怦然心动读书笔记英文_大学英文读书笔记格式

篇一：

Pride and Prejudice

（傲慢与偏见读书笔记）

Many people simply

regard Pride and Prejudice

as a love

story,

but

in

my

opinion,

this

book

is

an

illustration

of

the

society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between

money

and

marriage

at

her

time

and

gave

the

people

in

her

works

vivid

characters.

The

characters

have

their

own

personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts

to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man,

but

his

friend,

Mr.

Darcy,

is

a

very

proud

man

who

seems

to

always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family

are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil

of

others.

Elizabeth

is

a

clever

girl

who

always

has

her

own

opinion.

Mary

likes

reading

classic

books.

(Actually

she

is

a

pedant.) Kitty doesn

’

t have her own opinion but likes to follow

her

sister,

Lydia.

Lydia

is

a

girl

who

follows

exotic

things,

handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read

the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society

now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of

the society in Britain in the 18th century.

The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen

’

s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It

concludes

the

stratum

situation

and

economic

relationships

in

Britain

in

her

century.

You

can

find

these

from

the

very

beginning of this book.

The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads:

“

It is

a

truth

well

known

to

all

the

world

that

an

unmarried

man

in

poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife

”

. The

undertone

is

very

clear:

the

foundation

of

the

marriage

at

that

time is not emotion but possession.

People

always

think

that

Austen

was

an

expert

at

telling

love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of

love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I

know

the

truth

is

that

a

poor

woman

must

be

in

need

of

a

husband, a wealthy man.

I couldn

’

t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off

her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about

these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time.

Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father

’

s

possessions.

Younger

sons

and

daughters

who

are

used

to

luxurious

lives

have

no

choice

but

marry

a

man

or

woman

in

possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives.

Thus,

we

can

see

that

getting

married

is

a

way

to

become

wealthier,

particularly

for

women

without

many

possessions.

Jane

Austen

told

us

that

money

and

possession

determined

everything, including marriage and love in her century.

In

“

Pride and Prejudice

”

, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly

opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don

’

t

have

many

possessions

and

their

social

positions

are

much

lower

than

them.

From

this,

we

can

see

there

are

a

lot

of

obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband.

The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.

In

modern

society,

although

the

marriages

of

economic

needs

have

decreased

rapidly,

the

concept

of

“

money

determines everything

”

is still rooted in some people

’

s mind. A

lot

of

parents

try

hard

to

interfere

their

children

’

s

marriages.

Education

background,

possessions,

jobs

remains

the

main

reason that may influence one

’

s marriage. Marry for money is

still a big problem in our

society.

We

can

’

t

help

thinking:

can

money

determine

everything?

Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane

Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects

big

problems.

Although

Austen

was

only

21

when

she

wrote

“

Pride

and

Prejudice

”

,

her

sharp

observation

of

social

lives

makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The

plots in her works are always very natural. The development of

the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the

depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book

prominent

and

classic.

Today,

her

book

still

can

be

the

guide

telling

us

the

economic

relationships

both

at

her

time

and

in

modern time.

篇二：

Camille

（卡米尔读书笔记）

I read the Chinese version of

“

Camille< /p>

”

a few years ago.

At

that

time

I

was

deeply

moved

by

the

main

character

Marguerite

Gautier.

< br>“

Camille

”

or

“

The

Lady

of

the

Camellias

”

by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite

Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid

1800's,

and

how

she

falls

in

love

with

a

young

man,

Armand

Duval,

and

then

tries

to

escape

from

her

questionable

past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up

returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the

knowledge

that

she

was

a

noble

woman

at

heart.

When

I

first

began

to

read

the

book,

I

did

not

care

for

Marguerite

or

her

attitude

or

lifestyle,

but

as

I

got

further

into

the

narrative,

I

realized that her saucy attitude was

a front to cover the lonely

woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved,

until

the

gentle

Armand

Duval

came

into

her

life

and

showed

her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do

for

him.

It

must

have

taken

great

courage

for

Marguerite

to

leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it

was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely.

And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval

for she could even change herself for him.

However, happiness didn

’

t last for long. When M. Duval,

Armand's

father,

came

to

her,

pleading

for

her

to

leave

Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his

younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure

of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she

loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving

up

her

own

happiness

and

hurting

Armand

temporarily.

She

reluctantly

returned

to

her

former

life,

knowing

day

Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically

alone,

except

for

her

one

female

friend,

Julie

Duprat,

who

helped

her

during

her

illness.

She

had

her

journal

sent

to

Armand

after

her

death,

explaining

why

she

had

made

the

choices

she

had.

I

think

Dumas's

last

few

lines

about

Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and

I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be

condoned,

we

as

a

society

assume

that

all

of

these

type

of

women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the

case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are

young,

and

try

to

redeem

themselves,

but

sometimes

past

situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though

they

desperately

wish

to

do

so.

This

applies

to

both

men

and

women

in

many

different

types

of

circumstances:

involvement

in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial

problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which

exists in the whole society.

As

far

as

the

other

characters

in

the

book,

I

think

Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her,

but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being

Armand

and

Julie

Duprat.

Of

course,

the

Comte

de

G.

and

Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The

Duke

needed

to

“

wake

up

and

smell

the

coffee

”

and

realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly

cared,

he

could

have

helped

her

leave

her

lifestyle

without

“

keeping

”

her

himself.

And

lastly,

Prudence

was

a

blood- sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the

men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had

so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.

Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book

out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It

was

pale

blue,

very

transparent,

with

thin

fine

veins.

a

dried

flower

flew

away

from

the

book.

It

was

pale

blue,

very

transparent,

with

thin

fine

veins.

I

held

it

against

the

morning

light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is

just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of

withering. But it wasn

’

t her fault; it

’

s because of the evil of

Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.

Suddenly,

I

remembered

a

saying:

“

Women

are

like

the

flowers

”

. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers;

their delicate beauty

makes people feel they are the miracle of

life.

However,

even

the

God

envies

their

beauty.

It

seems

that