Government should spend more money in improving internet acc

Government should spend more money in improving internet access than public transportation.

(

骑墙派

)

开头段：

served as two essential tools to connect different people, internet and transportation

pave the major way for us to communicate in the modern society. At present, in accordance with

this role, a fairly controversial belief begins to put forth that government is supposed to put more

investment

to

bank

internet

access

than

that

of

public

transportation,

for

internet

wires

the

world closely and provides oceans of information for us. Nonetheless, a meticulous look helps us

to

find

out

the

fact

that

transportation

system

is

of

the

same

necessity

of

patronization

as

internet.

1.

Improving social internet access is a sine qua non of enhancing social economics.

Clear is that for most of merchants

，

internet plays an indispensable role in communicating

with

clients,

importing

products

and

getting

to

know

international

information.

If

the

government can put building more sophisticated and far-ranging internet access into practice,

those business elites have access to expanding their business ceaselessly

，

eventually pushing

the whole economic of the country forward

；

As for stock managers who are accustomed to

gluing their eyes on the computer screens and setting for whole days to record and calculate

data

，

insufficient and poor internet condition is a sword of Damocles. As a matter of fact,

merely several seconds

’

delay can appallingly cause millions of irreparable lose.

2.

Public transportation is of unsurpassed importance in maintaining social order.

It is not rare to see that a wholesome transportation network

，

including subway, bus, cars

and

airplane

give

people

access

to

smoothly

arrive

their

destinations

with

the

aim

to

accomplish sorts of tasks in various fields. On the contrary, the transportation system lacking

sufficient and proper emphasis from government may cause large-scale problems; As it did in

the recent train accident happened in Wenzhou, China, which aloofly bereaved hundreds of

lives and impair over one thousand people serious. If the local government had patronized

the

trains

’

construction

with

more

affluent

capital,

the

manufacturer

could

afford

more

advanced

material

and

fine

mechanism

to

censor

the

train

’

s

condition

more

effectively,

eventually avoid this tragedy befalling.

Scientists should be responsible for negative impact of their discoveries?

不应该：

1.

Requiring

scientists

to

undertake

the

responsibility

of

negative

impact

severely

impede

technological

enhancement

。

It

is

universally

acknowledged

that

there

exist

inevitably

and

inexorably unknown risks and failures on the way of pursuing scientific breakthrough. Only

when we judiciously learn from those negative impacts, rather than arrest, criticize and fire

talent

and

intellectual

scientists,

can

we

truly

harvest

the

unsurpassed

opportunity

to

progress and win more essential benefits. As it did in the case of Benjamin Franklin, one of

the

most

preeminent

scientist

around

the

world

who

made

a

great

contribution

to

the

application

of

electricity,

had

a

irreparable

mistake---lightening

electrocuted

his

dedicated

and talented assistant to death during the process of one experiment. Had Benjamin been

held accountable to this experimental accident and arrested by the police

，

and had to spent

his rest of life in prison, he might fail to gain more encouragement in the bereft sorrow so as