-
正方一辩陈述本方观点：
从人类发展的终极目
标看，
我们要彻底地解决环境问题，
必须要标本兼治。要治本，
必须优先发展经济，从根本上优化经济结构堵住
产生环境问题的源头，要治标，同样要优
先发展经济，为解决眼前的环境问
题提供技术、
资金等支持，<
/p>
只有这样，
才能为人类生存和发展提供环境保障。
From the ultimate goal of human
development, we need to address both the
symptoms and root causes to solve the
environmental problems
thoroughly. To
effect a permanent cure, we must give first
priority to the
development of economy,
and optimize the economic structure
fundamentally to block the source of
the environment problems
；
To
take
temporary
solution
，
we also should give
priority to the development of
economy,
so that we have the technology, capital and other
supportsfor
solving the environmental
problems. Only in this way can environment
protection be provided for human
survival and development.
反
方一辩陈述本方观点：
经济发展是指社会能够提供丰裕的商品来改善人类的物
质生活
,
环境保护则是采取一定的政策措施来保护
生态平衡。
经济要发展意味
着企业需要更多的厂房与原材料来保
障商品的供应——那便存在一个问题：
自然分给人类的土地与原材料是有限
,
经济优先发展就一定会侵占原本不属
于人类的自然
资源。
The economic development
refers to
society can
provide
abundant
commodity to
improve human material life; environmental
protection is to
take certain policy
measures to protect the ecological balance.
economic
development means that
companies need more workshop and raw materials
to ensure the supply of
goods
——
then there is a
problem,
that is
nature land
and raw materials to human is limited,
economic priority development will
occupy nature resources which
originally do not belong to the human.
二辩盘问
Two debate
questioned
反方二辩：请问对方一辩，经济是一时
之事，环境是万代之事，哪个重要？经济
发展慢了，人们还可以吃到饭，环境没了，还能
生存吗？
My fellow debaters
，
please allow me to economy
is
the temporary
matter
, but the environment
is of
the
ten
thousand
generation, which one
is
more
important?
When Economic
develops
slowly
, people can also eat rice;
how can we still survive if there is no
environment.
正方一辩：
不好意思对方辩友，<
/p>
恐怕我们今天讨论的重点是优先权。
并不是说经
< br>济优先就不搞环保了，
只是环保处于较次的位置，
跟中国
现状一样，
政策虽
然说要重视环保，
但
一般县区还是经济发展优先的，
也就有资本的大城市才
比较重视
搞环保，相信大家心知肚明
Sorry, I'm
afraid
the key points
we
debate today are the right of
priority.
Economy
development
first
does not mean totally ignorethe
environmental protection,
the
environmental protection is just in the inferior
position
.Just like the
present China,
although
the
policy attach great
importance to
environmental
protection,
economic
development receive
priority in the general
counties
, there is
only
capital cities would
likely
take
it
seriously
to
environmental protection,
everybody
know it in our own heart.
<
/p>
反方二辩：
请问正方三辩，
如果发展经济
优先的话，
很可能造成环境成本大于经
济效益的情况，这样的经
济是发展还是倒退？
Excuse
me,
my fellow debaters.
If
economic development receivespriority
then it is likely to cause
the environmental costs to be
larger
than the economic
efficiency, such economy
develops or backs up
?
正方三辩：
这种情况确实有存在，
但并不是每时每
刻都存在。
各个行业情况不同，
我们不能以偏概全。
但按你的意思，
这种情况下经济效益是负的，
那我
们改
行环境保护优先，就能转亏为盈？我不这么觉得。
This kind of situation
is
there
truly,
but not every
moment
. The situation in
each industry is different; we cannot
draw conclusions from
one
part. But
according to your
point, in this case the economic benefit is
negative, then
if we changed
environment first,
we
can
turn it into profit? I don't think so.
正方四辩补充发言
：
as a
developing country, the economy power is far
behind
the developed counties, China
have one fifth of the people in the world,
but the income of per head is only in
109th among countries. so the urgent
affairs of china is developing our
economy. Second, economy growth
doesn’t
necessarily conflict with environment protection.
we can develop
our economy without
environment pollution .Third, when our economy
strength become strong ,we can spend
more money and energy on
environment
protection,till then it will be a win-win. In a
word, considering
the current
situations, economy growth should take priority in
China.
正方二辩：
我们知道环境的保护是预防为主，<
/p>
防治结合，
而预防和治理都要依靠
技术的
发展，
那请问对方一辩，
如果没有强有力的经济基础支持科学技
术发
展，那么以科技为支撑的环保从何谈起呢？
We know that the protection of the
environment is
mainly
prevention, and
we should combine prevention with
treatment, and the prevention and
control depends on the development of
technology, then
my
fellow
debaters
,
if there is no
strong economic basis for science and technology
development,
then
don
’
t
mention
the environmental protection
supported
by the
science and technology.
反方一辩：你的问题未免抽象了点
。科技发展无止尽，经济发展也没尽头，什么
时候算得上是“强有力”呢？但是环境保护
是迫在眉睫，耽误不起。
Your question is
a little abstract. Science and technology develops
endlessly
,
so
dose economic development,
when willit
be
considere
d as
“strong
environmental protection is
imminent
, which can't afford
to delay.
正方二辩：
请问反方三辩，
经济发展是让人们享受到丰富的生活内容，
包括衣食
住行娱乐，这难道不是现在社会上人们的普遍愿望吗？
Excuse me,
my fellow
responsibilityof economic development
is
to
let
people
enjoy
a rich life
, including
the basic necessities
and
entertainment, isn't it now the
people's universal desire?
反方三辩：
人们喜欢的期望的不一定都是好的。
我相信，
人们更倾向于在一个既
能享受到生活乐趣，同
时又是一个健康和谐自然的环境中生存。
People`s
expectation is not necessarily that
good. I believe that people tend to live
in a life of happiness, and
at the same time,
survive
in
a healthy and
harmonious
naturalenvironment
反方四辩补充发言
：
我们生活的环境，
我们的子孙后代也要在这里生活。
我们发
展经济破坏了环境，
有些破坏是无法弥补
的，
是对子孙后代的犯罪。
现在世界各
国都已高度重视可持续发展战略的研究，
大力发展绿色工业，
无
公害产业。
我国
是具有悠久历史和文明的大国，
在发展经济过程中更应该重视环境保护，
为子孙
后代留
下美好的生活空间。
The environment we
live in, our future generations
have to
live here. We destroy the environment of economic
development,
some damage is
irreparable, the future generations of crime. Now
countries
around the world have
attached great importance to the strategy of
sustainable
development research,
vigorously develop the green industry, and
pollution-free industries. China is a
civilization with a long history and a big
country in the process of economic
development should also attach
importance to environmental protection,
to leave our future generations a
better living space.
反方二辩小结：
发展经济必须保护环境是自然规律的要求。
< br>经济发展过程中，
如
果自然环境受到了严重损害，
那么我们将受到自然的严厉惩罚。
重大的洪涝灾害
都是破坏环境造成的必然结果。
在抗洪救灾中消耗的人力、
物力、
财务恐怕已超
过了牺牲环境的经济发展成果。
自然规律是无情的，
谁侵犯了它谁将受到它的报
复
。我们必须高度重视发展经济过程中保护自然环境和社会环境。
we must protect the environment of
economic development is a natural law
requirements. The process of economic
development, if the serious damage to the
natural environment, then we will be
natural to be severely punished. Major floods
caused damage to the environment are
the inevitable result. In the floods in the
consumption of manpower, material and
financial fear of the expense of the
environment more than the fruits of
economic development. The laws of nature is
merciless, who violated it who will be
its revenge. We must attach great importance to
the process of economic development in
the protection of the natural environment and
social environment
正方二辩小结：
but you forget that
China has 130 million people. The eastern cities
can’t stand for the whole China. We
know that environment protection need
high-technology, High-tech personnel,
and science research. They all need a lot of
money, and money is created by economy.
I want to ask my fellow debater that can
we protect our environment well without
strong economy strength
自由辩论
正方一辩：
请问对方辩友，
原始社会的人类祖先们环境保护工作
做得可
谓好了吧，而他们
经济发展很
落后，所所以才一直过着钻木取火、茹毛饮血的生活，按你们的
意思我们应该回归这种生
活吗？
Excuse me, my fellow
friends .In the primitive society, human
ancestor`s
environmental protection
work is good, but to them Economic development
is very backward, so it has been living
a life of the earliest people, should
we return to this kind of life
according to
your
meaning?
反方一辩：
人类祖先确实需要发展经
济，
但若是在这个过程中砍完了森林，
污染
了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也无法发展下去了。我想问的是，核电站是
<
/p>
经济发展的产物，
但众所周知，
几次核电
站的泄漏带来了环境的极度恶化，
请问
你怎么看？
Human ancestors do need to
develop the economy, but if cut out the
forests,
pollute the river,
making
Food and clothing are
no longer
guaranteedin this
process,
I’m afraid
it cannot
develop
anylonger
. What I
want to ask is, nuclear power station
is the outcome of the economic
development, but it is well known that
a few times nuclear power leakage
has
brought
the environment extremely
worsened
, what do you
think
of it
?
正方二辩：
首先，我方并没有承诺经济发展就一定会破坏到环境；其次，对方所
说的情况只是凤毛麟
角；
第三，
核电站泄漏是科技不力，
而
经济是科学研究
的基础。
First, we
havenever pledge
that the
economic development certainly will
destroy the environment;
second,
the situation
you
said
is only
rare
;
third,
nuclear power station leakage because
the technology is not strong
.
But
economy is the
foundation of scientific research.
反方二辩：
但是核电站可以再建，
那些污染了的
土地和地下水怎么办？没有了这
些，
我
们
的生活怎么办？你愿意生活在核电站附近，
还是一片山清水秀
之间？
But the nuclear power station may
be reconstructed, how
about
these
polluted land and
the underground water?
Without land and
water
, how
does our life
manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear
power
station, or between pieces of
beautiful sceneries?
正方三辩：
但是对方辩友请注意，
核电站的建造，
正是
为了千千万万人类的生活
用电得到满足。有了电，我们的机器可以运作，生产可以兴起，
环境总会有
办法弥补，我也想问，你愿意生活在两小时停一次电的地方还是用电无忧之<
/p>
处？
Please note that the
construction of nuclear power stations is
precisely
to
satisfy
millions of people's
living power.
With
the
electricity, our machine can be
operated, the production can rise,
and there must be
any
way
to make up for
the environment. I also want to
ask,
are you willing to live in a place
two hours
stop a electricity or a place
with abundant power.
反方三辩：
你的意思是破坏了环境然后再去弥补。
为什么要先污染后治理？为什
么要兜这么大一个圈子呢？而且我国的经济建设里程已经证明，
先污染后治
理是错的，行不通的。
You mean to
make up for the environment after
destroying
it. Why management
after pollution? Why to pocket so big a
circle? And the economic construction
of our country has already proved
that
treatment after pollution is
wrong
, it won't work.
正方四辩：我不得不说我方真冤枉。是你给的前提，说核电站泄漏了，严重污染
了环境，
而我方坚信是可以挽救的。
而且事实上，
包括核电站在内的很多工
业厂子，都种有青草绿树，他们在搞经济的同时，
并没有放弃环境的保护。
I can not but
say that we are really undeserved. It is you who
give the
premise, said that
the nuclear power station
leakage
has polluted the
environment seriously, but we believed
that is
can be
in fact,
including nuclear power
stations
, many industrial
factories
,
plant
all kinds
of green grass and trees, while they
practice the economy,
theydo not
give
up the protection of
the environment.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
上一篇：《战士和苍蝇①》阅读答案
下一篇：中英颜色词文化差异比较研究