-
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY
The Governing Body of
Homerton Children’s Centre
adopted
this performance
management policy on31 October 2007.
APPLICATION OF THE POLICY
The policy applies to the head teacher
and to all teachers employed by the school except
teachers on contracts of less than one
term, those undergoing induction
(ie
NQTs
)
and
those
who are the subject of capability
procedures.
PURPOSE
This
policy sets out the framework for a clear and
consistent assessment of the overall
performance
of
teachers
and
the
head
teacherand
for
supporting
their
development
needs within the context of the
school's improvement plan and their own
professional
needs. Where teachers are
eligible for pay progression, the assessment of
performance
throughout the cycle
against the performance criteria specified in the
statement will be
the basis on which
the recommendation is made by the
reviewer.
This
policy
should be read
in
conjunction with
the
school's
pay
policy which
provides
details
of
the
arrangements
relating
to
teacher's
pay
in
accordance
with
the
School
Teachers'
Pay
and
Conditions
Document.
LINKS TO SCHOOL
IMPROVEMENT, SCHOOL SELF EVALUATION AND SCHOOL
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
To
comply
with
the
requirement
to
show
howthe
arrangements
for
performance
management link
with those for school improvement, school self-
evaluation and school
development
planningand
to
minimise
workload
and
bureaucracy
the
performance
management process will be the main
source of information as appropriate for school
self-evaluation and the wider school
improvement process.
Similarly, the
school improvement and development plan and the
school
'
s self evaluation
form are key documents for the
performance management process.
All
reviewers are expected to explore the alignment of
reviewees' objectives with the
school's
priorities
and
plans.
The
objectives
should
also
reflect
reviewees
'
professionalaspirations.
CONSISTENCY OF TREATMENT AND
FAIRNESS
The Governing Body
is committed to ensuring consistency of treatment
and fairness in
the operation of
performance ensure this the following provisions
are
made in relation to moderation,
quality assurance and objective setting.
Quality assurance
The head
teacher has determined that she will delegate the
reviewer role for some or all
teachers
for whom she is not the line manager.
In these circumstances the head teacher
will moderate all the planning statements to
check that the plans recorded in the
statements of teachers at the school:
?
are consistent between those who have similar
experience and similar levels of
responsibility
? comply with
the school's performance management policy, the
regulations and the
requirements of
equality legislation
The Governing Body
will review the quality assurance processes when
the performance
policy is reviewed.
OBJECTIVE SETTING
The
objectives
set
will
be
rigorous,
challenging,
achievable,
time-bound,
fair
and
equitable in relation to teachers with
similar roles/responsibilities and experience, and
wil
l
have regard
to what can reasonably be expected of any teacher
in that position given
the desirability
of the reviewee being able to achieve a
satisfactory
balance
between
the
time
required
to
discharge
his
professional
duties
and
the
time
required
to
pursue
his
personal
interests
outside
work,
consistent
with
the
school's
strategy for bringing downward pressure
on working hours. They shall also take account
of the teacher's professional
aspirations and any relevant pay progression
criteria. They
should be such that, if
they are achieved, they will contribute to
improving the progress
of children at
the school.
The reviewer and reviewee
will seek to agree the objectives butwhere a joint
determination cannot be made the
reviewer will make the determination.
In this school
:
all teachers, includingthe head
teacher, will have no more than 3objectives
teachers, including the head teacher,
will not necessarily all have the same number
of objectives
all teachers,
including the head teacher, will have a whole
school objective
Though performance
management is an assessment of overall performance
of teachers
and
the
head
teacher,
objectives
cannot
cover
the
full
range
of
a
teacher's
roles/responsibilities.
Objectives
will,
therefore,
focus
on
the
priorities
for
an
individual
for the cycle. At the review stage it will be
assumed that those aspects of a
teacher
'
s
roles/responsibilities not covered by the
objectives or any amendment to the
statement
which
may
have
been
necessary
in
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
the
regulations have been
carried out satisfactorily.
Reviewing
Progress
At the end of the
cyc
l
e assessment of
performance against an objective will be on the
basis
of
the
performance
criteria
set
at
the
beginning
of
the
cycle.
Good
progress
towards the
achievement of a challenging objective, even if
the performance criteria
have not been
met in full, will be assessed favourably.
The performance management cycle is
annual, but on occasions it may be appropriate to
set objectives that will cover a period
over more than one cycle. In such cases, the basis
on which the progress being made
towards meeting the performance criteria for the
objective
will
be
assessed
at
the
end
of
the
first
cycle
and
will
be
recorded
in
the
planning
and review statement at the beginning of the
cycle.
APPEALS
At
specified points in the performance management
process teachers and head teachers
have
a
right
of
appeal
against
any
of
the
entries
in
their
planning
and
review
a reviewee wishes to
appeal on the basis of more than one entry this
would constitute one appeal hearing.
Details of the appeals process are
covered in the school's pay
policy.
CONFIDENTIALITY
The
whole performance management process and the
statements generated under it, in
particular, will be treated with strict
confidentiality at all times. Only the reviewee's
line manager or, where
she
has more than one, each
of her line managers will be provided
with access to the reviewee's plan
recorded in her statement, upon request, where
this
is necessary to enable the line
manager to discharge her line management
responsibilities. Reviewees will be
told who has requested and has been granted
access.
TRAINING AND SUPPORT
The school's CPD programme will be
informed by the training and development needs
identified in the training annex of the
reviewees' planning and review statements.
The
governing
body
will
ensure
in
the
budget
planning
that,
as
far
as
possible
,
appropriate
resources
are
made
available
in
the
school
budget
for
any
training
and
support agreed for reviewees.
An account of the training and
development needs of teachers in general,
including the
instances where it did
not prove possible to provide any agreed CPD, will
form a part of
the
head
teacher's
annual
report
to
the
governing
body
about
the
operation
of
the
per
f
ormance
management in the school.
With regard
to the provision of CPD in the case of competing
demands on the school
budget, a
decision on relative priority will be taken with
regard to the extent to which: (a)
the
CPD
identified
is
essential
for
a
reviewee
to
meet
their
objectives;
and
(b)
the
extent to which the training and
support will help the school to achieve its
priorities. The
school's priorities
will have precedence. Teachers should not be held
accountable for
failing
to
make
good
progress
towards
meeting
their
performance
criteria where
the
support recorded in the
planning statement has not been
provided
.
APPOINTMENT OF
REVIEWERS FOR THE HEAD TEACHER
Appointment of Governors
The
Governing Body is the reviewer for the head
teacher and to discharge this
responsibility on its behalf may
appoint 2 or 3 governors.
Where a head
teacher is of the opinion that any of the
governors appointed by the
governing
body under this regulation is unsuitable for
professional reasons, s/he may
submit a
written request to the governing body for that
governor to be replaced, stating
those
reasons.
Appointment of
School Improvement Partner or External
Adviser
The local authority
has appointed a School Improvement Partner for the
school, who will
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
上一篇:(完整word版)常见英语单词前缀和后缀..
下一篇:绩效管理英文文献和参考文献