关键词不能为空

当前您在: 主页 > 英语 >

美国FDA分析方法验证指南中英文对照

作者:高考题库网
来源:https://www.bjmy2z.cn/gaokao
2021-02-10 23:54
tags:

-

2021年2月10日发(作者:中国万岁)




美国


FDA


分析方法验证指南中英文对




I.


INTRODUCTION


This guidance provides recommendations to applicants on submitting analyti


cal procedures, validation data, and samples to support the documentation of th


e identity, strength, quality, purity, and potency of drug substances and drug


products.


1.


绪论



本指南旨在为申请者提供建议,以帮助其提交分析方法,方法验证资料和样品用于支


持原 料药和制剂的认定,剂量,质量,纯度和效力方面的文件。



This guidance is intended to assist applicants in assembling information,


submitting samples, and presenting data to support analytical methodologies. Th


e recommendations apply to drug substances and drug products covered in new dru


g applications (


NDAs


), abbreviated new drug applications (


ANDAs


), biologics lic


ense applications (


BLAs


), product license applications (


PLAs


), and supplements


to these applications.


本指南旨在帮助申请者收集资料,


递交样品并资料以支持分析方法。


这些建议适用于


N


DA


ANDA



BLA



PLA


及其它们的补充中所涉及的原料药和制剂。



The principles also apply to drug substances and drug products covered in


Type II drug master files (


DMFs


). If a different approach is chosen, the applic


ant is encouraged to discuss the matter in advance with the center with produc


t


jurisdiction to prevent the expenditure of resources on preparing a submissi


on that may later be determined to be unacceptable. < /p>


这些原则同样适用于二类


DMF


所涉及的 原料药和制剂。如果使用了其它方法,鼓励申


请者事先和


FDA


药品评审中心的官员进行讨论,


以免出现这种情况,

< p>
那就是花了人力物力所


准备起来的递交资料后来发现是不可用的。



The principles of methods validation described in this guidance apply to a


ll types of analytical procedures. However, the specific recommendations in thi


s guidance may not be applicable to certain unique analytical procedures for pr


oducts such as biological, biotechnological, botanical, or radiopharmaceutical


drugs.


本 指南中所述的分析方法验证的原则适用于各种类型的分析方法。但是,本指南中特


定的建 议可能不适用于有些产品所用的特殊分析方法,


如生物药,


生物 技术药,


植物药或放


射性药物等。



For example, many bioassays are based on animal challenge models, 39 immun


ogenicity assessments, or other immunoassays that have unique features that sho






uld be considered when submitting analytical procedure and methods validation i


nformation.


比如说,


许多生物分析是建立在动物挑战模式,


免疫原性评估或其它有着独特特性的免疫分


析基础上的,在递交分析方法和分析方法验证资料时需考虑这些独特的性质。

< br>


Furthermore, specific recommendations for biological and immunochemical te


sts that may be necessary for characterization and quality control of many drug


substances and drug products are beyond the scope of this guidance document.


而且,许多原料药和制剂的界定和质量控制所需的生物和免疫化学检测并不在本指南

< br>的范围之内。



Although this guidance does not specifically address the submission of ana


lytical procedures and validation data for raw materials, intermediates, excipi


ents, container closure components, and other materials used in the production


of drug substances and drug products, validated analytical procedures should be


used to analyze these materials.


尽管本指南并不专门叙述原料,中间体,赋形剂,包装材料及原料药和制剂生产中所

< p>
用的其它物料的分析方法及分析方法验证资料的递交,


但是应该应用验证过 的分析方法来分


析检测这些物质。



For questions on appropriate validation approaches for analytical procedur


es or submission of information not addressed in this guidance, applicants shou


ld consult with the appropriate chemistry review staff at FDA.


对于本指南中未提及的关于分析方法验证和资料提交方面的问题,请向


FDA


相关的化


学评审人员咨询。

< p>


This


guidance,


when


finalized,


will


replace


the


FDA


guidance


for


industry


on


S


ubmitting


Samples


and


Analytical


Data


for


Methods


Validation


(February


1987).


本指南,一旦定稿,将取代

FDA



1987



2


月份发布的工业指南:分析方法验证所需提


交的样 品和分析资料。



II.


BACKGROUND



Each NDA and ANDA must include the analytical procedures necessary to ensu


re the identity, strength, quality, purity, and potency of the drug substance a


nd drug product, including bioavailability of the drug product (21 CFR 314.50(d)


(1) and 314.94(a)(9)(i)).


II.


背景



每个


NDA



ANDA


都必需包括必要的分析方法以确保原料药和制剂的认定,


剂量,


质量,


纯度和效力,还包括制剂的生物利用度


(21 CFR 314.50(d)(1)



314.94(a)( 9)(i))




FDA


验证文件现场备查,可以不与


DMF


一起交。



Data must be available to establish that the analytical procedures used in


testing meet proper standards of accuracy and reliability (21 CFR 211.165(e) a


nd 211.194(a)(2)).


必须要有资料来论 证所用的分析方法是符合一定的准确度和可靠性标准的。







Methods validation is the process of demonstrating that analytical procedu


res are suitable for their intended use. The methods validation process for ana


lytical procedures begins with the planned and systematic collection by the app


licant of the validation data to support the analytical procedures.


分析方法 验证是论证某一分析方法适用于其用途的过程。分析方法的验证过程是从申


请者有计划地 系统性收集验证资料以支持分析方法开始的。



The


review chemist evaluates the analytical procedures and validation dat


a submitted in the NDA or ANDA.


审评化学家会对< /p>


NDA



ANDA


中的分析方法和验证资料进行评审。



On request from FDA, an NDA or ANDA applicant must submit samples of drug


product, drug substance, noncompendial reference standards, and blanks so that


the applicant's drug substance and drug product analytical procedures can be ev


aluated by FDA laboratories (21 CFR 314.50(e) and 314.94(a)(10)).


一 旦


FDA


有要求,则


NDA

< p>


ANDA


的申请者必须提交制剂,原料药,非药 典对照品和空


白以使


FDA


实验室能对 申请者所用分析方法进行评审


(21 CFR 314.50(e) and 314.94(a)(1


0))




The FDA laboratory analysis demonstrates that the analytical procedures ar


e reproducible by laboratory testing. The review chemists and laboratory analys


ts determine the suitability of the analytical procedures for regulatory purpos


es.


FDA


实验室的 分析会论证该分析方法在实验室内是可以重现的。


审评化学家和实验室分析家

< p>
会从法规的角度确定该分析方法的适用性。



FDA investigators inspect the analytical laboratory testing sites to ensur


e that the analytical procedures used for release and stability testing comply


with current good manufacturing practices (CGMPs) (21 CFR part 211) or good lab


oratory practices (GLPs) (21 CFR part 58), as appropriate.


FDA


检查官会对分析实验室进行检查确保用于放行和稳定性实验的分析方法符合现行



GMP



21CFR part 211)



GLP (21 CFR part 58)




Each BLA and PLA must include a full description of the manufacturing meth


ods, including analytical procedures, that demonstrate that the manufactured pr


oduct meets prescribed standards of safety, purity, and potency (21 CFR 601.2(a)


and 601.2(c)(1)(iv)).

< br>每个


BLA



PLA

< p>
都必须要有详细的生产工艺描述,包括分析方法,以说明所生产的产


品是符 合规定睥安全,纯充和效力标准的


(21 CFR 601.2(a) and 601.2(c)(1)(iv))




Data must be available to establish that the analytical procedures used in


testing meet proper standards of accuracy and reliability (21 CFR 81211.194(a)


(2)). For BLAs, PLAs, and their supplements, the analytical procedures and thei


r validation are submitted as part of the license application or supplement and


are evaluated by the review committee.






必须要 有资料证明所用的分析方法是符合一定的准确度和可靠性要求的


(21 CFR 812 1


1.194(a)(2))


。对于


B LA



PLA


及它们的补充,在所提交 的许可证申请中应当要有分析方法


和方法验证这部分的资料,审评委员会会对这部分资料 进行评审。



Representative samples of the product must be submitted and summaries of r


esults of tests performed on the lots represented by the submitted sample must


be provided (21 CFR 601.2(a) and 601.2(c)(1)(vi)). The review committee chair m


ay request analytical testing by CBER laboratory analysts to evaluate the appli


cant=s analytical procedures and verify the test results.


需提供代表性样品及该样品所代表批号的检测结果总结


(21 CFR 601.2(a) and 601.2


(c)(1)(vi))



评审委员会主席会要求


CBER

< br>实验室的分析人员进行分析实验对申请者的分析


方法进行评估,并确认其分析结果 。



All analytical procedures are of equal importance from a validation perspe


ctive. In general, validated analytical procedures should be used, irrespective


of whether they are for in-process, release, acceptance, or stability testing.


Each quantitative analytical procedure should be designed to minimize assay va


riation.


从验证的角度来看,

< br>所有的分析方法有着同样的重要性。


一般来说,


应当要应 用已验证过的


分析方法,


而不论其是被用于过程控制,


放行,合格或稳定性实验。高等每个定量分析方法


时都应当要减少其分析 误差。



Analytical procedures and validation data are submitted in the sections of


the application on analytical procedures and controls. Recommendations on info


rmation to be submitted are included in sections III through IX and XI of this


guidance. Information on submission of the methods validation package to the ND


A or ANDA and samples to the FDA laboratories is provided in section X.


分析方法和验证资料应当摆在申请的分析方法和控制章节中提交。


本指南的第

< p>
III



I


X

< p>
章和


XI


章给出了所需提供资料方面的建议。



FDA


实验室提供样品和递交

< p>
NDA



ANDA



的分析方法验证资料的信息见第


X


章。



III.


TYPES


OF


ANALYTICAL


PRO


CEDURES



A. Regulatory Analytical Procedure A regulatory analytical procedure is th


e analytical procedure used to evaluate a defined characteristic of the drug su


bstance or drug product. The analytical procedures in the U.S. Pharmacopeia/Nat


ional Formulary (USP/NF) are those legally recognized under section 501(b) of t


he Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) as the regulatory analytical procedur


es for compendial items. For purposes of determining compliance with the Act, t


he regulatory analytical procedure is used.


III


分析方法的类型







A.


法定分析方法



法定分析方法是被用来 评估原料药或制剂的特定性质的。


USP/NF


中的分析方法是 法定


的用于药典项目检测的分析方法。为了确认符合法规,需使用法定分析方法。



B. Alternative Analytical Procedure


An alternative analytical procedure is an analytical procedure proposed by


the applicant for use instead of the regulatory analytical procedure. A valida


ted alternative analytical procedure should be submitted only if it is shown to


perform equal to or better than the regulatory analytical procedure.


B.


替代分析方法



替代分析方法是申请者 提出用于代替法定分析方法的分析方法。只有当一替代分析方


法相当于或优于法定分析方 法时,才可以应用验证过的替代分析方法。



If an alternative analytical procedure is submitted, the applicant should


provide a rationale for its inclusion and identify its use (e.g., release, stab


ility testing), validation data, and comparative data to the regulatory analyti


cal procedure.


如果提交了替 代分析方法,申请者还应当提供其理由,并标明其用途(如,放行,稳定性实


验),验证 资料及其与法定分析方法的对比资料。



C. Stability-Indicating Assay


A stability-indicating assay is a validated quantitative analytical proced


ure that can detect the changes with time in the pertinent properties of the dr


ug substance and drug product.


C.


稳定性指示分析



稳定性指示分析是能 检测出原料药或制剂的某些性质随着时间的延长而出现的变化的


定量分析方法。



A stability-indicating assay accurately measures the active ingredients, w


ithout interference from degradation products, process impurities, excipients,


or other potential impurities




稳定性指示 分析能不受降解产物,工艺杂质,赋形剂或其它潜在杂质的影响而准确测


定其中的活性成 分。



If an applicant submits a non-stability-indicating analytical procedure fo


r release testing, then an analytical procedure capable of qualitatively and qu


antitatively monitoring the impurities, including degradation products, should


complement it. Assay analytical procedures for stability studies should be stab


ility-indicating, unless scientifically justified.


如果申请者递交了用于放行检 测的非稳定性指示分析方法,则应当要有能定性和定量


地监测杂质,

包括降解产物,


的分析方法对其进行补充。


稳定性试验中所 用的含量分析方法


应当要有稳定性指示能力,除非有科学的理由能证明其合理性。



IV


.


REFERENCE


STANDARDS







A. Types of Standards A reference standard (i.e., primary standard) may be


obtained from the USP/NF or other official sources (e.g., CBER, 21 CFR 610.20).


If there are questions on whether a source of a standard would be considered b


y FDA to be an official source, applicants should contact the appropriate chemi


stry review staff. When there is no official source, a reference standard shoul


d be of the highest possible purity and be fully characterized.


IV


标准品



A


.标准品的类型


< br>可以从


USP/NF


处或其它官方


(


比如说,


CBER



21CFR 610.20)


获得标准品


(


也就是一级


对照品


)


。如果不能确定一标准品的来源是否会被


FDA


认为是官方来源 ,申请者应当要向适


当的化学评审人员咨询。


如果没有官方来源 ,


则被用来作标准品的物质应当要有尽可能高的


纯度,并得到充 分界定。



A working standard (i.e., in-house or secondary standard) is a standard th


at is qualified against and used instead of the reference standard.


工作对照品


(


也就是内部标准品或二 级标准品


)


是根据一级对照品标定的,


并用来代替


一级对照品的。



B. Certificate of Analysis


A certificate of analysis (COA) for reference standards from non-official


sources should be submitted in the section of the application on analytical pro


cedures and controls. For standards from official sources, the user should ensu


re the suitability of the reference standard. The standard should be stored cor


rectly and used within the established use interval.


B


.分析报告单


对于非官方标准品,在申请的分析方法和控制章节中应当要提供该标准品的分析报告


单。


对于从官方获得的标准品,


用户应当要确保标准品的适用性 。


应当正确储存标准品并在


已确定的时间段内使用该标准品。< /p>



C. Characterization of a Reference Standard


Reference standards from USP/NF and other official sources do not require


further characterization. A reference standard that is not obtained from an off


icial source should be of the highest purity that can be obtained by reasonable


effort, and it should be thoroughly characterized to ensure its identity, stre


ngth, quality, purity, and potency.


C


.标准品的界定


< br>从


USP/NF


及其它官方来源获得的标准品是不需要进 一步界定的。


非官方对照品要有尽


可能高的纯度,并进行充分地 界定以确保其结构,剂量,质量,纯度和效力。



The qualitative and quantitative analytical procedures used to characteriz


e a reference standard are expected to be different from, and more extensive th


an, those used to control the identity, strength, quality, purity, and potency


of the drug substance or the drug product. Analytical procedures used to Draft



Not for Implementation characterize a reference standard should not rely sol






ely on comparison testing to a previously designated reference standard.


用于界定标准品的定性和定量分析方法应当 要不同于用于控制原料药或制剂的结构,剂量,


质量,


纯度和效 力的分析方法,


要比它们更深入。


用于标准品界定的分析方法不 应仅仅是和


先前的指定标准品进行比较实验。



Generally, this characterization information should include:



A brief description of the manufacture of the reference standard, if the


manufacturing process differs from that of the drug substance. Any additional


purification procedures used in the preparation of the reference standard shoul


d be described.


一般来说,界定资料应当要包括:



标 准品的简单工艺描述,如果其生产工艺是否于其相应的原料药的话。应当要叙述制


备标准 品时所用的补充精制过程。



Legible reproductions of the relevant spectra, chromatograms, thin-layer c


hromatogram (TLC) photographs or reproductions, and other appropriate instrumen


tal recordings.


Data establishing purity. The data should be obtained by usin


g appropriate tests, such as TLC, gas chromatography (GC), high- pressure liquid


chromatography (HPLC), phase solubility analysis, appropriate thermometric ana


lytical procedures, and others as necessary.


相关光谱图,


色 谱图,


TLC


照片及其它仪器输出的清晰复印件。


建立纯度的资料。


应当


要应用适当的检测方法来获得 这些资料,比如说


TLC



GC



HPLC


,相溶解分析,适当的热分


析方法及其它必要的分析方法。



Appropriate chemical attribute information, such as structural formula, em


pirical formula, and molecular weight. Information to substantiate the proof of


structure should include appropriate analytical tests, such as elemental analy


sis, infrared spectrophotometry (IR), ultraviolet spectrophotometry (UV), nucle


ar magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), and mass spectrometry (MS), as well a


s applicable functional group analysis. Detailed interpretation of the test dat


a in support of the claimed structure should be provided.


适当的化学性质资料 ,比如结构式,经验式和分子量等。结构确证资料应当要包括适


当的分析测试,比如元素 分析,


IR



UV,NMR

< p>


MS


,及适用的官能团分析。还应当要提供具< /p>


体的结构解析资料。



A physical description of the material, including its color and physical f


orm.


Appropriate physical constants such as melting range, boiling range, ref


ractive index, dissociation constants (pK values), and optical rotation.


A de


tailed description of the analytical procedures used to characterize the refere


nce standard.


物理性质的描述,包括颜色和物理形态。


适当的物理常数,比如说熔程,沸程,折射


率,离解常数


( pK



)


和旋光度。用于界定标准品的 分析程序的详细叙述。



For biotechnological/biological product reference standards, the recommend


ations on characterization information above may apply and should be considered.






However, additional and/or different tests would be important to assess physic


ochemical characteristics, structural characteristics, biological activity, and


/or immunochemical activity.


至于生物技术

< br>/


生物产品的标准品,应当要考虑上述建议,可能可以应用。然而,其它


确定物理化学性质,


结构特性,


生物活性和


/


或免疫化学活性的补充检测和


/


或其它检测将是


非常重要的。



Physicochemical determinations may include isoform, electrophoretic, and l


iquid chromatographic patterns, as well as spectroscopic profiles. Structural c


haracterization may include a determination of amino acid sequence, amino acid


composition, peptide map, and carbohydrate structure. Biological and/or immunoc


hemical activity should be assessed using the same analytical procedures used t


o determine product potency.

物理化学性质包括异构体,电泳和液相色谱行为及光谱性质等。结构界定可能包括氨


基酸序列,氨基酸组成,缩氨酸图和碳水结构。确定生物和


/


或 免疫化学活性的分析方法应


当要和用来确定产品效力的分析方法一样。

< br>


These can include animal-based, cell culture-based, biochemical, or ligand


/receptor-binding assays. While these tests may be needed for complete characte


rization of certain reference standards, specific recommendations for validatio


n of biological and immunochemical tests are not contained in this guidance doc


ument.


这些分析方法可以包 括基于动物的,细胞培养的,


生物化学的或配位体


/

< p>
接受体螯合的


分析方法。


如果这些检测需用于某些 标准品的界定,


生物和免疫化学检测的分析方法验证方


面的特殊 建议并不在本指南的范围之内。



V


.


METHODS


V


ALIDATION


FOR


I


NDs



For an investigational new drug, sufficient information is required in eac


h phase of an investigation to ensure proper identification, quality, purity, s


trength, and/or potency. The amount of information on analytical procedures and


methods validation necessary will vary with the phase of the investigation (21


CFR 312.23(a)(7)).


V



IND


中的分析方法验证



对于


IND

< br>而言,每个阶段的研究都需要有足够的资料以确保合适的认定,


质量,

< p>
纯度,剂


量和


/


或效力。 所需的分析方法和方法验证方面的资料会随着研究的阶段变化而变化


(21


C


FR


312.23(a)(7))




For general guidance on analytical procedures and methods validation infor


mation to be submitted for phase 1 studies, sponsors should refer to the FDA gu


idance for industry on Content and Format of Investigational New Drug Applicati






ons (INDs) for Phase 1 Studies of Drugs, Including Well- Characterized, Therape


utic, Biotechnology-Derived Products (November 1995).


关于在第

1


阶段研究所需提交的分析方法和方法验证资料方面的指南,发起人可以参



FDA


的指南:药品(包括结构确定的,有疗 效的,生物技术产品)第


1


阶段研究的


IND


申请的内容和格式(


1995



11


月)。



General guidance regarding analytical procedures and methods validation in


formation to be submitted for phase 2 or phase 3 studies will be provided in th


e FDA guidance for industry INDs for Phase 2 and 3 Studies of Drugs, Including


Specified Therapeutic Biotechnology- Derived Products, Chemistry, Manufacturing,


and Controls Content and Format, when finalized (draft guidance published Apri


l 1999).



2


和第


3


阶段研究所需提交的分析方法和方法 验证资料方面的指南,发起人将可以


参考


FDA


的指南:药品(包括结构确定的,有疗效的,生物技术产品)第


1


阶段研究的


IND


申请的


C MC


内容和格式(草案,


1999


年< /p>


4


月)。



All analytical procedures should be fully developed and validation complet


ed when the NDA, ANDA, BLA, or PLA is submitted.


在递交


NDA



ANDA



BLA< /p>



PLA


时,所有的分析方法都应当要开 发出来,并得到验证。



VI. CONTENT AND FORMAT OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR NDAs, 230ANDAs, BLAs,


AND PLAs


Any analytical procedure submitted in an NDA, ANDA, BLA, or PLA should be


described in sufficient detail to allow a competent analyst to reproduce the ne


cessary conditions and obtain results comparable to the applicant=s. Aspects of


the analytical procedure that require special attention should be described.


VI




ND A



ANDA



BLA



PLA


中分析方法的内容和 格式



NDA



ANDA



BLA



PLA


中所提交的任一分析方法都应当要有详细的描述,以使合格的

< p>
分析人员能重现出所需的实验条件并获得和申请者相当的实验结果。


应当要 叙述分析方法中


需要特殊注意的地方。



If the analytical procedure used is in the current revision of the USP/NF


or other FDA recognized standard references (e.g., AOAC International Book Of M


ethods) and the referenced analytical procedure is not modified, a statement in


dicating the analytical procedure and reference may be provided rather than a d


escription of the method (21 CFR 211.194).


如果所用的分析方法是


USP/NF


或其它


FDA


认可参考文 献


(如,


<


国际方法汇编< /p>


>>



中且所参考的分析方法未经过修改 的话,


则需提供该分析方法的参引,


而不用提供该分析方


法的描述(


21 CFR 211.194


)。



A description of analytical procedures from any other published sources sh


ould be provided, because the referenced sources may not be readily accessible


to the reviewer.


对于从其它公开发表的文献上获得的分析方法,应当要对其进行叙述,因为评审官可


能并不能很方便的获得这些文献。







分析方法描述中需要包括的典型内容如下所示:



A. Principle


A statement of the principle of the analytical procedure should be include


d. For example, separation is based on isocratic reversed phase HPLC with detec


tion by UV.


B. Sampling


The number of samples (e.g., vials, tablets) selected, how they a


re used (i.e., as individual or composite samples), and the number of replicate


analyses per sample should be described.


A


.基本方法



HPLC


进行分离的,检测器为


UV


检测器。



B


.取样



需 要叙述的有:所选样品的数目(比如,瓶,片等),它们是如何使用的(也就是,


单独的 或是混合样品),每个样品分析的重复次数。



C. Equipment and Equipment Parameters


A listing of all equipment (e.g., instrument type, detector, column type,


dimensions) should be included, as well as a list of equipment parameters (e.g.,


flow rate, temperatures, run time, wavelength settings). A drawing representin


g the experimental configuration (e.g., illustrating positions for a spray patt


ern analytical procedure) should be provided, when appropriate.


C


.仪器和仪器参数



需要叙述的有:仪器列表(比如,仪器类型,检测器,柱子类型,尺寸等)和仪器参数(比


如,流速,温度,运行时间和设定波长等)。如果必要的话,还要提供实验结构示意图(比

< p>
如,阐述喷洒式分析方法的位置)。



D. Reagents


A list of reagents and their grades (e.g., USP/NF, American Chemical Socie


ty (ACS) Analytical Reagent) should be included. If in-house or modified commer


cial reagents are used, directions for their preparation should be included. Un


stable or potentially hazardous reagents should be identified, and storage cond


itions, directions for safe use, and usable shelf life for these reagents shoul


d be specified.


D


.试剂



需 要叙述的有:试剂列表及其相应的规格(比如:


USP/NF


, 美国化学社(


ACS


)分析试


剂)。< /p>


如果使用的是自制试剂或更改过的商业试剂,则应当要有其制备方法。对于不稳定的


或有潜在危险的试剂,应标明其储存条件,安全使用说明和使用周期。



E. System Suitability Testing


System suitability test parameters and acceptance criteria are based on th


e concept that the equipment, electronics, analytical operations, and samples t


o be analyzed constitute an integrated system. System suitability testing ensur


es that the system is working properly at the time of analysis. Appropriate sys


tem suitability criteria should be defined and included in the analytical proce






dure.


E


.系统适应性实验



系统适应性实验参数和合格标准是建立基础是:仪器,电子元件,分析操作和待测样

品是个不可分割的整体。


系统适应性实验确保系统在样品分析的时候能很好地运行。


在分析


方法中应当要包括适当的系统适应性合格标准。



All chromatographic analytical procedures should include system suitabilit


y testing and criteria. Parameters typically used in system suitability evaluat


ions are defined and discussed in the CDER reviewer guidance on Validation of C


hromatographic Methods (November 1994).


所有的色谱分析方法都应当要有系统适应性实验及相应的合格标准。


CDER


评审官指南


<

<


色谱分析方法的验证


>>



1994



11


月 )对用于评估系统适应性的典型参数进行了定义和


讨论。



System suitability testing is recommended as a component of any analytical


procedure, not just those that involve chromatographic techniques. Regardless


of the type of analytical procedure, testing should be used to confirm that the


system will function correctly independent of the environmental conditions. Fo


r example, titration analytical procedures should always include the evaluation


of a blank (commonly referred to as a blank titration).


建议系统 适应性实验应成为所有分析方法的一部分,而不仅仅是色谱分析方法。无论


是哪类分析方 法,


都要采用实验来证实该系统能不受环境条件的影响而正确地运行。

< br>比如说,


滴定法一般来说需要进行空白实验。



F. Preparation of Standards


Procedures for the preparation of all standard solutions (e.g., stock, wor


king standard solutions, internal standards) should be included.


F


.标准品的制备


< br>要有所有标准品溶液(比如,储备液,工作对照品溶液,内部对照品溶液)的配制方


法。



G. Preparation of Samples


Sample preparation for individual tests should be clearly described. Speci


fic details should be provided for unusual sample preparations (e.g., solid- pha


se extraction, derivatization).


G.


操作过程



应当要按操作步骤对操作过程进行逐步叙述。叙述应当要适当包括如下信息:平衡时


间 ,样品进样顺序和系统适应性或启动参数。需标明不常见的危险。



I. Calculations


Representative


calculations,


with


a


tabulation


defining


all


symbols


and


numeric


al


factors,


and


specific


instructions


for


the


calculation


of


degradation


products


and


i


mpurities


should


be


included.


Any


mathematical


transformations


or


formulas


used


in



data


analysis


should


be


described


in


detail.


These


may


include


logarithmic


transfor






mations


used


to


obtain


a


linear


relationship


from


exponential


data,


or


the


use


of


m


ultiple


order


regression


analyses.


I


.计算



应 当要提供代表性计算公式,并要列表说明所有符号和数字系数,及计算降解产物和


杂质的 特殊使用说明。


所有用于数据分析的数学转换或公式应详细描述。


这些包括对数转换


以获得指数数据的线性关系,或多元回归分析的使用。



J.


Reporting


of


Results


J.


结果报告



1. General


The format used to report results (e.g., percent label claim, weight/weigh


t, weight/volume, parts per million (ppm)) including the specific number of sig


nificant figures to be reported should be provided.


1


.通则



应 该规定关键计算步骤中的数字单位(例如,‘标签’标示量的百分比,


W/W

< p>


W/L



p

< p>
pm


等)



2. Impurities Analytical Procedures


The name and location/identifier (e.g., retention time (RT), relative rete


ntion time (RRT)) of impurities and the type of impurity (e.g., process, degrad


ant, excipient degradant) should be included in the analytical procedures for i


mpurities in the drug substance and drug product. The detection limit (DL) or q


uantitation limit (QL) should be stated, as appropriate. The DL or QL can be se


t using the drug substance's detection response.


2


.杂质分析规程


< br>在有关原料药和产品的杂质检测规程中,应当包括杂质的名称和检测位


/


标志(例如,保留


时间


RT

,相对保留时间


RRT


),以及杂质的种类(比如工艺降解 产物,赋形剂降解产物),


如有可能,还应当指明检测限


DL< /p>


或定量限


QL


。也可以在原料药检测中设 置


DL



QL




Reporting of organic impurities should cover (1) specified identified impu


rities by name, (2) specified unidentified impurities by location/identifier,


(3) any unspecified impurities, and (4) total impurities. The total organic imp


urities for the drug product or drug substance is the sum of all impurities equ


al to or greater than their individual QL.


See recommendations regarding appropriate QLs in FDA impurities guidances


(see references). Inorganic impurities and residual solvents should also be add


ressed.


有机杂质的报告中,应当包括:


1


、有记载的已经过确认的杂质的名称;


2


、有记载但


未经过确认杂质的(检测)位


/


标志;


3


、所有的没有记载的杂质 ,以及;


4


、总杂质。总有


机杂质是指 所有达到或超过其自身定量限度的杂质的总量。


在这里可以参考


FDA


杂质指南文


章中有关判定定量限度的内容(看后面的参考 )。无机杂质和溶剂的残留,也应该被提到。



For the drug product, drug substance process impurities may be excluded fr


om reporting if an acceptable rationale is provided in the sections on analytic






al procedures and controls. Drug product impurities from the drug product manuf


acturing process, packaging, and labeling should be addressed.


对于产品以及原料 药的工艺杂质也可以不包括在报告中,除非分析规程和控制环节中


描叙了一个可以被接受 的原则,


那么,在产品制造和包装过程中(包括贴签)产生的杂质就

要被提到。



The above reporting information may not be strictly applicable to all prod


ucts (e.g., biological, biotechnological, botanical, radiopharmaceutical drugs),


but any significant process and product-related impurities should be determine


d and reported.


并不 是所有产品(比如,生物制剂、生物工艺制剂、植物制剂、放射制剂)的报告都


必须严格 按照以上谈到的内容来写,


但是所有关键的工序以及产品相关的杂质都要有检测和


报告。



VII. METHODS VALIDATION FOR NDAs, ANDAs, BLAs, AND PLAs


A. Noncompendial Analytical Procedures


In an NDA, ANDA, BLA, or PLA, data must be submitted to establish that the anal


ytical procedures used in testing meet proper standards of accuracy and reliabi


lity (21 CFR 211.194(a)(2)). Methods validation is the process of demonstrating


that analytical procedures are suitable for their intended use. At the time of


submission, the NDA, ANDA,


BLA, or PLA should contain methods validation information to support the adequa


cy of the analytical procedures.


VII



NDA



ANDA



BLA



PLA


中的分析方法验证



A


.非药典分析方法




NDA



ANDA



BLA



PLA


中,应当要递交资料以说明检测中所用的分析方法是满足适当的


准确 度和可靠性要求


(21 CFR 211.194(a)92))



分析方法验证是个论述分析方法是适用于其


拟定用途的过程 。在递交资料时,


NDA



ANDA< /p>



BLA



PL A


中应当要包含分析方法验证资料


以支持分析方法的准确度。< /p>



The International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) guidance Q2A Text on V


alidation of Analytical Procedures (March 1995) and Q2B Validation of Analytica


l Procedures: Methodology (November 1996) provide recommendations on validation


of analytical procedures. Analytical procedures outside the scope of the ICH g


uidances should still be validated.


ICH


指导原则


Q2A

:分析方法验证(


1995



3< /p>


月)和


Q2B


:分析方法验证:方法学(


19


96



1 1


月)给出了分析方法验证的建议。对于超出


ICH

< p>
指导原则范围的分析方法也是需要


验证的。



1. Validation Characteristics


Applicants should submit information on the validation characteristics of


their proposed analytical procedures (see ICH Q2A and ICH Q2B). Although not al


l of the validation characteristics are needed for all types of tests (see sect


ion VII.A.3), typical validation characteristics are:






1.


验证项目



申请者应当要送交其所拟定分析方法的验证项目方面的信息(见


ICH


Q2A



ICH Q2


B


)。尽管不是对于所有类型的分析方法都需要进行所有的验证项目(见第


VII.A.3


章),


但还是有典型的验证 项目,如:



Accuracy



Precision (repeatability and intermediate precision)



Specificity



Detection limit



Quantitation limit



Linearity



Range



Robustnes


准确度



精密度(重复性和中间精密度)



专属性



检测限



定量限



线性



范围



耐用性



2. Other Methods Validation Information


Methods validation information should also include:



Data to demonstrate the stability of all analytical sample preparations th


rough the time required to complete the analysis.


2.


其它验证资料



分析方法验证资料还应当要包括:



说 明所有分析制备样品在完成分析所需的时间内的稳定性的资料。



Legible reproductions of representative instrument output or recordings (e.


g., chromatograms) and raw data output (e.g., integrated areas), as appropriate.


Instrument output for placebo, standard, and sample should also be provided (s


ee section VII.A.2.c).


清晰可读的仪器代表性输出和记录资料(如 色谱图)和原始资料输出(积分面积)。


安慰剂,对照品和样品的仪器输出也都是需要提 供的(见第


VII.A.2.c


章)。



Representative calculations using submitted raw data, to show how the impu


rities in drug substance are calculated.


Information from stress studies (see


section VII.A.2.b).


Impurities labeled with their names and location identifie


rs (e.g., RRT for chromatographic data) for the impurity analytical procedure.


代表性计算公式,以表明原料药中的杂质是如何计算的。


(



VII.A.2.b

章)。对于杂


质分析方法,要标明杂质的名称和位置标识符(如,色谱中的相对保留 时间


RRT


)。



For drug substances:







A discussion of the possible formation and control of polymorphic and en


antiomeric substances.



Identification and characterization of each organic impurity, as appropria


te. This information may not be needed for all products (e.g., botanicals). Oth


er impurities (e.g., inorganics, residual solvents) should be addressed and qua


ntitated.


对于原料药:



1.


讨论可能会形成的异构体并讨论异构体的控制。



对每个有机杂质进行适当的标识和界定。不是所有的产品(如,植物药)都需要这些

< br>资料的。对于其它杂质(如无机杂质,残留溶剂),应当要进行说明并定量分析。



Recommendations on submitting information on impurities is provided in var


ious FDA guidances such as the ICH guidance Q3A Impurities in New Drug Substanc


es (January 1996).



A list of known impurities, with structure if available, including process


impurities, degradants, and possible isomers.


FDA


的指导文件,如 比


ICH


指导原则


Q3A

< p>
新原料药中的杂质(


1996


< br>1


月)。



已知杂质列表,包括 工艺杂质,降解产物和可能的异构体。如果知道结构的话,也需


提供。

< br>


For drug products:


A degradation pathway for the drug substance in the dosage form, 419where


possible.


Data demonstrating recovery from the sample matrix as illustrated b


y the accuracy studies.


Data demonstrating that neither the freshly prepared


nor the degraded placebo interferes with the quantitation of the active ingredi


ent. ICH Q2A and Q2B address almost all of the validation parameters. Areas tha


t should be provided in more detail are described below.


对于制剂:



原料药在 制剂中可能的降解途径。通过准确度实验论证的样品回收率资料。要有资料


论证无论是新 制的安慰剂还是分解了的安慰剂都不会影响活性成分的定量分析。


ICH


Q2A



ICH

Q2B


几乎对所有的验证参数都进行了论述。下面论述的是那些还需要更详细地进行


论述的方面。



a. Robustness


Robustness, a measure of the analytical procedure's capability to remain u


naffected by small but deliberate variations, is described in ICH Q2A and Q2B.


Such testing should be performed during development of the analytical procedure


and the data discussed and/or submitted. In cases where an effect is observed,


representative instrument output (e.g., chromatograms) should be submitted.


a.


耐用性



ICH


Q2A



ICH

Q2B


对耐用性是有论述的,


它衡量的是分析方法在细微的 变化下不受


影响的能力。


该实验应当是在分析方法开发过程中进 行的,


对实验结果进行讨论和


/


或递交 。


如果观察到有影响,需提供代表性仪器输出(如色谱图)。







b. Stress Studies


Degradation information obtained from stress studies (e.g., products of ac


id and base hydrolysis, thermal degradation, photolysis, oxidation) for the dru


g substance and for


the active ingredient in the drug product should be provid


ed to demonstrate the specificity of the assay and analytical procedures for im


purities. The stress studies should demonstrate that impurities and degradants


from the active ingredient and drug product excipients do not interfere with th


e quantitation of the active ingredient. Stress studies are described in variou


s FDA guidances relating to the stability of drug products (see references). Th


e design of the stress studies and the results should be submitted to the stabi


lity section of the application. Representative instrument output (e.g., chroma


tograms) and/or other appropriate data (e.g., degradation information obtained


from stress studies) should be submitted in the sections on analytical procedur


es and controls.


b.


强降解实验


FDA


很多关于药品稳定性的指导原则都对强降解实验进行了论述。



在申请的稳定性一章中应当要提供的资料有:强降解实验设计和实验结果。而 代表性


仪器输出(如:色谱图)和


/


或 其它资料(强降解实验中所得的降解信息)应当要提供在分


析方法和控制



一章中。



c. Instrument Output/Raw Data


i. Organic Impurities


Representative data should be submitted to support an assessment of the or


ganic impurities. Representative data for residual solvents are generally not n


eeded. Instrument output and the raw numerical values (e.g., peak area) with ap


propriate identification and labeling (e.g., RT for chromatographic peaks, chem


ical shift (d) and coupling constant (J) for NMR) should be provided. The impur


ity profile should be assessed at the quantitation limit and the instrument out


put provided. Additional information should be provided to confirm that the imp


urity profile is adequately characterized. For example, a representative chroma


togram using detection at a low wavelength, such as 205 nm, and double the prop


osed total run time could be submitted to support the specificity of the analyt


ical procedure.


c.


仪器输出


/


原始资料



i.



有机杂质



应当要提供代表性资料以支 持有机杂质的评估。一般来说,是不需要残留溶剂的代表


性资料的。仪器输出和原始数值 (比如,峰面积)及合适的标记和标注(比如,色谱峰的保


留时间,

核磁共振的化学位移和耦合常数)


都应当要提供。


根据所提 供的定量限和仪器输出


对杂质情况进行评估。还应当要提供其它资料以确认杂质情况得到 了充分地界定。比如说,


比如说,代表性图谱选用的检测波长是


205nm


,则可以将拟定的运行时间延长至两倍以支持


分析方 法的专属性。







For quantitation purposes, the response factor of the drug substance may b


e


used for impurities without a reference standard. In cases where the response f


actors are not close, this practice may still be acceptable, provided a correct


ion factor is applied or the impurities are, in fact, being overestimated. Acce


ptance criteria and analytical procedures used to estimate identified or uniden


tified impurities often are based on analytical assumptions (e.g., equivalent d


etector response). Assumptions should be discussed and justified.


在定量分析时,原料药的 响应因子可用于没有相应对照品的杂质。如果响应因子不接


近的话,

只要应用了较正因子或或者杂质实际上是被高估的话,


这样做也是可行的。


用于评


估指定杂质或未指定杂质的合格标准和分析方法经常都是基于分析 假设的


(比如,


相当的检


测器响应)。 应当要对这些假设进行讨论和合理性说明。



ii. Drug Substance


Data should be submitted showing the separation and detection of impuritie


s using spiked or stress samples. Complete impurity profiles as graphic output


(e.g., chromatograms) and raw data (e.g, integrated peak areas) of representati


ve batches should be submitted in the sections on analytical procedures and con


trols for the drug substance. For ANDAs and related submissions, appropriate in


formation for the batches used in the biobatch or submission batch should be pr


ovided. All responses (e.g., peaks) should be labeled. The analytical procedure


used should be capable of differentiating changes, if any, between past and pr


esent batches. The quantitation limit and the type of organic impurity (e.g., d


egradant, process impurity) should be stated. The analytical procedure number,


batch number, manufacturing date and site, and date of analysis should be provi


ded.


ii.


原料药



ANDA


和相关的递交,用于生物利用度研究的批次(


bio batch


)或者提交批次(


submis

sion batch


)的相关资料应当要提供。所有的响应(比如,色谱峰)都应 当要进行标注。所


用的分析方法应当要有能力区分先前批次和当前批次之间的变化,


如果有这些变化的话。



当要说明定量限和 有机杂质的类型(比如:降解物,工艺杂质)。还需提供分析方法编号,


批号,生产日期 和生产地点及分析日期。



iii. Drug Product


Information such as instrument output (e.g., chromatograms) and raw data


(e.g., integrated peak areas) from representative batches under long-term and a


ccelerated stability conditions, and stressed samples should be submitted in th


e sections on analytical procedures and controls of the drug product. For ANDAs


and related submissions, appropriate information for the biobatch or submissio


n batch should be provided. References to the raw data (e.g., chromatograms) sh


ould be included in the stability section of the application.


iii.


制剂







在制剂的分析方法和控制一章中,应要当提供的资料有:代表性批号在长期和加速稳


定性实验条件下及强降解实验条件下的仪器输出(如,图谱)和原始资料(如峰面积)。对



ANDA


和相关递交,应当要提供生物利用 度实验批次或递交批次的适当资料。在申请的稳


定性章节中应当要引用原始资料(比如: 图谱)。



At a minimum, the submission should include instrument output and raw data


for release testing and at the latest available time point for the same batch.


All responses (e.g., peaks) should be labeled and identified. In addition, the


analytical procedure number, batch number of the drug product, manufacturing d


ate, date of analysis, source and batch number of drug substance, manufacturing


site, and container/closure information should be provided. The analytical pro


cedures used should be capable of differentiating changes, if any, between past


and present batches. The quantitation limit and the type (e.g., degradant, lea


chables from packaging) should be reported. Multiple methodologies can be used.


至少,


递交材料中应当要包括放行检测


(Rel ease testing)


的仪器输出和原始资料


.



标注所有的响应信号(如色谱峰)。此外,还要提供,分析方法编号 ,制剂的批号,生产日


期,分析日期,原料药的来源和批号,生产地点及容器

< p>
/


密闭系统信息。如在过往批次和现


批次之间存在 差异的话,


所用的分析方法应当要有能力区分出来。


应当要报告 检测限和类型


(如,降解物,包装时的漏出物)。



3. Recommended Validation Characteristics for Types of Tests


Table 1 is a summary of the validation characteristics that should be addr


essed during validation of different types of analytical procedures. The same m


ethodology can be used for several purposes. The validation information should


support the intended purpose of the test. For example, if Raman spectroscopy is


the methodology selected to quantitate polymorphic forms as impurities, or chi


ral HPLC for enantiomeric impurities, the recommended validation characteristic


s in Table 1 under quantitative testing for impurities would apply. However, if


Raman spectroscopy or chiral HPLC are used for the purpose of identification o


r as specific tests, the recommended validation characteristics listed for thos


e types of tests would apply.


3.


各类检测的推荐验证项目




1


概述了在不同分析方法的验证过程中所需 要的验证项目。同一分析方法可用于多


个用途。


验证资料需要能 支持该分析方法的拟定用途。


比如说,


如果拉曼光谱用于定量分 析


多晶型杂质,或手性


HPLC


用于分 析异构体杂质,则要应用表


1


中杂质定量分析

< br>


中所推荐


的验证项目。然而,如果拉曼光谱或手性


HPLC


被用于鉴定或特征实验的话,则要应用表

< br>1


中所推荐的这些类型的验证项目。


< br>表


1


:不同类型检测的推荐验证项目



检验项目





验证内容







杂质测定



鉴别



定量



含量分析及溶


含量


/

< br>效



价特殊分析



限度



出度(仅用于检测)




准确度



精密度-重复




精密度-中间


精密度



专属性



检测限



定量限



线性



范围



耐用性



NOTE:








+2


-


-


-


-


-


+


+


+


+


-3


+


+


+


+


-


-


-


+


+


-


-


-


-3


+


+


+1


+5


-


-


+


+


+


+4



4



4


+4


-


-


-


-


+4


- Signifies that this characteristic is not normally evaluated.


+ Signifies that this characteristic is normally evaluated.


1 In cases where reproducibility has been performed, intermediate precisio


n is not needed.


2 Lack of specificity for an analytical procedure may be compensated for b


y the addition of a second analytical procedure.


3 May be needed in some cases.


4 May not be needed in some cases.


5 Lack of specificity for an assay for release may be compensated for by i


mpurities testing.


注:



-:表示通常不需要验证的项目。



+:表示通常需验证的项目。



1


:假如已经论证了重现性,可不需要再论证中间精密度。



2


:如果一分析方法缺少专属性的话,则需要另一分析方法进行补偿。< /p>



3


:有些情况下是需要的。



4


:有些情况下是不需要的。



a:Identification


Identification analytical procedures may include tests such as IR, differe


ntial scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV, and HPLC retenti


on time. A specific identification test should be included for the active ingre


dient whenever possible. In cases where a nonspecific identification analytical


procedure is proposed for the active ingredient, two independent analytical pr


ocedures are generally sufficient, if justified. For other identification tests


(e.g., a chiral HPLC retention time as confirmation for the presence of an ena


ntiomer, chloride test for a counterion) a single test is acceptable. This conc


ept of the number of identification tests is applicable to both the drug substa


nce and drug product.






a.


鉴别



定性分析方法有:红外


(IR)


,差示热分析


(DSC)



X-


射线衍射


(XRD)



HPLC


保留时间。


对于原料药,


尽可能要有专属性强的鉴别实验,


如果用 的是专属性不强的定性分析方法,



通常来说运用两个独立的分 析方法应当是足够的。对于其它的一些定性分析方法


(


如,手性


HPLC


的保留时间用于确认是否存在异构体,平衡离子的氯化 物实验


)


,就一个检测也是可可


行的。 定性实验数目的概念既适用于原料药,也适用于制剂。



b. Impurities


The validation characteristics under quantitative testing for impurities,


as described in Table 1, apply, regardless of which methodology is used to quan


titate impurities. If the same analytical procedure is proposed as a limit test,


validation characteristics under limit testing for impurities will apply.


b.


杂质




1


中杂质定量分析



项下所说的相应验证项目。


如果同样的方法还用做定性检测的分


析方法的话,则要对表


1


中杂质定性分析



项下的验证项目进行验证。



c. Assay


Assay includes the content of the active ingredient, preservative (if use


d), and


measurement of content in dissolution and content uniformity samples.


c.


含量



含量分析包括活性成分的含量,所用到的防腐剂的含量,及溶出度和含量均匀度检测


样品的含量测定。



d. Specific Tests


Specific tests to control the drug substance, excipient, or drug product c


an include tests such as particle size analysis, droplet distribution, spray pa


ttern, dissolution (excludes measurement), optical rotation, and methodologies


such as DSC, XRD, and Raman spectroscopy. The validation characteristics may di


ffer for the various analytical procedures. For example, accuracy, repeatabilit


y, intermediate precision and robustness should be evaluated for molecular size


distribution gel permeation chromatography (GPC).


d.


特定实验



用于原料药,赋形剂或制剂控制的特定检测包括粒径分析,雾化状态,溶出度,旋光


度 和比如


DSC



XRD


及拉曼光谱等方法。不同的分析方法所需的验证项目是不尽相同的。比


如说,对 于凝胶渗透色谱


(GPC)


,需要考察其准确度,重复性,中间 精密度和耐用性。



B. Compendial Analytical Procedures


The suitability of a compendial analytical procedure must be verified unde


r actual conditions of use (21 CFR 211.194(a)(2)). Information to demonstrate t


hat USP/NF analytical procedures are suitable for the drug product or drug subs


tance should be included in the submission. Information on the specificity, int


ermediate precision, and stability of the sample solution should be included. C


ompendial assay analytical procedures may not be stability-indicating, and this






should be considered when developing the specification (see section III.C). Fo


r compendial items, additional analytical procedures, such as impurities or osm


olality, may be requested to support the quality of the drug product or drug su


bstance. These additional analytical procedures should be validated (see sectio


n VII.A).


B


.药典分析方法


(21CFR 211.194(a)(2))




在 申请中应当要提供药典分析方法适用于该药品或原料药分析的论证资料。还应该要


包括专 属性,


中间精密度,


和样品溶液稳定性方面的资料。

< p>
药典含量分析方法可能是没有稳


定性指示能力的,


因此在开发质量标准的过程中因当要考虑这个


(


见第

< p>
III.C.



)



对于药典项


目,可能需要补充方法,


比如杂 质或渗透度,


来控制制剂或原料药的质量。


这些补充方法也


是需要验证的


(


见第


VII.A.



)




VIII.


STATISTICAL


ANALYSIS



A. General


Methods validation includes an assessment of the adequacy of the analytica


l procedure. Statistical analysis (e.g., linear regression analysis, relative s


tandard deviation) of methods validation data is often used to demonstrate the


validity of the method. The statistical procedures for the analysis of the vali


dation data should be determined prior to the start of any validation study. Th


e procedure followed, including the amount of data to collect and the criteria


used in determining the acceptability of the analytical procedure, should be sp


ecified.


The raw methods validation data and statistical procedures used to analyze


the raw data should be provided and discussed in the sections on analytical pr


ocedures and controls. All statistical procedures used in the analysis of the d


ata should be based on sound principles and be suitable for evaluating the data


set.


VIII.


统计分析



A


.基本原则



(


比如:线性回归分析,相对标准偏差


)

以说明方法的正确性。在开始分析方法验证之


前,


应当就要 确定用于验证资料分析的统计方法。


还应当要规定所要遵循的程序,

包括所需


采集的数据量和确定分析方法合适性的合格标准。



应当要在分析方法和控制章节中提供和讨论分析方法验证原始资料和所用的统计方


法。所有用于数据分析的统计程序都应当是科学的,并适用于评估该数据群的。



B. Comparative Studies


Comparative studies are performed to evaluate intermediate precision (e.g.,


different equipment, analysts, days). Comparative studies are also used to eva


luate between laboratory variability (i.e., reproducibility) when an analytical


procedure is used in more than one laboratory or to compare and evaluate the p


recision and accuracy of two analytical procedures (e.g., regulatory analytical


procedure and an alternative analytical procedure). When comparative studies a






re performed, homogeneous samples from the same batch should be used, if feasib


le. Comparative results should be statistically analyzed and discussed and any


bias explained.


B:


对比研究



开展对比研究以评估中间精密度


(


如,不同设备,不同分析员 ,不同天等


)


。当一分析


方法会在多个 实验室应用时,或要比较和评估两个分析方法


(


比如,法定分析 方法和替代分


析方法


)


的精密度和准确 度时,


也会进行对比研究以评估实验室间的差异


(


也就是,


重现性


)



在进行对比研究时,


应当要尽可能地使用同一批号的均匀样品。


需对对比研究的结果进行统


计分析和讨论,并对偏差进行解释。



C. Statistics


For information on statistical techniques used in making comparisons, as w


ell as other general information on the interpretation and treatment of analyti


cal data, appropriate literature or texts should be consulted (see references)


.


C:


统计



关 于用于对比分析的统计技术资料,和用于分析数据处理和解析的其它基本资料,可


参见相 关的文献


(


见参考文献


)




IX.


REV


ALIDATION



When sponsors make changes in the analytical procedure, drug substance (e.


g., route of synthesis), or drug product (e.g., composition), the changes may n


ecessitate revalidation of the analytical procedures. Revalidation should be pe


rformed to ensure that the analytical procedure maintains its characteristics


(e.g., specificity) and to demonstrate that the analytical procedure continues


to ensure the identity, strength, quality, purity, and potency of the drug subs


tance and drug product, and the bioavailability of the drug product. The degree


of revalidation depends on the nature of the change. When a different regulato


ry analytical procedure is substituted (e.g., HPLC for titration), the new proc


edure should be validated (see section VII).


IX




再验证



当发起人对分析方法,原料药


(


比如,合成路线


)

< br>,或制剂


(


比如,组分


)


作了更改的话,


则需要对分析方法进行重验证。进行重验证是为了确保 该分析方法仍然保持其特性


(


比如,


专 属性


)



并论证说明该分析方法仍然能 确保原料药和制剂的同一性,浓度


/


剂量,质量,



度和功效,


及制剂的生物利用度。


重验证的程序取决于该变更的性质。


当使用了另一个法定


分析程序的话


(


比如,用


HPLC< /p>


代替了滴定法


)


,则新的分析方法也需要 验证


(


见第


VII


)




If during each use an analytical procedure can meet the established system


suitability requirements only with repeated adjustments to the operating condi


tions stated in the analytical procedure, the analytical procedure should be re


evaluated, amended, and revalidated, as appropriate.






FDA intends to provide guidance in the future on postapproval changes in a


nalytical procedures.

< p>
如果在每次使用时,都必须要对分析方法中所述的操作条件进行反复调整,才能使其


符合系统适应性要求的话,则该分析方法需要适当进行重新评估,修正和重验证。



X.


METHODS


V


ALIDATION


PACK


AGE:


CONTENTS


AND


PROCESSI


NG



Part of the methods validation process may include FDA laboratory analysis


to demonstrate that an analytical procedure is reproducible by laboratory test


ing. A methods validation package (see X.A) and samples (see X.B) will be neede


d for this process.


A. Methods Validation Package


The methods validation package will usually include information copied fro


m pertinent sections of the application. To aid the review chemist, these copie


s should retain the original pagination of the application sections. For ANDA a


nd NDA products, the archival copy and extra copies of the methods validation p


ackages should be submitted with the application. For ANDAs and related supplem


ental applications, one archival copy and two extra copies of the methods valid


ation package should be submitted. For NDAs and related supplemental applicatio


ns, one archival copy and three extra copies should be submitted. For BLAs and


PLAs, a separate methods validation package need not be submitted. Information


similar to that specified here should be included in the BLA or PLA submission.


X




分析方法验证资料:内容和数据处理



FDA


实验室的分析以论证说明某一分析方法是能被重现的。


在 这个过程中将会需要分析


方法验证资料


(



X.A)


和样品


(



X.B)




A


.分析方法验证资料



分析方法验证资料通常会包括申请中的相关章节。为了便于评审化学家进行评审,这

< br>些资料应当要和其在原来申请中一样,包括内容和形式


(archival co py)


和其它副本。对于


仿制药申请和其相关的补充申请,需要 提交一份分析方法验证资料的存档副本


(archival c


opy)


和另外两份副本。


对于新药申请及其相关补充申请,< /p>


需要提交一份分析方法验证资料的


存档副本


(archival copy)


和另外三份副本。对于


BL A



PLA


,则不需要单独递交分析方 法


验证资料。类似的资料应当摆在


BLA



PLA


申请中。



The methods validation package should include:


1. Tabular List of All Samples to Be Submitted


The list should include the lot number, identity (with chemical name and s


tructure



-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-



本文更新与2021-02-10 23:54,由作者提供,不代表本网站立场,转载请注明出处:https://www.bjmy2z.cn/gaokao/632637.html

美国FDA分析方法验证指南中英文对照的相关文章