投稿常用语

一、投稿时的

Cover latter

1). Here within enclosed is our paper for consideration to be published on

The further information about the paper is in the following:

The Title: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

The Authors: XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXX

The

authors

claim

that

none

of

the

material

in

the

paper

has

been

published

or

is

under

consideration for publication elsewhere.

I am the corresponding author and my address and other information is as follows:

Address: Department of XXXXXXXXX,

College of Chemistry and Enviromental Science, Henan Normal University

Xinxiang City, Henan Province, 453007,

E-mail:

Tel: +86-XXX-XXXXXXX

Fax: +86-XXX-XXXXXXX

Thank you very much for consideration!

Sincerely Yours,

Dr. XXX

2). Dear Dr. A:

I

am

sending

a

manuscript

entitled

“

”

by

–

which

I

should

like

to

submit

for

possible

publication in the journal of - .

Yours sincerely

3). Dear Dr. A:

Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the

journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would

be of interest to the journal’s readers.

4). Dear Dr. A:

Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have

read

and

approve

this

version

of

the

article,

and

due

care

has

been

taken

to

ensure

the

integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict

of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the

signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.

We

appreciate

your

consideration

of

our

manuscript,

and

we

look

forward

to

receiving

comments from the reviewers.

二、询问有无收到稿件

Dear Editors,

We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive

acknowledgement

of

their

safe

arrival.

We

fear

that

may

have

been

lost

and

should

be

grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send

our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.

三、询问论文审查回音

Dear Editors

，

It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in

your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a

decision.

I

should

appreciated

your

letting

me

know

what

you

have

decided

as

soon

as

possible.

四、关于论文的总体审查意见

1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor

revision are list below.

2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the

benefit

of

the

reader,

however,

a

number

of

points

need

clarifying

and

certain

statements

require further justification. There are given below.

3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our

knowledge of the subject sufficiently

to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the

authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as

–

4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.

5.

This

manuscript

is

not

suitable

for

publication

in

the

journal

of

–

because

the

main

observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .

6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you

will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not

satisfactory.

7.

We

feel

that

this

potentially

interesting

study

has

been

marred

by

an

inability

to

communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek

the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.

8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful

editing.

Attention

should

be

paid

to

the

wording

of

those

parts

of

the

Discussion

of

and

Summary which have been underlined.

9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in

Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so

much variation between assays.

10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody

used?

五、给编辑的回信

1. In reply to the ref

eree’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –

One

minor

point

raised

by

the

referee

concerns

of

the

extra

composition

of

the

reaction

mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on

page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the

result.

2. I have read the referee’s

comments

very carefully and conclude that the paper has been

rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity

table

in

my

article

although

perhaps

I

should

have

done.

This

was

for

the

sake

of

brevity

rather than an error or omission.