关于投稿及询问信的写法及注意事项

-------------

精选文档

---- -------------

我的询问信

Dear Editors,

We dispatched our manuscript (manuscript ID 85581) to your journal

about ten weeks ago. We have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether

you have reached a decision. We fear that our submission process does not meet

the requirements and should be grateful if you kindly give us some information

regarding the status of the manuscript.

Thanks for your information.

With kind regards,

SCI

投稿常用英语

一、投稿信

1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:

I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by –

which I should like to

submit for possible publication in the journal of - .

Yours sincerely

可编辑

-------------

精选文档

-----------------

2. Dear Dr. A:

Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for

publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it

deals with -

. We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s

readers.

3. Dear Dr. A:

Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by

sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due

care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this

paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits

in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter

the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another

source.

We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look

forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.

二、询问有无收到稿件

可编辑

-------------

精选文档

-----------------

Dear Editors,

We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but

have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear

that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know

whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our

manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.

三、询问论文审查回音

Dear Editors

，

It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for

possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and

am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should

appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as

possible.

四、关于论文的总体审查意见

1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable

可编辑

-------------

精选文档

-----------------

interest. A few minor revision are list below.

2. This is a well- written paper containing interesting results which merit

publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points

need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There

are given below.

3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and

do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant

publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their

findings to specialist journal such as

–

4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data

were added.

5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of

–

because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a

reputable journal of - .

6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite

this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning

of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.

可编辑

-------------

精选文档

---------- -------

7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an

inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like

to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good

knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.

8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning

HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of

those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been

underlined.

9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of

that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly

unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between

assays.

10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the

temperature? Were antibody used?

五、给编辑的回信

1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say

可编辑

------ -------

精选文档

-----------------

that

–

One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition

of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further

minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2

(line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.

2. I

have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that

the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data.

I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although

perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than

an error or omission.

3. Thank you for your letter of

–

and for the referee’s comments

concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their

comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with

their approval.

4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional

experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our

original findings are confirmed.

5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of

可编辑