-
专
四
作
文
< br>样
题
及
参
考
答
案
+
2
0
1
6
、
2
0
1
7
、
2
0
1
8
真
题
及
< br>参
考
答
案
精品文档
专四作文样题
(2016
年发布
)
第一部分：原题
PART VI
[45
MIN]
Should
we
review
traditional
Chinese
characters
or
continue
using
simplified
characters?
This
has
been
an
intensely
discussed
question
for
years.
The
following
are
the
supporters'
and
opponents'
opinions.
Read
carefully the opinions
from both sides and write your response in about
200
words,
in
which
you
should
first
summarize
briefly
the
opinions
from
both
sides and give your
view on the issue.
Marks
will
be
awarded
for
content
relevance,
content
sufficiency,
organization
and
language
quality.
Failure
to
follow
the
above
instructions
may result in a loss of marks.
Yes
No
Traditional
characters,
which
In
today’s
world,
efficiency
date back to more than 2000 years
matters
most.
Traditional
ago,
have
a
more
beautiful
characters,
which
usually
have
appearance and a more
reasonable
more strokes than simplified
ones,
are
more
difficult
to
learn.
By
structure.
As
indicated
by
the
親
contrast,
simplified
characters
are
and
愛
examples,
traditional
much easier to
learn and use. Over
characters
make
more
sense,
the
past
50
years,
lots
of
classic
convey
traditional
values
and
can
texts
have
been
turned
into
therefore
represent
traditional
simplified-character versions, which
culture.
For
two
millennia,
Chinese
means
simplified
characters
can
historical records and classic works
also
promote
and
preserve
were
written
in
traditional
traditional
culture.
Constant
characters. To be able to read them
simplification
has
been
a
trend
in
and
inherit
traditional
cultures,
we
the
evolution
of
Chinese
need
to bring traditional characters
characters.
From
the
oracle
bones
back. Politically, it is also necessary
script
of
3000
years
ago
to
to
restore
traditional
Chinese
traditional
characters,
the
Chinese
characters.
Currently,
traditional
writing
system
has
always
been
characters
are
still
in
use
in
Hong
slimming
down
for
better
Kong,
Taiwan
and
many
Chinese
communication.
communities
around
the
world.
Restoring
them
can
contribute
to
cross-Strait
exchanges
and
national
reunifications
and
unite
Chinese people around
the world.
WRITING
第二部分：参考答案（
1
）
写作指南
收集于网络，如有侵权请联系管理员删除
精品文档
考生在下笔之前应先审题，
明确写作要求：针对
“
我们究竟是该恢复中文繁
体字还是继续使用简体汉字
”
这一热议话题，首先总结
正反方的意见，然后给出
个人观点。文章结构可安排如下：
<
/p>
第一段：简要概括赞同和反对恢复繁体字方和提倡使用简体字方的观点，
< br>
第二段：
表明自己的观点：
复兴繁体字是不明智的。直击正方观点漏洞，
分三点铺陈论证。繁体字在沟通交流上效率
不及简体字；繁体字可读性和可接
受性不强；保存传统文化和价值并不是只有恢复繁体字
这一种方式。
第三段：重申观点
——
恢复中文繁体字不是明智之举。
The
necessity
to
revive
traditional
Chinese
characters
has
aroused
an
increasingly
heated
discussion
for
decades.
Some
in
favor
of
it
hold
that
traditional Chinese
characters, with a more vivid and descriptive
appearance,
is
a
perfect
embodiment
of
traditional
culture
and
a
bond
for
cross-
Straits
exchanges
and
national
reunification
(
复兴
).
Some
are
against
it
for
its
complexity to write and
inefficiency to communicate, which can be
otherwise
avoided
by
simplified
characters.
Besides,
simplified
characters
can
also
serve
the
purpose
of
promoting
traditional
culture
and
this
simplified
writing
system is an irreversible
(
不可逆的
)
trend.
From my perspective
,
it's not wise to deliberately / intentionally
initiate a
renaissance of traditional
Chinese characters for following reasons:
First
and
foremost
,
words
and
language
are
tools
created
for
better
communication. In
this
sense,
efficiency
is of
utmost
importance
if
simplified
Chinese characters can perform the same
function of the traditional ones.
Secondly
,
readability
(
可读性
)
and
acceptability
are
potential
barriers
/
hindrance to the restoration
(
恢复
)
of traditional characters. Most of mainland
Chinese learn simplified characters
from their infancy / childhood. So it will be
hard for them to accept a totally
unfamiliar word system.
Last,
traditional
Chinese
characters
do
help
cultural
inheritance
(
传承
)
,
but it doesn't mean reviving it is the
sole
(
唯一的
)
way to
preserve traditional
culture and
values.
Taking the above factors into
consideration,
I think it is unwise to
revive
traditional Chinese characters.
(252
words)
2016
年专四真题作文
第一部分：原题
PART VI
WRITING
[45
MIN]
Read
carefully
the
following
excerpt
on
term-
time
holiday
arguments
in
the Uk, and then write
your response in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which
you should:
?
Summarize the main message of the excerpt, and
then
收集于网络，如有侵权请联系管理员删除
精品文档
?
Comment
on
whether
parents
should
take
children
out
of
school
for
holiday during term time in order to
save money.
You should support
yourself with information from the excerpt.
Marks
will
be
awarded
for
content
relevance,
content
sufficinecy,
organization and language quality,
failure to follow the above instruction may
result in a loss of marks.
Term-time holidays will be banned
Parents are to be banned
by Michael Gove, UK’s Education Secretary,
from taking their children out of
school to save money on holidays.
He
is
to
abolish
the
right
of
head
teachers
to
“authorise
absense”
from
the classroom, which
has been used to let families take term-time
breaks, and
will warn them they face
fines for their children not being at school.
“Any time out of school has the
potential to damage a child’s education,”
a senior source at the Department for
Ed
ucation said this weekend. “That is
why
the
government
will
end
the
distinction
between
authorized
and
unauthorized absence.”
“This is part of the government’s wider
commitment to bring down truancy
(
['tru??
ns
?<
/p>
]
旷课
)
levels
in
our
schools.
There
will
also
be
stricter
penalties
(
['pen
?
lt
?
]
处罚
)
for parents and schools.”
The tough measures on truancy are part
of a wider attempt by Mr Gove
to make
education more academically rigorous and to tackle
a culture in the
educational
establishment
which
he
believes
has
a
ccepted
“excuses
for
failure”.
Russell Hobby, the general secretary of
the National Association of Head
Teachers,
said
the
measure
would
discourage
parents
from
trying
to
put
pressure on heads to
section term time holidays. “ The high cost of
holidays
outs
ide of term
time is still an issue but ultimately a child’s is
more important
than a holiday, he said.
第二部分：参考答案
Which
Is More Important, Education or a Cheaper Holiday?
New
research
has
shown
that
almost
four
out
of
ten
parents
in
the
UK
have
taken
their
children
out
of
school
to
go
on
holidays.
Cost
is
the
main
reason given by parents for sacrificing
their children’s education. Parents are
to
be
banned,
however,
by
UK’s
Education
Authority,
from
taking
their
children out of school to go during
term time.
Should
local
authorities
stagger
school
holidays
to
enable
families
with
children
to
take
advantage
of
travel
bargains?
Or
is
it
wrong
for
parents
to
jeopardize their children’s education
for the sake of a cheaper holiday?
As
far
as I am concerned
,
education is more important.
Firstly,
children’s education
must
come first.
A
cheap
holiday
during
the
school
season
shouldn’t
be
the
reason to
take a child out of school. Some parents are not
willing to sacrifice
or schedule their
lives in terms of their ch
ildren’s
needs. This kind of attitude
will
influence
their
children
deeply.
It’s
no
wonder
so
many
kids
are
not
收集于网络，如有侵权请联系管理员删除