关键词不能为空

当前您在: 主页 > 英语 >

(初创版)北京大学博士研究生英语水平考试试题

作者:高考题库网
来源:https://www.bjmy2z.cn/gaokao
2021-02-10 03:06
tags:

-

2021年2月10日发(作者:军事政变)


北京大学博士研究生英语水平考试(


PKU- GATE





2015



12


< br>27







说明:考试总共

< br>180


分钟,试题题型包括五大题型,主要是常规性


题目 和新题型,常规题目包括听力、阅读理解,新题型有材料听写、


比较写作;外文书籍阅读 与写作;转译。



试题共有试题册和答题卡组成,还会发下自己 的条形码(不愧为帝


国最高学府,科研开发制作技术高端大气上档次!)




第一大题:听力(分值


2 0%




记得是三段材料(或两段), 前两段材料是选择题,下面给出


3-4


个问题,供选择。



某不才听的材料不够准确,第一段材料大约是讨论美国楼市关键词< /p>



zombie house



us hosing market


。坚持使用美国等国外原汁原


味的材料,勇气可嘉,与从小到大听

< p>
Chinglish



某不习惯,但


是趣味性强。



还有一题是听力默写,材料中空出了 十个空,每个空去掉不止一个


词汇,让你填。听力材料大约长


8 00-1000


个词(


a4


纸的基本上 都


是这个材料)。这段材料关于智能医学的似乎,关键词是


au togenic training




听力播放的时间:


14



-14



25


分。



朗读人员:一男一女,女的是


Chinese


、男的是


foreigner


(似乎),

地道的美式发音。



第二大题:阅读理解(分值

< p>
40%


)。共四篇阅读材料,每一篇阅读


下有五个 题目,和高考、硕考没大区别,但是材料明显要长,每篇


材料大约有

1000-1200


个单词,生词量也大,平均每


1-2< /p>


句就有个


生词。每篇的题目中有单词理解、有细节理解、有


main idea


等。



Passage one



:似乎是关 于伦理学的学术论文,题目的中关键词和


生词有:


turn the other cheek



ethical precept



moral urge



morality



moral precepts



give without thought of reward



altruistic



ironically


< p>
selfish agendas



kin


、等,经过多方


搜索没有搜集到原文出处。似乎是这篇论文:《


Morality as the


substructure of social justice: religion in


education as a case in point


》,(


South African Journal of


Education Copyright


?


2011 EASA Vol 31:394-406< /p>


)(百度文


库能找到)



Passage two


:关于美国的


public policies


,某一位经济学在媒体


上大放厥词,然后向观众道歉的新闻报道,最后说 明这些都无关紧


要,因为米国人民并不看电视、看新闻(


O(< /p>



_



)O~< /p>


玩笑),可能


是说美国人民并不是太关注新闻媒体,多数政治冷漠 。关键词和生


词有:


an Gruber


(麻省理工学院的经济学家乔纳森


?



鲁伯


(


参与起草奥巴马医改方案,并发表了讲话视频



)、


House


committee on oversight and Government reform



Affordable


care Act



ACA

< p>
)、


linguistic


congressional Budge office


hurts their own pocketbooks



bread and circus games


——


Juvenal


:尤维纳利斯,又译朱文纳尔)、


prof usely



warrant



Third Reich death


——


p arels


。不才没找到原文。



参考 背景文章:


据美国《赫芬顿邮报》


11



12


日报道,近日,美国福克新


闻频 道主持人、时事评论员梅金·凯利


(Megyn Kelly)


就奥巴马总统推进的医改与来访嘉


宾进行辩论,痛批奥巴马医改是骗局。



据了解,前不久,麻省理工学院的经济学家乔纳森·格鲁伯

< br>(Jonathan Gruber)


参与


起草奥巴马医 改方案,并发表了讲话视频。针对该视频,凯利与民主党战略家、民意


测验专家伯纳德· 惠特曼


(Bernard Whitman)


在节目中展开辩论,双方各执一词。



凯利称,美国选民的愚蠢使得奥巴马医改方案在


2010


年顺利通过。惠特曼则表示,


平价医疗法已经奏效,群众也从中受益。对于惠 特曼的说法,凯利难掩愤怒,连呼


“真的吗?群众们真的知道吗?你觉得观众能够相信吗 ?”



凯利的质疑与争论贯穿节目始终,他批评道:“平价医改 是一个骗局,政府欺骗


了我们!”(


/world/2014- 11/19/c_




Jonathan Gruber Apologizes For 'Glib' And 'Insulting'


Comments About Obamacare


文章地址:


/2014/12/09/jonathan- gruber-obamacare-


hearing_n_


WASHINGTON -- Economist Jonathan Gruber testified before the House


Oversight Committee Tuesday morning, where he apologized for saying that the



Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor also denied the notion that he was


the



process behind health care reform,


an expert on politics and my tone implied that I was, which is wrong. In other cases


I simply made insulting and mean comments that are totally uncalled for in any


situation. I sincerely apologize both for conjecturing with a tone of expertise and for


doing so in such a disparaging fashion.


“I did not draft Gov. [Mitt] Romney’s health care plan, and I was not th


e


'architect' of President Obama's health care plan,


consulting work on both the Massachusetts health care law and the Affordable Care


Act.


Republicans have seized on recently unearthed videos of Gruber discussing that


work disparagingly, which they've attempted to use to delegitimize the law. The


economist, who was consulted by the White House on the bill in 2009, said in 2013


that the


inability of the American voter to understand the content


of the Affordable


Care Act had helped the bill pass. The Obama administration and numerous


Democrats involved in the law's drafting have awkwardly tried to distance


themselves from the economist.


House Oversight Committee Chair Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said Gruber's comments



Cummings (D-Md.), the ranking member on the committee, also chastised Gruber for



“public relations gift” in their campaign to repeal the law.



At one point in the hearing, Issa asked Gruber,




In one video, Gruber said subsidies to help low-income Americans buy insurance


are


limited to state-established exchanges


. Federally run Obamacare exchanges


currently operate in more than 30 states. The video of Gruber's remarks has been


used to bolster a


serious legal challenge


to the law that will be heard before the


Supreme Court.


But Gruber claimed he was taken out of context.



government, for whatever reason, might not create a federal exchange,


Tuesday.


states could guarantee that their citizens would receive tax credits would be to set


up their own exchanges.


The controversy has also impacted Gruber personally. Vermont officials said last


month after the videos were released that they would


stop paying him


for consulting


on the state health care system.


Marilyn B. Tavenner, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid


Services, also faced questions at the hearing, including over the way the


administration


inflated Obamacare enrollment numbers


by including dental plans in


its accounting.



deceive the American people and I believe the error was inadvertent.


Controversial


MIT


economist


JonathanGruber


reportedly


played key role in ObamaCare law


Published June 22, 2015


FoxN ews


.


com



ObamaCare law


Published June 22, 2015


FoxNews


.


com



Facebook


0



Twitter


0



livefyre



Email



Print



MIT economist Jonathan Gruber, who claimed the authors of


ObamaCare took advantage of what he called the



American voter,


than previously acknowledged, according to a published report.


The


Wall Street Journal


, citing 20,000 pages of emails sent


by Gruber between January 2009 and March 2010, reported Sunday


that Gruber was frequently consulted by staffers and advisers for


both the White House and the Department of Health and Human


Services (HHS) about the Affordable Care Act. Among the topics


that Gruber discusses in the emails are media interviews,


consultations with lawmakers, and even how to publicly describe his


role.


The emails were released as the Supreme Court prepares to rule


on the legality of federal health insurance exchange subsidies.


The Journal reports that the officials Gruber contacted by e-


mail included Peter Orszag, then the director of the Office of


Management and Budget (OMB); Jason Furman, an economic


adviser to the president; and Ezekiel Emanuel, then a special adviser


for health policy at OMB.



tighter than they admitted,


of the House oversight committee, told the Journal.



doubt he was a much more integral part of this than they’ve said.


He


put up this facade he was an arm’s length away.


It was a farce.



used economic modeler for administrations and state governments


run by both parties



both before and after the Affordable Care Act


was passed,


a statement.


Gruber became the center of a political storm in November


2014, when a


video surfaced


of him taking part in a 2013 panel


discussion about ObamaCare. At one point, Gruber said the Obama


administration wrote the bill


Congressional Budget Office] did not score the mandate as taxes. If


CBO scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies ... Lack of


transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the


stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was


really, really critical for the thing to pass.


At the time of the controversy, President Obama referred


to Gruber as


However, the Journal reports that Gruber's emails appear to


reference at least one meeting with Obama. Furthermore, one email


from Jeanne Lambrew, a top Obama health adviser,


thanks Gruber for


moment



Fox News previously reported


that HHS retained Gruber in


March 2009 on a $$95,000 contract to produce


memoranda on the estimated changes in health insurance coverage


and associated costs and impacts to the government under alternative


specifications of health system reform.


three months later saw Gruber receive an additional $$297,600.


Gruber later apologized


for his comments in a December 2014


hearing before the House Oversight Committee, calling the remarks




Passage three


:文章出自《


The



New Yorker



< p>
纽约客)



The Comeback Conundrum


The Financial Page



SEPTEMBER 21, 2015 ISSUE



BY


JAMES SUROWIECKI



文章地址:


H TTP:///MAGAZINE/2015/09/21/THE-


COMEBACK -CONUNDRUM




-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-



本文更新与2021-02-10 03:06,由作者提供,不代表本网站立场,转载请注明出处:https://www.bjmy2z.cn/gaokao/625920.html

(初创版)北京大学博士研究生英语水平考试试题的相关文章

(初创版)北京大学博士研究生英语水平考试试题随机文章