关键词不能为空

当前您在: 主页 > 英语 >

英语论文结论部分写作特点总结

作者:高考题库网
来源:https://www.bjmy2z.cn/gaokao
2021-02-18 08:08
tags:

-

2021年2月18日发(作者:线索英文)


英语论文写作



论文结论部分(


Conclusion


)写作特点总结



Conclusion



Conclu sion


是作者对所研究课题进行的总体性讨论,


具有严密的科 学性和客观性,


反映


本研究课题的价值,同时对以后的研究具有 指导意义。



Conclusion



Introduction


遥相呼应,因为

Introduction


部分介绍了本课题的研究目的,


那么


Conclusion


要告诉读者这些目的是否达到,在研 究中做了哪些工作,取得了什么结果,


这些结果说明了什么问题,


有何价值和意义,


研究过程中存在或发现了哪些问题,


原因是 什


么,建议如何解决等。



Concl usion


的具体内容通常包含以下几个部分:



(1)


概括说明本课题的研究内容、结果及其意义与价值。



(2)


比较具体地说明本研究证明了什么假设或理论,得出了 什么结论,研究结果有何实


用价值,有何创造性成果或见解,解决了什么实际问题,有何 应用前景等。



(3)


与他人的相关研究进行比较。



(4)


本课题的局限性、不足之处,还有哪些尚待解决的问题。



(5)


展望前景,或指出进一步研究的方向。



Conclusion


通常使用现在时态

< br>



Result



Conclusion


本次选取


5


篇文章,

< br>


第一篇,论文中的主要


Result

< br>已在第


2


部分和第三部分中叙述,在

Conclusion


又重新总


结了一下。



第二篇,论文中的主要


Result


写在



Conclusion


中。



第三篇,论文中的主要


Result


写在第


3


部分(



STUDIES


AND


RESUL TS


)中,


Result


< p>
Conclusion


是分开的。



第四篇,论文中的主要


Result


已第

< p>
4


部分的(


IV


. Results and Discussion


)中进行叙述,



Result



Conclusion


是分开的。



第五篇,


论文中的主要


Result


已第


4

< br>部分的



4. Results and discussion



中进行叙述,



Result



Conclusion


是分开的。







1




题目:


An


overview


of


NACA



6-digit


airfoil


series


characteristics with


reference


to


airfoils


for


large wind turbine blades



IV


. Conclusions



The two-dimensional aerodynamics characteristics of the NACA


63 and 64 six-digit series of



airfoils measured in the NASA


LTPT have been investigated, with a view to verify RFOIL



calculations at high Reynolds numbers. The following conclusions can be drawn:



- The zero-lift angle of the NACA


64-618 airfoil needs to be adjusted with -0.4 degrees.




- The zero-lift angle of The NACA


63-615 needs to be corrected with -0.87 degrees in the


smooth case and



with +1 degree in case of wrap around roughness.




-The maximum lift coefficients predicted with RFOIL match the LTPT data well at Re=3x106,


but under predict the Cl,max at Re=6x106 by 3.5 % , up to 6.5% at Re=9x106.



-It is uncertain if the established differences in lift between experiment and calculations are


caused by a constant bias in the measurements or by the fact that the RFOIL code fails to


predict the right level of maximum lift.



-RFOIL consistently under predicts the drag coefficient. The difference is about 9% for a wide



range of airfoils and Reynolds numbers



-NACA


standard roughness causes a reduction in the lift coefficient of 18% to 20% for most


airfoils from the NACA


64 series



-The zero-lift angle of airfoil NACA


64-418 with wrap-around roughness needs a correction of


+0.54 degrees.



-Wind tunnel experiments and side-by-side tests in the field with one clean rotor need to be


done to be able to better predict the effects of roughness.


写作特点:



内容:

< br>第


1


句,


概括了文章的的主要研 究内容。



2


句至第

< br>8


句逐条的列出了文章的得出结


论。


使用了被动语态,


The two- dimensional aerodynamics characteristics of the NACA


63 and 64


six-digit series of airfoils measured in the NASA


LTPT


have been investigated


have been


investigated.


主要时态为一般现在时态





2




题目:



HIGH-LIFT ENHANCEMENT USING ACTIVE FLOW CONTROL



V. CONCLUSIONS


The


high-lift


performance


of


an


airfoil


with


a


single- element


flap


is


enhanced significantly


using


an


active


flow


control


system


consisting


of


spanwise


fluidic


actuators



that


are


integrated


near


the


separation point.


Spanwise


arrays


of


spanwise-oscillating


or


non-oscillating


jets


issue tangentially


to


the


local


surface


from


a


miniature


downstreamfacing


surface


step.


Jet


actuation


leads


to


flow


attachment


of


varying


streamwise


extent


that


depends


on


the


jet


momentum


coefficient


and


the


formation of a low pressure domain near the juncture between the main body and the flap. As a result,


lift is increased substantially, by as much as


?CL = 1.40, 1.22 and 1.04 at Rec = 6.7?105, 8.3?105



and 1.0?106, respectively, for α = 4?.



In the present experiments, three spanwise rows of fluidic jets are placed in the vicinity of


the juncture


and operated in various combinations leading to significant increases in lift.


The upstream (x/c = 0.59)


and middle (x/c = 0.61) actuators, which are closest to separation (x/c = 0.62) are most effective, while


the


downstream


actuator


(x/c


=


0.64)


only


produces


a


significant


lift


increment


when


operated


in


conjunction


with


one


of


the


other


actuators.


The


degree


of


flow


attachment


increases


with


jet


momentum coefficient and simultaneous operation of multiple actuators can increase the lift increment


further even when the flow is attached. Actuation results in a strong suction peak near the juncture (Cp


~ ?7.5) and also leads to increases in suction on the main body of the airfoil and near the leading edge.


The lift increment is measured over a range of angles of attack (0? < α < 12?) and is accompanied by an


increase in lift-induced pressure drag and an increase in nose-down pitching moment.



It is shown that the high- lift performance can be improved significantly by design modifications of the


surface


interface


between


the


jet


actuators and the surrounding


flow.


In


particular,


modifying


the


jet


orifices


from


a


“stepped” to


a


“recessed”


configuration


enhances


the


interaction of


the


jets


with


the


cross flow,


resulting in increased lift


for a given


momentum coefficient, particularly at lower levels of


C


?.


The


recessed design


also


reduces the


loss


in


lift


caused by


the


presence


of


the


orifices


and


the


attached flow exhibits significantly stronger suction peaks near the flap juncture and the leading edge.


At


C


?


=


0.36%


the


upstream


actuator


yields


?CL


=


0.


5


7


and


0.79


for


the


stepped


and


recessed


configurations, respectively, and operating the combination of upstream and


middle actuators at C


? =


0.36% each yields


?CL = 0.78 and 0.92, respectively.



The effect of the actuator jets on the attached flow is characterized using PIV measurements of the flow


field over the flap and additional high-magnification


measurements in the vicinity of the actuators. In


the absence of actuation, the flow separates near the juncture between the flap and the main body (x/c =


0.62), forming a recirculating domain over the flap and a detached vorticity


layer. Actuation leads to


complete flow attachment through the trailing edge with significant acceleration of the flow within the


attached boundary layer downstream of the actuators


and outside of the boundary layer along most of


the


flap.


At


C=


1.6%


an


interaction


domain


containing


a


cross


-stream


velocity


peak


(~2.3


times


the


maximum speed of the jet under quiescent conditions) is formed along the flap between the actuator jet

-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-



本文更新与2021-02-18 08:08,由作者提供,不代表本网站立场,转载请注明出处:https://www.bjmy2z.cn/gaokao/664703.html

英语论文结论部分写作特点总结的相关文章