-
Essay
类型
5
种:
阐述观点型,
利弊型,同意不同意型
,问题
分析型,讨论型。
people think the university education
is to prepare students for employment. Others
think
it has other function. Discuss
and give your opinion.
2.
Many people
are afraid of leaving their houses because of the
spread of crimes. Some people
think
that more actions can be taken by the government
to prevent crime from occuring. But
others think little can be done. What
is your opinion?
3.
Water
rescources around the world are falling deficient.
Analyse the possible
reasons and provide your suggestions.
4.
Some people believe that air travel
should be restricted because it causes serious
pollution and
uses up the
world
’
s fuel resources. To
what extent do you agree or disagree?
5.
Differences
between countries are becoming less evident
nowadays. People tend ot have the
same
films, music, brands, TV channels,etc. To what
extent do you think the disadvantages
outweigh the advantages?
6.
Companies
should
encourage
old
employees(55years
old)
to
retire,in
order
to
give
opportunities to the new generation. To
what extent do you agree or disagree?
7.
We
have
been
living
in
the
nuclear
age
now
for
over
half
a
century.
Since
the
first
atomic
bombs
were
developed,
nuclear
technology
has
provided
governments
with
the
ability
to
totally destroy the
planet. Yet the technology has been put to
positive use as an energy source
and
in
certain
areas
of
medicine.
To
what
extent
is
nuclear
technology
a
danger
to
life
on
Earth?
What are the benefits and risks assocated with its
use?
雅思
< br>essay
写作注意的要点:
Essay
评分标准:
观点正确,结构清晰;
论点论据充分;
连贯性;
长度
250-280
;
VSS
并注重多变性
语法,主谓结构一定不能出错
五种类型
同意不同意类
利弊性
讨论性
Discuss
问题分析
阐述个人观点(也可划在前面的类型中)
注意问题:
1.
倒向一方面:完全同意,或完全
不同意,要兼顾;中立可分同意段,不同意段;
2
利弊性与同意性相当
3.
讨论性
Discuss
Body1
支持观点,并提供论点,
至少两个,
Body2:
支持观点,并提供论点,至少两个
.
结论段可以给出个人观点,可能会出三个答案;
4.
提出问题并给出解决办法
第一段可以全部写原因
第二段可全部写出办法
或
body1Reason Body2ReasonBody
3Solution
或问题分析第三种结构:
问题两段,
办法一段
范
文
ys
we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you
think this is
happening? What can
governments do to help reduce the amount of
rubbish
produced?
(问题分析型)结构
I think it is true that in almost every
country today each household and family produces a
large amount of waste every week. Most
of this rubbish comes from the packaging from
the things we buy, such as processed
food. But even if we buy fresh food without
packaging, we still produce rubbish
from the plastic bags used everywhere to carry
shopping home.
The reason
why we have so much packaging is that we consume
so much more on a daily
basis than
families did in the past. Convenience is also very
important in modern life, so
we buy
packaged or canned food that can be transported
from long distances and stored
until we
need it, first in the supermarket, and then at
home.
However, the amount of
waste produced is also a result of our tendency to
use something
once and throw it away.
We forget that even the cheapest plastic bag has
used up
valuable resources and energy
to produce. We also forget that it is a source of
pollution
and difficult to dispose of.
I think, therefore, that governments
need to raise this awareness in the general
public.
Children can be educated about
environmental issues at school, but adults need to
take
action. Governments can encourage
such action by putting taxes on packaging, such as
plastic bags, by providing recycling
services and by fining households and shops that
do
not attempt to recycle their waste.
With the political will, such measures
could really reduce the amount of rubbish we
produce. Certainly nobody wants to see
our resources used up and our planet poisoned
by waste.
2.
题目:
Some people
think that personal happiness is
directly related to economic success.
Others argue
that happiness depends on
completely other factors.
Discuss both
of the views and give your own opinion.
(
Discuss
型)
In recent
years, the
discussion
of
whether personal
happiness is directly
associated to( economic success
has
become
a controversial
issue. Notions toward it differ
widely
from person to person.
Intro: ound information al idea
(1. no copying<
/p>
—
paraphase--)
词;句式结
构
-varitey)
Body1
:
Some people
believe that happiness is related to
economic success because only money can
make
people’s life more
enjoyable
. When it comes to economic
success, the majority of people believe
that money means
a luxurious life. To
begin with, if someone owns great
success on economic, that means he can
spend more
money on whatever he likes
and spend more time on his
hobbies. (
p>
结构
—
linking
—
具体的信息
)) Emotionally,
money
can buy happiness at least to
some extent. That is to say,
you can
buy things that you like in order to fulfill your
needs
and vanities and this makes you
feel happier. You can also
enjoy the
best education and social welfare. Thirdly,
economic success implies high social
class and status,
which can make people
feel happy and respectable.
(51ielts.
Opponents,
however, hold the view that happiness
does
not depend on economic success but
completely other
factors
.
First of all,
numerous
studies show that happy
individuals are successful across
multiple life
domains
,
including marriage, income, work
performance and health.
The happiness
exists not only because economic success
makes people happy, but also because
positive affect
engenders happiness.
What’s more, It is indisputable
that
there are millions of
people who still have a miserable life
and have to face the dangers of
starvation and exposure,
but some of
them still lead a happy life because they keep
the happy spirit. Last but not least,
money can not buy
everything, such as
friendship, true love and health. You
can buy things corporeal, but you can
never spend money
to ask for more time.
In the final analysis, both
sides have sound foundations.
However,
if asked to make a choice, I will not hesitate to
assent to the latter. I firmly believe
that happiness is not
only related to
economic success but also links to other
factors which are much more
significant.
: Should
government invest poor population or hi-tech
research.
阐述观
点型
Government investment has been put on
more and more emphasis since people’s
gradual awareness of its importance.
The discussion of whether the government should
investigate in Hi-Tech products or on
poor people become fierce among different people.
In my opinion, this is a dilemma which
cannot be easily decided. However, the poor
people should be concerned first.
People is the most fundamental aspect
to form the society, thus they deserve more
emphasis. It was our ancestors who
first lit a fire with wood and bring light and
culture to
this world. And it is due to
this, society was gradually formed and developed
as we can
see today. We can not ignore
the significant role that people play in the long
history of this
world, therefore, as
the central machine of country, government is
responsible for every
person in the
society, and it should concern those who are poor
and give them necessary
help.
In addition, poverty will make the
society unstable. Because of poverty, many people
tend
to steal or rub with the purpose
of making a living, which highly increase the
crime rate.
Being desperate, some of
them become more assailable, with their brain full
of
resentment and envy. As a result,
they find killing an innocent person or lit a fire
on other’s
house is a
good
way of releasing their anger, and that’s what we
often see in the news. If
our
government don’t investigate on them, we can not
imagine what our society will be
like.
Moreover, using a lot of money on Hi-
Tech in a country which still has a large poor
population is a waste of money. To
produce a large number of Hi-Tech products will
certainly lead to the result of
detaining in stores because people have neither
money nor
emotion to enjoy the
luxuries. When poor people are making every effort
to make their
ends meet, the government
have no reason not to give a hand in them but put
money on
wasteful research or explore
on Hi-Tech products.
To sum up,
investigating on poor people’ benefit overweigh
using money on Hi
-Tech
products. It is better to make poor
people rich first, and then enjoy the pleasure
that
Hi-Tech bring to us.
4. Nowadays, international tourism is
the biggest industry in the world.
Unfortunately, international tourism
creates tension rather than understanding
between people from different cultures.
To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
International tourism is booming:
millions of tourists go to other countries to
explore the
outside world.
Tourism enhances the mutual
understanding between the local people
and tourists. Some people hold opposite
opinions.
They think that
international tourism
causes tension
rather than promoting understanding between people
from different
cultures.
The people holding the latter view
suppose that tourists are likely to offend the
local
people because of the lack of
knowledge of the local customs, which differ from
their
own.
Moreover,
tourism inevitably harms the natural resources and
the cultural legacy,
which may lead to
the resentment of the local people.
However, I can hardly assent to this
idea: the above mentioned rarely happens.
In my
opinion, international
tourism does encourage the understanding between
people from
different countries.
For one thing, without going to see for
themselves, people may never
know what
other countries are really like and thus can be
misled by hearsay or films and
TV
programmes, which, more often than not, are one-
sided.
For instance, one of my
American friends told me that most
Americans had a strange bias against the Russian
people until some young Americans
traveled to Russia and saw with their own eyes
that
the Russians are human beings just
like them.
Another example is that,
with the
development of Chinese
tourism, people outside China start to realize
that Chinese men
no longer have long
braids and Chinese
women’s feet are of
normal size now. Secondly,
having seen
the fine scenery or experienced the rich culture
of other countries, tourists will
have
the desire to develop a good relationship with the
locals, which certainly contributes
to
the understanding between them.
In
conclusion, instead of causing tension,
international tourism furthers the understanding
of people from different countries.
(281 words)
6. Companies should
encourage old employees (55 years old) to retire,
in order to
give opportunities to the
new generation. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
Nowadays, plenty
of employees who are more than 55 years old must
retire because of
company policy;
therefore, many people think that the development
of a company cannot
be separated from
the number of young employees. The above point is
certainly true; this
essay will outline
three reasons.
The main
reason is that plenty of young employees mean that
the company is infused with
lots of
young blood. With the development of technology,
more and more new
technological
products have been developed. The new generation
masters advanced
technology and have
the energy to exploit. They have learned lots of
knowledge in the
university; therefore
it is definitely useful for the development of
companies.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
上一篇:二年级童话故事作文大全
下一篇:英语单词词汇变形汇总情况