论文投稿套话

一、投稿信

1. Dear Dr

. Defendi ML:

I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by –

which I should like to submit for possible publication in

the journal of - .

Yours sincerely

2. Dear Dr

. A:

Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for pu

blication in the journal of - .

We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the

journal’s readers.

3. Dear Dr

. A:

Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All author

s have read and

approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work.

No

part

of

this

paper

has

published

or

submitted

elsewhere.

No

conflict

of

interest

exits

in

the

submission of

this manuscript, and we have attached to this

letter the signed letter granting us

permission to use Figure 1 from another source.

We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments

from the reviewers.

二、询问有无收到稿件

Dear Editors,

We

dispatched

our

manuscript

to

your

journal

on

3

August

2006

but

have

not,

as

yet,

receive

acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you

would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again.

Thank you in advance for your help.

三、询问论文审查回音

Dear Editors

，

It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your

journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I

should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.

四、关于论文的总体审查意见

1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision

are list below.

2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit

of the reader

, however

, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further

justification. There are given below.

3.

Although

these

observation

are

interesting,

they

are

rather

limited

and

do

not

advance

our

knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try

submitting their findings to specialist journal such as

–