英文文章修改意见

英文文章修改意见

【篇一：英文论文修改建议】

英文论文修改建议

对于国内许多的研究人员而言，撰写一篇英文论文的难度不亚于让

他们重新撰 写一篇新的论文。在英文基础十分有限的情况下，又要

发表英文论文，那么我们应该怎么 做呢

?

下面辑文编译给大家一些英

文论 文修改建议，希望能帮到大家。

所 谓英文论文修改服务，就是针对专业性较强、权威性较强的英文

论文进行润色。对于不同 的英文论文修改，我们建议大家一定要找

到相关的切入点。只有找到关键的切入点，才能 让修改之后的论文

看起来更加专业权威，具有更高的可读性。

一、针对英文论文的修改，我们建议首先寻找整篇论文当中， 语句

不通顺，读起来不够清晰的地方。然后针对性的去除多余杂乱的词

< br>汇，让语句看起来干练简洁。现在的英文论文修改服务，是很多机

构提供的服务项 目之一，通常都是由高水准、丰富经验的人员帮助

进行修改。

二、一篇好的英文论文，如果想要达到更加上等品位的标准， 不仅

应该寻找专业的英文论文修改机构帮助自己进行润色。更加需要在

< br>写作的过程当中，加强相关的学术性、权威性。让整篇论文看起来

更加专业、加强 论文当中的学术地方。

三、现在不 少专业人士都喜欢通过英文论文修改服务，加强自己文

章的可读性、权威性。也能够扩展 文章当中的交流信息，进一步提

升整体文章的素质以及写作水质。一篇上等品质的英文论 文，一定

要有自己的见解，独特的思维，从标题到内容甚至论文的每个结

构，都需要有创新的焦点所在。

< br>四、针对不同的英文论文修改，都可以根据内容，抓住相关的切入

点，从而让文章 的语言语句显得更加具有层次感，让阅读的人能够

感受到文章结构的饱满程度。这样不仅 可以让英文论文拥有更加深

入研究的价值，还能够吸引阅读者反反复复的阅读。

辑文编译高质量的

sci

论文发表网

,

专业科研立项

,sci

医学论文编辑

,

< br>还提供医学论文翻译

,

医学论文发表，医学课题设计

,

数据统计分析

,

医

学基金申请等服务

.

微信号：

sci- jwedit

，关注微信，论文免费查重。

【篇二：英文论文审稿意见汇总】

英文论文审稿意见汇总

以下

12

点无轻重主次之分。每一点内容由总结性标题和代表性审

稿人意见构成。

1

、目标和结果不清晰。

it is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by

someone with expertise in technical english editing paying

particular attention to english grammar, spelling, and sentence

structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to

the reader.

2

、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。

◆

in general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and

statistical me

thods used in the study.

◆

furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these

various experiments should be provided.

3

、对于研究 设计的

rationale:

also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study

design.

4

、夸张地陈述结论

/

夸大成果

/

不严谨：

the conclusions are overstated. for example, the study did not

show

if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with

the polymer formulation.

5

、对

hypothesis

的清晰界定：

a hypothesis needs to be presented

。

6

、对某个概念或工具使用的

rationale/

定义概念：

what was the rationale for the film/sbf volume ratio?

7

、对研究问题的定义：

try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,

write one section to define the problem

8

、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写

literature review:

the topic is novel but the application proposed is not so

novel.

9

、对

claim,

如

a

＞

b

的证明，

verification:

there is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with

previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether

the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.

10

、严谨度问题：

mnq is easier than the primitive pnqs, how to prove that.

11

、格式（重视程度）：

◆

in addition, the list of references is not in our style. it is

close but not completely correct. i have attached a pdf file with

instructions for authors which shows examples.

◆

before

submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly

prepared and

formatted. if you are unsure, please consult the formatting

nstructions to authors that are given under the instructions

and forms button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.

12

、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：

有关语言的审稿人意见：

◆

it is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by

someone with expertise in technical english editing paying

particular attention to english grammar, spelling, and sentence

structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to

the reader.

◆

the authors must have their work reviewed by a

proper translation/reviewing service before submission; only

then can a proper review be performed. most sentences

contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not

complete sentences.

◆

as presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal.

there are pro

blems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause

construction.

◆

the english of your manuscript must be improved before

resubmission. we str ongly suggest that you obtain assistance

from a colleague who is well-versed i

n english or whose native language is english.

◆

please have someone competent in the english language

and the subject matte r of your paper go over the paper and

correct it. ?

◆

the quality of english needs improving.

来自编辑的鼓励：

encouragement from reviewers:

◆

i would be very glad to re-review the paper in greater depth

once it has be

en edited because the subject is interesting.

◆

there is continued interest in your manusc

ript titled ……

which you subm

itted to the journal of biomedical materials research: part b -

applied biomat

erials.

◆

the submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of

publication.

老外写的英文综述文章的审稿意见

ms. ref. no.: ******

title: ******

materials science and engineering

dear dr. ******,

reviewers have now commented on your paper. you will see

that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. if you

are prepared to undertake the work required, i would be

pleased to reconsider my decision.

for your guidance, reviewers comments are appended below.

reviewer #1: this work proposes an extensive review on

micromulsion-based methods for the synthesis of ag

nanoparticles. as such, the matter is of interest, however the

paper suffers for two serious limits:

1) the overall quality of the english language is rather poor;

2) some figures must be selected from previous literature to

discuss also the synthesis of anisotropically shaped ag

nanoparticles (there are several examples published), which

has been largely overlooked throughout the paper.

once the above concerns are fully addressed, the manuscript

could be accepted for publication in this journal

这是一 篇全过程我均比较了解的投稿，稿件的内容我认为是相当不

错的，中文版投稿于业内有较 高影响的某核心期刊，并很快得到发

表。其时我作为审稿人之一，除了提出一些修改建议 外，还特建议

了

5

篇应增加的参考文献 ，该文正式发表时共计有参考文献

25

篇。

作者或许看到审稿意见还不错，因此决意尝试向美国某 学会主办的

一份英文刊投稿。几经修改和补充后，请一位英文

“

功底较好的中国

人翻译，投稿后约

3< /p>

周，便返回了三份审稿意见。

从英文刊的反馈意见看，这篇稿件中最严重的问题是文献综述和引

用不 够，其次是语言表达方面的欠缺，此外是论证过程和结果展示

形式方面的不足。