA guidance for industry INDs for
Phase 2 and 3 Studies of Drugs, Including
Specified Therapeutic Biotechnology-
Derived Products, Chemistry,
Manufacturing,
and Controls Content and
Format, when finalized (draft guidance published
Apri
l 1999).
第
2
p>
和第
3
阶段研究所需提交的分析方法和方法
验证资料方面的指南,发起人将可以
参考
FDA
的指南:药品(包括结构确定的,有疗效的,生物技术产品)第
1
阶段研究的
IND
申请的
C
MC
内容和格式(草案,
1999
年<
/p>
4
月)。
All analytical procedures should be
fully developed and validation
complet
ed when the NDA, ANDA, BLA, or
PLA is submitted.
在递交
NDA
,
ANDA
,
BLA<
/p>
或
PLA
时,所有的分析方法都应当要开
发出来,并得到验证。
VI. CONTENT AND
FORMAT OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR NDAs,
230ANDAs, BLAs,
AND PLAs
Any analytical procedure submitted in
an NDA, ANDA, BLA, or PLA should be
described in sufficient detail to allow
a competent analyst to reproduce the
ne
cessary conditions and obtain results
comparable to the applicant=s. Aspects
of
the analytical procedure that
require special attention should be described.
VI
.
ND
A
,
ANDA
,
BLA
和
PLA
中分析方法的内容和
格式
NDA
,
ANDA
,
BLA
和
PLA
中所提交的任一分析方法都应当要有详细的描述,以使合格的
分析人员能重现出所需的实验条件并获得和申请者相当的实验结果。
应当要
叙述分析方法中
需要特殊注意的地方。
If the analytical procedure used is in
the current revision of the USP/NF
or
other FDA recognized standard references (e.g.,
AOAC International Book Of M
ethods) and
the referenced analytical procedure is not
modified, a statement in
dicating the
analytical procedure and reference may be provided
rather than a d
escription of the method
(21 CFR 211.194).
如果所用的分析方法是
USP/NF
或其它
FDA
认可参考文
献
(如,
<
国际方法汇编<
/p>
>>
)
中且所参考的分析方法未经过修改
的话,
则需提供该分析方法的参引,
而不用提供该分析方
法的描述(
21 CFR
211.194
)。
A
description of analytical procedures from any
other published sources sh
ould be
provided, because the referenced sources may not
be readily accessible
to the reviewer.
对于从其它公开发表的文献上获得的分析方法,应当要对其进行叙述,因为评审官可
p>
能并不能很方便的获得这些文献。
分析方法描述中需要包括的典型内容如下所示:
A. Principle
A statement of
the principle of the analytical procedure should
be include
d. For example, separation is
based on isocratic reversed phase HPLC with
detec
tion by UV.
B.
Sampling
The number of samples (e.g.,
vials, tablets) selected, how they a
re
used (i.e., as individual or composite samples),
and the number of replicate
analyses
per sample should be described.
A
.基本方法
HPLC
进行分离的,检测器为
UV
检测器。
B
.取样
需
要叙述的有:所选样品的数目(比如,瓶,片等),它们是如何使用的(也就是,
单独的
或是混合样品),每个样品分析的重复次数。
C.
Equipment and Equipment Parameters
A
listing of all equipment (e.g., instrument type,
detector, column type,
dimensions)
should be included, as well as a list of equipment
parameters (e.g.,
flow rate,
temperatures, run time, wavelength settings). A
drawing representin
g the experimental
configuration (e.g., illustrating positions for a
spray patt
ern analytical procedure)
should be provided, when appropriate.
C
.仪器和仪器参数
需要叙述的有:仪器列表(比如,仪器类型,检测器,柱子类型,尺寸等)和仪器参数(比
如,流速,温度,运行时间和设定波长等)。如果必要的话,还要提供实验结构示意图(比
如,阐述喷洒式分析方法的位置)。
D.
Reagents
A list of reagents and their
grades (e.g., USP/NF, American Chemical
Socie
ty (ACS) Analytical Reagent)
should be included. If in-house or modified
commer
cial reagents are used,
directions for their preparation should be
included. Un
stable or potentially
hazardous reagents should be identified, and
storage cond
itions, directions for safe
use, and usable shelf life for these reagents
shoul
d be specified.
D
.试剂
需
要叙述的有:试剂列表及其相应的规格(比如:
USP/NF
,
美国化学社(
ACS
)分析试
剂)。<
/p>
如果使用的是自制试剂或更改过的商业试剂,则应当要有其制备方法。对于不稳定的
或有潜在危险的试剂,应标明其储存条件,安全使用说明和使用周期。
E. System Suitability Testing
System suitability test parameters and
acceptance criteria are based on th
e
concept that the equipment, electronics,
analytical operations, and samples t
o
be analyzed constitute an integrated system.
System suitability testing ensur
es that
the system is working properly at the time of
analysis. Appropriate sys
tem
suitability criteria should be defined and
included in the analytical proce
dure.
E
.系统适应性实验
系统适应性实验参数和合格标准是建立基础是:仪器,电子元件,分析操作和待测样
品是个不可分割的整体。
系统适应性实验确保系统在样品分析的时候能很好地运行。
在分析
方法中应当要包括适当的系统适应性合格标准。
All chromatographic analytical
procedures should include system
suitabilit
y testing and criteria.
Parameters typically used in system suitability
evaluat
ions are defined and discussed
in the CDER reviewer guidance on Validation of
C
hromatographic Methods (November
1994).
所有的色谱分析方法都应当要有系统适应性实验及相应的合格标准。
p>
CDER
评审官指南
<
<
色谱分析方法的验证
>>
(
p>
1994
年
11
月
)对用于评估系统适应性的典型参数进行了定义和
讨论。
System suitability testing is
recommended as a component of any
analytical
procedure, not just those
that involve chromatographic techniques.
Regardless
of the type of analytical
procedure, testing should be used to confirm that
the
system will function correctly
independent of the environmental conditions.
Fo
r example, titration analytical
procedures should always include the
evaluation
of a blank (commonly
referred to as a blank titration).
建议系统
适应性实验应成为所有分析方法的一部分,而不仅仅是色谱分析方法。无论
是哪类分析方
法,
都要采用实验来证实该系统能不受环境条件的影响而正确地运行。
< br>比如说,
滴定法一般来说需要进行空白实验。
F. Preparation of Standards
Procedures for the preparation of all
standard solutions (e.g., stock,
wor
king standard solutions, internal
standards) should be included.
F
.标准品的制备
< br>要有所有标准品溶液(比如,储备液,工作对照品溶液,内部对照品溶液)的配制方
法。
G. Preparation of
Samples
Sample preparation for
individual tests should be clearly described.
Speci
fic details should be provided for
unusual sample preparations (e.g., solid-
pha
se extraction, derivatization).
G.
操作过程
应当要按操作步骤对操作过程进行逐步叙述。叙述应当要适当包括如下信息:平衡时
间
,样品进样顺序和系统适应性或启动参数。需标明不常见的危险。
I. Calculations
Representative
calculations,
with
a
tabulation
defining
all
symbols
and
numeric
al
factors,
and
specific
instructions
for
the
calculation
of
degradation
products
and
i
mpurities
should
be
included.
Any
mathematical
transformations
or
formulas
used
in
data
analysis
should
be
described
in
detail.
These
may
include
logarithmic
transfor
mations
used
to
obtain
a
linear
relationship
from
exponential
data,
or
the
use
of
m
ultiple
order
regression
analyses.
I
.计算
应
当要提供代表性计算公式,并要列表说明所有符号和数字系数,及计算降解产物和
杂质的
特殊使用说明。
所有用于数据分析的数学转换或公式应详细描述。
这些包括对数转换
以获得指数数据的线性关系,或多元回归分析的使用。
J.
Reporting
of
Results
J.
结果报告
1. General
The format used
to report results (e.g., percent label claim,
weight/weigh
t, weight/volume, parts per
million (ppm)) including the specific number of
sig
nificant figures to be reported
should be provided.
1
.通则
应
该规定关键计算步骤中的数字单位(例如,‘标签’标示量的百分比,
W/W
,
W/L
,
p
pm
等)
2.
Impurities Analytical Procedures
The
name and location/identifier (e.g., retention time
(RT), relative rete
ntion time (RRT)) of
impurities and the type of impurity (e.g.,
process, degrad
ant, excipient
degradant) should be included in the analytical
procedures for i
mpurities in the drug
substance and drug product. The detection limit
(DL) or q
uantitation limit (QL) should
be stated, as appropriate. The DL or QL can be
se
t using the drug substance's
detection response.
2
.杂质分析规程
< br>在有关原料药和产品的杂质检测规程中,应当包括杂质的名称和检测位
/
标志(例如,保留
时间
RT
,相对保留时间
RRT
),以及杂质的种类(比如工艺降解
产物,赋形剂降解产物),
如有可能,还应当指明检测限
DL<
/p>
或定量限
QL
。也可以在原料药检测中设
置
DL
和
QL
。
Reporting of organic
impurities should cover (1) specified identified
impu
rities by name, (2) specified
unidentified impurities by location/identifier,
(3) any unspecified impurities, and (4)
total impurities. The total organic
imp
urities for the drug product or drug
substance is the sum of all impurities
equ
al to or greater than their
individual QL.
See recommendations
regarding appropriate QLs in FDA impurities
guidances
(see references). Inorganic
impurities and residual solvents should also be
add
ressed.
有机杂质的报告中,应当包括:
p>
1
、有记载的已经过确认的杂质的名称;
2
、有记载但
未经过确认杂质的(检测)位
/
标志;
3
、所有的没有记载的杂质
,以及;
4
、总杂质。总有
机杂质是指
所有达到或超过其自身定量限度的杂质的总量。
在这里可以参考
FDA
杂质指南文
章中有关判定定量限度的内容(看后面的参考
)。无机杂质和溶剂的残留,也应该被提到。
For the
drug product, drug substance process impurities
may be excluded fr
om reporting if an
acceptable rationale is provided in the sections
on analytic
al procedures and controls.
Drug product impurities from the drug product
manuf
acturing process, packaging, and
labeling should be addressed.
对于产品以及原料
药的工艺杂质也可以不包括在报告中,除非分析规程和控制环节中
描叙了一个可以被接受
的原则,
那么,在产品制造和包装过程中(包括贴签)产生的杂质就
要被提到。
The above reporting
information may not be strictly applicable to all
prod
ucts (e.g., biological,
biotechnological, botanical, radiopharmaceutical
drugs),
but any significant process and
product-related impurities should be
determine
d and reported.
并不
是所有产品(比如,生物制剂、生物工艺制剂、植物制剂、放射制剂)的报告都
必须严格
按照以上谈到的内容来写,
但是所有关键的工序以及产品相关的杂质都要有检测和
报告。
VII. METHODS
VALIDATION FOR NDAs, ANDAs, BLAs, AND PLAs
A. Noncompendial Analytical Procedures
In an NDA, ANDA, BLA, or PLA, data must
be submitted to establish that the
anal
ytical procedures used in testing
meet proper standards of accuracy and
reliabi
lity (21 CFR 211.194(a)(2)).
Methods validation is the process of
demonstrating
that analytical
procedures are suitable for their intended use. At
the time of
submission, the NDA, ANDA,
BLA, or PLA should contain methods
validation information to support the
adequa
cy of the analytical procedures.
VII
.
NDA
,
ANDA
,
BLA
和
PLA
中的分析方法验证
A
.非药典分析方法
在
NDA
,
ANDA
,
BLA
或
PLA
p>
中,应当要递交资料以说明检测中所用的分析方法是满足适当的
准确
度和可靠性要求
(21 CFR 211.194(a)92))
。
分析方法验证是个论述分析方法是适用于其
拟定用途的过程
。在递交资料时,
NDA
,
ANDA<
/p>
,
BLA
或
PL
A
中应当要包含分析方法验证资料
以支持分析方法的准确度。<
/p>
The International Conference
on Harmonisation (ICH) guidance Q2A Text on
V
alidation of Analytical Procedures
(March 1995) and Q2B Validation of
Analytica
l Procedures: Methodology
(November 1996) provide recommendations on
validation
of analytical procedures.
Analytical procedures outside the scope of the ICH
g
uidances should still be validated.
p>
ICH
指导原则
Q2A
:分析方法验证(
1995
年
3<
/p>
月)和
Q2B
:分析方法验证:方法学(
19
96
年
1
1
月)给出了分析方法验证的建议。对于超出
ICH
指导原则范围的分析方法也是需要
验证的。
1. Validation Characteristics
Applicants should submit information on
the validation characteristics of
their
proposed analytical procedures (see ICH Q2A and
ICH Q2B). Although not al
l of the
validation characteristics are needed for all
types of tests (see sect
ion VII.A.3),
typical validation characteristics are:
1.
验证项目
申请者应当要送交其所拟定分析方法的验证项目方面的信息(见
ICH
Q2A
和
ICH Q2
B
)。尽管不是对于所有类型的分析方法都需要进行所有的验证项目(见第
p>
VII.A.3
章),
但还是有典型的验证
项目,如:
Accuracy
Precision (repeatability and
intermediate precision)
Specificity
Detection limit
Quantitation limit
Linearity
Range
Robustnes
准确度
精密度(重复性和中间精密度)
专属性
检测限
定量限
线性
范围
耐用性
2. Other Methods Validation Information
Methods validation information should
also include:
Data to
demonstrate the stability of all analytical sample
preparations th
rough the time required
to complete the analysis.
2.
其它验证资料
分析方法验证资料还应当要包括:
说
明所有分析制备样品在完成分析所需的时间内的稳定性的资料。
Legible reproductions of representative
instrument output or recordings (e.
g.,
chromatograms) and raw data output (e.g.,
integrated areas), as appropriate.
Instrument output for placebo, standard, and
sample should also be provided (s
ee
section VII.A.2.c).
清晰可读的仪器代表性输出和记录资料(如
色谱图)和原始资料输出(积分面积)。
安慰剂,对照品和样品的仪器输出也都是需要提
供的(见第
VII.A.2.c
章)。
Representative calculations using
submitted raw data, to show how the
impu
rities in drug substance are
calculated.
Information from stress
studies (see
section VII.A.2.b).
Impurities labeled with their names and
location identifie
rs (e.g., RRT for
chromatographic data) for the impurity analytical
procedure.
代表性计算公式,以表明原料药中的杂质是如何计算的。
(
见
VII.A.2.b
章)。对于杂
质分析方法,要标明杂质的名称和位置标识符(如,色谱中的相对保留
时间
RRT
)。
For drug substances:
A discussion of the possible formation
and control of polymorphic and
en
antiomeric substances.
Identification and characterization of
each organic impurity, as appropria
te.
This information may not be needed for all
products (e.g., botanicals). Oth
er
impurities (e.g., inorganics, residual solvents)
should be addressed and qua
ntitated.
对于原料药:
1.
讨论可能会形成的异构体并讨论异构体的控制。
对每个有机杂质进行适当的标识和界定。不是所有的产品(如,植物药)都需要这些
< br>资料的。对于其它杂质(如无机杂质,残留溶剂),应当要进行说明并定量分析。
Recommendations on submitting
information on impurities is provided in
var
ious FDA guidances such as the ICH
guidance Q3A Impurities in New Drug
Substanc
es (January 1996).
A list of known impurities, with
structure if available, including
process
impurities, degradants, and
possible isomers.
FDA
的指导文件,如
比
ICH
指导原则
Q3A
新原料药中的杂质(
1996
年
< br>1
月)。
已知杂质列表,包括
工艺杂质,降解产物和可能的异构体。如果知道结构的话,也需
提供。
< br>
For drug products:
A
degradation pathway for the drug substance in the
dosage form, 419where
possible.
Data demonstrating recovery from the
sample matrix as illustrated b
y the
accuracy studies.
Data demonstrating
that neither the freshly prepared
nor
the degraded placebo interferes with the
quantitation of the active ingredi
ent.
ICH Q2A and Q2B address almost all of the
validation parameters. Areas tha
t
should be provided in more detail are described
below.
对于制剂:
原料药在
制剂中可能的降解途径。通过准确度实验论证的样品回收率资料。要有资料
论证无论是新
制的安慰剂还是分解了的安慰剂都不会影响活性成分的定量分析。
ICH
Q2A
和
ICH
Q2B
几乎对所有的验证参数都进行了论述。下面论述的是那些还需要更详细地进行
论述的方面。
a.
Robustness
Robustness, a measure of
the analytical procedure's capability to remain
u
naffected by small but deliberate
variations, is described in ICH Q2A and Q2B.
Such testing should be performed during
development of the analytical procedure
and the data discussed and/or submitted. In cases
where an effect is observed,
representative instrument output (e.g.,
chromatograms) should be submitted.
a.
耐用性
ICH
Q2A
和
ICH
Q2B
对耐用性是有论述的,
它衡量的是分析方法在细微的
变化下不受
影响的能力。
该实验应当是在分析方法开发过程中进
行的,
对实验结果进行讨论和
/
或递交
。
如果观察到有影响,需提供代表性仪器输出(如色谱图)。
b. Stress Studies
Degradation information obtained from
stress studies (e.g., products of ac
id
and base hydrolysis, thermal degradation,
photolysis, oxidation) for the dru
g
substance and for
the active ingredient
in the drug product should be provid
ed
to demonstrate the specificity of the assay and
analytical procedures for im
purities.
The stress studies should demonstrate that
impurities and degradants
from the
active ingredient and drug product excipients do
not interfere with th
e quantitation of
the active ingredient. Stress studies are
described in variou
s FDA guidances
relating to the stability of drug products (see
references). Th
e design of the stress
studies and the results should be submitted to the
stabi
lity section of the application.
Representative instrument output (e.g.,
chroma
tograms) and/or other appropriate
data (e.g., degradation information obtained
from stress studies) should be
submitted in the sections on analytical
procedur
es and controls.
b.
强降解实验
FDA
很多关于药品稳定性的指导原则都对强降解实验进行了论述。
在申请的稳定性一章中应当要提供的资料有:强降解实验设计和实验结果。而
代表性
仪器输出(如:色谱图)和
/
或
其它资料(强降解实验中所得的降解信息)应当要提供在分
析方法和控制
一章中。
c.
Instrument Output/Raw Data
i. Organic
Impurities
Representative data should
be submitted to support an assessment of the
or
ganic impurities. Representative data
for residual solvents are generally not
n
eeded. Instrument output and the raw
numerical values (e.g., peak area) with
ap
propriate identification and labeling
(e.g., RT for chromatographic peaks,
chem
ical shift (d) and coupling
constant (J) for NMR) should be provided. The
impur
ity profile should be assessed at
the quantitation limit and the instrument
out
put provided. Additional information
should be provided to confirm that the
imp
urity profile is adequately
characterized. For example, a representative
chroma
togram using detection at a low
wavelength, such as 205 nm, and double the
prop
osed total run time could be
submitted to support the specificity of the
analyt
ical procedure.
c.
仪器输出
/
原始资料
i.
有机杂质
应当要提供代表性资料以支
持有机杂质的评估。一般来说,是不需要残留溶剂的代表
性资料的。仪器输出和原始数值
(比如,峰面积)及合适的标记和标注(比如,色谱峰的保
留时间,
核磁共振的化学位移和耦合常数)
都应当要提供。
根据所提
供的定量限和仪器输出
对杂质情况进行评估。还应当要提供其它资料以确认杂质情况得到
了充分地界定。比如说,
比如说,代表性图谱选用的检测波长是
205nm
,则可以将拟定的运行时间延长至两倍以支持
分析方
法的专属性。
For
quantitation purposes, the response factor of the
drug substance may b
e
used
for impurities without a reference standard. In
cases where the response f
actors are
not close, this practice may still be acceptable,
provided a correct
ion factor is applied
or the impurities are, in fact, being
overestimated. Acce
ptance criteria and
analytical procedures used to estimate identified
or uniden
tified impurities often are
based on analytical assumptions (e.g., equivalent
d
etector response). Assumptions should
be discussed and justified.
在定量分析时,原料药的
响应因子可用于没有相应对照品的杂质。如果响应因子不接
近的话,
只要应用了较正因子或或者杂质实际上是被高估的话,
这样做也是可行的。
用于评
估指定杂质或未指定杂质的合格标准和分析方法经常都是基于分析
假设的
(比如,
相当的检
测器响应)。
应当要对这些假设进行讨论和合理性说明。
ii. Drug
Substance
Data should be submitted
showing the separation and detection of
impuritie
s using spiked or stress
samples. Complete impurity profiles as graphic
output
(e.g., chromatograms) and raw
data (e.g, integrated peak areas) of
representati
ve batches should be
submitted in the sections on analytical procedures
and con
trols for the drug substance.
For ANDAs and related submissions, appropriate
in
formation for the batches used in the
biobatch or submission batch should be
pr
ovided. All responses (e.g., peaks)
should be labeled. The analytical
procedure
used should be capable of
differentiating changes, if any, between past and
pr
esent batches. The quantitation limit
and the type of organic impurity (e.g.,
d
egradant, process impurity) should be
stated. The analytical procedure number,
batch number, manufacturing date and
site, and date of analysis should be
provi
ded.
ii.
原料药
ANDA
和相关的递交,用于生物利用度研究的批次(
bio
batch
)或者提交批次(
submis
sion batch
)的相关资料应当要提供。所有的响应(比如,色谱峰)都应
当要进行标注。所
用的分析方法应当要有能力区分先前批次和当前批次之间的变化,
p>
如果有这些变化的话。
应
当要说明定量限和
有机杂质的类型(比如:降解物,工艺杂质)。还需提供分析方法编号,
批号,生产日期
和生产地点及分析日期。
iii. Drug
Product
Information such as instrument
output (e.g., chromatograms) and raw data
(e.g., integrated peak areas) from
representative batches under long-term and
a
ccelerated stability conditions, and
stressed samples should be submitted in
th
e sections on analytical procedures
and controls of the drug product. For
ANDAs
and related submissions,
appropriate information for the biobatch or
submissio
n batch should be provided.
References to the raw data (e.g., chromatograms)
sh
ould be included in the stability
section of the application.
iii.
制剂
p>
在制剂的分析方法和控制一章中,应要当提供的资料有:代表性批号在长期和加速稳
定性实验条件下及强降解实验条件下的仪器输出(如,图谱)和原始资料(如峰面积)。对
于
ANDA
和相关递交,应当要提供生物利用
度实验批次或递交批次的适当资料。在申请的稳
定性章节中应当要引用原始资料(比如:
图谱)。
At a minimum, the
submission should include instrument output and
raw data
for release testing and at the
latest available time point for the same
batch.
All responses (e.g., peaks)
should be labeled and identified. In addition,
the
analytical procedure number, batch
number of the drug product, manufacturing
d
ate, date of analysis, source and
batch number of drug substance,
manufacturing
site, and
container/closure information should be provided.
The analytical pro
cedures used should
be capable of differentiating changes, if any,
between past
and present batches. The
quantitation limit and the type (e.g., degradant,
lea
chables from packaging) should be
reported. Multiple methodologies can be used.
至少,
递交材料中应当要包括放行检测
(Rel
ease testing)
的仪器输出和原始资料
.
需
标注所有的响应信号(如色谱峰)。此外,还要提供,分析方法编号
,制剂的批号,生产日
期,分析日期,原料药的来源和批号,生产地点及容器
/
密闭系统信息。如在过往批次和现
批次之间存在
差异的话,
所用的分析方法应当要有能力区分出来。
应当要报告
检测限和类型
(如,降解物,包装时的漏出物)。
3. Recommended Validation
Characteristics for Types of Tests
Table 1 is a summary of the validation
characteristics that should be
addr
essed during validation of
different types of analytical procedures. The same
m
ethodology can be used for several
purposes. The validation information should
support the intended purpose of the
test. For example, if Raman spectroscopy
is
the methodology selected to
quantitate polymorphic forms as impurities, or
chi
ral HPLC for enantiomeric
impurities, the recommended validation
characteristic
s in Table 1 under
quantitative testing for impurities would apply.
However, if
Raman spectroscopy or
chiral HPLC are used for the purpose of
identification o
r as specific tests,
the recommended validation characteristics listed
for thos
e types of tests would apply.
3.
各类检测的推荐验证项目
表
1
概述了在不同分析方法的验证过程中所需
要的验证项目。同一分析方法可用于多
个用途。
验证资料需要能
支持该分析方法的拟定用途。
比如说,
如果拉曼光谱用于定量分
析
多晶型杂质,或手性
HPLC
用于分
析异构体杂质,则要应用表
1
中杂质定量分析
< br>
中所推荐
的验证项目。然而,如果拉曼光谱或手性
p>
HPLC
被用于鉴定或特征实验的话,则要应用表
< br>1
中所推荐的这些类型的验证项目。
< br>表
1
:不同类型检测的推荐验证项目
检验项目
\
验证内容
\
杂质测定
鉴别
定量
含量分析及溶
含量
/
< br>效
价特殊分析
限度
出度(仅用于检测)
准确度
精密度-重复
性
精密度-中间
精密度
专属性
检测限
定量限
线性
范围
耐用性
NOTE:
-
-
-
+2
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
-3
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-3
+
+
+1
+5
-
-
+
+
+
+4
+
4
+
4
+4
-
-
-
-
+4
- Signifies
that this characteristic is not normally
evaluated.
+ Signifies that this
characteristic is normally evaluated.
1 In cases where reproducibility has
been performed, intermediate precisio
n
is not needed.
2 Lack of specificity
for an analytical procedure may be compensated for
b
y the addition of a second analytical
procedure.
3 May be needed in some
cases.
4 May not be needed in some
cases.
5 Lack of specificity for an
assay for release may be compensated for by
i
mpurities testing.
注:
-:表示通常不需要验证的项目。
+:表示通常需验证的项目。
1
p>
:假如已经论证了重现性,可不需要再论证中间精密度。
2
:如果一分析方法缺少专属性的话,则需要另一分析方法进行补偿。<
/p>
3
:有些情况下是需要的。
4
:有些情况下是不需要的。
a:Identification
Identification analytical procedures
may include tests such as IR,
differe
ntial scanning calorimetry
(DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV, and HPLC
retenti
on time. A specific
identification test should be included for the
active ingre
dient whenever possible. In
cases where a nonspecific identification
analytical
procedure is proposed for
the active ingredient, two independent analytical
pr
ocedures are generally sufficient, if
justified. For other identification
tests
(e.g., a chiral HPLC retention
time as confirmation for the presence of an
ena
ntiomer, chloride test for a
counterion) a single test is acceptable. This
conc
ept of the number of identification
tests is applicable to both the drug
substa
nce and drug product.
a.
鉴别
定性分析方法有:红外
(IR)
,差示热分析
(DSC)
,
X-
射线衍射
(XRD)
和
HPLC
保留时间。
对于原料药,
尽可能要有专属性强的鉴别实验,
如果用
的是专属性不强的定性分析方法,
则
通常来说运用两个独立的分
析方法应当是足够的。对于其它的一些定性分析方法
(
如,手性
HPLC
的保留时间用于确认是否存在异构体,平衡离子的氯化
物实验
)
,就一个检测也是可可
行的。
定性实验数目的概念既适用于原料药,也适用于制剂。
b.
Impurities
The validation
characteristics under quantitative testing for
impurities,
as described in Table 1,
apply, regardless of which methodology is used to
quan
titate impurities. If the same
analytical procedure is proposed as a limit
test,
validation characteristics under
limit testing for impurities will apply.
b.
杂质
表
1
中杂质定量分析
项下所说的相应验证项目。
如果同样的方法还用做定性检测的分
析方法的话,则要对表
1
中杂质定性分析
项下的验证项目进行验证。
c. Assay
Assay includes the
content of the active ingredient, preservative (if
use
d), and
measurement of
content in dissolution and content uniformity
samples.
c.
含量
p>
含量分析包括活性成分的含量,所用到的防腐剂的含量,及溶出度和含量均匀度检测
样品的含量测定。
d. Specific
Tests
Specific tests to control the
drug substance, excipient, or drug product
c
an include tests such as particle size
analysis, droplet distribution, spray
pa
ttern, dissolution (excludes
measurement), optical rotation, and methodologies
such as DSC, XRD, and Raman
spectroscopy. The validation characteristics may
di
ffer for the various analytical
procedures. For example, accuracy,
repeatabilit
y, intermediate precision
and robustness should be evaluated for molecular
size
distribution gel permeation
chromatography (GPC).
d.
特定实验
用于原料药,赋形剂或制剂控制的特定检测包括粒径分析,雾化状态,溶出度,旋光
度
和比如
DSC
,
XRD
及拉曼光谱等方法。不同的分析方法所需的验证项目是不尽相同的。比
如说,对
于凝胶渗透色谱
(GPC)
,需要考察其准确度,重复性,中间
精密度和耐用性。
B. Compendial
Analytical Procedures
The suitability
of a compendial analytical procedure must be
verified unde
r actual conditions of use
(21 CFR 211.194(a)(2)). Information to demonstrate
t
hat USP/NF analytical procedures are
suitable for the drug product or drug
subs
tance should be included in the
submission. Information on the specificity,
int
ermediate precision, and stability
of the sample solution should be included.
C
ompendial assay analytical procedures
may not be stability-indicating, and
this
should be considered when
developing the specification (see section III.C).
Fo
r compendial items, additional
analytical procedures, such as impurities or
osm
olality, may be requested to support
the quality of the drug product or drug
su
bstance. These additional analytical
procedures should be validated (see
sectio
n VII.A).
B
.药典分析方法
(21CFR
211.194(a)(2))
。
在
申请中应当要提供药典分析方法适用于该药品或原料药分析的论证资料。还应该要
包括专
属性,
中间精密度,
和样品溶液稳定性方面的资料。
药典含量分析方法可能是没有稳
定性指示能力的,
因此在开发质量标准的过程中因当要考虑这个
(
见第
III.C.
章
)
。
p>
对于药典项
目,可能需要补充方法,
比如杂
质或渗透度,
来控制制剂或原料药的质量。
这些补充方法也
p>
是需要验证的
(
见第
VII.A.
章
)
。
VIII.
STATISTICAL
ANALYSIS
A.
General
Methods validation includes an
assessment of the adequacy of the
analytica
l procedure. Statistical
analysis (e.g., linear regression analysis,
relative s
tandard deviation) of methods
validation data is often used to demonstrate the
validity of the method. The statistical
procedures for the analysis of the
vali
dation data should be determined
prior to the start of any validation study.
Th
e procedure followed, including the
amount of data to collect and the criteria
used in determining the acceptability
of the analytical procedure, should be
sp
ecified.
The raw methods
validation data and statistical procedures used to
analyze
the raw data should be provided
and discussed in the sections on analytical
pr
ocedures and controls. All
statistical procedures used in the analysis of the
d
ata should be based on sound
principles and be suitable for evaluating the
data
set.
VIII.
统计分析
A
.基本原则
(
比如:线性回归分析,相对标准偏差
)
以说明方法的正确性。在开始分析方法验证之
前,
应当就要
确定用于验证资料分析的统计方法。
还应当要规定所要遵循的程序,
包括所需
采集的数据量和确定分析方法合适性的合格标准。
应当要在分析方法和控制章节中提供和讨论分析方法验证原始资料和所用的统计方
法。所有用于数据分析的统计程序都应当是科学的,并适用于评估该数据群的。
B. Comparative Studies
Comparative studies are performed to
evaluate intermediate precision (e.g.,
different equipment, analysts, days). Comparative
studies are also used to eva
luate
between laboratory variability (i.e.,
reproducibility) when an analytical
procedure is used in more than one laboratory or
to compare and evaluate the p
recision
and accuracy of two analytical procedures (e.g.,
regulatory analytical
procedure and an
alternative analytical procedure). When
comparative studies a
re performed,
homogeneous samples from the same batch should be
used, if feasib
le. Comparative results
should be statistically analyzed and discussed and
any
bias explained.
B:
对比研究
开展对比研究以评估中间精密度
(
如,不同设备,不同分析员
,不同天等
)
。当一分析
方法会在多个
实验室应用时,或要比较和评估两个分析方法
(
比如,法定分析
方法和替代分
析方法
)
的精密度和准确
度时,
也会进行对比研究以评估实验室间的差异
(
也就是,
重现性
)
。
在进行对比研究时,
应当要尽可能地使用同一批号的均匀样品。
需对对比研究的结果进行统
计分析和讨论,并对偏差进行解释。
C. Statistics
For
information on statistical techniques used in
making comparisons, as w
ell as other
general information on the interpretation and
treatment of analyti
cal data,
appropriate literature or texts should be
consulted (see references)
.
C:
统计
关
于用于对比分析的统计技术资料,和用于分析数据处理和解析的其它基本资料,可
参见相
关的文献
(
见参考文献
)
。
IX.
REV
ALIDATION
When sponsors make changes in the
analytical procedure, drug substance
(e.
g., route of synthesis), or drug
product (e.g., composition), the changes may
n
ecessitate revalidation of the
analytical procedures. Revalidation should be
pe
rformed to ensure that the analytical
procedure maintains its characteristics
(e.g., specificity) and to demonstrate
that the analytical procedure continues
to ensure the identity, strength,
quality, purity, and potency of the drug
subs
tance and drug product, and the
bioavailability of the drug product. The
degree
of revalidation depends on the
nature of the change. When a different
regulato
ry analytical procedure is
substituted (e.g., HPLC for titration), the new
proc
edure should be validated (see
section VII).
IX
.
再验证
当发起人对分析方法,原料药
(
比如,合成路线
)
< br>,或制剂
(
比如,组分
)
作了更改的话,
则需要对分析方法进行重验证。进行重验证是为了确保
该分析方法仍然保持其特性
(
比如,
专
属性
)
,
并论证说明该分析方法仍然能
确保原料药和制剂的同一性,浓度
/
剂量,质量,
纯
度和功效,
及制剂的生物利用度。
重验证的程序取决于该变更的性质。
当使用了另一个法定
分析程序的话
(
比如,用
HPLC<
/p>
代替了滴定法
)
,则新的分析方法也需要
验证
(
见第
VII
章
)
。
If during each use an analytical
procedure can meet the established
system
suitability requirements only
with repeated adjustments to the operating
condi
tions stated in the analytical
procedure, the analytical procedure should be
re
evaluated, amended, and revalidated,
as appropriate.
FDA intends to
provide guidance in the future on postapproval
changes in a
nalytical procedures.
如果在每次使用时,都必须要对分析方法中所述的操作条件进行反复调整,才能使其
符合系统适应性要求的话,则该分析方法需要适当进行重新评估,修正和重验证。
X.
METHODS
V
ALIDATION
PACK
AGE:
CONTENTS
AND
PROCESSI
NG
Part of the methods
validation process may include FDA laboratory
analysis
to demonstrate that an
analytical procedure is reproducible by laboratory
test
ing. A methods validation package
(see X.A) and samples (see X.B) will be
neede
d for this process.
A.
Methods Validation Package
The methods
validation package will usually include
information copied fro
m pertinent
sections of the application. To aid the review
chemist, these copie
s should retain the
original pagination of the application sections.
For ANDA a
nd NDA products, the archival
copy and extra copies of the methods validation
p
ackages should be submitted with the
application. For ANDAs and related
supplem
ental applications, one archival
copy and two extra copies of the methods
valid
ation package should be submitted.
For NDAs and related supplemental
applicatio
ns, one archival copy and
three extra copies should be submitted. For BLAs
and
PLAs, a separate methods validation
package need not be submitted. Information
similar to that specified here should
be included in the BLA or PLA submission.
X
.
分析方法验证资料:内容和数据处理
FDA
实验室的分析以论证说明某一分析方法是能被重现的。
在
这个过程中将会需要分析
方法验证资料
(
见
X.A)
和样品
(
见
X.B)
。
A
.分析方法验证资料
分析方法验证资料通常会包括申请中的相关章节。为了便于评审化学家进行评审,这
< br>些资料应当要和其在原来申请中一样,包括内容和形式
(archival co
py)
和其它副本。对于
仿制药申请和其相关的补充申请,需要
提交一份分析方法验证资料的存档副本
(archival c
opy)
和另外两份副本。
对于新药申请及其相关补充申请,<
/p>
需要提交一份分析方法验证资料的
存档副本
(archival copy)
和另外三份副本。对于
BL
A
和
PLA
,则不需要单独递交分析方
法
验证资料。类似的资料应当摆在
BLA
和
PLA
申请中。
The methods validation package should
include:
1. Tabular List of All
Samples to Be Submitted
The list
should include the lot number, identity (with
chemical name and s
tructure
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
上一篇:香港公司章程样本中英文对照版
下一篇:环保类词汇