-
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一页一篇范
文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
It is
inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost
as technology develops. Technology and
traditional cultures are incompatible.
To what extent do you agree
or disagree with this view?
Some people
believe that technological developments lead to
the loss of traditional cultures. While
this may be true in the case of some
societies, others seem to be unaffected by
technology and
the modern world.
On the one hand, the advances in
technology that have driven industrialisation in
developed
countries have certainly
contributed to the disappearance of traditional
ways of life. For example,
in pre-
industrial Britain, generations of families grew
up in the same small village communities.
These communities had a strong sense of
identity, due to their shared customs and beliefs.
However, developments in transport,
communications and manufacturing led to the
dispersal of
families and village
communities as people moved to the cities in
search of work. Nowadays most
British
villages are inhabited by commuters, many of whom
do not know their closest neighbours.
On the other hand, in some parts of the
world traditional cultures still thrive. There are
tribes in the
Amazon Rainforest, for
example, that have been completely untouched by
the technological
developments of the
developed world. These tribal communities continue
to hunt and gather food
from the
forest, and traditional skills are passed on to
children by parents and elders. Other
traditional cultures, such as farming
communities in parts of Africa, are embracing
communications
technologies. Mobile
phones give farmers access to information, from
weather predictions to
market prices,
which helps them to prosper and therefore supports
their culture.
In conclusion, many
traditional ways of life have been lost as a
result of advances in technology,
but
other traditional communities have survived and
even flourished.
(260 words, band 9)
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
Most
people
have
forgotten
the
meaning
behind
traditional
or
religious
festivals;
during
festival periods,
people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves.
To what extent do you agree
or disagree with this opinion?
Some people argue that we
no longer remember the original meaning of
festivals, and that most of
us treat
them as opportunities to have fun. While I agree
that enjoyment seems to be the priority
during festival times, I do not agree
that people have forgotten what these festivals
mean.
On the one
hand, religious and traditional festivals have
certainly become times for celebration. In
the UK, Christmas is a good example of
a festival period when people are most concerned
with
shopping, giving and receiving
presents, decorating their homes and enjoying
traditional meals with
their
families.
Most
people
look
forward
to
Christmas
as
a
holiday
period,
rather
than
a
time
to
practise
religion. Similar behaviour can be seen during
non-religious festivals, such as Bonfire Night.
People associate this occasion with
making fires, watching firework displays, and
perhaps going to
large events in local
parks; in other words, enjoyment is people’s
primary goal.
However, I disagree with the idea that
the underlying meaning of such festivals has been
forgotten.
In UK primary schools,
children learn in detail about the religious
reasons for celebrating Christmas,
Easter
and
a
variety
of festivals
in
other
religions.
For
example,
in
late
December,
children
sing
Christmas songs which
have a religious content, and they may even
perform nativity plays telling
the
story of Jesus’ birth. Families also play a role
in passing knowledge of religious festivals’
deeper
significance
on
to
the
next
generation.
The
same
is
true
for
festivals
that
have
a
historical
background, such
as Bonfire Night or Halloween, in the sense that
people generally learn the stories
behind these occasions at an early
age.
In
conclusion, although people mainly want to enjoy
themselves during festivals, I believe that they
are still aware of the reasons for
these celebrations.
(296
words, band 9)
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
We
cannot help everyone in the world that needs help,
so we should only be concerned with
our
own communities and countries.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
with this statement?
Some people believe that we should not
help people in other countries as long as there
are problems
in our own society. I
disagree with this view because I believe that we
should try to help as many
people as
possible.
On the
one hand, I accept that it is important to help
our neighbours and fellow citizens. In most
communities there are people who are
impoverished or disadvantaged in some way. It is
possible
to
find
homeless
people,
for
example,
in
even
the
wealthiest
of
cities,
and
for
those
who
are
concerned about this problem, there are
usually opportunities to volunteer time or give
money to
support these people. In the
UK, people can help in a variety of ways, from
donating clothing to
serving free food
in a soup kitchen. As the problems are on our
doorstep, and there are obvious
ways to
help, I can understand why some people feel that
we should prioritise local charity.
At the same time, I believe
that we have an obligation to help those who live
beyond our national
borders. In some
countries the problems that people face are much
more serious than those in our
own
communities, and it is often even easier to help.
For example, when children are dying from
curable diseases in African countries,
governments and individuals in richer countries
can save lives
simply by paying for
vaccines that already exist. A small donation to
an international charity might
have a
much greater impact than helping in our local
area.
In
conclusion, it is true that we cannot help
everyone, but in my opinion national boundaries
should
not stop us from helping those
who are in need.
(280 words,
band 9)
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
Some people believe that hobbies need
to be difficult to be enjoyable.
To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
Some
hobbies are relatively easy, while others present
more of a challenge. Personally, I believe
that both types of hobby can be fun,
and I therefore disagree with the statement that
hobbies need
to be difficult in order
to be enjoyable.
On the one hand, many people enjoy easy
hobbies. One example of an activity that is easy
for most
people
is
swimming.
This
hobby
requires
very
little
equipment,
it
is
simple
to
learn,
and
it
is
inexpensive. I remember learning to
swim at my local swimming pool when I was a child,
and it never
felt
like
a
demanding
or
challenging
experience.
Another
hobby
that
I
find
easy
and
fun
is
photography. In my
opinion, anyone can take interesting pictures
without knowing too much about
the
technicalities of operating a camera. Despite
being straightforward, taking photos is a
satisfying
activity.
On
the
other
hand,
difficult
hobbies
can
sometimes
be
more
exciting.
If
an
activity
is
more
challenging, we might
feel a greater sense of satisfaction when we
manage to do it successfully. For
example, film editing is a hobby that
requires a high level of knowledge and expertise.
In my case,
it took me around two years
before I became competent at this activity, but
now I enjoy it much more
than I did
when I started. I believe that many hobbies give
us more pleasure when we reach a higher
level of performance because the
results are better and the feeling of achievement
is greater.
In
conclusion,
simple
hobbies
can
be
fun
and
relaxing,
but
difficult
hobbies
can
be
equally
pleasurable for
different reasons.
266
words
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
Universities should accept equal
numbers of male and female students in every
subject.
To what extent do
you agree or disagree?
In my opinion, men and women should
have the same educational opportunities. However,
I do not
agree with the idea of
accepting equal proportions of each gender in
every university subject.
Having the same number of men and women
on all degree courses is simply unrealistic.
Student
numbers
on
any
course
depend
on
the
applications
that
the
institution
receives.
If
a
university
decided to fill
courses with equal numbers of males and females,
it would need enough applicants
of each
gender. In reality, many courses are more popular
with one gender than the other, and it
would not be practical to aim for equal
proportions. For example, nursing courses tend to
attract
more female applicants, and it
would be difficult to fill these courses if fifty
per cent of the places
needed to go to
males.
Apart
from the practical concerns expressed above, I
also believe that it would be unfair to base
admission to university courses on
gender. Universities should continue to select the
best candidates
for each course
according to their qualifications. In this way,
both men and women have the same
opportunities, and applicants know that
they will be successful if they work hard to
achieve good
grades at school. If a
female student is the best candidate for a place
on a course, it is surely wrong
to
reject her in favour of a male student with lower
grades or fewer qualifications.
In conclusion, the
selection of university students should be based
on merit, and it would be both
impractical and unfair to change to a
selection procedure based on gender.
(265 words, band 9)
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
Some people think that
instead of preventing climate change, we need to
find a way to live
with it.
To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
Climate change represents a major
threat to life on Earth, but some people argue
that we need to
accept it rather than
try to stop it. I completely disagree with this
opinion, because I believe that we
still have time to tackle this issue
and reduce the human impact on the Earth's
climate.
There
are
various
measures
that
governments
and
individuals
could
take
to
prevent,
or
at
least
mitigate, climate change. Governments
could introduce laws to limit the carbon dioxide
emissions
that lead to global warming.
They could impose “green taxes” on drivers,
airline companies and other
polluters,
and they could invest in renewable energy
production from solar, wind or water power. As
individuals, we should also try to
limit our contribution to climate change, by
becoming more energy
efficient, by
flying less, and by using bicycles and public
transport. Furthermore, the public can affect
the actions of governments by voting
for politicians who propose to tackle climate
change, rather
than for those who would
prefer to ignore it.
If instead of taking the above measures
we simply try to live with climate change, I
believe that the
consequences will be
disastrous. To give just one example, I am not
optimistic that we would be able
to
cope
with
even
a
small
rise
in
sea
levels.
Millions
of
people
would
be
displaced
by
flooding,
particularly
in countries
that
do
not
have
the
means
to
safeguard low-lying
areas. These
people
would
lose
their
homes
and
their
jobs,
and
they
would
be
forced
to
migrate
to
nearby
cities
or
perhaps to other
countries. The potential for human suffering would
be huge, and it is likely that we
would
see outbreaks of disease and famine, as well as
increased homelessness and poverty.
In conclusion, it is clear
to me that we must address the problem of climate
change, and I disagree
with those who
argue that we can find ways to live with
it.
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
323
words
Some people who have been in prison
become good citizens later, and it is often argued
that
these are the best people to talk
to teenagers about the dangers of committing a
crime.
To what extent do you
agree or disagree?
It is true that ex-
prisoners can become normal, productive members of
society. I completely agree
with the
idea that allowing such people to speak to
teenagers about their experiences is the best
way to discourage them from breaking
the law.
In
my
opinion,
teenagers
are
more
likely
to
accept
advice
from
someone
who
can
speak
from
experience. Reformed offenders can tell
young people about how they became involved in
crime,
the dangers of a criminal
lifestyle, and what life in prison is really like.
They can also dispel any ideas
that
teenagers
may
have
about
criminals
leading
glamorous
lives.
While
adolescents
are
often
indifferent to the guidance given by
older people, I imagine that most of them would be
extremely
keen to hear the stories of
an ex-offender. The vivid and perhaps shocking
nature of these stories is
likely to
have a powerful impact.
The
alternatives to using reformed criminals to
educate teenagers about crime would be much less
effective. One option would be for
police officers to visit schools and talk to young
people. This could
be useful in terms
of informing teens about what happens to
lawbreakers when they are caught, but
young people are often reluctant to
take advice from figures of authority. A second
option would be
for
school
teachers
to
speak
to
their
students
about
crime,
but
I
doubt
that
students
would
see
teachers
as
credible
sources
of
information
about
this
topic.
Finally,
educational
films
might
be
informative, but there would be no
opportunity for young people to interact and ask
questions.
In conclusion, I
fully support the view that people who have turned
their lives around after serving a
prison sentence could help to deter
teenagers from committing crimes.
(287 words, band 9)
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
The
older generations tend to have very traditional
ideas about how people should live, think
and
behave.
However,
some
people
believe
that
these
ideas
are
not
helpful
in
preparing
younger generations for modern
life.
To what extent do you
agree or disagree with this view?
It is true that many older
people believe in traditional values that often
seem incompatible with the
needs of
younger people. While I agree that some
traditional ideas are outdated, I believe that
others
are still useful and should not
be forgotten.
On
the one hand, many of the ideas that elderly
people have about life are becoming less relevant
for younger people. In the past, for
example, people were advised to learn a profession
and find a
secure job for life, but
today’s workers expect much more variety and
diversity from their careers. At
the
same time, the ‘rules’ around relationships are
being eroded as young adults make their own
choices about who and when to marry.
But perhaps the greatest disparity between the
generations
can be seen in their
attitudes towards gender roles. The traditional
roles of men and women, as
breadwinners
and housewives, are no longer accepted as
necessary or appropriate by most younger
people.
On the other hand, some traditional
views and values are certainly applicable to the
modern world.
For
example,
older
generations
attach
great
importance
to
working
hard,
doing
one’s
best,
and
taking
pride
in
one’s
work,
and
these
behaviours
can
surely
benefit
young
people as
they
enter
today’s
competitive
job
market.
Other
characteristics
that
are
perhaps
seen
as
traditional
are
politeness and good
manners. In our globalised world, young adults can
expect to come into contact
with people
from a huge variety of backgrounds, and it is more
important than ever to treat others
with respect. Finally, I believe that
young people would lead happier lives if they had
a more
‘old-
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
fashioned’ sense of community and
neighbourliness.
In conclusion, although the views of
older people may sometimes seem unhelpful in
today’s world,
we should not dismiss
all traditional ideas as irrelevant.
(299 words, band 9)
Foreign visitors should pay more than
local visitors for cultural and historical
attractions.
To what extent
do you agree or disagree with this
opinion?
It is
sometimes argued that tourists from overseas
should be charged more than local residents to
visit important sites and monuments. I
completely disagree with this idea.
The
argument
in
favour
of
higher
prices
for
foreign
tourists
would
be
that
cultural
or
historical
attractions
often
depend
on
state
subsidies
to
keep
them
going,
which
means
that
the
resident
population already
pays money to these sites through the tax system.
However, I believe this to be
a very
shortsighted view. Foreign tourists contribute to
the economy of the host country with the
money
they
spend
on
a
wide
range
of
goods
and
services,
including
food,
souvenirs,
accommodation and
travel. The governments and inhabitants of every
country should be happy to
subsidise
important tourist sites and encourage people from
the rest of the world to visit them.
If travellers realised that
they would have to pay more to visit historical
and cultural attractions in a
particular nation, they would perhaps
decide not to go to that country on holiday. To
take the UK as
an example, the tourism
industry and many related jobs rely on visitors
coming to the country to see
places
like
Windsor
Castle
or
Saint
Paul’s
Cathedral.
These
two
sites
charge
the
same
price
regardless of
nationality, and this helps to promote the
nation’s cultural heritage. If overseas tourists
stopped coming due to higher prices,
there would be a risk of insufficient funding for
the maintenance
of these important
buildings.
In
conclusion, I believe that every effort should be
made to attract tourists from overseas, and it
would be counterproductive to make them
pay more than local residents.
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
(269
words, band 9)
When choosing a job, the salary is the
most important consideration.
To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
Many
people choose their jobs based on the size of the
salary offered. Personally, I disagree with
the idea that money is the key
consideration when deciding on a career, because I
believe that other
factors are equally
important.
On
the one hand, I agree that money is necessary in
order for people to meet their basic needs. For
example, we all need money to pay for
housing, food, bills, health care, and education.
Most people
consider it a priority to
at least earn a salary that allows them to cover
these needs and have a
reasonable
quality of life. If people chose their jobs based
on enjoyment or other non-financial factors,
they might find it difficult to support
themselves. Artists and musicians, for instance,
are known for
choosing a career path
that they love, but that does not always provide
them with enough money to
live
comfortably and raise a family.
Nevertheless, I believe
that other considerations are just as important as
what we earn in our jobs.
Firstly,
personal
relationships
and
the
atmosphere
in
a
workplace
are
extremely
important
when
choosing
a
job.
Having
a
good
manager
or
friendly
colleagues,
for
example,
can
make
a
huge
difference
to
workers’
levels
of
happiness
and
general
quality
of
life.
Secondly,
many
people’s
feelings of job
satisfaction come from their professional
achievements, the skills they learn, and the
position they reach, rather than the
money they earn. Finally, some people choose a
career because
they want to help others
and contribute something positive to
society.
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
In
conclusion,
while
salaries
certainly
affect
people’s
choice
of
profession,
I
do
not
believe
that
money outweighs all other
motivators.
(275 words, band
9)
Some people think that all
teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in
their free time
to help the local
community. They believe this would benefit both
the individual teenager and
society as
a whole.
Do you agree or
disagree?
Many
young people work on a volunteer basis, and this
can only be beneficial for both the individual
and society as a whole. However, I do
not agree that we should therefore force all
teenagers to do
unpaid work.
Most young people are
already under enough pressure with their studies,
without being given the
added
responsibility of working in their spare time.
School is just as demanding as a full-time job,
and teachers expect their students to
do homework and exam revision on top of attending
lessons
every day. When young people do
have some free time, we should encourage them to
enjoy it with
their friends or to spend
it doing sports and other leisure activities. They
have many years of work
ahead of them
when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not
believe that society has anything to gain from
obliging young people to do
unpaid
work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against
the values of a free and fair society to force
a group of people to do something
against their will. Doing this can only lead to
resentment amongst
young people, who
would feel that they were being used, and parents,
who would not want to be
told how to
raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced
to volunteer, and this is surely the best
system.
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to
work for free and help others, but in my opinion
we should
not make this
compulsory.
(250 words, band
9)
Wild animals have no place
in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste
of resources.
To what
extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that it
is pointless to spend money on the protection of
wild animals because we
humans have no
need for them. I completely disagree with this
point of view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue
that wild animals have no place in the 21st
century. I do not
believe that planet
Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and
there is nothing special about
this
particular
century
that
means
that
we
suddenly
have
the
right
to
allow
or
encourage
the
extinction of any species. Furthermore,
there is no compelling reason why we should let
animals die
out.
We
do
not
need
to
exploit
or
destroy
every
last
square
metre
of
land
in
order
to
feed
or
accommodate the world’s
population. There is plenty of room for us to
exist side by side with wild
animals,
and this should be our aim.
I
also
disagree
with
the
idea
that
protecting
animals
is
a
waste
of
resources.
It
is
usually
the
protection of natural habitats that
ensures the survival of wild animals, and most
scientists agree
that these habitats
are also crucial for human survival. For example,
rainforests produce oxygen,
absorb
carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate.
If we destroyed these areas, the costs of
managing
the
resulting
changes
to
our
planet
would
far
outweigh
the
costs
of
conservation.
By
protecting wild animals and their
habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all
life on Earth.
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
In
conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or
not wild animals should exist, and I believe that
we should do everything we can to
protect them.
(269 words,
band 9)
Some people believe that school
children should not be given homework by their
teachers,
whereas others argue that
homework plays an important role in the education
of children.
Discuss both these views
and give your own opinion.
People’s opinions differ as to whether
or not school children should be given homework.
While there
are some strong arguments
against the setting of homework, I still believe
that it is a necessary
aspect of
education.
There
are several reasons why people might argue that
homework is an unnecessary burden on
children.
Firstly,
there
is
evidence
to
support
the
idea
that
homework
does
nothing
to
improve
educational
outcomes. Countries such as Finland, where school
children are not given homework,
regularly
top
international
educational
league
tables
and
outperform
nations
where
setting
homework is the norm. Secondly, many
parents would agree that the school day is already
long
enough, and leaves their children
too tired to do further study when they return
home. Finally, it is
recognised
that
play
time
is
just
as
beneficial
as
study
time
from
the
perspective
of
brain
development.
In spite of the above arguments, I
support the view that homework has an important
role to play in
the schooling of
children. The main benefit of homework is that it
encourages independent learning
and
problem solving, as children are challenged to
work through tasks alone and at their own pace.
In doing so, students must apply the
knowledge that they have learnt in the classroom.
For example,
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
by doing
mathematics exercises at home, students
consolidate their understanding of the concepts
taught by their teacher at school. In
my view, it is important for children to develop
an independent
study habit because this
prepares them to work alone as adults.
In conclusion, homework
certainly has its drawbacks, but I believe that
the benefits outweigh them
in the long
term.
(270
words, band 9)
Several
languages
are
in
danger
of
extinction
because
they
are
spoken
by
very
small
numbers
of
people.
Some
people
say
that
governments
should
spend
public
money
on
saving
these languages, while others believe that would
be a waste of money.
Discuss
both these views and give your opinion.
It is true that some
minority languages may disappear in the near
future. Although it can be argued
that
governments
could
save
money
by
allowing
this
to
happen,
I
believe
that
these
languages
should be
protected and preserved.
There are several reasons why saving
minority languages could be seen as a waste of
money. Firstly,
if a language is only
spoken by a small number of people,
expensive
education
programmes will be
needed to make sure
that more people learn it, and the state will have
to pay for facilities, teachers
and
marketing. This money might be better spent on
other public services. Secondly, it would be
much cheaper and more efficient for
countries to have just one language. Governments
could cut
all kinds of costs related to
communicating with each minority group.
Despite the above
arguments, I believe that governments should try
to preserve languages that are
less
widely spoken. A language is much more than simply
a means of communication; it has a vital
connection with the cultural identity
of the people who speak it. If a language
disappears, a whole
way of life will
disappear with it, and we will lose the rich
cultural diversity that makes societies more
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
interesting.
By
spending
money
to
protect
minority
languages,
governments
can
also
preserve
traditions, customs and behaviours that
are part of a country’s history.
In conclusion, it may save
money in the short term if we allow minority
languages to disappear, but
in the long
term this would have an extremely negative impact
on our cultural heritage.
(258 words)
In
many
countries,
a
small
number
of
people
earn
extremely
high
salaries.
Some
people
believe that this is
good for the country, but others think that
governments should not allow
salaries
above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your
own opinion.
People have different views about
whether governments should introduce a maximum
wage. While
in some ways it may seem
reasonable to allow people to earn as much as
companies are willing to
pay, I
personally believe that employee remuneration
should be capped at a certain level.
There are various reasons
why it might be considered beneficial to allow
people to be paid extremely
high
salaries. If companies offer excellent pay
packages, they can attract the most talented
people
in their fields to work for
them. For example, technology companies like
Google are able to employ
the best
programmers because of the huge sums that they are
willing to pay. Furthermore, these
well-paid
employees
are
likely
to
be
highly
motivated
to
work
hard
and
therefore
drive
their
businesses
successfully.
In
theory,
this
should
result
in
a
thriving
economy
and
increased
tax
revenues, which means that paying high
salaries benefits everyone.
However, I agree with those who argue
that there should be a maximum wage. By
introducing a limit
on earnings, the
pay-gap between bosses and employees can be
reduced. Currently, the difference
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集
本资料由雅思干货君整理，正好一
页一篇范文，非常适合打印出来认真研读。
between
normal and top salaries is huge, and this can
demotivate workers who feel that the situation
is unfair. With lower executive
salaries and higher minimum wages, everybody will
be better off. One
possible consequence
of greater equality could be that poverty and
crime rates fall because the
general
population will experience an improved standard of
living.
In
conclusion, it seems to me that it would be
better, on balance, for governments to set a limit
on
the wages of the highest earners in
society.
Some people
believe that studying at university or college is
the best route to a successful
career,
while others believe that it is better to get a
job straight after school.
Discuss both views and give your
opinion.
When
they
finish
school,
teenagers
face
the
dilemma
of
whether
to
get
a
job
or
continue
their
education. While there are some
benefits to getting a job straight after school, I
would argue that it
is better to go to
college or university.
The option to start work straight after
school is attractive for several reasons. Many
young people
want to start earning
money as soon as possible. In this way, they can
become independent, and
they will be
able to afford their own house or start a family.
In terms of their career, young people
who decide to find work, rather than
continue their studies, may progress more quickly.
They will
have the chance to gain real
experience and learn practical skills related to
their chosen profession.
This may lead
to promotions and a successful career.
On the other hand, I
believe that it is more beneficial for students to
continue their studies. Firstly,
academic qualifications are required in
many professions. For example, it is impossible to
become
a doctor, teacher or lawyer
without having the relevant degree. As a result,
university graduates have
雅思干货铺有雅思备考所需的各种雅思干货
加小编微信：
ielts_seven
，
送你所有的考官
< br>Simon
大小作文范文及话题思路合集