-
霍佳漩
12835008
From Linguistic Competence
to
Communicative Competence
Introduction
Linguistic
competence
and
communicative
competence
are
closely
related
and
distinguished
with
each
other.
Communicative
competence
contains
the
linguistic
competence, and
linguistic competence is the basis of the
communicative competence.
The
communicative
competence
without
linguistic
competence
iscompletelyimpossibleinpractice; the
linguistic competence is a pile of rules without
practical application. Thus the primary
goal of the foreign language teaching should
be
cultivating
the
linguistic
competence
in
order
to
achieve
the
ultimate
goal
of
cultivating the
communicative competence of the language learners.
Linguistic Competence
Linguistic competence, which is put
forward by Noam Chomsky (1928), refers
to the knowledge of a language system.
It is a language user’s underlying knowledge
about
the
system
of
rules.
To
acquire
this
competence
is
to
obtain
the
ability
of
recognizing
and
producing
acceptable
grammatical
sentences
in
language.
But
this
competence
is
an
idealization,
it
is
the
knowledge
of
the
“ideal
speaker
-listener
operating
with
a
completely
homogeneous
speech
community,
who
knows
its
language
perfectly
and
is
unaffected
by
such
grammatical
irrelevant
conditions
as
memory limitations, distractions, shift
of attention and interest and errors in applying
his knowledge of the language in actual
performance” (
Hymes, 1972). It is
necessary
but
not
far
from
sufficient
for
a
language
user
to
communicate
with
others
successfully in a
speech community.
Communicative
competence
It
is
an
obvious
fact
that
any
foreign
language
teaching/learning
program
is
aimed
to make its learners competent enough to use the
target language for effective
the
early 70s, the term
“communicative
competence”
was
coined
by
Dell
Hymes
(1972),
a
sociolinguist
who
was
believed
that
the
linguistic
competence is too limited. Then the
communicative competence is “the aspect of our
1
霍佳漩
12835008
competence
that
enables
us
to
convey
and
interpret
messages
and
to
negotiate
meanings interpersonally with specific
context (Brown, 2002).” Michael Canale and
Merrill
Swain
(1980)
suggested
that
four
different
subcategories,
grammatical
competence,
discourse competence, sociolinguistic competence,
strategic competence,
make
up
the
construct
of
communicative
competence.
The
first
two
competences
reflect
the
use
of
linguistic
system
itself.
It
is
suggested
that
the
communicative
competence encompasses the linguistic
competence.
The
relationship between the two competences
The
communicative
competence
theory
suggests
that
a
good
mastery
of
grammar is far enough to make an
appropriate language use in a real social context,
and the language learners should not
only stay in the stage of linguistic competence,
but also need to struggle for the
development of communicative competence. A good
example
is
the
sentence
“Colorless
green
ideas
sleep
furiously.”
This
sentence
is
grammatically
possible,
and
idiomatically
feasible,
but
semantically
either
inappropriate or
absurd,
and practically
rarely, if
not
never, used in
a
real
language
interaction situation (Brumfit, 2000).
So
are
these
two
competences
incompatible?
Brumfit
gives
us
a
diagram
to
show the logical relationship between
the two competences.
Diagram 1:
CC:
communicative competence
LC: linguistic
competence
The
diagram
implies
that
some
areas
of
linguistic
competence
are
essentially
irrelevant to
the communicative, but in
general,
linguistic competence is
the
part of
the
communicative
competence.
Thus
we
can
know
that,
teaching
the
linguistic
competence
will
necessarily
leave
a
large
area
of
the
communicative
competence
untouched.
The
mastery
of
the
linguistic
competence
is
sure
to
enable
a
speaker
to
produce
grammatical
sentences,
but
can
not
sure
to
enable
the
speaker
to
have
the
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
上一篇:What is a bank
下一篇:大学英语四级阅读理解精读100篇