雅思作文-3. 保护动物的资源是否过多？

#45:

保护动物的资源是否过多？

Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources have been given to the protection of wild animals and

birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

学生范文

范文

1

：

主体部分两段

（

7+

）

A

人类活动危及动物的生存

B

很多动物数量减少

C

保护

解释（

A-B

）：大量捕杀

解释（

A-B

）：破坏环境，让动物的栖息地更少

< /p>

解释（

B-C

）：法律体现关注

解释（

B-C

）：投 入钱建立动物保护区

Threaten/endanger animals, human activities

Hu nting/slaughtering/poaching

Animal habitat

Wildlife reserves/sanctuaries

Pour money into, spend money on,

I believe that more money should be poured into wildlife preservation since human activities have posed a threat to the

survival of numerous species. Mass hunting has caused a drop in the number of animals, and animal habitat has been

destroyed by activities such as logging, farming and housing development. It is impossible to mitigate or avoid these

problems, if the government does not enforce laws to curb poaching, or spends adequate money in setting and running

wildlife reserves. There is still a need for more attention and investment.

A

生态系统有自己的运行机制

B

保护某些动物会影响其他生物

C

保护资源过多

解释（背景）：物种之 间有比较微妙的关系，决定了自然界的平衡

解释（

）：保护某些动物，猎物变少，吃草的动物，导致植物的破坏

解释（

A-B

）： 动物园的动物失去天性，很难在原来的栖息地生存，影响其他物种的数量

Subtle relationship, balance of nature, ecological balance

Carnivore, prey, herbivore, plant, vegetation, flora

Lose instinct, home area

On the other hand, in some areas, animal and bird conservation has attracted undue attention and conservation efforts

have a negative effect on the ecosystem and some species. Different species of Animals and birds have a subtle

relationship, which determines the ecological balance. The preservation of some predators in natural reserves may

endanger preys, while the protection of herbivores can cause damage to vegetation. Another common measure is to

keep animals in zoos, but these animals will lose instinct and skills to survive in natural home areas. as a consequence,

their absence can affect other species in the food chain. The government in these regions should not pay too much

attention to animal protection.

In conclusion, I do not agree with the idea that animal protection has received excessive attention and consumed too

much resources, although I admit that in some regions, overprotection has some negative consequences.

主体段二（其他观点）

A

国家重心是提高人们的生活水准

B

没有什么资源保护动物

C

人类保护的资源和关注是不够的

（反对）

解释（

A

）：人还没满足基本的需求，国家没有什么钱