-
英语专业本科生开题报告样本
可根据内
容选择:
基础型、
应用基础
< br>型、应用
型、调研
型。居中
对齐
题
目
用
p>
Times
New
Roman 5
p>
号字,加粗,题
目须有
中英文
,英文在
四川农业大学本科生毕业论文(设计)开题报告
前,中文在后,居中对齐。
毕业论文(设计)题目
选题类型
学
院
An Empirical Study into Lexical
Inference and Strategy Use into EFL
Reading
EFL
阅读中的词义
推测及策略运用实证研究
XXX
语言学院
XXX
XXX
年
级
课题来源
专
业
职
称
2006
级
学
号
XXX
英语
教授
XXXXXXX
引言部分。
一级标题用
Times
New Roman
小
2
号,
段前
0.5
行,段
后
0.5
行
研究背景。
说
明
研
究
的背景。
二
< br>级
标
题
用
Times
New
Roman
3
号。
段前
0.5
< br>行,
段后
0.5
行。注意字
p>
母大小写
指导教师
姓
名
1. Introduction
1.1 Study Background
The
present study is stimulated by both practical and
theoretical considerations in
the
field
of
second
/foreign
language
learning
and
teaching.
The
importance
of
EFL
正
文
用
Tim
es
New
Roman
小
4
号
字
,
1.5
倍
行
距
reading
is
commonly
acknowledged
by
both
teachers
and
learners
in
the
process
of
learning and teaching, so the topic of
lexical inference strategies is of practical
interest
to both teachers, who would
like to employ pedagogical techniques which can
reinforce
and develop
students
’
achievements in
EFL reading to better their effects of
instruction,
and
learners
themselves,
who
once
master
those
strategies,
are
in
a
better
position
to
infer
unknown
word
meanings
in
the
process
of
reading.
Learners
can
sometimes
deliberately apply those strategies to
solve problems they encounter in reading in order
to
conquer
the
inherently
difficult
task
of
learning
a
foreign
language.
This
indicates
that lexical
inference ability and inferring strategies are
paramount in EFL reading. As
to
the
relationships
among
gender,
majors,
foreign
language
proficiency,
lexical
inference ability
and inferring strategies respectively, they are
also of practical interest
to
both
language
teachers,
who
can
utilize
different
methods
to
instruct
students
of
different gender and
majors according to their different foreign
language proficiency so
as to
facilitate both their teaching effects and
students
’
understanding and
researchers,
who can investigate what
factors ascribe to the differentiations and why,
so as to make
full use of advantages
and avoid disadvantages to orient language
teaching and learning
in the long run.
To understand lexical inference and strategies, we
have to refer to the
该部分根据自己的具体题目需
要,
可有可无,
如论文中有新的、
生僻的或者重要的名词,则需要
有该部分对这些名词加以解释
< br>
definitions of inference, lexical
inference, LIA and LS first
.
1.2 Definitions of Inference and
Lexical Inference
Inference
refers
to
the
process,
in
language
learning,
of
arriving
at
a
hypothesis,
idea,
or
judgment
on
the
basis
of
other
knowledge,
ideas,
or
judgments,
that
is,
the
process
of
making
inference
or
inferring
(Richards
&
Platt
and
Platt,
2000:222).
In
language learning,
inference has been discussed as a learning
strategy used by learners,
especially
in reading, to work out grammatical and other
kinds of rules (Carton, 1971).
According
to
W.
Grabe
and
r
(2005:260),
inference
refers
to
the
process
of
drawing
a
logical
conclusion
based
on
explicit
information
in
text
and
background
knowledge. The
mental activity/process involved when readers
encounter unknown or
unfamiliar words
or phrases (hereafter for the sake of convenience
we use unknown or
unfamiliar
words
to
refer
to
both
unknown
and
unfamiliar
words
and
phrases)
and
thereby assign meanings to them in the
process of reading is termed
“
lexical inference
or inferring (Barnett, 1990:79). Thus
in this study we adopt the term lexical inference
in
the
sense
that
readers
are
aware
of
encountering
unknown
or
unfamiliar
words
or
phrases,
in
the
reading
process,
and
make
deliberate
attempts
to
figure
out
their
meanings and draw a
logical conclusion based on the logical reasoning
of the explicit
information
in
a
text
and
background
knowledge.
It
is
a
deliberate
and
conscious
process of
deriving meanings from co-text in reading process.
已有研究及其不足。
该部分很重要,
它
是你的研究存在的前提。因为已
有研究有不足之处,才有必要做现
在的研究。
1.3 Previous Studies
and Their Deficiencies
Previous
researches on word meanings in context has
concentrated more on other
foreign or
second language reading strategies than on lexical
inference strategies. Some
theorists
focus
on
receptive
acquisition
of
vocabulary
and
recommend
that
students
learn
lexical
inference
techniques
in
order
to
enlarge
their
vocabularies
(Bramski,
D
&Williams,
1984;
Crow,
1986).
For
researchers
investigating
the
categorizations
of
lexical
inference
strategies,
results
tend
to
be
in
two
directions
(1)
towards
a
categorization
of
contextual
clues
students
use
or
might
use
(Bramski,
D
&Williams
1984;
Siebert,
1945,
quoted
from
Barnett,
1990),
and
(2)
towards
an
explanation
of
precisely
how
students
discover
meanings
of
unfamiliar
words,
that
is
the
process
of
lexical
inferring
in
test-taking.
Studies
on
developing
and
investigating
learners
’
learning and reading strategies
conducted by both language teachers and
researchers are
2
abundant in the
last two decades (Oxford, 1990;
O
’
Malley
&
Chamot, 1990;
程晓堂
,
郑
敏
,2002;
文秋芳
,1996;
肖建壮
,1997), but only few of
which focus their attention on
lexical
inference in reading. Available studies are those
which view this issue from the
perspective
of
reading
strategies
and
concentrate
on
the
process
of
lexical
inferring
(Bensoussan,
M,
&
Laufer,
1984;
Haynes,1984),
aiming
to
explore
how
learners
react
when they encounter
unknown or unfamiliar words in reading process.
Researches into
the categorization of
lexical inference strategies are plentiful and
abundant in the recent
years
(Adams,1982;
Clarke
and
Nation,1980;
王瑛
,
2006).
Some
attempt
to
validate
the
effectiveness
of
lexical
inference
strategy
training
at
tertiary
level
(
王萍
,2004),
hoping to justify the effectiveness of
lexical inference strategies training; some home
in
on the factors affecting lexical
inference and their constraints (Palmberg,1987;
任绍曾
,
2003;
赵福利
,2002
).
A
few
studies
concerned
with
relational
investigation,
for
instance, study into the
impact of language proficiency on lexical
inference ability (
刘
津
开
,1999),
study
into
influence
of
depth
of
vocabulary
knowledge
on
lexical
inferential success
(
寻阳
,
孙丽
,2006).
研究的意义,必要性重要性等等,
该部分很重要。
1.4 Significance of This Study
Based
on
the
previous
studies,
this
study
goes
a
step
further
and
attempts
to
investigate the influence of gender,
major and language proficiency in a narrow sense,
i.e.
at
tertiary
level,
on
the
lexical
strategy
use
and
inferential
success
based
on
the
previous
categorization
of
various
lexical
inference
strategies.
Answers
to
these
questions are of great importance to
both the
pedagogy and language
research, which
can
shed
light
on
and
guide
the
teaching
and
learning
and
make
the
processes
more
fulfilling and easier.
These answers can also help practitioners to find
some respective
methods to combine the
two processes together and make them harmonious in
the long
run.
研<
/p>
究
目
的
与
要
回
答的具体问题。该
部
分
是
开
题
考
察
的核心部分
2. Purpose of This Study and Research
Questions
The goal of this study is to
investigate the influence of Language Proficiency
(LP),
Gender (G), and Majors (M) on
Lexical Inference Ability (LIA) and
learners
’
Lexical
Inference Strategy Use (LISU), that is
to say, whether learners of different majors and
gender
with
different
language
proficiency
perform
differentially
in
test
in
terms
of
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
上一篇:应聘外贸业务员英文自我介绍
下一篇:英语职业技能训练教案