关键词不能为空

当前您在: 主页 > 英语 >

case brief writing 在英美法的学习中可谓是最常用的基本功了

作者:高考题库网
来源:https://www.bjmy2z.cn/gaokao
2021-03-01 12:35
tags:

-

2021年3月1日发(作者:雨后春笋般)


case brief writing


在英美法的学习中可谓是最常 用的基本功了,由于面对的


经常是洋洋洒洒的万言判决书,


如何 抓住


case


的重点,


比如案件事实< /p>



facts




争议点


(issues)


、法院认定


(holding)


、推理过程或者判决理由(


reasoning


),


一个简明扼要的


case


brief


就非常重要了。那怎如何写 呢?总结起来差不多有


这样几种:



1Title (e.g. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka)




2 Facts: Summarize the facts of the case. List only the essential facts


that you need to understand the holding and reasoning of the case.




3 Procedure: Most of the cases that you'll read in law school will be


appellate


court


decisions.


In


this


section,


you


want


to


list


what


happened


in


the


lower


court(s).


Do


not


go


into


too


much


detail.


One


or


two


sentences


are sufficient for this section.




4


Issue(s):


What


is/are


the


question(s)


facing


the


court?


Form


the


issue


questions in a way that they can be answered by yes or no.



5 Holding: How did the court answer the issue question(s)? YES/NO?




6


Reasoning:


This


is


the


most


important


section


of


your


case


brief.


Here


you


want


to


list


the


reasoning


of


the


majority


in


reaching


its


decision.


You can actually be quite detailed in this section. List what the law


was before this case was decided and how the law has changed after this


decision.


Law


professors


love


to


discuss


the


reasoning


of


a


case


in


class


discussions.




7


Concurring/dissenting


opinions


(不是必须的,要看案件有没有附随意见)




一、


FPIHRC

< br>写法(如下所述)



Title


(e.g. Roe v. Wade)


Citation


(e.g. 410 U.S. 113 (1973))




Facts


:


Summarize


the


facts


of


the


case.


List


only


the


essential


facts


that


you need to understand the holding and reasoning of the case.




Procedure


: Most of the cases that you'll read in law school will be


appellate


court


decisions.


In


this


section,


you


want


to


list


what


happened


in


the


lower


court(s).


Do


not


go


into


too


much


detail.


One


or


two


sentences


are sufficient for this section.




Issue(s):


What is/are the question(s) facing the court? Form the issue


questions in a way that they can be answered by yes or no.




Holding


: How did the court answer the issue question(s)? YES/NO?




Reasoning


: This is the most important section of your case brief. Here


you


want to list the reasoning of


the


majority in


reaching its decision.


You


can


actually


be


quite


detailed


in


this


section.


List


what


the


law


was


before this case was decided and how the law has changed after this


decision.


Law


professors


love


to


discuss


the


reasoning


of


a


case


in


class


discussions.




Concurring/dissenting opinions


: Even though I read the concurring and


dissenting opinions, I rarely brief them. However, there are some cases


(e.g. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer) where the concurring or


dissenting opinions end up becoming more important than the majority's


opinions. In such cases,


you should add


this section to


your case brief.




二、


FIHRQ

写法(注意:下面第一条的


citation


是每个


case


brief


都必须要有

< p>
的,另外还应当包含


the case's title






I.


CITATION




From what specific source is the case taken?


For example, was the case reported in the U.S. Supreme Court Reports?




II. THE FACTS




A. Material




·




What materially happened?




·




Was there, for example, a collision on the high seas? A dispute


over territory?




B. Legal




·




From what legal circumstances did the case originate?




·




Did two states agree, for example, to submit their dispute to an


arbitral tribunal? Was an opinion sought from the I.C.J.?




III. LEGAL


ISSUES




A. Specific




·




What specific legal questions does this case raise?





·




For


example,


does


the


proximity


of


Ruritania


to


Zombie


Island


give


Ruritania


a


legal


basis


for


making


a


territorial


claim


for


Zombie


Island?




B. General




·




What more general legal questions does this case raise?




·




For


example,


is



a


legitimate


basis


under


international


law for making a territorial claim for an island?




IV. THE


HOLDING





·




What


decision was


made? That


is, in


support


of which side did the


court hold?





·




For


example,


in


Missouri


v.


Holland,


did


the


court


decide


in


favor


of




V. LEGAL RATIONALE




·




What legal reasoning informed the court's decision?




·




What rules of law, for example, did it apply?




·




How did it interpret legal principles, documents?




·




How did it construe the facts?




VI. QUESTIONS




·




What


existing


legal


questions,


if


any,


are


unresolved


by


this


case?




·




What new questions, if any, does it raise?




三、


FIHR


写法



四、


FIRAC


写法




-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-



本文更新与2021-03-01 12:35,由作者提供,不代表本网站立场,转载请注明出处:https://www.bjmy2z.cn/gaokao/688365.html

case brief writing 在英美法的学习中可谓是最常用的基本功了的相关文章

case brief writing 在英美法的学习中可谓是最常用的基本功了随机文章