-
Why ordinary people need to understand
power
Eric Liu
I'm a teacher and a
practitioner of civics in America. Now, I will
kindly ask those of
you who have just
fallen asleep to please wake up. (Laughter) Why is
it that the
very word
because
the
very
word
signifies
something
exceedingly
virtuous,
exceedingly
important, and exceedingly boring.
Well, I think it's the responsibility of people
like us, people who show up for
gatherings like this in person or online, in any
way
we
can,
to
make
civics
sexy
again,
as
sexy
as
it
was
during
the
American
Revolution, as sexy
as it was during the Civil Rights Movement. And I
believe the
way we make civics sexy
again is to make explicitly about the teaching of
power.
The way we do that, I believe,
is at the level of the city.
This is what I want to talk
about today, and I want to start by defining some
terms
and
then
I
want
to
describe
the
scale
of
the
problem
I
think
we
face
and
then
suggest
the ways that I believe cities can be the seat of
the solution. So let me start
with
some
definitions.
By
civics,
I
simply
mean
the
art
of
being
a
pro-social,
problem-solving
contributor
in
a
self-
governing
community.
Civics
is
the
art
of
citizenship,
what
Bill
Gates
Sr.
calls
simply
showing
up
for
life,
and
it
encompasses
three
things:
a
foundation
of
values,
an
understanding
of
the
systems that make the
world go round, and a set of skills that allow you
to pursue
goals and to have others join
in that pursuit.
And that brings me to my definition of
power, which is simply this: the capacity to
make others do what you would have them
do. It sounds menacing, doesn't it? We
don't like to talk about power. We find
it scary. We find it somehow evil. We feel
uncomfortable
naming
it.
In
the
culture
and
mythology
of
democracy,
power
resides with the people. Period. End of
story. Any further inquiry not necessary
and
not
really
that
welcome.
Power
has
a
negative
moral
valence.
It
sounds
Machiavellian
inherently.
It
seems inherently evil.
But
in
fact
power
is
no more
inherently good or evil than fire or
physics. It just is. And power governs how any
form
of
government
operates,
whether
a
democracy
or
a
dictatorship.
And
the
problem we face today,
here in America in particular, but all around the
world, is
that far too many people are
profoundly illiterate in power
—
what it is, who has it,
how it operates, how it flows, what
part of it is visible, what part of it is not, why
some people have it, why that's
compounded. And as a result of this
illiteracy,
those
few
who
do
understand
how
power
operates
in
civic
life,
those
who
understand how a bill
becomes a law, yes, but also how a friendship
becomes a
subsidy, or how a bias
becomes a policy, or how a slogan becomes a
movement,
the
people
who
understand
those
things
wielddisproportionate
influence,
and
they're perfectly happy to fill the
vacuum created by the ignorance of the great
majority.
This is why it is so fundamental for us
right now to grab hold of this idea of power
and
to
democratize
it.
One
of
the
things
that
is
so
profoundly
exciting
and
challenging about this moment is that
as a result of this power illiteracy that is so
pervasive,
there
is
a
concentration
of
knowledge,
of
understanding,
of
clout.
I
mean,
think about it: How does a friendship become a
subsidy? Seamlessly, when
a senior
government official decides to leave government
and become a lobbyist
for a private
interest and convert his or her relationships into
capital for their new
masters.
How
does
a
bias
become
a
policy?
Insidiously,
just
the
way
that
stop-and-frisk, for
instance, became over time a bureaucratic numbers
game. How
does
a
slogan
become
a
movement?
Virally,
in
the
way
that
the
Tea
Party,
for
instance,
was
able
to
take
the
Tread
on
Me
flag
from
the
American
Revolution, or how, on the other side,
a band of activists could take a magazine
headline,
The thing is,
though, most people aren't looking for and don't
want to see these
realities. So much of
this ignorance, this civic illiteracy, is willful.
There are some
millennials, for
instance, who think the whole business is just
sordid. They don't
want to have
anything to do with politics. They'd rather just
opt out and engage in
volunteerism.
There are some techies out there who believe that
the cure-all for
any
power
imbalance
or
power
abuse
is
simply
more
data,
more
transparency.
There are some on the left who think
power resides only with corporations, and
some
on
the
right
who
think
power
resides
only
with
government,
each
side
blinded
by
their
selective
outrage.
There
are
the
naive
who
believe
that
good
things just happen and
the cynical who believe that bad things just
happen, the
fortunate
and
unfortunate
alike
who
think
that
their
lot
is
simply
what
they
deserve
rather
than
the
eminently
alterable
result
of
a
prior
arrangement,
an
inherited allocation, of
power.
As a
result of all of this creeping fatalism in public
life, we here, particularly in
America
today, have depressingly low levels of civic
knowledge, civic engagement,
participation,
awareness.
The
whole
business
of
politics
has
been
effectively
subcontracted
out
to
a
band
of
professionals,
money
people,
outreach
people,
message people,
research people. The rest of us are meant to feel
like amateurs in
the
sense
of
suckers.
We
become
demotivated
to
learn
more
about
how
things
work. We begin to opt out.
Well,
this
problem,
this
challenge,
is
a
thing
that
we
must now
confront,
and I
believe that when you have this kind of
disengagement, this willful ignorance, it
becomes both a cause and a consequence
of this concentration of opportunity of
wealth
and
clout
that
I
was
describing
a
moment
ago,
this
profound
civic
inequality. This is why it is so
important in our time right now to reimagine
civics
as the teaching of power.
Perhaps it's never been more important at any time
in
our lifetimes. If people don't learn
power, people don't wake up, and if they don't
wake up, they get left out.
Now, part of the art of
practicing power means being awake and having a
voice,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
上一篇:格列佛游记的英文介绍
下一篇:土地资源管理中英文对照外文翻译文献