-
北京大学博士研究生英语水平考试(
PKU-
GATE
)
2015
年
12
月
< br>27
日
说明:考试总共
< br>180
分钟,试题题型包括五大题型,主要是常规性
题目
和新题型,常规题目包括听力、阅读理解,新题型有材料听写、
比较写作;外文书籍阅读
与写作;转译。
试题共有试题册和答题卡组成,还会发下自己
的条形码(不愧为帝
国最高学府,科研开发制作技术高端大气上档次!)
第一大题:听力(分值
2
0%
)
记得是三段材料(或两段),
前两段材料是选择题,下面给出
3-4
个问题,供选择。
某不才听的材料不够准确,第一段材料大约是讨论美国楼市关键词<
/p>
有
zombie
house
、
us hosing market
。坚持使用美国等国外原汁原
味的材料,勇气可嘉,与从小到大听
Chinglish
的
某不习惯,但
是趣味性强。
还有一题是听力默写,材料中空出了
十个空,每个空去掉不止一个
词汇,让你填。听力材料大约长
8
00-1000
个词(
a4
纸的基本上
都
是这个材料)。这段材料关于智能医学的似乎,关键词是
au
togenic training
。
听力播放的时间:
14
点
-14
p>
点
25
分。
p>
朗读人员:一男一女,女的是
Chinese
、男的是
foreigner
(似乎),
地道的美式发音。
第二大题:阅读理解(分值
40%
)。共四篇阅读材料,每一篇阅读
下有五个
题目,和高考、硕考没大区别,但是材料明显要长,每篇
材料大约有
1000-1200
个单词,生词量也大,平均每
1-2<
/p>
句就有个
生词。每篇的题目中有单词理解、有细节理解、有
main idea
等。
Passage one
:似乎是关
于伦理学的学术论文,题目的中关键词和
生词有:
turn
the other cheek
、
ethical
precept
、
moral urge
、
morality
、
moral
precepts
、
give without
thought of reward
、
altruistic
、
ironically
、
selfish agendas
、
kin
p>
、等,经过多方
搜索没有搜集到原文出处。似乎是这篇论文:《
p>
Morality as the
substructure
of social justice: religion in
education as a case in
point
》,(
South African
Journal of
Education Copyright
?
2011 EASA Vol 31:394-406<
/p>
)(百度文
库能找到)
Passage
two
:关于美国的
public policies
,某一位经济学在媒体
上大放厥词,然后向观众道歉的新闻报道,最后说
明这些都无关紧
要,因为米国人民并不看电视、看新闻(
O(<
/p>
∩
_
∩
)O~<
/p>
玩笑),可能
是说美国人民并不是太关注新闻媒体,多数政治冷漠
。关键词和生
词有:
an Gruber
(麻省理工学院的经济学家乔纳森
?
格
鲁伯
(
参与起草奥巴马医改方案,并发表了讲话视频
。
)、
House
committee on oversight and Government
reform
、
Affordable
care Act
(
ACA
)、
linguistic
、
congressional Budge office
hurts
their own pocketbooks
、
bread
and circus games
——
(
Juvenal
:尤维纳利斯,又译朱文纳尔)、
prof
usely
、
warrant
、
Third Reich death
——
p
arels
。不才没找到原文。
参考
背景文章:
据美国《赫芬顿邮报》
11
月
12
日报道,近日,美国福克新
闻频
道主持人、时事评论员梅金·凯利
(Megyn Kelly)
就奥巴马总统推进的医改与来访嘉
宾进行辩论,痛批奥巴马医改是骗局。
据了解,前不久,麻省理工学院的经济学家乔纳森·格鲁伯
< br>(Jonathan Gruber)
参与
起草奥巴马医
改方案,并发表了讲话视频。针对该视频,凯利与民主党战略家、民意
测验专家伯纳德·
惠特曼
(Bernard
Whitman)
在节目中展开辩论,双方各执一词。
凯利称,美国选民的愚蠢使得奥巴马医改方案在
2010
年顺利通过。惠特曼则表示,
平价医疗法已经奏效,群众也从中受益。对于惠
特曼的说法,凯利难掩愤怒,连呼
“真的吗?群众们真的知道吗?你觉得观众能够相信吗
?”
凯利的质疑与争论贯穿节目始终,他批评道:“平价医改
是一个骗局,政府欺骗
了我们!”(
/world/2014-
11/19/c_
)
Jonathan Gruber Apologizes For 'Glib'
And 'Insulting'
Comments About
Obamacare
文章地址:
/2014/12/09/jonathan-
gruber-obamacare-
hearing_n_
WASHINGTON -- Economist Jonathan Gruber
testified before the House
Oversight
Committee Tuesday morning, where he apologized for
saying that the
Massachusetts Institute of
Technology professor also denied the notion that
he was
the
process behind health care
reform,
an expert on politics and my
tone implied that I was, which is wrong. In other
cases
I simply made insulting and mean
comments that are totally uncalled for in any
situation. I sincerely apologize both
for conjecturing with a tone of expertise and for
doing so in such a disparaging
fashion.
“I did not draft Gov. [Mitt]
Romney’s health care plan, and I was not
th
e
'architect' of President
Obama's health care plan,
consulting
work on both the Massachusetts health care law and
the Affordable Care
Act.
Republicans have seized on recently
unearthed videos of Gruber discussing that
work disparagingly, which they've
attempted to use to delegitimize the law. The
economist, who was consulted by the
White House on the bill in 2009, said in 2013
that the
inability of the
American voter to understand the
content
of the Affordable
Care Act had helped the bill pass. The
Obama administration and numerous
Democrats involved in the law's
drafting have awkwardly tried to distance
themselves from the economist.
House Oversight Committee Chair Darrell
Issa (R-Calif.) said Gruber's comments
Cummings (D-Md.), the
ranking member on the committee, also chastised
Gruber for
“public relations
gift” in their campaign to repeal the
law.
At one point in the
hearing, Issa asked Gruber,
In one video,
Gruber said subsidies to help low-income Americans
buy insurance
are
limited to
state-established exchanges
. Federally
run Obamacare exchanges
currently
operate in more than 30 states. The video of
Gruber's remarks has been
used to
bolster a
serious legal
challenge
to the law that will be heard
before the
Supreme Court.
But Gruber claimed he was taken out of
context.
government, for
whatever reason, might not create a federal
exchange,
Tuesday.
states
could guarantee that their citizens would receive
tax credits would be to set
up their
own exchanges.
The controversy has also
impacted Gruber personally. Vermont officials said
last
month after the videos were
released that they would
stop paying
him
for consulting
on the
state health care system.
Marilyn B.
Tavenner, the administrator of the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid
Services, also
faced questions at the hearing, including over the
way the
administration
inflated Obamacare enrollment
numbers
by including dental plans in
its accounting.
deceive the American people
and I believe the error was
inadvertent.
Controversial
MIT
economist
JonathanGruber
reportedly
played key role in ObamaCare law
Published June 22, 2015
FoxN
ews
.
com
ObamaCare law
Published June
22, 2015
FoxNews
.
com
Facebook
0
Twitter
0
livefyre
Email
Print
MIT
economist Jonathan Gruber, who claimed the authors
of
ObamaCare took advantage of what he
called the
American
voter,
than previously acknowledged,
according to a published report.
The
Wall Street Journal
, citing
20,000 pages of emails sent
by Gruber
between January 2009 and March 2010, reported
Sunday
that Gruber was frequently
consulted by staffers and advisers for
both the White House and the Department
of Health and Human
Services (HHS)
about the Affordable Care Act. Among the topics
that Gruber discusses in the emails are
media interviews,
consultations with
lawmakers, and even how to publicly describe his
role.
The emails were
released as the Supreme Court prepares to rule
on the legality of federal health
insurance exchange subsidies.
The
Journal reports that the officials Gruber
contacted by e-
mail included Peter
Orszag, then the director of the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB); Jason
Furman, an economic
adviser to the
president; and Ezekiel Emanuel, then a special
adviser
for health policy at OMB.
tighter than they
admitted,
of the House oversight
committee, told the Journal.
doubt he was a much more
integral part of this than they’ve
said.
He
put up this facade
he was an arm’s length away.
It was a
farce.
used economic modeler
for administrations and state governments
run by both
parties
—
both before and
after the Affordable Care Act
was
passed,
a statement.
Gruber
became the center of a political storm in November
2014, when a
video
surfaced
of him taking part in a 2013
panel
discussion about ObamaCare. At
one point, Gruber said the Obama
administration wrote the bill
Congressional Budget Office] did not
score the mandate as taxes. If
CBO
scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies ...
Lack of
transparency is a huge
political advantage. And basically, call it the
stupidity of the American voter or
whatever, but basically that was
really, really critical for the thing
to pass.
At the time of the controversy,
President Obama referred
to Gruber as
However, the Journal reports that
Gruber's emails appear to
reference at
least one meeting with Obama. Furthermore, one
email
from Jeanne Lambrew, a top Obama
health adviser,
thanks Gruber for
moment
Fox News
previously reported
that HHS retained
Gruber in
March 2009 on a $$95,000
contract to produce
memoranda on the
estimated changes in health insurance coverage
and associated costs and impacts to the
government under alternative
specifications of health system
reform.
three months later saw Gruber
receive an additional $$297,600.
Gruber
later apologized
for his comments in a
December 2014
hearing before the House
Oversight Committee, calling the remarks
Passage
three
:文章出自《
The
New Yorker
》
(
纽约客)
The Comeback
Conundrum
The Financial Page
SEPTEMBER 21, 2015 ISSUE
BY
JAMES
SUROWIECKI
文章地址:
H
TTP:///MAGAZINE/2015/09/21/THE-
COMEBACK
-CONUNDRUM