-
第一部分:
SCI
投
稿信件的一些套话
SCI
投稿信件的一些套话
一、投稿信
1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:
I am
sending a manuscript entitled “” by –
which I should like to submit for possible
publication in the journal of - .
Yours sincerely
2. Dear Dr. A:
Enclosed is a
manuscript entitled “” b
y sb, which we
are submitting for publication in the
journal of - . We have chosen this
journal because it deals with - . We believe that
sth would
be of interest to the
journal’s readers.
3. Dear Dr. A:
Please find
enclosed for your review an original
re
search article, “” by sb. All authors
have
read and approve this version of
the article, and due care has been taken to ensure
the
integrity of the work. No part of
this paper has published or submitted elsewhere.
No conflict
of interest exits in the
submission of this manuscript, and we have
attached to this letter the
signed
letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from
another source.
We
appreciate your consideration of our manuscript,
and we look forward to receiving
comments from the reviewers.
二、询问有无收到稿件
Dear Editors,
We
dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3
August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive
acknowledgement of their safe arrival.
We fear that may have been lost and should be
grateful if you would let us know
whether or not you have received them. If not, we
will send
our manuscript again. Thank
you in advance for your help.
三、询问论文审查回音
Dear
Editors
,
It is
more than 12 weeks since I submitted our
manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in
your journal. I have not yet received a
reply and am wondering whether you have reached a
decision. I should appreciated your
letting me know what you have decided as soon as
possible.
四、关于论文的总体审查意见
1.
This is a carefully done study and the findings
are of considerable interest. A few minor
revision are list below.
2.
This is a well-written paper containing
interesting results which merit publication. For
the
benefit of the reader, however, a
number of points need clarifying and certain
statements
require further
justification. There are given below.
3. Although these observation are
interesting, they are rather limited and do not
advance our
knowledge of the subject
sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We
suggest that the
authors try submitting
their findings to specialist journal such as
–
4. Although
this paper is good, it would be ever better if
some extra data were added.
5. This
manuscript is not suitable for publication in the
journal of
–
because the
main
observation it describe was
reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .
6. Please ask someone familiar with
English language to help you rewrite this paper.
As you
will
see, I have made some correction at the beginning
of the paper where some syntax is
not
satisfactory.
7. We feel that this
potentially interesting study has been marred by
an inability to
communicate the finding
correctly in English and should like to suggest
that the authors seek
the advice of
someone with a good knowledge of English,
preferable native speaker.
8. The
wording and style of some section, particularly
those concerning HPLC, need careful
editing. Attention should be paid to
the wording of those parts of the Discussion of
and
Summary which have been underlined.
9. Preliminary experiments only have
been done and with exception of that summarized in
Table 2, none has been repeated. This
is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there
is so
much variation between assays.
10. The condition of incubation are
poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were
antibody
used?
五、给编辑的回信
1. In
reply to the
referee’s main criticism
of paper, it is possible to say that –
One minor point raised by the referee
concerns of the extra composition of the reaction
mixture in Figure 1. This has now been
corrected. Further minor changes had been made on
page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2
(line 6-11). These do not affect our
interpretation of the
result.
2. I have read the referee’s comments
very carefully and conclude that the paper has
been
rejected on the sole grounds that
it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not
include a toxicity
table in my article
although perhaps I should have done. This was for
the sake of brevity
rather than an
error or omission.
3. Thank you for
your letter of
–
and for the referee’s comments
concerning our manuscript
entitled “”.
We hav
e studied their comments
carefully and have made correction which we
hope meet with their approval.
4. I enclosed a revised manuscript
which includes a report of additional experiments
done at
the referee’s suggestion. You
will see that our original findin
gs are
confirmed.
5. We are sending the
revised manuscript according to the comments of
the reviewers.
Revised portion are
underlined in red.
6. We found the
referee’s comments most helpful and have revised
the manuscript
7. We are
pleased to note the favorable comments of
reviewers in their opening sentence.
8.
Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to
learn that our manuscript is acceptable for
publication in Cancer Research with
minor revision.
9. We have therefore
completed a further series of experiments, the
result of which are
summarized in Table
5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is
not account.
10. We deleted the
relevant passage since they are not essential to
the contents of the paper.
11. I feel
that the reviewer’s comments co
ncerning
Figures 1 and 2 result from a
misinterpretation of the data.
12. We would have include a non-protein
inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had
been available.
13. We
prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons
that it should be clear from the new
paragraph inserted at the end of the
Results section.
14. Although reviewer
does not consider it is important to measure the
temperature of the
cells, we consider
it essential.
15. The running title has
been changed to “”.
16. The
Materials and Methods section now includes details
for measuring uptake of isotope
and
assaying hexokinase.
17. The
concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2)
was incorrectly stated in the
original
manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors
are grateful to the referees for
pointing out their error.
18. As suggested by both referees, a
discussion of the possibility of laser action on
chromosome has
been included (page16, paragraph 2).
19. We included a new set of
photographs with better definition than those
originally
submitted and to which a
scale has been added.
20. Following the
suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure
3 and 4.
21. Two further papers,
published since our original submission, have been
added to the text
and Reference
section. These are:
22. We should like
to thank the referees for their helpful comments
and hope that we have
now produced a
more balance and better account of our work. We
trust that the revised
manuscript is
acceptable for publication.
23. I
greatly appreciate both your help and that of the
referees concerning improvement to
this
paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now
suitable for publication.
24. I should
like to express my appreciation to you and the
referees for suggesting how to
improve
our paper.
25. I apologize for the
delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to
our doing an
additional experiment, as
suggested by referees
第二部分:跟老外要实验材料或者文章的模板:
Dear Mr./Mrs.:
________
(
Author
name
)
I am a
graduate student of Harbin Medical University in
China. I major in
(您的
专业)
. Recently,
I found one of your articles, titled
(<
/p>
Title
)
in Medline.
I
found it may help me achieve my goals
in this research field. This would make a really
positive contribution to my work. I
would like to be able to read the full text of
this article. The
abstract makes the
article sound very interesting. I know there is
usually a fee required to
obtain the
full article from Medline; however, as a student,
my only income is a small
scholarship
which is about U S $$30.00 per month. I wonder if
you would consider sending
me the full
text by Email. Perhaps you would consider this as
an act of friendship between
our two
countries.
Thank you for your kind
consideration of this request.
Sincerely:
___________
(
your
name
)
My Email
address is: ____________________
(
your
email
)
Date
:
Month/day/year
Dear professor
***,
I appreciate that you
can take the time to read this e-mail.
I am ***, a post-graduate student in
the School of the ***, *** University in China. I
am very
interested in ***. We had got
several mutants about*** gifted by *** in ***.
Those mutants
have been used to
explain***. However, in my recent trial,***. In
your article “***”, you
isolated the
strain*** and confirmed that ***. This special
experimental phenomenon was
very
similar to that I observed. So I doubted the role
of *** may involve in the strange
phenomenon in my study. Because of
lacking the plasmids and strains used for genetic
modification of ***, it is difficult
for us to construct the relevant mutants used in
your articles.
Therefore, I am writing
to you to seek your help. Can you kindly provide
us those mutants
including****? It
would be very helpful to us.
Thank you very much in advance.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
上一篇:大学英语六级口语材料
下一篇:商务英语:电子支付