-
Brown V. Broad of Education of Topeka
Kansas(1954)
Plessy V. Ferguson (1896) became the
judicial cornerstone of racial discrimination
throughout the
United States. The case
established the
separate-but-equal
doctrine
. This doctrine was used to
Justify segregation in many areas of
American life for the next fifty
years.
A little more than a
decade
later,
in
1909,
the
National
Association
for
the
Advancement
of
Colored
People
(NAACP) was found to take up the battle
against the racial segregation and discriminations
In the
1930s,
its
legal
arm
developed
a
careful,
long-term
strategy
to
demolish
the
separate-but-equal
doctrine.
Rather than a head-on assault of Jim
Crow(
黑人)
, which the Court
was likely to rebuff,
NAACB lawyers
would chip away at segregation in the area of
education! showing in case after
case
that
separate
facilities
could
not
possibly
bl
equal.
A
successful
attack
on
the
separate-
but-equal
doctrine
begat!
with
a
series
of
lawsuits
in
the
1930s
to
admit
African
Americans to! state professional
schools. Beginning in the late 1930s, the Supreme
Court began to
move
away
from
the
separate-but-equal
doctrine.
B
1950,
the
Supreme
Court
had
ruled
that
African
Americans
who
were
admitted
to
a
state
university
could
not
be
assigned
to
separate
sections of classrooms, libraries, and
cafeterias. The Court was taking the position that
segregated
facilities
for
black
students
at
universities
violate
the
equal
protection
clause.
The
major
breakthrough, however did not come
until 1 95 1. The case involved an African
American who
lived in Topeka, Kansas.
In 1951' Oliver Brown
decided that his eight-year-old daughter,
it?
da Carol Brown, should
not have to go to an all-nonwhite elementary-
school twenty-one blocks away from her
home, when there was a white
school only seven blocks away. So Linda
Brown's parents had sued the school hoard of
Topeka,
Kansas, for not allowing their
daughter to at lend an all-white school, miles
closer to their home
than
the
separated
elementary
school
she
was
assigned
to
attend.
The
National
Association
for
the
Advancement
of
Colored People
(NAACP).
formed
in
1909,
decided
to
help
Oliver
Brown.
Thurgood
Marshall
,
the
NAACP's
leading
lawyer,
wanted
the
Court
to
strike
down
state
laws
that
required
racial
segregation
in
public
schools.
He
argued
that
African
American
children
were
not
getting
the
same
quality
of
education
as
white
children.
In
his
argument,
Marshall appealed to meet the Plessy doctrine head
on and declare that it is erroneous.
stands
mirrored
today
as
a
legal
aberration,
the
faulty
conception
of
an
era
dominated
by
provincialism, by intense emotionalism
in race relations... and by the preaching of a
doctrine of
racial
superiority
that
contradicted
the
basic
concept
upon
which
our
society
was
founded.
Twentieth century
American, fighting racism at home and abroad, had
rejected the race views of
Plessy
V.
Ferguson
because
we
have
come
to
the
realization
that
such
views
obviously
tend
to
preserve
not
the
strength
but
the
weakness
of
our
heritage.
By
the
time
Marshall
made
this
argument, black intellectuals,
scholars, and activists
and
their progressive white allies had closed
ranks in support of integration. To
suggest alternatives as the goal for African
Americans was to
find oneself swimming
against the current.
However, the NAACP campaign finally
made great
achievements in Brown V
Broad of Education of Topeka, probably the most
significant Supreme
Court decision of
the twentieth century. The results were monumental
in their impact on American
society.
During
late
1953
and
early
1954,
Chief
Justice
Earl
Warren
brought
the
court
in
support
of
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
上一篇:新标准大学英语综合教程4课文翻译
下一篇:Public_Finance