-
2009
年
2
月
21
日
Some
people think that environmental problems are too
big for individuals to deal with. Others,
however, think that each individual
should take some actions. Discuss both views and
give your
own opinion.
考题分析:
本题是一道典型的雅思环
境类写作考题。
在历届雅思写作环境类话题中,
出
题思路主要有以下三个方面:
1.
环境保护是谁的责任?考题给出
的选项通常会有个人、公司、国家、国际合作等(例
如
04
p>
年
5
月
15
日,
0-7
年
2
p>
月
3
日考题)。
2.
如何
保护环境?考题通常会给出某个方案问其正确与否(如
06
年<
/p>
6
月
17
日,<
/p>
08
年
6
月
p>
14
日考题)。
3.
为什么人们明知环境正在被破坏
却无动于衷例?(如
08
年
9
月
13
日
A
类议论文)
如果考前对以上三方面的雅思写作真题都思考过,
相信本题一定会变的
很简单,
实际上
只要把一些理由进行组合就可以了。
由于考题的提问形式是
“Discuss both
views
and give your
own
opinion. ”
所以,
既要讨论到个人能够采取何种行动
解决一些环境问题,
也要讨论为什么
有些环境问题个人无法解决
(即只有政府或公司才能解决)。
Sample Answer:
It
is true that our tiny individual actions often
seem insignificant compared to the scale and
complexity of global environmental
problems such as pollution, deforestation and
depletion of
natural resources. But
that does not relieve our duty as individuals to
do as much as we can to deal
with these
problems.
Individual actions, small as they may
be, can prove more effective than we realize. We
can
avoid driving the car, and take
public transit, walk, or bicycle instead. This
will reduce the use of
fossil fuels and
cut pollution. Saving energy at home, like turning
on the air conditioner only when
we
have to, or turning water heater down a few
degrees, is also ultimately good for the
environment. Individual actions can
also turn into united powers when, for example,
the whole
neighborhood is mobilized to
participate in a local campaign to oppose
environmentally damaging
policies.
There are,
however, obstacles that stand in the way of
individual action towards
environmental
conservation. The first obstacle is the lack of
professional knowledge needed to
cope
with serious environmental issues like soil
erosion and salinity, which require a significant
amount of investigation and research.
Another obstacle which makes individual action
almost
impossible is when an
environmental emergency or accident happens, e.g.
an oil spill near the
bord der line,
which would necessitate government intervention or
even international coordination.
So, in conclusion, when it
comes to environmental problems, individual
actions are
indispensable in the
problem solving process. But the most pressing and
complicated problems go
far beyond an
individual’s capability and so r
equire
the concerted effort of the government as well
as the global community.
271 words
20
09
年
2
月
2
8
日
Some people believe that
improve public health should increase the number
of sports
facilities; others believe
that it has little effects and need other measures
to improve it.
Discuss both views and give your
opinion.
考题分析:
本题是政府政策类话题和健康类话
题的结合。
考题虽新,
但政府类话题和健康类话题话
题却是经常出现的。
考到政府政策类的话题,
有一
个思路总是可以通用的,
那就是:政府可
以通过教育来提升人们
对于
......
的认识(这比花大笔资金建设某某工程要来的
更
“
实惠
”
和
有
效。
)
下面的范文是朗阁海外考试研
究中心研究员撰写的高分范文,其中就有对该思路的体
现,值得借鉴。
< br>
Sample Answer
(
359
words
)
The construction of new
sports facilities are definitely needed in an
environment where
people's health is in
a declining state. However, there are those who
believe that the way to
improving
people's health should lie in other measures that
governments have to come up with to
get
people to live more healthily.
In many countries around
the world, sports facilities are diminishing at an
alarming rate, with
existing ones being
threatened with closure or face redevelopment in
favor of housing and
commercial
development. The lack of sports facilities has
directly led to a sharp decline in the
general public’s involvement in sports
activities, which is the major culprit for ill
health and
excessive weight nowadays.
If a wider range of sports and fitness facilities
(swimming pools,
basketball court and
gymnasiums etc.) were available, then people would
be more willing to spend
time in these
facilities to train their bodies and to improve
their fitness, instead of living a
sedentary life at home watching
television, playing video games or using
computers.
However, the building of such
facilities may become a waste of time and
taxpayers’ money if
they are built far
away from where people live or if they are too
expensive to use. There are scenes
of
empty sports grounds in many cities because it
takes too much trouble to get there, and many
sports clubs are receiving fewer guests
because they charge unreasonably high membership
fees.
In these cases, the government
should be spending more on advertising healthier
life style instead
of just wasting
money on facilities that are not going to be
actively used by the people. For
example, it is important for people to
know that little things like jogging or taking the
stairs
provide as many benefits as
using exercising equipment in a sports club.
All in all, the
government should be spending more money on the
campaigns of getting the
people to be
more involved in a healthier lifestyle instead of
wasting taxpayers’ money on sports
facilities that are barely used by the
general public. This is by far the best way of
improving the
health standards of a
nation as a whole.
2009
年
3
月
7
日
Newspapers have become an
enormous influence on people’s ideas and opinions.
Why is this the
case? Is it a desirable
or undesirable situation?
The nickname
of the “Uncrowned King” given to the modern
journalist is by no means an
exaggeration. In almost every modern
society, newspapers have been playing an essential
role in
shaping people’s thoughts on a
wide range of iss
ues and are always
regarded as an indispensable
source of
information. In my opinion, this complex
phenomenon can be boiled down to several
key factors, and both its positive and
negative aspects need to be analyzed thoroughly.
To begin with, human curiosity is an
underlying factor in the growing popularity of
newspapers.
As the only species on the
planet equipped with extraordinary intelligence,
humans are
inveterately curious about
the latest events around the globe. Therefore, all
kinds of newspapers
pro
sper
in such an age that is gushing with information,
appealing to people’s increasingly strong
desire to know more about this
constantly changing world. It is little wonder
that numerous
readers are lured into
heavier reliance on those well-established and
internationally renowned
newspapers.
To a large extent, this situation is a
desirable one with its many positive aspects.
First of all, in
order to maintain
their good reputation, most newspapers and
magazines report actual events in a
detailed way, providing not only
factual information but also deep insights into
complex social
and political issues. In
addition, circulated on a daily basis and across
an extensive demographic
region, major
newspapers have smoothly operated branches,
seasoned correspondents and a highly
efficient system to collect local news
with the swiftest actions. Most importantly, their
coverage
and insightful comments can
encourage young readers to form their own opinions
on current
affairs.
On the
other hand, people should be fully aware of the
downside of the journalistic dominance.
More often than not, newspapers of
national importance are largely controlled by the
government
and act as the organ of the
authorities. By furnishing citizens with
prejudiced and self-opinionated
reports
on sensitive issues, such as foreign affairs and
national security, these newspapers can
manipulate their perspectives and
attitudes and exercise a sort of monopoly on their
way of
thinking. On a less serious
level, flooding the pages with trivial pieces of
entertainment news and
celebrity
secrets is the usual way to divert the public’s
attention away from government scandals
and to eclipse such social and economic
ills as unemployment, crime and judicial
incompetence.
In conclusion, although
the positive functions of modern journalism are to
be sufficiently
recognized, people must
not slacken their vigilance against the possible
abuse of such a
tremendous power that
newspapers possess. In other words, while
absorbing bits of information in
the
newspapers, readers are advised to adopt an
objective approach and cast a discriminating eye
on their way of presentation, comments
and implicit assumptions.
2
010
年
1
月
30
日
Today there is a great
increase in anti-social behavior and lack of
respect to others.
What are the causes
of this? What measures can be taken to reduce this
problem
?
Nowadays, the issue of
anti-social behaviour and lack of respect for
others is not
uncommon. This is
especially true among young people. There are
mainly two causes of
this phenomenon--
the negative influence of mass media and the
decline of the family and
poverty.
As the mass media become
increasingly commercialized, program producers and
publishers of books are more focused on
ratings, which is clearly associated with profits.
Therefore, violence of all kinds is
presented on TV and in books. The constant
exposure
to violence is to suggest
people that violence is an ordinary way of life,
and that shooting
and cheating are
possible ways to succeed. We also notice that our
societies and even
our families have
become less cohesive, as people have to struggle
to cope with the
challenges of life.
The decline in our sense of community and family
has gone
hand-in-hand with the rise of
individualism. People increasingly look after
their own
interests without considering
the needs of society.
Accordingly, it is the
government's responsibility to introduce
restrictions and supervision
on the
mass media, i.e. not allowing certain TV programs
at given times, or by limiting the
number of books published according to
their content. Families and schools also play
equally important role in dealing with
this problem. Parental guidance is a key factor of
self-cultivation in one's lifetime.
Parents can spend more time staying with their
children
and patiently carry out the
duty of family education. For children who exhibit
some
anti-social behaviour, schools
should help them to realize what they did is wrong
rather
than giving up on
them.
Overall, although the problem of anti-
social behaviour and lack of respect for others
seem
to be inevitable, we must
recognize its negative effects on the society as a
whole and
work on effective measures to
diminish its adverse influences.
专家点评:
本议论文的问题对于多数雅思考生来说稍显困难。困难之一来
自于考生对
―anti
-society
beh
avior‖
的不了解。要写这篇文章,考生可以从现在的
te
enage
身上看看实际的
―
反社会<
/p>
‖
行为的例子。比方说
―
非主流
‖
的打扮、对于学习的厌恶、青少年犯罪、离婚
家庭中子女的暴
力表现和自暴自弃的表现、
对男女关系处理方便
的任性随便等等。
例子数不胜数。
如果不理
解什么是
―
反社会
‖
行为,则这篇文章很难入手。
专家建议在安排段落的时候可以用其中的一
p>
段用来列举部分
“
反社会
< br>”
行为。
第二点困难则来自于考生对这些
―
反社会
‖
行为的成因和解决
方式找不到合适的语汇来表达。
从考生提供的这篇范文的内容和质量上来看,本文的作者是一
名语法和词汇功底较好的考
生。
该考生在词汇和句式的使用上均
有可圈可点之处。
然而在谈论这些行为的成因和解决方
法上,<
/p>
文章显得过于笼统和泛泛而谈,
因为缺乏适当的实例而使得本来较
好的语法和词汇功
底显得有些
spoiled
< br>。尤其是在第二个段落,考生有将
―
反社会
‖
行为片面的理解为
―
暴力
行为
‖
的嫌疑。另外,句子与句子的连接上,作者在主体段中做
的还稍显不够。因此,本文的评分
应在
6.5
< br>分左右。
朗阁海外考试研究中心专家提醒各位考生,写议论文要多用
―
< br>例证
‖
,以显示考生对于社会和
世界的了解。泛泛而谈的文章很难拿到令人满意的高分。
<
/p>
2010
年
1
月
14
日
Many people believe that scientific
research should be carried out and
controlled by the governments rather
than private companies.
To
what extent do you agree or disagree with this
opinion?
A country active in scientific research
is often one that has a strong power for
innovation
and wealth creation.
Nevertheless, the optimal structure for such kind
of research is still
source of debate.
Should it be the sole responsibility of the
government?
Some people argue that it’s better for
the government to co
ntrol scientific
research. They
believe that research
into nuclear technology, national defense or
military intelligence is in
the
national interest or involves high levels of
secrecy and should be carried out only by
the government. Also, in basic
scientific research which is directed purely
towards the
advancement of knowledge,
or where results cannot be guaranteed, there is
little
incentive for the private sector
to invest in these areas and therefore the
governments
take the leading role.
There are, however, reasons for private
companies to participate in scientific research.
Research is done more efficiently by
private companies because they are profit driven;
their products are also more closely
associated with market needs. Research into simple
articles such as cosmetics or cough
medicine is not what the government is interested
in,
so it’s necessary for the private
sector to invest in these areas because they are
important
for our daily lives.
From my point of view, both the
governments and private companies should be
actively
involved in scientific
research. We should encourage the cooperation
between different
research institutes
including state-owned research centers,
universities and corporate
labs to
accelerate the transfer of technology and research
into products and services that
can
benefit human life.
朗阁专家点评:
2010
年
1
月
14
日的考试为一次加试。
A
类议论文的题目完全重复了
2005
年
12
月
10
日的
A
类议论文的考题。
从这个问题本身来说,
p>
考生可能会比较陌生也比较难以论述。
“科学研究到底应该由政府来
负责还是由公司来施行?”
朗阁海外考试研究中心专家提示,
遇
到抽象的题目,
我们就要用具体的方法来对应。
比如说
像这道题目,
我们的切入点可以是政府为什么样类型的科学研究负责;<
/p>
而私人公司又为怎样
的科学研究负责,然后讲述各自的原因。
p>
如本文作者
所写的那样,牵涉到大笔资金投入和国家机密的
research into
nuclear
technology, national defense or
military intelligence
需要由政府来主导;
而跟我们日常生活
息息相关的
research into
simple articles such as cosmetics or cough medicin
e
则应该由公
司来负责。这样一来,文章不仅好写,而且生动。
本文论
述结构严谨,条理清晰,词汇丰富,句式多变,不失为一篇优秀范文。
2010
年
1
月
9
日<
/p>
Each country has its own
charity organizations.
Some people
think that those
organizations should
only offer help to their own country while others
think they are
suppose to give aid to
people in great need, wherever they live. Discuss
both sides
and give your
opinion.
Common individuals tend to be more
prepared to offer help to their relatives than to
the workmates and regular friends. And
it may be the human nature to show greater
preference to the people related. While
the issue being magnified to the national level,
similar controversy arises concerning
whether the national charity organizations of
one country should only goes to the
domestic emergency or all the people in need
should be supported whatever their
nationality are. As for me, I assert that loving
care
and assistance should never be
confined within the national boundary.
Undeniably, the
domestic citizens are supposed to acquire the
native aid, physically
and
economically. The fund and the material resource
of the charity institution mainly
come
from the generous donation of the public and of
course the masses should
enjoy the
access in case of emergency, in other words, from
the people, to the
people.
On the other
hand, the people suffering the miserable lives,
such as the natural
disaster and the
extreme poverty, should be involved into the help
list of all such aid
agencies. This is
particularly necessary in the case of the
catastrophic disasters when
sudden
earthquake or the seaquake occurs. People involved
generally lose all their
belongings in
such tragedy and are severely shocked, physically
because of the loss
of all possession
and mentally due to the loss of the relatives,
hence a hopeless
situation. Considering
their difficult position, every piece of bread
provided for these
people may be
crucial to their survival, and every penny
supplied to them might be
significant
to their livelihood. Still remember the disastrous
earthquake of 8.0 scales
taking place
in China, it is the unselfish supply all around
the world that help the
affected
regions to survive in the tragedy.
When
considering the necessity of the aid, the cases
with the greatest urgency and
the mal-
conditions should always be given priority, rather
than the nationalities of the
victims.
朗阁专家点评:
< br>本次考题为国际援助类考题,在去年的
9
月份曾经考过一
样的题目。
本文使用的是让步段的写法,这是一种既能展开双边论述,扩展写作空间,又能清晰体
现作者观点倾向的写法,推荐!
主体段第一段为让步段,论述的是求助资金需要
―
取之于民,用之于民
‖
;主体段第二段
论述的则是为何国际援助是必须的。
整个论述比较严谨,
用词和语法方面也体现了作者
比较成熟的论证思路和优秀的语言表达水平。
朗阁专家建议:
虽然这篇文章总体来
说是一篇比较优秀的范文,
但是读起来仍因缺乏实例而感到有点阅
读压力。作者在主体段第二段提到了在中国
―5·12‖
地震
中接受到的援助。如果能够生动
的对这些援助的类型进行举例,
再说明这些国际援助的必要性和体现的
―
地球村
‖
的含义,
文章会生动很多。
值得一提的文章的引言段,
作者分析了为何人们会提出援助应该只提供给本国这样的问
题,这样的
写法脱离了所谓的写作模板,也显示了文章作者思考的深度
2010
年
3
月
6
日
What are the effects of living longer
on individuals and the society?
Population
ageing has emerged as a global phenomenon in the
wake of the now virtually
universal
decline in fertility and increases in life
expectancy. Many countries are
confronted with new demographic
realities that spread from the cities to the
villages. In my
opinion, more problems
than benefits will surface with this trend.
Admittedly, older people often have
time to offer for the benefit of family and the
community. Nowadays, the young tend to
rely on the older generation for household
chores. It is also reported that time
devoted to voluntary work and care is at its
height
within the age groups over 55.
Such devotion adds greatly to the community well-
being, if
not to the GDP.
Population
ageing, however, brings about serious economic and
social problems. When
the number of
workers decreases, the national income goes down.
At the same time, as a