-
美国议案和法案的区别
【篇一:美国法典和美国联邦法规区别
(u.s.c
和
p>
cfr)
】
the united states code is divided into 50 titles
(listed below),
which deal with broad,
logically organized areas of legislation.
titles may optionally be divided into
subtitles, parts, subparts,
chapters,
and subchapters. all titles have sections as their
smallest basic coherent unit, though
sections are often divided
into
subsections, paragraphs, and clauses. not all
titles use
the same series of
subdivisions above the section level, and
they may arrange them in different
order. for example, in title
26 (the
tax code), the order of subdivision runs title -
subtitle -
chapter - subchapter - part
- subpart - section - subsection -
paragraph - subparagraph - clause -
subclause. in title 38
(veterans
benefits) the order runs title - part - chapter -
subchapter - section. put another way,
the title is always the
largest
division of the code, and the section the smallest
(except for subsections, paragraphs,
clauses, etc.), but
intermediate levels
vary in both number and sequence from
title to title.
the word title in this context is roughly akin to
a printed
volume, although many of the
larger titles span multiple
volumes.
similarly, no particular size or length is
associated
with other subdivisions; a
section might run several pages in
print, or just a sentence or two. some
subdivisions within
particular titles
acquire meaning of their own; for example, its
common for lawyers to refer to a
chapter 11 bankruptcy
or a
subchapter k partnership.
a sample citation would be 5 u.s.c. 552a, the
privacy act of
1974. a lawyer would
read that out loud as title five, united
states code, section five hundred
fifty-two a.
when sections
are repealed, their text is deleted and replaced
by a note summarizing what used to be
there. this is necessary
so that
lawyers reading old cases can understand what the
cases are talking about. as a result,
some portions of the code
consist
entirely of empty chapters full of historical
notes. for
example, title 8, chapter 7
is labeled exclusion of chinese. this
contains historical notes relating to
the chinese exclusion act,
which is no
longer in effect.
the code
of federal regulations (cfr) is the codification
of the
general and permanent rules and
regulations (sometimes
called
administrative law) published in the federal
register by
the executive departments
and agencies of the federal
government
of the united states.
the
cfr is published by the office of the federal
register, an
agency of the national
archives and records administration
(nara).
the cfr
is divided into 50 titles that represent broad
areas
subject to federal
regulation.
background
every
regulation in the cfr must have an enabling
statute, or
statutory authority. the
united states code (u.s. code) precedes
the cfr and contains statutes enacted
by congress. the cfr
contains
regulations, which spell out in further detail how
the
executive branch will interpret the
law.[1] the two documents
represent
different stages in the legislative process. the
u.s.
code is a codification of
legislation, while the cfr serves as
administrative law. administrative law
exists because the
congress often
grants broad authority to executive branch
agencies to interpret the statutes in
the (and in
uncodified statutes) which
the agencies are entrusted with
enforcing. congress may be too busy,
congested, or
gridlocked to micromanage
the jurisdiction of those agencies
by
writing statutes that cover every possible detail,
or
congress may determine that the
technical specialists at the
agency are
best equipped to develop detailed applications of
statutes to particular fact patterns as
they arise.
under the
administrative procedure act, the agencies are
permitted to promulgate detailed rules
and regulations through
a public
rulemaking process where the public is allowed to
comment, known as public information.
after a period of time,
the rules and
regulations are usually
published in the federal
register.
the parallel
table of authorities and rules in the index to the
cfr
correlates laws with their
regulations using u.s. code citations,
statutes at large citations and public
law numbers.[2]
effect of
administrative law
the
rules are treated by the courts as being as
legally binding
as statutory law,
provided the regulations are a reasonable
interpretation of the underlying
statutes. this reasonable
interpretation test or chevron doctrine
was articulated by the
u.s. supreme
court in a unanimous decision (six voting, three
recused) involving a challenge to new
clean air act regulations
promulgated
by the reagan administration in 1981. see chevron
u.s.a., inc. v. natural resources
defense council, inc.[3]
for example, if congress enacted a law that simply
stated that
there are not to be
excessive levels of mercury in any
significant body of water in the united
states (but defined
things no further),
an entity designated, as part of the law, to
enforce it (probably the united states
environmental protection
agency (epa))
could define in a scientific way what an
excessive level of mercury is, as well
as what constitutes a
significant body
of water. the agencys definitions and its plan
of enforcement for what congress
intended (along with listed
penalties
for
violation coming from
congress unless congress specified
otherwise) will all go into the
cfr.
also, enabling
legislation can be passed by congress which
gives a federal non-congressional
entity wide latitude in
creating rules
(law of bases). for example, the epa could be
designated by congress to promulgate
rules that control
harmful pollutants;
the agency could then promulgate broad
rules (including definitions and
enforcement provisions), in the
absence
of existing specific laws, to control lead
emissions,
radon emissions, pesticide
emissions, and so forth. such rules,
including any definitions and
enforcement provisions created
by
congress or the agency, will all go into the
cfr.
publication of
administrative law
the
rules and regulations are first promulgated or
published
in the federal register. each
is given a cfr citation, such as 42
cfr
260.11(a)(1), that can be cited immediately,
without waiting
for a page number from
the physical copy. the aforementioned
citation would be read, title 42, part
260, section 11, paragraph
(a)(1).
nara
also keeps an online version of the cfr, the
e-cfr, that is
normally updated two
days after changes to the regulations,
that have been published in the federal
register, become
effective.
【篇二:美国国会立法程序三部解读】
美国国会立法程序
解读一
*
国会成员
*
在美国,国会是最高级的立法机构。
美国国会分众议院和参议院两
院。
众议院议员有
435
人,每一名议员代表一个国会选区,任期为两年。
众议院里议员的席次是以每一
个州的人口依比例计算,比方说加利
福尼亚州人口众多,选区也多,所以在众议院里就有
53
名众议员代
表加利福尼亚州;相反
的,怀俄明州虽然面积广大,但是人口稀少,
所以整个州就算一个国会选区,在众议院里
只有一个席位。
不过参议院就不同
,不管州的面积和人口多少,每一个州都有两名
参议员,所以参议院里总共有
100
席位,每一名参议员的任期为六
年。
*
谁提草案
*
参议员和众议员被选民选入国会,其主要职责之一就是制定法
律。
美国国会的立法程序从拟定立法草案开始。在美国,任何人都可以
< br>拟定立法草案,但是任何新立法只有国会议员可以正式在国会里提
出。在通常情况
下,立法草案是由国会议员和其助理拟定的,这些
议员会在其选区竞选期间了解了选民对
某些议题的想法,并向选民
保证他如果选上将会在国会里提出其选民支持的立法草案。<
/p>
另外,议员的选民,不管是个人或组
织,也可以把拟定的立法草案
转交给代表当地选区的议员。与此同时,美国行政部门,包
括美国
总统和内阁成员等也可以向众议院议长或参议院议长提出立法草案。
这种立法来源叫做
“
行政
沟通
”(executive commu
nications
)
。根据
美国宪法,美国总统必须向国会报告
< br>“
国家现况
”
,这就是为什么每
年总统必须在国会发表国情谘文的原因。总统通常趁这个时候向国
会提出法案建议,在国情谘文发表过后,总统会正式把他的立法草
案送交给国会有关委
员会,委员会主席通常会立刻以原本的形式或
修改过的版本向国会提出。
*
四种提案
*
美国国会议员可以以四种不同的形式提出新立法,
这四种形式包括
法案
(bills)
、联合决议案
(joint
resolution)
、共同决议案
(concurrent
resolution)
和简单决议案
(simple res
olution)
。在参议
院和众议院里,大部份的立法都是以
“
法案
”
的形
式提出。比方说,
2001
年到
200
2
年期间,参众两院提出了
8948
项法案和
178
项联
合决议案。在这些
法案中,众议院提出了
5767
项法案和
125
项联合
决议案。
在执行上,
“
联合决议案
”
和
“
法案
”
两者没有很大的不同,两者都需
要经过同样的立法程序,不过对
美国宪法的修正案必须以联合决议
案的形式提出。这种决议案得到众议院和参议院三分之
二多数通过
后将直接送到总务管理局局长,让总务管理局局长送交到各州征求
各州批准,不需经过总统批准。联合决议案成为法律的方式和法案
相同。<
/p>
至于共同决议案和简单决议案的处理
方式则和法案或联合决议案的
方式有所不同。这两种类型的提案通常和制定美国法律无关
,而是
和两院议事规则、运作和表达两院对事情的看法有关。所以当两院
通过这种类型的决议案后,决议案不会递交给总统,要求总统批准。
*
共同决议案无约束力
*
众议院提出的共同决议案得到全院通过后将由众议院议事
员签署后
做为记录,参议院通过的共同决议案将交给参议院秘书签署,两院
通过的共同决议案都不会递交给总统采取行动。过去几个月,众议
院通过和几
个中国相关的决议案,像众议院通过的纪念天安门屠杀
事件
17
周年的第
794
号共同决议案,谴责中
国宗教迫害活动日益加
剧的第
608
号
共同决议案等,就是这种类型的决议案。
< br>美国乔治华盛顿大学政治管理学院教授丹尼斯
.
约翰逊在
接受采访时
解释说,这种决议案没有任何法律约束力。
约翰逊教授说:
“
< br>那种类型的决议案,可能会表达国会对一件事情的
看法。国会可能会对某个事件表
示不同意,不过那只是一个事件,
只是说我们不同意一个事件或我们对某个事件表示同意
或感激。
没
有任何法律约束力。
p>
”
在国会开会
期间,任何议员都可以提出新的立法。众议院有关单位
在收到新的立法后会给这个立法草
案一个编号,然后把这个立法提
案送交和这个立法有关的委员会
(committee)
或小组委员会
(subcommitt
ee)
,让小组成员对草案进行审议。
*
委员会和听证会
*
根据国会图书馆的介绍,美国立法过程中最重要的一个步骤可
能就
是委员会的行动。委员会或委员会小组成员在这个阶段对提出的立
< br>法草案进行密集的考虑,仔细研究和辩论,如果立法议题有足够的
重要性,委员会
会通过举行公共听证会,来了解正反两方对这项立
法的意见。
乔治华盛顿大学教授约翰逊说:
“<
/p>
国会听证会很重要,国会议员通过
听证会对立法进行进一步了解,
他们可能在听证会期间对议题进行
调查,听证会的专家证人很重要,委员会会邀请支持和
反对这项立
法的人说明他们的立场。听证会的另外一个目的是吸引媒体注意。
当你看到一个明星到国会听证会上作证时,通常是为了增加对这个
议题或立
法的宣传。
”
接下来,委员会小组成
员将对这项新的立法投票,来决定对这项立
法采取什么行动。委员会成员可以对提出的立
法进行修改,委员会
成员再投票决定是否赞成这些修改。如果这项立法没有在委员会审<
/p>
议阶段得到批准,这项立法的寿命就在这里结束了。
*
从全院表决到两院协调
*
得到委员会多数赞成通过的立法将被送到众议院全院,在众议
院院
会中让全体议员对立法进行审议,辩论和投票。这项立法通过适当
< br>议事程序在众议院全院表决后,将送到参议院审议。如果参议院对
众议院的立法有
修改,这整个修改后的立法必须再送回众议院审议。
众议院和参议院有时会在同样一个议
题上有不同看法,像最近在美
国炒得沸沸扬扬的移民法案问题就是一个例子。
乔治华盛顿大学教授约翰逊说:
“
常
常在众议院会有议员就一项议
题提出一种立法版本,在参议院有参议员则就同一个议题提
出另外
一个完全不同的立法版本。以移民问题为例,众议院和参议院在这
个问题上就存在许多政治上和实质上的分歧。这是为什么你会看到
参众两院就这
个议题有不同的版本。
“
但是最终,如果两院希望能制定一项新的移民法规,他们必须拟定
一个两
院统一的版本。参议院和众议院必须对一个完全一样的统一
版本进行投票。两院在这个过
程中必须做出很多妥协,并解决双方
的分歧。
”
参议院和众议院通常通过所谓的
< br>“
会议委员会
”(conference
committee)
来解决双方的分歧。约翰逊教授解释说:
“
会议委员会是由众议
院和参议院的部份成员组成,他们坐下来审查
两个不同的版本,双方就分歧进行谈判和妥
协,让两院能达成共
识。
”
*
总统签署
*
约翰逊教授表示,当会议委员会的成员达成共识后,同一个版
本的
立法草案将会分别在众议院和参议院表决,如果立法草案在两院都
< br>得到通过,这项草案将送交给总统,请总统签署,成为法律。