关键词不能为空

当前您在: 主页 > 英语 >

稿套话大全

作者:高考题库网
来源:https://www.bjmy2z.cn/gaokao
2021-02-12 14:50
tags:

-

2021年2月12日发(作者:nul)



第一部分:


SCI


投 稿信件的一些套话




SCI


投稿信件的一些套话




一、投稿信



1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:


I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by –


which I should like to submit for possible


publication in the journal of - .


Yours sincerely



2. Dear Dr. A:


Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” b


y sb, which we are submitting for publication in the


journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would


be of interest to the journal’s readers.




3. Dear Dr. A:


Please find enclosed for your review an original re


search article, “” by sb. All authors have


read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the


integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict


of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the


signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.



We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving


comments from the reviewers.



二、询问有无收到稿件



Dear Editors,



We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive


acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be


grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send


our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.



三、询问论文审查回音



Dear Editors




It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in


your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a


decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as


possible.



四、关于论文的总体审查意见



1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor


revision are list below.


2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the


benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements


require further justification. There are given below.


3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our


knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the


authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as




4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.


5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of



because the main


observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .


6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you




will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is


not satisfactory.


7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to


communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek


the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.


8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful


editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and


Summary which have been underlined.


9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in


Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so


much variation between assays.


10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody


used?



五、给编辑的回信



1. In reply to the


referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –



One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction


mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on


page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the


result.


2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been


rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity


table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity


rather than an error or omission.


3. Thank you for your letter of




and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript


entitled “”. We hav


e studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we


hope meet with their approval.


4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at


the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findin


gs are confirmed.


5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers.


Revised portion are underlined in red.


6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript



7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.


8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for


publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.


9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are


summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.


10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.


11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments co


ncerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a


misinterpretation of the data.


12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had


been available.


13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new


paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.


14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the


cells, we consider it essential.


15. The running title has been changed to “”.



16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope


and assaying hexokinase.


17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the


original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for


pointing out their error.


18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on




chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).


19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally


submitted and to which a scale has been added.


20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.


21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text


and Reference section. These are:


22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have


now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised


manuscript is acceptable for publication.


23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to


this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.


24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to


improve our paper.


25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an


additional experiment, as suggested by referees





第二部分:跟老外要实验材料或者文章的模板:




Dear Mr./Mrs.: ________



Author name




I am a graduate student of Harbin Medical University in China. I major in


(您的


专业)


. Recently, I found one of your articles, titled


(< /p>


Title



in Medline. I


found it may help me achieve my goals in this research field. This would make a really


positive contribution to my work. I would like to be able to read the full text of this article. The


abstract makes the article sound very interesting. I know there is usually a fee required to


obtain the full article from Medline; however, as a student, my only income is a small


scholarship which is about U S $$30.00 per month. I wonder if you would consider sending


me the full text by Email. Perhaps you would consider this as an act of friendship between


our two countries.


Thank you for your kind consideration of this request.


Sincerely: ___________



your name




My Email address is: ____________________



your email




Date

< p>


Month/day/year





Dear professor ***,



I appreciate that you can take the time to read this e-mail.


I am ***, a post-graduate student in the School of the ***, *** University in China. I am very


interested in ***. We had got several mutants about*** gifted by *** in ***. Those mutants


have been used to explain***. However, in my recent trial,***. In your article “***”, you


isolated the strain*** and confirmed that ***. This special experimental phenomenon was


very similar to that I observed. So I doubted the role of *** may involve in the strange


phenomenon in my study. Because of lacking the plasmids and strains used for genetic


modification of ***, it is difficult for us to construct the relevant mutants used in your articles.


Therefore, I am writing to you to seek your help. Can you kindly provide us those mutants


including****? It would be very helpful to us.



Thank you very much in advance.


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-



本文更新与2021-02-12 14:50,由作者提供,不代表本网站立场,转载请注明出处:https://www.bjmy2z.cn/gaokao/644068.html

稿套话大全的相关文章