-
EMA
工艺验证指南
---EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/BWP/70278/2012-Rev1 27
February 2014
Committee for Medicinal
Products for Human Use (CHMP)
Committee
for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP)
Guideline
on
process
validation
for
finished
products
-
information
and
data
to
be
provided
in
regulatory
submissions
制剂工艺验证指南
---
在法规提交中要提供的资
料和数据
Draft agreed by
CHMP/CVMP Quality Working Party
2
February 2012
由
CHMP/CVMP
质量工作组通过草案
Adoption by
CVMP for release for consultation
CVMP
同意公开征求意见
Adoption by CHMP for release for
consultation
CHMP
同意公开征求意见
End of consultation (deadline for
comments)
征求意见结束(截止日期)
Agreed by QWP
由
QWP
通过
Agreed by BWP
由
BWP
通过
Adoption by CHMP
由
CHMP
采用
Adoption
by CVMP
由
CVMP
采用
p>
2012
年
2<
/p>
月
2
日
8 March 2012
2012
年
3
月
8
日<
/p>
15 March 2012
201
2
年
3
月
15
日
31 October 2012
2012
年
10
月
31
日
8 November 2013
2013
< br>年
11
月
8
日
13 November 2013
2013
年
11
月
13
日
19
December 2013
2013
年
12
月
19
日
15 January 2014
2014
年
1
月
15
日
Date for coming into
effect
6 months after publication
生效日期
公布后
6
个月
This
guideline
replaces
the
note
for
guidance
on
process
validation
(CPMP/QWP/848/96,
EMEA/CVMP/598/99) including annex II
–
non-standard processes
(CPMP/QWP/2054/03).
本指南替代工艺验证注释(
CPMP/QWP/848/96,
EMEA/CVMP/598/99
)
,包括附录二
----
非标准工艺
(<
/p>
CPMP/QWP/2054/03
)
。
Process
validation,
continuous
process
verification,
on-going
process
verification,
critical
Keywords
process parameter,
critical quality attribute, lifecycle, change
control
关键词
工艺验证、
持续工艺确认、关键工艺参数、关键质量属性、生命周期、变更控制
Table of contents
目录
Executive
summary
实施摘要
1.
Introduction (background)
2. Scope
3. Legal basis
4. General
considerations
5. Process validation
5.1. Traditional process validation
5.2. Continuous process verification
介绍(背景)
范围
法规依据
一般考虑
工艺验证
传统工艺验证
持续工艺确认
5.3.
Hybrid approach
5.4. Design space
verification
6. Scale-up
7.
Post approval change control
混合方案
设计空间确认
放大生产
批准后变更控制
8.
Standard vs. non-standard methods of manufacture <
/p>
标准
VS
非标准生产方法
Definitions
定义
References
Annex I: Process validation scheme
参考文献
附录
I
:工艺验证计划
Annex
II: Standard/non-standard processes
附录<
/p>
II
:标准
/
非
标工艺
Executive
summary
实施摘要
This
guideline
replaces
the
previous
note
for
guidance
on
process
validation
(CPMP/QWP/848/96,
EMEA/CVMP/598/99).
The
guideline
is
brought
into
line
with
ICH
Q8,
Q9
and
Q10
documents
and
the
possibility to use continuous process
verification in addition to, or
instead
of, traditional process validation
described in the previous guideline has
been added and is encouraged. This guideline does
not introduce new
requirements on
medicinal products already authorised and on the
market, but clarifies how companies can
take advantage of the new possibilities
given when applying enhanced process understanding
coupled with
risk management tools
under an efficient quality system as described by
ICH Q8, Q9 and Q10.
本指南替代之前的工艺验证指南解释
(CPMP/QWP/848/96,
EMEA/CVMP/598/99)
。本指南与
ICH
p>
Q8
,
Q9
和
p>
Q10
文件相一致,提供在之前加入和鼓励采用的传统工艺验证这外
,提供了使用持续工艺确认
的可能性。本指南对已批准上市的药品未引入新要求,但阐述
了公司在
ICH
Q8,
Q9
和
Q10
中描述的
有
效质量体系下,应用强化工艺理解与风险管理工具时,如何抓住所给的新的可能性。
1. Introduction (background)
介绍(背景)
Process
validation
can
be
defined
as
documented
evidence
that
the
process,
operated
within
established
parameters,
can
perform
effectively
and
reproducibly
to
produce
a
medicinal
product
meeting
its
predetermined
specifications
and
quality
attributes
(ICH
Q7).
Continuous
process
verification
has
been
introduced
to
cover
an
alternative
approach
to
process
validation
based
on
a
continuous
monitoring
of
manufacturing performance. This
approach is based on the knowledge from product
and process development
studies and /
or previous manufacturing experience.
工
艺可定义为证明在建立的参数范围内操作的工艺可以重复有效地生产出符合其预定质量标准和质量
属性的药品的书面证据
(ICH
Q7)
。持续工艺验证被引入替代基于对工艺性能持续监测的工艺验证。这
种方法是
依据来自于产品和工艺研发和
/
或之前生产经验的知识。
Continuous
process
verification
may
be
applicable
to
both
a
traditional
and
enhanced
approach
to
pharmaceutical
development. It may use extensive in-line, on-line
or at-line monitoring and / or controls to
evaluate
process
performance.
It
is
intended
that
the
combination
of
the
advice
provided
in
the
Note
for
Guidance
on
Development
Pharmaceutics
(CPMP/QWP/155/96)
and
the
Note
for
Guidance
on
Pharmaceutical
Development
(ICH
Q8R2)
together
with
this
guideline
should
cover
all
of
the
critical
elements in manufacturing process for
inclusion in the dossier for regulatory submission
for a pharmaceutical
product
for
human
use.
For
veterinary
medicinal
products,
the
applicable
guidance
is
that
provided
in
the
Note for Guidance on Development
Pharmaceutics for Veterinary Medicinal Products
(EMEA/CVMP/315/98)
together
with
this
guideline.
Although
the
ICH
Q8
guideline
is
not
applicable
to
veterinary
medicinal
products the principles detailed in
this guideline may be applied to veterinary
medicinal products should an
applicant
choose
to
apply
an
enhanced
approach
to
pharmaceutical
development
and
process
validation.
Process
validation
should
not
be
viewed
as
a
one-off
event.
Process
validation
incorporates
a
lifecycle
approach linking product and process
development, validation of the commercial
manufacturing process and
maintenance
of the process in a state of control during
routine commercial production.
持续工艺确认既适
用于传统药品研发方法,也适用于加强药品研发方法。它采用广泛的在线监测和
/
或控制来评估工艺的性能。将研发药物指南解释
(CPMP/QWP/
155/96)
、药物研发指南解释
(ICH
Q8R2)
与本指南相结合,应可以覆盖人用药法规申报文件所需包括的生产工
艺的关键因素。对于兽药产品,
适用的指南为
“
兽药研发指南解释
”
(EMEA/CVMP/315
/98)
与本指南。尽管
ICH
Q8
指南不适用兽药产
品,本指南中的原则可以应用于兽药产品,申
请人应选择性采用更好的方法来进行药品研发和工艺验
证。工艺验证不应该作为是一次性
的事情。工艺验证应将产品生命周期结合工艺研发、商业生产工艺
验证、在常规商业化生
产中控制状态的工艺维护相结合。
2. Scope
范围
This document
is intended to provide guidance on the process
validation information and data to be provided
in
regulatory
submissions
for
the
finished
dosage
forms
of
chemical
medicinal
products
for
human
and
veterinary use. The general principles
also apply to active substances.
本文件意在提
供关于人用和兽用化学药品制剂的申报时所需提交的工艺验证资料和数据的指南。一般
原
则也适用于活性物质。
However,
information on validation of non-sterile active
substances is not required in the dossier.
但是,在申报文件中并不要求提交非无菌原料药的验证信息。
In
addition,
expectations
for
active
substances
are
contained
in
ICH
Q11
and
so
the
information
is
not
repeated in this
document.
另外,
ICH Q11
< br>中包括了对原料药的建议,因此本文件中不再重复这些信息。
The
principles
described
are
also
applicable
to
biological
medicinal
products.
However,
these
should
be
considered on a case by case basis in
view of the complex nature and inherent
variability of the biological
substance.
本文所述的原则也适用于生物制品。<
/p>
但是,
生物制品的工艺验证应根据其复杂性和内在变因各案考查。
It is expected that the
information / data requested in this guideline be
present in the dossier at the time of
regulatory submission.
在本指南中
所要求的资料
/
数据应该包括在法规申报的文件中。
This document provides guidance
on the validation of the manufacturing process,
which can be considered as
the second
stage in the product lifecycle. The first stage
(process design) is covered in the note for
guidance
on
pharmaceutical
development
(ICH
Q8R2/
EMEA/CVMP/315/98)
and
the
third
stage
(on-going
process
verification) is
covered under
GMP
(Annex
15).
本文件提供生产工艺验证指南,工艺验证可以当作产品生命周期的第二阶段。
第一阶段(工艺设计)
包括在药物研发指南解释(
ICH
Q8R2/ EMEA/CVMP/315/98
)中,第三阶段(持续工艺确认)包括
在
GMP
(附录
15
< br>)中。
3. Legal basis
法律依据
This
guideline has to be read in conjunction with the
introduction and general principles section (4) of
Annex
I to Directive 2001/83/EC as
amended and the introduction and general
principles section (2) of Annex I to
Directive 2001/82/EC as amended.
本指南应与指令
2001/83/EC
修订版本附录
1
第(
4
)部
分中的介绍和一般原则,以及指令
2001/82/EC
p>
修订版附录
1
第(
2
)部分中的介绍和一般原则一起解读。
4. General considerations
一般考虑
Irrespective
of whether a medicinal product is developed by a
traditional approach or an enhanced approach,
the
manufacturing
process
should
be
validated
before
the
product
is
placed
on
the
market.
In
exceptional
circumstances
concurrent validation may be accepted. Please
refer to GMP Annex 15 for further guidance.
Process validation should confirm that
the control strategy is adequate to the process
design and the quality of
the
product.
The
validation
should
cover
all
manufactured
strengths
and
all
manufacturing
sites
used
for
production of the marketed product. A
bracketing approach may be acceptable for
different strengths, batch
sizes and
pack sizes.
However, validation must
cover all proposed sites.
Process
validation data should
be
generated
for
all
products
to
demonstrate
the
adequacy
of
the
manufacturing
process
at
each
site
of
manufacture.
Validation
should
be
carried
out
in
accordance
with
GMP
and
data
should
be
held
at
the
manufacturing location and made
available for inspection if not required in the
dossier (see section 8).
工艺验证应确认控制策略对于工
艺设计和产品质量来说已足够。验证应覆盖生产上市产品的所有生产
场所和所有剂量产品
。不同剂量、不同批量和包装规格可以括号法。但是,验证必须覆盖所有拟生产
的场所。
每个生产场所所有产品均应有工艺验证数据,以证明生产工艺的充分性。工艺验证应符合
GMP
,数据应保留在生产场所,如果申报文件中未要求(参见第
8
部分)则应该在检查过程中随时可
提供。
< br>
Process validation can be performed
in a traditional way, as described below,
regardless of the approach to
development taken. However, there is
also the possibility to implement continuous
process verification if an
enhanced
approach to development has been performed or
where a substantial amount of product and process
knowledge
and
understanding
has
been
gained
through
historical
data
and
manufacturing
experience.
A
combination
of
traditional
process
validation
and
continuous
process
verification
may
be
employed.
The
in-line,
on-line
or
at-line
monitoring
that
is
often
utilised
for
continuous process
verification
(discussed
in
section 5.2) provides
substantially more information and knowledge about
the process
and might
facilitate
process
improvements.
如下所述,不管采用了什么研发方法,工艺验证都可以采
用传统方法。但是,如果已采用加强研发方
法,或通过历史数据和生产经验已获得大量产
品和工艺知识和理解,也存在实施持续工艺确认的可能
性。可能要采用传统工艺验证和持
续工艺确认相结合的方法。在线监控经常用于持续工艺确认(在第
5.2
部分中已讨论)
,提供大量的关于工艺的信息和知识,可能有利于工艺改进。<
/p>
5. Process validation
工艺验证
5.1.
Traditional process validation
传统工艺验证
Traditional process
validation is
normally
performed when the pharmaceutical
development
and/or process
development is concluded, after scale-
up to production scale and prior to marketing of
the finished product.
As part of the
process validation lifecycle, some process
validation studies may be conducted on pilot scale
batches if the process has not yet been
scaled up to production scale.
传统工艺验证一般
在药物研发和
/
或工艺研发结束后,在放大至生产规模后,成品
上市前进行。作为工
艺验证生命周期的一部分,如果有些工艺还没有放大到生产规模,部
分工艺验证研究可能会在中试批
次进行。
It should be noted that pilot batch
size should correspond to at least 10% of the
production scale batch (i.e.
such that
the multiplication factor for the scale-up does
not exceed 10). For solid oral dosage forms this
size
should
generally
be
10%
of
the
maximum
production
scale
or
100,000
units
whichever
is
the
greater
[1]
.
Where
the
intended
batch
size is
less
than
100,000
units,
the
predictive
value
of
the
pilot
batches
may
be
limited and a justified
approach should be followed. For other dosage
forms the pilot batch size should be
justified
taking
into
account
risk
to
the
patient
of
failure
of
the
dosage
form.
Since
it
is
not
generally
considered
useful
to
conduct
full
validation
studies
on
pilot
scale
batches,
the
process
validation
scheme
outlined
in
Annex
I
of
this
guideline
should
be
completed
for
each
product
for
subsequent
execution
at
production
scale;
bracketing
may
be
acceptable.
The
process
validation
scheme
to
be
followed
should
be
included in the dossier.
The scheme should include a description of the
manufacturing process, the tests to be
performed and acceptance criteria, a
description of the additional controls in place
and the data to be collected.
A
justification
for the chosen process
validation scheme should be presented
in
Module 3 and the Quality
Overall
Summary
for
human
medicines
and
in
Part
2.B
and
the
Pharmaceutical
Detailed
and
Critical
Summary for
veterinary medicines.
要注意的是中试生产批应至少对应商业
生产批量的
10%
(即,放大生产倍数不应超过
10
)
。该规模的
固体口服剂
型一般应为最大生产批量的
10%
或
1
0
万个单位剂量,
取其中大者。
如果要
生产的批量小于
10
万剂型单位,中试批次预期值可能受限,则
需要采用经过评估的方法。对于其它剂型,中试批量的
论述要考虑剂型失败给患者带来的
风险。由于一般认为在中试规模批次进行全验证研究是没有用的,
因此在本指南附录
p>
1
中列出的工艺验证计划应在之后的各产品生产规模时进行完善,<
/p>
可以接受括号法。
申报文件中应包括要执行的工艺验证计划。计划
中应包括工艺描述、要实施的测试和可接受标准、附
加控制的描述和要收集的数据。要在
人药申报文件模块
3
和质量综述、兽药申报文件第
2.B
部分和药
品详情和关键摘要中放入为什么选择
该工艺验证计划的论述。
In
certain
cases
however,
it
is
considered
necessary
to
provide
production
scale
validation
data
in
the
marketing
authorisation
dossier
at
the
time
of
regulatory
submission,
for
example
when
the
product
is
a
biological / biotech product or where
the applicant is proposing a non-standard method
of manufacture (see
section 8 and Annex
II). In these cases, data should be provided in
the dossier on a number of consecutive
batches at production scale prior to
approval. The number of batches should be based on
the variability of the
process, the
complexity of the process /product, process
knowledge gained during development, supportive
data at commercial scale during
technology transfer and the overall experience of
the manufacturer. Data on a
minimum
of
3
production
scale
batches
should
be
submitted
unless
otherwise
justified.
Data
on
1
or
2
production
scale batches may suffice where these are
supported by pilot scale batches and a
justification as
highlighted above.
在某些情况下,可能认为有必要在上市许可申报资料中提交生产批量的验证数据,例如,如果产
品是
生物
/
生物技术制品,或者申请人
所拟的工艺为非标生产方法(参见第
8
部分和附录二)
。这种情况下,
要在批准前在申报资料中包括采用生产批量所获得的连续
批次数据。批次数应基于工艺变动情况、工
艺
/
产品复杂程度、在研发阶段所获得的工艺知识、在技术转移中所获得的商业批量中的支持数据,以
及生产商的总体经验。除非另有论述,否则至少需要提交
3
批生产批量的数据。如果另有中试批量数
据支持,以及上述高亮显示的论述
提供,则仅提供
1
或
2
批生产批量数据也是可以的。
译者:未见哪里有高亮显示的内容。
The studies should address critical
steps of manufacture, by conducting additional
testing as necessary.
研究应说明关键生产工艺步骤,必要时增加检测。
5.2. Continuous process verification
持续工艺确认
Continuous
process
verification
is
an
alternative
approach
to
traditional
process
validation
in
which
manufacturing process
performance is continuously monitored and
evaluated (ICH Q8).
持续工艺确认是传统工艺验证的一种替代方
式,是指生产工艺的性能被持续地监控和评估(
ICH
Q8
)
。
Continuous process verification can be
used in addition to, or instead of, traditional
process validation.
持续工艺确认可以用于补充,或替代传统工艺验证。
It is a science and risk-based real-
time approach to verify and demonstrate that a
process that operates within
the
predefined
specified
parameters
consistently
produces
material
which
meets
all
its
critical
quality
attributes
(CQAs)
and
control
strategy
requirements.
In
order
to
enable
continuous
process
verification,
companies
should
perform,
as
relevant,
extensive
in-line,
on-line
or
at-
line
controls
and
monitor
process
performance and product quality on each
batch. Relevant data on quality attributes of
incoming materials or
components,
in-process
material
and
finished
products
should
be
collected.
This
should
include
the
verification of attributes, parameters
and end points, and assessment of CQA and critical
process parameter
(CPP)
trends.
Process
analytical
technology
(PAT)
applications
such
as
NIR
spectroscopy
with
or
without
feedback loop
(e.g. end
point determination of blend
homogeneity, determination of granules surface
area,
determination
of
content
uniformity
with
large
sample
size)
and
Multivariate
Statistical
Process
Control
(MSPC) can be viewed as enablers for
continuous process verification.
确认和证明一
个工艺如果在预定的特定参数范围内操作,即可以稳定生产出符合所有
CQA
和控制策
略要求的物料是一个科学并基于风险的实时方法。为了进行持续工
艺确认,公司应相应地实施众多的
在线控制和工艺性能监控,以及各批产品质量监控。应
收集进厂物料或组件、制程中物料和成品的质
量属性相关数据,还应该包括对属性、参数
和终点,和
CQA
和
CPP
趋势的评估。工艺分析技术
PAT
工具,如具有或
不具有反馈回路的
NIR
光谱(例如,混合均一性终点测试,颗
粒表面积测试,样品量
较大时含量均一性测试)
,和多变量统计
学工艺控制
MSPC
可以当作持续工艺确认的工具。
Sufficient
knowledge
and
understanding
of
the
process
is
required
in
order
to
support
continuous
process
verification. However, the scope and
extent of continuous process verification will be
influenced by a number
of factors
including:
为了支持持续工艺确认,需要对工艺有足够的知识和理解。但是
,持续工艺确认的程度会受到一些因
素的影响,包括
—
prior development and
manufacturing knowledge from similar products
and/or processes;
—
从同类产品和
/
或工艺中获得的研发生产前的知识
—
the
extent
of
process
understanding
gained
from
development
studies
and
commercial
manufacturing
experience;
—
在研发获
得的对工艺理解的程度,以及商业生产经验
—
the complexity of the
product and/or manufacturing process;
—
产品和
/
或生产工艺的复杂性
—
the level of
process automation and analytical technologies
used;
—
工艺自动化水平和使用的分析技术水平
—
for legacy
products, with reference to the product lifecycle,
process robustness and manufacturing history
since point of commercialization as
appropriate.
—
对于已有产品,参考产品生命周
期、工艺耐用性和自从商业化以来的生产历史(适用时)
A
discussion on the appropriateness and feasibility
of the continuous process verification strategy
should be
included in the development
section of the dossier and should be supported
with data from at least laboratory
or
pilot
scale
batches.
A
description
of
the
continuous
process
verification
strategy
including
the
process
parameters
and
material
attributes
that
will
be
monitored,
as
well
as
the
analytical
methods
that
will
be
employed, should be included as
described in Annex 1, with cross-reference to the
validation section of the
dossier.
Actual data generated during continuous process
verification at production scale should be
available
at the site for inspection.
The applicant should define the stage at which the
process is considered to be under
control and the validation exercise
completed prior to release of the product to the
market, and the basis on
which that
decision will be made. The discussion should
include a justification for the number of batches
to
be
used
based
on
the
complexity
and
expected
variability
of
the
process
and
existing
manufacturing
experience
of
the
manufacturing
site.
Continuous
process
verification
would
be
considered
the
most
appropriate method for
validating continuous processes.
在申报资料的
研发部分,应包括持续工艺确认策略的适当性和可行性讨论,并使用至少是实验室规模
或
中试规模批次的数据加以支持。持续工艺确认策略的内容应包括:要监控的工艺参数和物料属性、
要采用的分析方法,应该如附录
1
中所述,交叉引用至
申报文件的验证部分。在生产规模持续工艺确
认中所产生的实际数据应受检查现场可以获
得。申请人应定义工艺步骤受控起始点,和将产品放行上
市销售前所完成的验证工作,以
及做出该决定的根据。讨论应包括根据工艺复杂性和预期变化,以及
在生产场所内已有生
产经验来决定批次数的论述。在验证连续生产的工艺时,持续工艺确认被认为是
最适当的
方式。
Continuous process
verification can be introduced at any time in the
lifecycle of the product. It can be used
for the initial commercial production,
to re-validate commercialised products as part of
process changes or to
support continual
improvement.
持续工艺确认可以在产品生命周期的任何时间引入。它可以
用于初始的商业化生产,作为工艺变更的
一部分对商业产品进行再验证,或用于支持持续
改进。
Continuous process
verification is dependent on compliance with GMP
principles and requirements.
持续工艺确认是独立于
GMP
原则和要求符合性的。
Pharmaceutical
quality
systems
(PQS)
as
described
in
ICH
Q10
can
complement
GMP
requirements.
However, GMP
matters and PQS should not be included in the
submission as they are assessed and handled
by GMP inspectors as appropriate.
在
ICH
Q10
里所述药品质量体系
PQS
可以补充
GMP
要求,但是,
GMP
事宜和<
/p>
PQS
不应该包括在申
报资料中,因为它
们是由
GMP
审计官在适当时进行评估的。
5.3. Hybrid approach
混合方案
It
may
be
necessary
to
use
either
the
traditional
process
validation
or
the
continuous
process
verification
approach
for
different
steps
within
the
manufacturing
process.
It
should
be
clear
in
the
dossier
which
approach to validation has been taken
for which steps in the manufacturing process.
在生产工艺的不同步骤可能需要采用传统工艺验证或持续工艺确认方法。在文件中应清楚说明生产
工
艺哪个步骤采用了哪种验证方法。
The
validation
requirements
in
terms
of
batch
size
and
number
of
batches
would
depend
on
the
extent
to
which
continuous process verification has been used. For
non-standard processes (as defined in section 8)
if
continuous
process
verification
does
not
address
the
critical
unit
operation(s)
the
process
validation
requirements highlighted in section 5.1
should be applied unless otherwise justified.
验证中关于批量和批次数的要求取决于所使用的持续工艺确认的深度。对于非标工艺(如第
8
部分所
定义)
,如
果持续工艺确认未包括对关键单元操作的确认,如无其它论述,则适用第
5.1
部分中高亮显
示的工艺验证要求。
5.4. Design space verification
设计空间确认
A
design
space
will
normally
be
developed
at
laboratory
or
pilot
scale.
During
scale-up
the
commercial
process
is
generally
conducted
and
validated
in
a
specific
area
of
the
design
space,
defined
as
the
target
interval or Normal Operating Range
(NOR). During the product lifecycle, moving from
one area to another
within
the
design
space
(i.e.
change
in
the
NOR)
may
represent
higher
or
unknown
risks
not
previously
identified during initial establishment
of the design space.
设计空间一般是在实验室或中试规模时建
立的。在放大过程中,一般会实施商业化工艺,在设计空间
的内一个特定区域进行验证,
把它定义为目标区间,或常规操作范围
NOR
。在整个产品生命
周期中,
在设计空间内从一个区间移动至另一个区间(即
NOR
的变更)可能代表更高或未知风险,这些风险
可能在初期设计空
间建立期间并未能预先识别。
For this
reason and depending on how the design space was
originally established and how the process was
validated, there will be situations
where it will be necessary to confirm the
suitability of the design space and
verify
that
all
product
quality
attributes
are
still
being
met
in
the
new
area
of
operation
within
the
design
space. This is termed ‘design space
verification’.
因为上述原因,
根据设计空间初始建立情况,
和工艺验证情况,
会需
要对设计空间的适当性进行确认,
对于在设计空间内一个新的操作空间生产出的产品是否
满足所有质量属性应进行确认。
这称为
“
设计空
间确认
”
。
< br>
If
the
parameters
investigated
during
development
of
the
design
space
have
not
been
shown
to
be
scale
independent and the process has been
validated using traditional process validation,
design space verification
would be
required and a verification protocol should be
provided in the dossier.
如果在设计空间发展阶段所调查
的参数并未显出与放大不相关,且工艺采用了传统工艺验证方法进行
验证,则需要对设计
空间进行确认,并在文件中提供确认方案。
If
continuous process verification has been utilised,
this may contribute towards ensuring the validity
of the
design
space
throughout
the
product
lifecycle.
In
this
case,
a
design
space
verification
strategy
should
be
included as part of the continuous
process verification strategy.
如果采用了持续工
艺确认,则有助于保证在产品生命周期内设计空间的有效性。这种情况下,设计空
间确认
策略应作为持续工艺确认策略的一部分。
Depending
on the change and the extent of movement within
the design space (i.e. distance from validated
target/NOR or new area of design space
with higher or unknown risk) protocols for
verification may include
controls of
quality attributes (QA’s) and process parameters
(PP’s) not included in the routine control system
(e.g. monitoring or testing of QA’s and
PP’s
that are expected to
be
scale dependant
and when applicable,
equipment dependant). It is not
necessary to verify entire areas of the Design
Space or the edge of failure. In
principle
more
than
one
area
of
the
design
space
should
be
verified
but
a
stepwise
approach
taking
into
consideration
the
need
to
adjust
the
NOR
within
the
approved
design
space
during
product
lifecycle
is
acceptable.
根据变更情况,以及在设计空间内移
动程度()
,确认方案可能包括质量属性控制(
QA
)和工艺参数
控制
(
PP
)
,
这两项并不包括在常规控制系统中
(例如对不受放大和设施影响的
QA
和
PP
监控和测试)
。
< br>不需对设计空间的整个区间,或失效边缘进行确认。原则上,应该对设计空间内不止一个区间进行确
认,但在整个产品生命周期内,由于会在批准的设计空间对
NOR
p>
进行调整的需要,因而进行分步确
认方式也是可以接受的。