雅思7分作文集

Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing

international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with

this opinion?

The World Cup football match and the Olympics are held worldwide with great national support and expectations. As a fan of

those competitions, I agree with the idea that sporting events can be necessary for international relations and national unity. In

this essay, I will think about the effects of these popular sporting events.

First of all, the World Cup, Olympics and other international games work for easing tensions among different nations. For example,

South and North Korea have football games regularly which give two nations a chance to understand each other deeply. In the

mid 1990s, a hundreds of North Korean supporters came to South Korea with the footballers and they were very excited during

the sporting events. Even if it sounds ridiculous, many South Koreans were quite surprised at that moment when North Koreans

shouted and cried during the match. We all realized that they were very normal sports fans even though they were occasionally

very secretive. Through the sports, two divided nations could reduce their political and ideological tensions and could feel the

patriotic unity.

On the other hand, some sports matches can make international relations worse. For instance, football or baseball games

between Korea and Japan are always big matches in two countries where full of tensions overflow. Sometimes, after the matches,

the two rivals blame each other and their patriotic emotions explode in an aggressive way. Even much worse scenario is that the

troubles caused by losing games affect the players directly. As far as I know, a couple of Korean players in Japan are suffered

from invisible discrimination after the match between two countries.

In conclusion, I think that international sporting occasions can be one of the good ways to ease tensions or to release patriotism

safely. However, I believe that games can not be the fundamental ways for the sound patriotism or peaceful international

relations

Some people say that the Internet is making the world smaller by bringing people together. To what extent do you

agree that the internet is making it easier for people to communicate with one another?

In today?s world _ due to the advancement of technology new inventions are coming into existence. It is a certainty

that ?necessity is a mother of invention?. _ Internet is just like a wonder box, which contains every type of information. Besides

it has also proved as a very important tool to connect people with each other.

In today?s modernized era nobody has sufficient time to write letters to their loved ones. Moreover it also takes longer to send

or receive any information. But through an internet it is an easiest way to send massages to our loved ones. Either it can be in

the form of an e- mail or by text messages from internet to cell phones. We can send and receive messages straight way.

In other hand today?s youth generation mostly prefer to do chatting on () internet. Through this chatting we can write messages

and straight way can get their reply. Moreover voice chatting is going to be very popular day-by-day.

As it is a reality that advantages and disadvantages are like both sides of a coin, which usually runs parallel. So like other things

internet also have some downsides, like people are facing some health problems for example, poor eye-sight, back ache, migrane.

Today?s teenagers usually prefer to spend their time on internet rather than to participating in other physical activities, so that?s

why they are going to be weaker in their physical health.

To conclude, I would like to say that internet is one of the most modernized and most successful tools, not only for communication,

even to get most relevant information regarding every field in a very short period of time.

This is a great essay, well done! Remember ?the Internet? is a proper noun, currently, there is only one. Pay

attention to your punctuation

–

many commas are missing after linking words. Otherwise, the essay is well argued

and set out.

With all the troubles in the world today, money spent on space exploration is a complete waste. The money could be

better spent on other things.

Nations after nations, everyday, every year, celebrate their achievements in space exploration . However, it is now time to

question how meaningful these blasts are. This essay aims to explain why it is questionable.

First, until all urgent and important matters in this globe have been solved, money bumped on space exploration is of no meaning.

It is not a common sense at all to invest million dollars researching and producing foods for astronauts (for space exploration

purpose), while everyday thousands of people are starving. Furthermore, the discovery of outer space only serves a minor group

of people if the majority are even not well-educated. Those in rural areas or third-world nations do no even know how to prevent

common threatening diseases like AIDS and lung cancer.

Then, some may argue that the purpose of space exploration are to discover new lands, new energy resources or to deter

potential threat to globe. Nevertheless, is it effective to do so while other alternatives are available? Lands on earth are no yet

effectively used. New energy resources (e.g. solar and nuclear energy) have not yet been widely-used. Threats of plagues have

not yet been deterred. All these ?not- yets? need money. That is why costly space discovery programs are a waste of money.

In the nutshell, people should only invest in space exploration providing that () early-mentioned urgent and important matters

have been solved. Also, purposes of space exploration campaign should be studied carefully and other alternatives should be

considered before money is wasted.

In some countries children have very strict rules of behaviour, in other countries they are allowed to do almost

anything they want. To what extent should children have to follow rules?

Freedom plays a mandatory role in everybody?s life. We can see in today?s modernized era nobody likes to get some restrictions

upon them, whether it would be a child or an adult. Some people think that there should have some strict rules of behaviour for

children, but I disagree with this statement.

Wherever it is a reality that sometimes more restrictions can cause more frustration in children, which leads to many other

mental diseases as well. Morever they can be, behave like a stubborn. Sometimes they feel themselves under pressure, which

can be a main reason for their poor performance in their field. In some cases children would be crazier to do these things from

where we?ll try to keep them away.

In other words _ we have to look for other aspects as well, like if we usually ignore our children?s bad habits, then they can?t be

good human beings in their future life. Moreover_ if we never draw attention upon the children?s main activities then they may

be acquiring bad company. They can know regarding the value of respect for their elders. They can know the importance of

relationships. They can know regarding their cultural values as well.

In a nutshell, I would like to say that children should be teach regarding the value of their customs, rituals and respect towards

their elders for their future life, but most of the extra restriction should be being avoided. It would be better to make them good

human beings in their coming future.

A good essay, set out well. Some sentences are too short and could be combined together to create more complex

structure. There are also some repetitions of the same words, that should be avoided. Overall, nicely done.

Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food

and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens

themselves?

I think wealthy nations should be required to share their wealth among poorer nations. But their helping should only stop at

providing such things as food and education because of three following reasons.

Firstly, citizens of both wealthy nations and poorer nations are human beings. Therefore, we can not look at, hear of, and talk

about people who lack food, education, etc… without compassion and sympathy. Sharing wealth among poorer nations is not only

a good deed but also a task itself.

Secondly, many nations in Africa and Asia are very very poor. Famine, diseases, crime and illiteracy are killing their citizens. In

the contrary, a lot of nations in Europe and America are too rich. If there are no actions taken, this inequality will increase

dramatically. Poor countries will become more and more poorer while rich countries will become more and more richer. As a result,

poorest countries will be slaves of richest countries. So, sharing wealth is an useful way to prevent people from that bad future.

Thirdly, although sharing wealth among poorer nations is very necessary but this helping should only stop at providing such

things as food, medicine and education. Or else, poor nations may depend on aid. They won’t have enthusiasm to build their

countries

by themselves. Moreover, rich nations can take advantage of sharing wealth to interfere deeply in poor nations’

governments. This can’t be considered humane action and should be prevented.

In my opinion, sharing wealth among poorer nations has both bad side and good side. What we have to do is avoiding its bad side

and practicing its good side.

This is an excellent essay, your arguments are convincing and very well presented. There are only a few minor

mistakes, read and consider the comments. Very well done

Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food

and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens

themselves?

I think wealthy nations should be required to share their wealth among poorer nations. But their helping should only stop at

providing such things as food and education because of three following reasons.

Firstly, citizens of both wealthy nations and poorer nations are human beings. Therefore, we can not look at, hear of, and talk

about people who lack food, education, etc… without compassion and sympathy. Sharing wealth among poorer nations is not only

a good deed but also a task itself.

Secondly, many nations in Africa and Asia are very very poor. Famine, diseases, crime and illiteracy are killing their citizens. In

the contrary, a lot of nations in Europe and America are too rich. If there are no actions taken, this inequality will increase

dramatically. Poor countries will become more and more poorer while rich countries will become more and more richer. As a result,

poorest countries will be slaves of richest countries. So, sharing wealth is an useful way to prevent people from that bad future.

Thirdly, although sharing wealth among poorer nations is very necessary but this helping should only stop at providing such

things as food, medicine and education. Or else, poor nations may depend on aid. They won’t have enthusiasm to build their

countries by themselves. Moreover, ric

h nations can take advantage of sharing wealth to interfere deeply in poor nations’

governments. This can’t be considered humane action and should be prevented.

In my opinion, sharing wealth among poorer nations has both bad side and good side. What we have to do is avoiding its bad side

and practicing its good side.

This is an excellent essay, your arguments are convincing and very well presented. There are only a few minor

mistakes, read and consider the comments. Very well done

Should the same laws which prohibit the sale and consumption of heroin be applied to tobacco?

Recently, a hostile debate arouse when a few well reputable health organizations suggested the application of a similar act of

heroin selling and usage prohibition _. In this assay, I will analyse why the adoption of such a law could be a breakthrough in our

youngsters safety, according to my vision.

Firstly , tobacco does not differ much from heroin when it comes to the later addictive effect. Nicotin , the active ingredient in

tobac

co, exerts its effect by acting directly on smoker’s brain cells. Numerous experiments carried out by scientist on animals,

specailly rats, proved that this toxic chemical does lead by time to dependency, just similar to the effect experienced with herion.

Secondly, restriction on cigerattes selling will surely show an instant decline in tobacco smoking. ” Having an easy access t

o

cigarettes puts a tremendous pressure, specially on teenagers,to resist such a temptation” , head of Pschycology

depar

tment at Alexandria Medical college , states firmly. “Giving the new generation the sense that the severity of smoking is

equivilant to other lethal drugs usage woulod be a life saving step,they will thank us for() as they get older.” he continues

.

To reca

pitulate, applying of a futuristic law as the suggested one will definetly have a positive impact ,not only on young people’s

health but on our society as a whole.

Well done! This is a very good essay but take care of your spelling.

Advertising is all around us, it is an unavoidable part of everyone?s life. Some people say that advertising is a

positive part of our lives while others say it is negative. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Give reasons

for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at

least 250 words.

Many people wonder about advertisement. Some people think that it has negative impact in our life. However, others said it has

been playing as positive effect in this world. This is not an easy essay to be answered, but I will look at this issue.

Why advertisement has been playing a negative effect in our life ? Of Course for several reasons: firstly, it motivates the

psychological point in every body especially women. They

will run to buy this advertised product especially if it’s from cosmetic

roof, just to show their beauty to men, which will leads to more offender and raped cases. Secondly, you can sit comfortably with

your family and suddenly the telephone is ringing, nothing important, rather than one of the companies try to convince you to buy

one of their products. It is a real intrusive example of advertisement. Lastly, sometimes you do not have the financial ability to

buy something, but with these new methods of advertisement, you will run to buy it, which will affect your budget.

On the other hand, there are some good things. Such as, it compares the prices of the most of companies which benefit the

consumer. Beside, it really opens our vision to see more products which we do not knowit unless TV and Radio show these things.

In addition to, it cut down our daily routine to see new faces and know more language with daily update for their method of

advertisement.

In conclusion, as we can see there are many aspects to this essay. I feel that there is no benefit at all from advertisement, it plays

on minds of people buy more thing that they do not need it at all.

Your arguments are good and the paragraphs are well set out but you must be careful making definitive statements,

eg ?it motivates the psychological point in every body?, how do you know all advertisements motivate me, for

instance?

Overall, a very good essay, well done.

We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in business, hospitals, crime detection and

even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or

should we be more suspicious of their benefits?

In the last two decades cybernetics have experienced a major breakthrough .This led to the utilization of computers at nearly all

parts of our daily life, from personal computers to complicated surgery performing. Surely the uptake of this technology

facilitates a lot of difficult tasks but is this excessive dependance ripping the warmth of our lives? In this essay, I will outline how

the availability of computers affects our lives.

Most of the daily tasks an individual experiences are time and effort consuming. These two fundemental qualities could be

tremendously saved by the use of computers. The average period required to prepare a decent meal for a middle-class family is

around an hour to and hour and a half when using traditional methods. This time could be literally reduced to half if computerized

decivesare used instead. Moreover, a busy businessman is enabled to easily close a profitable deal just with a touch on this highly

programmed laptop while enjoying his family vacation and not having to exert an extra effort of traveling long distances just to

sign a deal.

On the other hand, new generations are growing remarkably dependent on these modern utilities, which make them handicapped

when it comes to preparing a cup of tea. Inaddition, psychologists suggest that one of the main reasons for sucidal rate increase

is recent electric inventions. This is due to that humans by nature stay emotionally healthy through socializing, but due to the

importance of modern technology to maintain a financially satisfying standard of life they gradually isulate themselves. As time

passes by each of these individuals gets stuck in a vicious circle of loneliness that eventually leads to suicidal attempts specially

among youngsters.

In conclusion, similar to every other invention computers has its benefits and drawbacks, I personally think it all depends upon

how we use the given tools . Moderation is the key here to keep the balance and allow us to live in harmony.

Good essay, nice vocabulary, a little too long (340 words instead of 250), a few grammatical mistakes. The topic is

not fully covered (what about the “things will they be used for in future” part?).