关键词不能为空

当前您在: 主页 > 英语 >

EMA工艺验证指南

作者:高考题库网
来源:https://www.bjmy2z.cn/gaokao
2021-02-11 12:53
tags:

-

2021年2月11日发(作者:拆散)


EMA


工艺验证指南



---EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/BWP/70278/2012-Rev1 27 February 2014


Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP)


Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP)


Guideline


on


process


validation


for


finished


products


-


information


and


data


to


be


provided


in


regulatory


submissions

< p>
制剂工艺验证指南


---


在法规提交中要提供的资 料和数据



Draft agreed by CHMP/CVMP Quality Working Party


2 February 2012



CHMP/CVMP


质量工作组通过草案



Adoption by CVMP for release for consultation


CVMP


同意公开征求意见



Adoption by CHMP for release for consultation


CHMP


同意公开征求意见



End of consultation (deadline for comments)


征求意见结束(截止日期)



Agreed by QWP



QWP


通过



Agreed by BWP



BWP


通过



Adoption by CHMP



CHMP


采用



Adoption by CVMP



CVMP


采用



2012



2< /p>



2




8 March 2012


2012



3



8


日< /p>



15 March 2012


201 2



3



15




31 October 2012


2012



10



31




8 November 2013


2013

< br>年


11



8



13 November 2013


2013



11


< p>
13




19 December 2013


2013


12



19



15 January 2014


2014

< p>


1



15




Date for coming into effect


6 months after publication


生效日期



公布后


6


个月



This


guideline


replaces


the


note


for


guidance


on


process


validation


(CPMP/QWP/848/96,


EMEA/CVMP/598/99) including annex II



non-standard processes (CPMP/QWP/2054/03).


本指南替代工艺验证注释(


CPMP/QWP/848/96,


EMEA/CVMP/598/99



,包括附录二


----


非标准工艺


(< /p>


CPMP/QWP/2054/03





Process


validation,


continuous


process


verification,


on-going


process


verification,


critical


Keywords


process parameter, critical quality attribute, lifecycle, change control


关键词



工艺验证、 持续工艺确认、关键工艺参数、关键质量属性、生命周期、变更控制




Table of contents


目录



Executive summary


实施摘要



1. Introduction (background)


2. Scope


3. Legal basis


4. General considerations


5. Process validation


5.1. Traditional process validation


5.2. Continuous process verification


介绍(背景)



范围



法规依据



一般考虑



工艺验证



传统工艺验证



持续工艺确认



5.3. Hybrid approach


5.4. Design space verification


6. Scale-up


7. Post approval change control


混合方案



设计空间确认



放大生产



批准后变更控制



8. Standard vs. non-standard methods of manufacture < /p>


标准


VS


非标准生产方法



Definitions


定义



References


Annex I: Process validation scheme


参考文献



附录


I


:工艺验证计划



Annex II: Standard/non-standard processes


附录< /p>


II


:标准


/


非 标工艺




Executive summary


实施摘要



This


guideline


replaces


the


previous


note


for


guidance


on


process


validation


(CPMP/QWP/848/96,


EMEA/CVMP/598/99).


The


guideline


is


brought


into


line


with


ICH


Q8,


Q9


and


Q10


documents


and


the


possibility to use continuous process verification in addition to, or


instead of, traditional process validation


described in the previous guideline has been added and is encouraged. This guideline does not introduce new


requirements on medicinal products already authorised and on the market, but clarifies how companies can


take advantage of the new possibilities given when applying enhanced process understanding coupled with


risk management tools under an efficient quality system as described by ICH Q8, Q9 and Q10.


本指南替代之前的工艺验证指南解释


(CPMP/QWP/848/96, EMEA/CVMP/598/99)


。本指南与


ICH


Q8



Q9



Q10


文件相一致,提供在之前加入和鼓励采用的传统工艺验证这外 ,提供了使用持续工艺确认


的可能性。本指南对已批准上市的药品未引入新要求,但阐述 了公司在


ICH


Q8,


Q9



Q10


中描述的


有 效质量体系下,应用强化工艺理解与风险管理工具时,如何抓住所给的新的可能性。



1. Introduction (background)


介绍(背景)



Process


validation


can


be


defined


as


documented


evidence


that


the


process,


operated


within


established


parameters,


can


perform


effectively


and


reproducibly


to


produce


a


medicinal


product


meeting


its


predetermined


specifications


and


quality


attributes


(ICH


Q7).


Continuous


process


verification


has


been


introduced


to


cover


an


alternative


approach


to


process


validation


based


on


a


continuous


monitoring


of


manufacturing performance. This approach is based on the knowledge from product and process development


studies and / or previous manufacturing experience.


工 艺可定义为证明在建立的参数范围内操作的工艺可以重复有效地生产出符合其预定质量标准和质量


属性的药品的书面证据


(ICH


Q7)


。持续工艺验证被引入替代基于对工艺性能持续监测的工艺验证。这


种方法是 依据来自于产品和工艺研发和


/


或之前生产经验的知识。



Continuous


process


verification


may


be


applicable


to


both


a


traditional


and


enhanced


approach


to


pharmaceutical development. It may use extensive in-line, on-line or at-line monitoring and / or controls to


evaluate


process


performance.


It


is


intended


that


the


combination


of


the


advice


provided


in


the


Note


for


Guidance


on


Development


Pharmaceutics


(CPMP/QWP/155/96)


and


the


Note


for


Guidance


on


Pharmaceutical


Development


(ICH


Q8R2)


together


with


this


guideline


should


cover


all


of


the


critical


elements in manufacturing process for inclusion in the dossier for regulatory submission for a pharmaceutical


product


for


human


use.


For


veterinary


medicinal


products,


the


applicable


guidance


is


that


provided


in


the


Note for Guidance on Development Pharmaceutics for Veterinary Medicinal Products (EMEA/CVMP/315/98)


together


with


this


guideline.


Although


the


ICH


Q8


guideline


is


not


applicable


to


veterinary


medicinal


products the principles detailed in this guideline may be applied to veterinary medicinal products should an


applicant


choose


to


apply


an


enhanced


approach


to


pharmaceutical


development


and


process


validation.


Process


validation


should


not


be


viewed


as


a


one-off


event.


Process


validation


incorporates


a


lifecycle


approach linking product and process development, validation of the commercial manufacturing process and


maintenance of the process in a state of control during routine commercial production.


持续工艺确认既适 用于传统药品研发方法,也适用于加强药品研发方法。它采用广泛的在线监测和


/


或控制来评估工艺的性能。将研发药物指南解释


(CPMP/QWP/ 155/96)


、药物研发指南解释


(ICH


Q8R2)


与本指南相结合,应可以覆盖人用药法规申报文件所需包括的生产工 艺的关键因素。对于兽药产品,


适用的指南为



兽药研发指南解释



(EMEA/CVMP/315 /98)


与本指南。尽管


ICH


Q8


指南不适用兽药产


品,本指南中的原则可以应用于兽药产品,申 请人应选择性采用更好的方法来进行药品研发和工艺验


证。工艺验证不应该作为是一次性 的事情。工艺验证应将产品生命周期结合工艺研发、商业生产工艺


验证、在常规商业化生 产中控制状态的工艺维护相结合。



2. Scope


范围



This document is intended to provide guidance on the process validation information and data to be provided


in


regulatory


submissions


for


the


finished


dosage


forms


of


chemical


medicinal


products


for


human


and


veterinary use. The general principles also apply to active substances.


本文件意在提 供关于人用和兽用化学药品制剂的申报时所需提交的工艺验证资料和数据的指南。一般


原 则也适用于活性物质。



However, information on validation of non-sterile active substances is not required in the dossier.


但是,在申报文件中并不要求提交非无菌原料药的验证信息。



In


addition,


expectations


for


active


substances


are


contained


in


ICH


Q11


and


so


the


information


is


not


repeated in this document.


另外,


ICH Q11

< br>中包括了对原料药的建议,因此本文件中不再重复这些信息。



The


principles


described


are


also


applicable


to


biological


medicinal


products.


However,


these


should


be


considered on a case by case basis in view of the complex nature and inherent variability of the biological


substance.


本文所述的原则也适用于生物制品。< /p>


但是,


生物制品的工艺验证应根据其复杂性和内在变因各案考查。



It is expected that the information / data requested in this guideline be present in the dossier at the time of


regulatory submission.


在本指南中 所要求的资料


/


数据应该包括在法规申报的文件中。

< p>


This document provides guidance on the validation of the manufacturing process, which can be considered as


the second stage in the product lifecycle. The first stage (process design) is covered in the note for guidance


on


pharmaceutical


development


(ICH


Q8R2/


EMEA/CVMP/315/98)


and


the


third


stage


(on-going


process


verification) is covered under


GMP


(Annex 15).


本文件提供生产工艺验证指南,工艺验证可以当作产品生命周期的第二阶段。 第一阶段(工艺设计)


包括在药物研发指南解释(


ICH Q8R2/ EMEA/CVMP/315/98


)中,第三阶段(持续工艺确认)包括 在


GMP


(附录


15

< br>)中。



3. Legal basis


法律依据



This guideline has to be read in conjunction with the introduction and general principles section (4) of Annex


I to Directive 2001/83/EC as amended and the introduction and general principles section (2) of Annex I to


Directive 2001/82/EC as amended.


本指南应与指令


2001/83/EC


修订版本附录


1


第(


4


)部 分中的介绍和一般原则,以及指令



2001/82/EC


修订版附录


1


第(


2


)部分中的介绍和一般原则一起解读。



4. General considerations


一般考虑



Irrespective of whether a medicinal product is developed by a traditional approach or an enhanced approach,


the


manufacturing


process


should


be


validated


before


the


product


is


placed


on


the


market.


In


exceptional


circumstances concurrent validation may be accepted. Please refer to GMP Annex 15 for further guidance.


Process validation should confirm that the control strategy is adequate to the process design and the quality of


the


product.


The


validation


should


cover


all


manufactured


strengths


and


all


manufacturing


sites


used


for


production of the marketed product. A bracketing approach may be acceptable for different strengths, batch


sizes and pack sizes.


However, validation must cover all proposed sites.


Process


validation data should


be


generated


for


all


products


to


demonstrate


the


adequacy


of


the


manufacturing


process


at


each


site


of


manufacture.


Validation


should


be


carried


out


in


accordance


with


GMP


and


data


should


be


held


at


the


manufacturing location and made available for inspection if not required in the dossier (see section 8).


工艺验证应确认控制策略对于工 艺设计和产品质量来说已足够。验证应覆盖生产上市产品的所有生产


场所和所有剂量产品 。不同剂量、不同批量和包装规格可以括号法。但是,验证必须覆盖所有拟生产


的场所。 每个生产场所所有产品均应有工艺验证数据,以证明生产工艺的充分性。工艺验证应符合


GMP


,数据应保留在生产场所,如果申报文件中未要求(参见第


8


部分)则应该在检查过程中随时可


提供。

< br>


Process validation can be performed in a traditional way, as described below, regardless of the approach to


development taken. However, there is also the possibility to implement continuous process verification if an


enhanced approach to development has been performed or where a substantial amount of product and process


knowledge


and


understanding


has


been


gained


through


historical


data


and


manufacturing


experience.


A


combination


of


traditional


process


validation


and


continuous


process


verification


may


be


employed.


The


in-line,


on-line


or


at-line


monitoring


that


is


often


utilised


for


continuous process


verification


(discussed


in


section 5.2) provides substantially more information and knowledge about


the process


and might


facilitate


process improvements.


如下所述,不管采用了什么研发方法,工艺验证都可以采 用传统方法。但是,如果已采用加强研发方


法,或通过历史数据和生产经验已获得大量产 品和工艺知识和理解,也存在实施持续工艺确认的可能


性。可能要采用传统工艺验证和持 续工艺确认相结合的方法。在线监控经常用于持续工艺确认(在第


5.2


部分中已讨论)


,提供大量的关于工艺的信息和知识,可能有利于工艺改进。< /p>



5. Process validation


工艺验证



5.1. Traditional process validation


传统工艺验证



Traditional process


validation is


normally performed when the pharmaceutical


development


and/or process


development is concluded, after scale- up to production scale and prior to marketing of the finished product.


As part of the process validation lifecycle, some process validation studies may be conducted on pilot scale


batches if the process has not yet been scaled up to production scale.


传统工艺验证一般 在药物研发和


/


或工艺研发结束后,在放大至生产规模后,成品 上市前进行。作为工


艺验证生命周期的一部分,如果有些工艺还没有放大到生产规模,部 分工艺验证研究可能会在中试批


次进行。



It should be noted that pilot batch size should correspond to at least 10% of the production scale batch (i.e.


such that the multiplication factor for the scale-up does not exceed 10). For solid oral dosage forms this size


should


generally


be


10%


of


the


maximum


production


scale


or


100,000


units


whichever


is


the


greater


[1]


.


Where


the


intended


batch


size is


less


than


100,000


units,


the


predictive


value


of


the


pilot


batches


may


be


limited and a justified approach should be followed. For other dosage forms the pilot batch size should be


justified


taking


into


account


risk


to


the


patient


of


failure


of


the


dosage


form.


Since


it


is


not


generally


considered


useful


to


conduct


full


validation


studies


on


pilot


scale


batches,


the


process


validation


scheme


outlined


in


Annex


I


of


this


guideline


should


be


completed


for


each


product


for


subsequent


execution


at


production


scale;


bracketing


may


be


acceptable.


The


process


validation


scheme


to


be


followed


should


be


included in the dossier. The scheme should include a description of the manufacturing process, the tests to be


performed and acceptance criteria, a description of the additional controls in place and the data to be collected.


A justification


for the chosen process


validation scheme should be presented in


Module 3 and the Quality


Overall


Summary


for


human


medicines


and


in


Part


2.B


and


the


Pharmaceutical


Detailed


and


Critical


Summary for veterinary medicines.


要注意的是中试生产批应至少对应商业 生产批量的


10%


(即,放大生产倍数不应超过


10



。该规模的


固体口服剂 型一般应为最大生产批量的


10%



1 0


万个单位剂量,


取其中大者。


如果要 生产的批量小于


10


万剂型单位,中试批次预期值可能受限,则 需要采用经过评估的方法。对于其它剂型,中试批量的


论述要考虑剂型失败给患者带来的 风险。由于一般认为在中试规模批次进行全验证研究是没有用的,


因此在本指南附录


1


中列出的工艺验证计划应在之后的各产品生产规模时进行完善,< /p>


可以接受括号法。


申报文件中应包括要执行的工艺验证计划。计划 中应包括工艺描述、要实施的测试和可接受标准、附


加控制的描述和要收集的数据。要在 人药申报文件模块


3


和质量综述、兽药申报文件第


2.B


部分和药


品详情和关键摘要中放入为什么选择 该工艺验证计划的论述。



In


certain


cases


however,


it


is


considered


necessary


to


provide


production


scale


validation


data


in


the


marketing


authorisation


dossier


at


the


time


of


regulatory


submission,


for


example


when


the


product


is


a


biological / biotech product or where the applicant is proposing a non-standard method of manufacture (see


section 8 and Annex II). In these cases, data should be provided in the dossier on a number of consecutive


batches at production scale prior to approval. The number of batches should be based on the variability of the


process, the complexity of the process /product, process knowledge gained during development, supportive


data at commercial scale during technology transfer and the overall experience of the manufacturer. Data on a


minimum


of


3


production


scale


batches


should


be


submitted


unless


otherwise


justified.


Data


on


1


or


2


production scale batches may suffice where these are supported by pilot scale batches and a justification as


highlighted above.


在某些情况下,可能认为有必要在上市许可申报资料中提交生产批量的验证数据,例如,如果产 品是


生物


/


生物技术制品,或者申请人 所拟的工艺为非标生产方法(参见第


8


部分和附录二)


。这种情况下,


要在批准前在申报资料中包括采用生产批量所获得的连续 批次数据。批次数应基于工艺变动情况、工



/


产品复杂程度、在研发阶段所获得的工艺知识、在技术转移中所获得的商业批量中的支持数据,以


及生产商的总体经验。除非另有论述,否则至少需要提交


3

< p>
批生产批量的数据。如果另有中试批量数


据支持,以及上述高亮显示的论述 提供,则仅提供


1



2


批生产批量数据也是可以的。



译者:未见哪里有高亮显示的内容。



The studies should address critical steps of manufacture, by conducting additional testing as necessary.


研究应说明关键生产工艺步骤,必要时增加检测。



5.2. Continuous process verification


持续工艺确认



Continuous


process


verification


is


an


alternative


approach


to


traditional


process


validation


in


which


manufacturing process performance is continuously monitored and evaluated (ICH Q8).


持续工艺确认是传统工艺验证的一种替代方 式,是指生产工艺的性能被持续地监控和评估(


ICH Q8





Continuous process verification can be used in addition to, or instead of, traditional process validation.


持续工艺确认可以用于补充,或替代传统工艺验证。



It is a science and risk-based real- time approach to verify and demonstrate that a process that operates within


the


predefined


specified


parameters


consistently


produces


material


which


meets


all


its


critical


quality


attributes


(CQAs)


and


control


strategy


requirements.


In


order


to


enable


continuous


process


verification,


companies


should


perform,


as


relevant,


extensive


in-line,


on-line


or


at- line


controls


and


monitor


process


performance and product quality on each batch. Relevant data on quality attributes of incoming materials or


components,


in-process


material


and


finished


products


should


be


collected.


This


should


include


the


verification of attributes, parameters and end points, and assessment of CQA and critical process parameter


(CPP)


trends.


Process


analytical


technology


(PAT)


applications


such


as


NIR


spectroscopy


with


or


without


feedback loop


(e.g. end


point determination of blend homogeneity, determination of granules surface area,


determination


of


content


uniformity


with


large


sample


size)


and


Multivariate


Statistical


Process


Control


(MSPC) can be viewed as enablers for continuous process verification.


确认和证明一 个工艺如果在预定的特定参数范围内操作,即可以稳定生产出符合所有


CQA

< p>
和控制策


略要求的物料是一个科学并基于风险的实时方法。为了进行持续工 艺确认,公司应相应地实施众多的


在线控制和工艺性能监控,以及各批产品质量监控。应 收集进厂物料或组件、制程中物料和成品的质


量属性相关数据,还应该包括对属性、参数 和终点,和


CQA



CPP

< p>
趋势的评估。工艺分析技术


PAT


工具,如具有或 不具有反馈回路的


NIR


光谱(例如,混合均一性终点测试,颗 粒表面积测试,样品量


较大时含量均一性测试)


,和多变量统计 学工艺控制


MSPC


可以当作持续工艺确认的工具。

< p>


Sufficient


knowledge


and


understanding


of


the


process


is


required


in


order


to


support


continuous


process


verification. However, the scope and extent of continuous process verification will be influenced by a number


of factors including:


为了支持持续工艺确认,需要对工艺有足够的知识和理解。但是 ,持续工艺确认的程度会受到一些因


素的影响,包括




prior development and manufacturing knowledge from similar products and/or processes;



从同类产品和


/


或工艺中获得的研发生产前的知识




the


extent


of


process


understanding


gained


from


development


studies


and


commercial


manufacturing


experience;



在研发获 得的对工艺理解的程度,以及商业生产经验




the complexity of the product and/or manufacturing process;



产品和


/


或生产工艺的复杂性




the level of process automation and analytical technologies used;



工艺自动化水平和使用的分析技术水平




for legacy products, with reference to the product lifecycle, process robustness and manufacturing history


since point of commercialization as appropriate.



对于已有产品,参考产品生命周 期、工艺耐用性和自从商业化以来的生产历史(适用时)



A discussion on the appropriateness and feasibility of the continuous process verification strategy should be


included in the development section of the dossier and should be supported with data from at least laboratory


or


pilot


scale


batches.


A


description


of


the


continuous


process


verification


strategy


including


the


process


parameters


and


material


attributes


that


will


be


monitored,


as


well


as


the


analytical


methods


that


will


be


employed, should be included as described in Annex 1, with cross-reference to the validation section of the


dossier. Actual data generated during continuous process verification at production scale should be available


at the site for inspection. The applicant should define the stage at which the process is considered to be under


control and the validation exercise completed prior to release of the product to the market, and the basis on


which that decision will be made. The discussion should include a justification for the number of batches to


be


used


based


on


the


complexity


and


expected


variability


of


the


process


and


existing


manufacturing


experience


of


the


manufacturing


site.


Continuous


process


verification


would


be


considered


the


most


appropriate method for validating continuous processes.


在申报资料的 研发部分,应包括持续工艺确认策略的适当性和可行性讨论,并使用至少是实验室规模


或 中试规模批次的数据加以支持。持续工艺确认策略的内容应包括:要监控的工艺参数和物料属性、


要采用的分析方法,应该如附录


1


中所述,交叉引用至 申报文件的验证部分。在生产规模持续工艺确


认中所产生的实际数据应受检查现场可以获 得。申请人应定义工艺步骤受控起始点,和将产品放行上


市销售前所完成的验证工作,以 及做出该决定的根据。讨论应包括根据工艺复杂性和预期变化,以及


在生产场所内已有生 产经验来决定批次数的论述。在验证连续生产的工艺时,持续工艺确认被认为是


最适当的 方式。



Continuous process verification can be introduced at any time in the lifecycle of the product. It can be used


for the initial commercial production, to re-validate commercialised products as part of process changes or to


support continual improvement.


持续工艺确认可以在产品生命周期的任何时间引入。它可以 用于初始的商业化生产,作为工艺变更的


一部分对商业产品进行再验证,或用于支持持续 改进。



Continuous process verification is dependent on compliance with GMP principles and requirements.


持续工艺确认是独立于


GMP


原则和要求符合性的。



Pharmaceutical


quality


systems


(PQS)


as


described


in


ICH


Q10


can


complement


GMP


requirements.


However, GMP matters and PQS should not be included in the submission as they are assessed and handled


by GMP inspectors as appropriate.



ICH


Q10

里所述药品质量体系


PQS


可以补充


GMP


要求,但是,


GMP


事宜和< /p>


PQS


不应该包括在申


报资料中,因为它 们是由


GMP


审计官在适当时进行评估的。


5.3. Hybrid approach


混合方案



It


may


be


necessary


to


use


either


the


traditional


process


validation


or


the


continuous


process


verification


approach


for


different


steps


within


the


manufacturing


process.


It


should


be


clear


in


the


dossier


which


approach to validation has been taken for which steps in the manufacturing process.


在生产工艺的不同步骤可能需要采用传统工艺验证或持续工艺确认方法。在文件中应清楚说明生产 工


艺哪个步骤采用了哪种验证方法。



The


validation


requirements


in


terms


of


batch


size


and


number


of


batches


would


depend


on


the


extent


to


which continuous process verification has been used. For non-standard processes (as defined in section 8) if


continuous


process


verification


does


not


address


the


critical


unit


operation(s)


the


process


validation


requirements highlighted in section 5.1 should be applied unless otherwise justified.


验证中关于批量和批次数的要求取决于所使用的持续工艺确认的深度。对于非标工艺(如第


8


部分所


定义)


,如 果持续工艺确认未包括对关键单元操作的确认,如无其它论述,则适用第


5.1


部分中高亮显


示的工艺验证要求。



5.4. Design space verification


设计空间确认



A


design


space


will


normally


be


developed


at


laboratory


or


pilot


scale.


During


scale-up


the


commercial


process


is


generally


conducted


and


validated


in


a


specific


area


of


the


design


space,


defined


as


the


target


interval or Normal Operating Range (NOR). During the product lifecycle, moving from one area to another


within


the


design


space


(i.e.


change


in


the


NOR)


may


represent


higher


or


unknown


risks


not


previously


identified during initial establishment of the design space.


设计空间一般是在实验室或中试规模时建 立的。在放大过程中,一般会实施商业化工艺,在设计空间


的内一个特定区域进行验证, 把它定义为目标区间,或常规操作范围


NOR


。在整个产品生命 周期中,


在设计空间内从一个区间移动至另一个区间(即


NOR


的变更)可能代表更高或未知风险,这些风险


可能在初期设计空 间建立期间并未能预先识别。



For this reason and depending on how the design space was originally established and how the process was


validated, there will be situations where it will be necessary to confirm the suitability of the design space and


verify


that


all


product


quality


attributes


are


still


being


met


in


the


new


area


of


operation


within


the


design


space. This is termed ‘design space verification’.



因为上述原因,


根据设计空间初始建立情况,


和工艺验证情况,


会需 要对设计空间的适当性进行确认,


对于在设计空间内一个新的操作空间生产出的产品是否 满足所有质量属性应进行确认。


这称为



设计空


间确认



< br>


If


the


parameters


investigated


during


development


of


the


design


space


have


not


been


shown


to


be


scale


independent and the process has been validated using traditional process validation, design space verification


would be required and a verification protocol should be provided in the dossier.


如果在设计空间发展阶段所调查 的参数并未显出与放大不相关,且工艺采用了传统工艺验证方法进行


验证,则需要对设计 空间进行确认,并在文件中提供确认方案。



If continuous process verification has been utilised, this may contribute towards ensuring the validity of the


design


space


throughout


the


product


lifecycle.


In


this


case,


a


design


space


verification


strategy


should


be


included as part of the continuous process verification strategy.


如果采用了持续工 艺确认,则有助于保证在产品生命周期内设计空间的有效性。这种情况下,设计空


间确认 策略应作为持续工艺确认策略的一部分。



Depending on the change and the extent of movement within the design space (i.e. distance from validated


target/NOR or new area of design space with higher or unknown risk) protocols for verification may include


controls of quality attributes (QA’s) and process parameters (PP’s) not included in the routine control system


(e.g. monitoring or testing of QA’s and PP’s


that are expected to


be scale dependant


and when applicable,


equipment dependant). It is not necessary to verify entire areas of the Design Space or the edge of failure. In


principle


more


than


one


area


of


the


design


space


should


be


verified


but


a


stepwise


approach


taking


into


consideration


the


need


to


adjust


the


NOR


within


the


approved


design


space


during


product


lifecycle


is


acceptable.


根据变更情况,以及在设计空间内移 动程度()


,确认方案可能包括质量属性控制(


QA

< p>
)和工艺参数


控制



PP




这两项并不包括在常规控制系统中


(例如对不受放大和设施影响的


QA



PP


监控和测试)


< br>不需对设计空间的整个区间,或失效边缘进行确认。原则上,应该对设计空间内不止一个区间进行确


认,但在整个产品生命周期内,由于会在批准的设计空间对


NOR


进行调整的需要,因而进行分步确


认方式也是可以接受的。


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-



本文更新与2021-02-11 12:53,由作者提供,不代表本网站立场,转载请注明出处:https://www.bjmy2z.cn/gaokao/636517.html

EMA工艺验证指南的相关文章