-
考研英语阅读理解模拟试题及解析一
The
majority of successful senior managers do not
closely follow the classical rational
model of first clarifying goals,
assessing the problem, formulating options,
estimating
likelihoods of success,
making a decision, and only then taking action to
implement the
decision. Rather,
in
their day-by-day
tactical maneuvers, these senior
executives rely on
what
is
vaguely
termed
intuition
to
manage
a
network
of
interrelated
problems
that
require
them
to
deal
with
ambiguity,
inconsistency,
novelty,
and
surprise
;
and
to
integrate
action
into the process of
thinking.
Generations
of
writers
on
management
have
recognized
that
some
practicing
managers
rely
heavily on intuition. In general,
however, such writers display a poor grasp of what
intuition is. Some see it as the
opposite of rationality; others view it as an
excuse for
capriciousness.
Isenberg's
recent
research
on the
cognitive processes of senior managers reveals
that
managers'
intuition
is
neither
of
these.
Rather,
senior
managers
use
intuition
in
at
least
five distinct ways.
First, they intuitively sense when a problem
exists. Second, managers
rely
on
intuition
to
perform
well-learned
behavior
patterns
rapidly.
This
intuition
is
not
arbitrary
or
irrational,
but
is
based
on
years
of
painstaking
practice
and
hands-on
experience
that
build
skills.
A
third
function
of
intuition
is
to
synthesize
isolated
bits
of
data
and
practice
into
an
integrated
picture,
often
in
an
Aha
!
experience.
Fourth,
some
managers use intuition as a check on
the results of more rational analysis. Most senior
executives are familiar with the formal
decision analysis models and tools, and those who
use such systematic methods for
reaching decisions are occasionally leery of
solutions
suggested
by
these
methods
which
run
counter
to
their
sense
of
the
correct
course
of
action.
Finally,
managers
can
use
intuition
to
bypass
in-
depth
analysis
and
move
rapidly
to
engender
a plausible
solution. Used in this way, intuition is an almost
instantaneous cognitive
process in
which a manager recognizes familiar
patterns.
One
of
the
implications
of
the
intuitive
style
of
executive
management
is
that
thinking
is
inseparable
from
acting.
Since
managers
often
know
what
is
right
before
they
can
analyze
and
explain
it,
they
frequently
act
first
and
explain
later.
Analysis
is
inextricably
tied
to
action
in
thinking/acting
cycles,
in
which
managers
develop
thoughts
about
their
companies and organizations not by
analyzing a
problematic situation and
then acting, but
by acting and
analyzing in close concert.
Given the great uncertainty
of many of the management issues that they face,
senior
managers
often
instigate
a
course
of
action
simply
to
learn
more
about
an
issue.
They
then
use the results of the action to
develop a more complete understanding of the
issue. One
implication
of
thinking/acting
cycles
is
that
action
is
often
part
of
defining
the
problem,
not just of
implementing the solution.
1. According to the text,
senior managers use intuition in all of the
following ways
EXCEPT to
[A] Speed up of
the creation of a solution to a
problem.
[B] Identify a problem.
[C] Bring
together disparate facts.
[D] Stipulate clear
goals.
2. The text suggests which of the
following about the writers on management
mentioned
in line 1, paragraph
2
[A] They have criticized managers for
not following the classical rational model of
decision analysis.
[B]
They
have
not
based
their
analyses
on
a
sufficiently
large
sample
of
actual
managers.
[C] They have relied in
drawing their conclusions on what managers say
rather than on
what managers
do.
[D] They have misunderstood how
managers use intuition in making business
decisions.
3. It can be inferred from the text
that which of the following would most probably
be
one
major
difference
in
behavior
between
Manager
X,
who
uses
intuition
to
reach
decisions,
and Manager Y, who uses only formal
decision analysis
[A] Manager X analyzes
first and then acts
;
Manager
Y does not.
[B]
Manager X checks
possible
solutions to
a
problem by systematic
analysis
;
Manager
Y does not.
[C] Manager X takes action
in order to arrive at the solution to a
problem
;
Manager
Y does not.
[D]
Manager
Y
draws
on
years
of
hands-on
experience
in
creating
a
solution
to
a
problem
;
Manager X does not.
4. The text
provides support for which of the following
statements
[A] Managers who rely on intuition are
more successful than those who rely on formal
decision analysis.
[B] Managers
cannot justify their intuitive
decisions.
[C] Managers'' intuition works contrary
to their rational and analytical
skills.
[D]
Intuition
enables
managers
to
employ
their
practical
experience
more
efficiently.
5. Which of the
following best describes the organization of the
first paragraph of
the text
[A] An
assertion is made and a specific supporting
example is given.
[B] A conventional model is
dismissed and an alternative
introduced.
[C] The results of recent research are
introduced and summarized.
[D] Two opposing points of
view are presented and evaluated.
答案与考点解析
1.
「答案」
D
「考点解析」这是一道归纳推导题。本题题干中的
senior
managers
暗示本题的答案信息在第
三段
,
因为第三段首句包含题干中的
senior man
agers
。通过仔细阅读和理解本段中所谈到的五点
,
我们可推导出本题的正确选项是选项
D.
本题
选项
A
、
B
、
C
所涉及的内容分别在本段的第五点、第一
点和第三点提到。考生在解题时一定要学会认真归纳和总结原文所表达的每一层含义。
2.
「答案」
D
「考点解析」这是一道句间关系题。题干已将本题的答案信息
圈定在第二段。本段中的第二句
是本题答案信息的最主要来源
,
通过阅读和理解此句
,
我们可推导出本
题的正确选项是
D.
考生在解题
时一定
要适当理解上下句之间的关系。
3.
「答案」
C
「考点解析」本题是一道审题定位题。题干中的
who
uses intuition to reach decisions
暗
示本题的答案信息在第四段
,
因为第四段首句含有
和题干中
who
uses
intuition
to
reach
decisions
大致相同的
the
intuitive style of executive management
。通过仔细阅读和理解第四段的每一
句话
,
我们可发现第四段的第一句话都在强调
act
(行动)
p>
,
可见本题的正确选项应该是强调行动的
选
项
C.
本题的答案信息来源是第四段的第二句话。考生在解题时
一定要首先准确地审题定位
,
然后
要善
于归纳和理解原文中的中心主旨信息。
4.
「答案」
D
「考点解析」本题是一道审题定位题。题干中并没有明确指出
本题答案信息在原文的准确位置。
在这种情况下
,
考生往往迷失解题思路。在考生迷失解题思路时一定要牢记全文中心主旨
,<
/p>
并且抓住
各段的核心句。
本文的中心主旨
句在第一段的尾句。
如果考生能够抓住第一段的尾句
,
并结合第三段
的第四、五句
,
< br>就可以推导出本题的正确选项应该是
D.
考生在解题时<
/p>
,
尤其是在迷失解题思路时
,
一
定要首先抓全文的中心主旨句
,
同时还要抓一些明确表示启承转合关系的句子结构。
5.
「答案」
B
「考点解析」本题是一道段落结构题。第一句话中的
do no
t
和第二句句首的
rather
是破解
本
题的关键。抓住这两个关键就可以推导出本题的正确选项应该是
B.
考生在解题时一定要注意表示否
定的词语以及表示启承转
合的词语
,
更要注意句子之间的相互关系。
[
参考译文
]
大部分成功的高层管理人员并不拘泥于传统的推理模式
,
即:
首先确定目标
,
然后估定问
p>
题
,
摆出各种可能性
,
估计成功率
,
再做决定
,
最后才付诸行动去实施。
相反
< br>,
在这些人的日常决策过程
中
,
他们靠一种定义模糊的直觉应付大量相关问题
,
这些问题使他们必须在一堆含糊不清
,
自相矛盾
,
奇特无比或者令人惊异的事物中做抉择
,<
/p>
而且在考虑过程中就要有相应的行动。
管理学作品的写作者早就注意到了实践当中一些管理者对直觉
依赖很强。
不过总的来说
,
这些写
p>
作者未曾表达出什么叫做直觉。有些人将其视作理性的对立面
,
p>
还有人认为它是反复无常的(做法、
性格)的一个借口。
Isenberg
最近对高层管理人员认知过程的研究揭示了管理者的直觉并不是上述的任何一种情
况。高层管理者是在五个不同的方面使用直觉。首先
,
他们直觉地感到有问题存在。第二
,
依靠直觉
,
管理者们能很快表现出有教养的行为方式。这种直觉并不是任意
,
非理性的
,
而是在
多年实践磨练
,
和亲身体验培养出的技能的基础上形成。
第三
,
直觉把一些零散的数据和实际情况组合
为一个完整画
面
,
这经常表现为一声<
/p>
Aha
式的体验。第四
,
有些管理者也应用直觉来检验更理性化分析的结果。大
部分高层管理人员熟知传
统的决策分析模式和工具
,
那些使用这些正式的系统化方法做出
决定的人
经常会对一种情况保持警惕
,
那就是有时此方法得出的结论和他们对正确行为的感觉不符。最后
,
管
理者可通过直觉绕开深奥的分析而快速产生一个可能的解决办法。
这么使用时
,
直觉几乎是一个瞬间
的思维过程
,
这一模式为管理者所熟悉。
< br>
这些管理者用直觉方式的
一个特点是思考和行动不能分开。由于(在这种方式中)管理者在分
析和解释问题之前就
已经明白应该怎么去做
,
他们经常是先行动
,
后解释。在思考
D
行动的循环中
,
分析是必不可少的。
在这其中管理者
们不是靠分析他们面对的形势来思考其公司、
组织的情况
,
p>
而是
行动和分析在高度一致地进行。
由于管理者们经常面对许多不确定
的情况
,
他们鼓励采取各种行动来对问题作一番深入了解。
p>
他
们藉此对问题做出更深的体会。
这种思考
行为循环的一个特点即:
行动是确定问题的一部分
,
而不只
是解决问题的步骤。
考研英语阅读理解模拟试题及解析二
Roger
Rosenblatt’s
book
Black
Fiction,
in
attempting
to
apply
literary
rather
than
sociopolitical criteria to its subject,
successfully alters the approach taken by most
previous studies. As Rosenblatt notes,
criticism of Black writing has often served as a
pretext
for
expounding
on
Black
history.
Addison
Gayle’s
recent
work,
for
example,
judges
the value of Black fiction by overtly
political standards, rating each work according to
the notions of Black identity which it
propounds.
Although
fiction
assuredly
springs
from
political
circumstances
,
its
authors
react
to
those circumstances in ways other than
ideological, and talking about novels and stories
primarily
as
instruments
of
ideology
circumvents
much
of
the
fictional
enterprise.
Rosenblatt’s
literary
analysis
discloses
affinities
and
connections
among
works
of
Black
fiction which solely
political studies have overlooked or
ignored.
Writing
acceptable
criticism
of
Black
fiction,
however,
presupposes
giving
satisfactory
answers
to
a
number
of
questions.
First
of
all,
is
there
a
sufficient
reason,
other
than
the
facial
identity
of
the
authors,
to
group
together
works
by
Black
authorsSecond,
how does
Black fiction make itself distinct from other
modern fiction with which it is
largely
contemporaneous Rosenblatt shows that Black
fiction constitutes a distinct body
of
writing
that
has
an
identifiable
,
coherent
literary
tradition.
Looking
at
novels
written
by
Black
over
the
last
eighty
years,
he
discovers
recurring
concerns
and
designs
independent
of chronology. These structures are
thematic, and they spring, not surprisingly, from
the
central
fact
that
the
Black
characters
in
these
novels
exist
in
a
predominantly
white
culture,
whether they try to
conform to that culture or rebel against
it.
Black
Fiction
does
leave
some
aesthetic
questions
open.
Rosenblatt’s
thematic
analysis
permits considerable objectivity; he
even explicitly states that it is not his
intention
to judge the merit of the
various works D yet his reluctance seems
misplaced, especially
since an attempt
to appraise might have led to interesting results.
For instance, some of
the
novels
appear
to
be
structurally
diffuse.
Is
this
a
defect,
or
are
the
authors
working
out of, or trying to
forge, a different kind of aesthetic In addition,
the style of some
Black novels, like
Jean
Toomey’s
Cane, verges
on expressionism or surrealism; does this
technique
provide
a
counterpoint
to
the
prevalent
theme
that
portrays
the
fate
against
which
Black
heroes
are
pitted,
a
theme
usually
conveyed
by
more
naturalistic
modes
of
expression
In spite of
such omissions, what Rosenblatt does include in
his discussion makes for
an astute and
worthwhile study. Black Fiction surveys a wide
variety of novels, bringing
to our
attention in the process some fascinating and
little-known works like James Weldon
Johnson’s
Autobiography of
an Ex-Colored Man. Its argument is tightly
constructed, and
its forthright, lucid
style exemplifies levelheaded and penetrating
criticism.
1. The author of the text is primarily
concerned with __________.
[A] Evaluating the
soundness of a work of criticism.
[B] Comparing
various critical approaches to a
subject.
[C] Discussing the limitations of a
particular kind of criticism.
[D] Summarizing
the major points made in a work of
criticism.
2. The author of the text believes that
Black Fiction would have been improved had
Rosenblatt __________.
[A]
Evaluated
more carefully the
ideological and
historical
aspects of Black fiction.
[B] Attempted
to be more objective in his approach to novels and
stories by Black
authors.
[C]
Explored
in
greater
detail
the
recurrent
thematic
concerns
of
Black fiction
throughout its history.
[D] Assessed
the relative literary merit of the novels he
analyzes thematically.
author’s
discussion of Black
Fiction can be best described as
__________.
[A] Pedantic and
contentious.
[B] Critical but admiring.
[C] Ironic and
deprecating.
[D] Argumentative but
unfocused.
author of the text employs all of the
following in the discussion of
Rosenblatt’s
book
EXCEPT
:
__________.
[A] Rhetorical questions.
[B] Specific
examples.
[C] Comparison and contrast.
[D] Definition
of terms.
5. The author of the text refers to
James Weldon
Johnson’s
Autobiography of an
Ex-Colored Man most
probably in order to __________.
[A]
point
out
affinities
between
Rosenblatt’s
method
of
thematic
analysis
and
earlier
criticism.
[B] Clarify the point about
expressionistic style made earlier in the
passage.
[C] Qualify the assessment of
Rosenblatt’s
book made in
the first paragraph of the
passage.
[D] give a specific example
of one of the accomplishments of
Rosenblatt’s
work.
答案与考点解析
「答案」
A
「考点解析」这是一道中心主旨题。通过阅读本文各段尤其是
首段第一句和尾段第一句,我们
可以推断出本题的正确选项应该是突出“evaluat
ing”(评价)一词的选项
A.
考生在解题时一定要
注意段落的中心主旨句,以及每句话所表达的内含和作用。
「答案」
D
「考点解析」这是一道审题定位与反推题。从本题题干中的“would have
been improved”可
推断出考生要在原文中寻找到谈论某一方面“不足”的
地方。尾段首句的“such omissions”(这
样的忽略)暗示本题的答案信
息来源应该在倒数第二段。通过仔细阅读和理解倒数第二段,可将本
题的答案信息来源确
定在倒数第二段的第二句。根据倒数第二段第二句的内容进行反推,就可得出
本题的正确
选项是
D.
考生在解题时一定要具备利用上下段之间的关系迅速
审题定位的能力,更要具
备反推即逆向思维的能力。
「答案」
B
「考点解析」这是一道归纳推导题。从本题的题干可以看出本
题的答案信息来源不局限于某一
段或某一句,而是涉及全文的从头至尾。但是只要抓住全
文的中心主旨句就可以得出本题的正确答
案
B.
本文的中心主旨句是第一段的首句和尾段的首句。考生在解题时一定要抓住中心主旨句,并且
对它们所表达的内容要进行分析和归纳。
「答案」
D
「考点解析」这是一道写作手法题
型。本题型旨在考察考生的语言基本功。这是一道较难的题
目。本题
A
、
B
、
C
所涉及的内容可分别在第三段的第二、三句、第四段的第三句以及第一段的第三
句里找到。第一段的第三句涉及
B
和
C
两个选项。选项
D“definition
of
terms”(给词语下定义)
在原文中没有涉及,故本选项是正确答案。考生在解题时一定要注意英文中常见的写作手段。
「答案」
D
「考点解析」这是一道例(举)证题。通过题干中的“Weldon
Johnson''s
Autobiography
of
an
Ex-Colored
M
an”可将本题的答案信息来源迅速确定在尾段的第二句,本句中的“like”(例
如)
一词暗示本题的正确选项应该是含有“specific example”的选项
D.
考生在解题时一定要注意原文
中某
些关键词的应用和理解。
[
参考译文
]
罗杰罗森布莱特的着作《黑人小说
》
,试图运用文学的而不是社会政治的标准来研究黑人小说,
这
成功地改变了大多数早先研究的方法。如罗森布莱特所注意到的,黑人着作的评论经常被充当为
< br>一种阐述黑人历史的借口。例如,阿狄森盖尔的最新着作,就用了公开的政治标准来判定黑人小说
的价值,按照作品中所提出的黑人个体的各观念对每个作品进行评价。
虽然小说确实是源于政治环境,但
作者反映这些环境的方法是非意识形态的,如把小说和故事
的讨论作为意识形态的工具,
则会忽视了许多小说的成就。罗森布莱特对黑人文学的分析揭示了黑
人小说着作间的密切
关系和联系,而纯粹政治研究中忽视了这些联系。
然而写出为人所接受的黑人小说评论的前提是要对许多问题做
出令人满意的回答。首先,除了
这些作家的种族身份外,是否有充分的理由可将黑人作家
的作品归于一类其次,黑人小说如何将自
己和其他现代小说分开它们大半属于同一时代的
作品。罗森布莱特的研究阐明了黑人小说已构成了
一个与众不同的作品群体,它们具有可
识别的、连贯的文学传统。着眼于最近八十年黑人创作的小
说,罗森布莱特揭示了小说中
与时代无关而反复出现的侧重点和布局。这些结构与主题相关,并不
让人感到惊奇的是,
它们源于这样一个中心事实,即小说中的黑人生存在一个白人文化支配的环境
中,不管他
们试图迎合这一文化还是反叛这一文化。
《黑人小说》确实对一些美学的问题没有给予回答,罗森布莱
特的主题分析允许相当的客观性;
他甚至直言,
对各个作品的优
劣判定不是他工作的意图
DD
然而他的犹豫看起来是不合时宜的
,
尤其
是因为尝试评定可能会导致一些有趣的结果。例如,一些
小说所显示的结构散漫冗长。这是否是一
个缺陷,或者是作者这样做是出于一种美学考虑
,还是作者试图创造一种不同类的美学另外,象金
图莫的《手杖》那样的黑人小说风格,
近于表现主义和超现实主义;难道这个技巧只是用更自然主
义的表现方式为表达流行的黑
人英勇反抗命运的主题提供一个对应物吗
尽管存在这些遗漏,罗森布莱特所做的包括他的讨论,已包括
了足以构成精明而有价值的研究
内容。
《黑人小说》考察了广泛
的小说,在此过程中我们的注意力被吸引到一些引人入胜但鲜为人知
的作品上,如詹姆士
威尔顿约翰逊的《一个曾是有色人的自传》
。这本书的主题结构紧密,直率、明
晰的风格例示了一种冷静而敏锐的文学评论。
考研英语阅读理解模拟试题及解析三
Bernard
Bailyn
has
recently
reinterpreted
the
early
history
of
the
United
States
by
applying
new
social
research
findings
on
the
experiences
of
European
migrants.
In
his
reinterpretation,
migration
becomes
the
organizing
principle
for
rewriting
the
history
of
preindustrial North America. His
approach rests on four separate
propositions.
The
first
of
these
asserts
that
residents
of
early
modern
England
moved
regularly
about
their countryside; migrating to the New
World was simply a natural spillover. Although at
first
the
colonies
held
little
positive
attraction
for
the
English
D
they
would
rather
have
stayed home D by the
eighteenth century people increasingly migrated to
America because
they regarded it as the
land of opportunity. Secondly, Bailyn holds that,
contrary to the
notion that used to
flourish in America history textbooks, there was
never a typical New
World community.
For example, the economic and
demographic
character
of
early New England
towns
varied considerably.
Bailyn's third proposition
suggest two general patterns prevailing among the
many
thousands
of
migrants:
one
group
came
as
indentured
servants,
another
came
to
acquire
land.
Surprisingly,
Bailyn
suggests
that
those
who
recruited
indentured
servants
were
the
driving
forces
of
transatlantic
migration.
These
colonial
entrepreneurs
helped
determine
the
social
character
of
people
who
came
to
preindustrial
North
America.
At
first,
thousands
of
unskilled laborers were
recruited; by the 1730's, however, American
employers demanded
skilled
artisans.
Finally, Bailyn argues that the
colonies were a half-civilized hinterland of the
European culture system. He is
undoubtedly correct to insist that the colonies
were part
of an Anglo-American empire.
But to divide the empire into English core and
colonial
periphery, as Bailyn does,
devalues the achievements of colonial culture. It
is true, as
Bailyn claims, that high
culture in the colonies never matched that in
England. But what
of seventeenth-
century New England, where the settlers created
effective laws, built a
distinguished
university, and published books Bailyn might
respond that New England was
exceptional. However, the ideas and
institutions developed by New England Puritans had
powerful effects on North American
culture.
Although
Bailyn
goes
on
to
apply
his
approach
to
some
thousands
of
indentured
servants
who migrated just prior to the
revolution, he fails to link their experience with
the
political development of the United
States. Evidence presented in his work suggests
how
we might make such a connection.
These indentured servants were treated as slaves
for the
period during which they had
sold their time to American employers. It is not
surprising
that as soon as they served
their time they passed up good wages in the cities
and headed
west
to
ensure
their
personal
independence
by
acquiring
land.
Thus,
it
is
in
the
west
that
a
peculiarly American political culture began, among
colonists who were suspicious of
authority and intensely anti-
aristocratic.
Which
of
the
following
statements
about
migrants
to
colonial
North
America
is
supported
by information in
the text
[A] A larger percentage of migrants to
colonial North America came as indentured
servants than as free agents interested
in acquiring land.
[B] Migrants who came to
the colonies as indentured servants were more
successful at
making a livelihood than
were farmers and artisans.
[C]
Migrants
to
colonial
North
America
were
more
successful
at
acquiring
their
own
land
during
the eighteenth century than during the seventeenth
century.
[D] By the 1730's,migrants already
skilled in a trade were in more demand by American
employers than were unskilled
laborers.
The author of the text states that
Bailyn failed to
[A] Give sufficient
emphasis to the cultural and political
interdependence of the
colonies and
England.
[B] Describe carefully how migrants of
different ethnic backgrounds preserved their
culture in the United
States.
[C] Take advantage of social research
on the experiences of colonists who migrated to
colonial North America specifically to
acquire land.
[D]
Relate
the
experience
of
the
migrants
to
the
political
values
that
eventually
shaped
the character of the
United States.
Which of the following best summarizes
the author's evaluation of Bailyn's fourth
proposition
[A] It is totally
implausible.
[B] It is partially
acceptable.
[C] It is highly admirable.
[D] It is
controversial though persuasive.
According
to
the
text,
Bailyn
and
the
author
agree
on
which
of
the
following
statements
about the culture of colonial New
England
[A] High culture in New England never
equaled the high culture of England.
[B]
The
cultural
achievements
of
colonial
New
England
have
generally
been
unrecognized
by
historians.
[C]
The
colonists
imitated
the
high
culture
of
England
,
and
did
not
develop
a
culture
that
was uniquely their own.
[D] The southern colonies
were greatly influenced by the high culture of New
England.
The author of the text would be most
likely to agree with which of the following
statements about Bailyn's
work
[A] Bailyn underestimates the effects
of Puritan thought on North American
culture.
[B] Bailyn overemphasizes the economic
dependence of the colonies on Great
Britain.
[C] Bailyn's
description
of the
colonies
as
part
of
an
Anglo-American empire
is