-
2019
年翻译资格考试
catti
三级笔译实务试题二
英译汉
Globalization for Change in Higher
Education
What
is globalization and how does it affect higher
education policy and academic
institutions? The answer is
deceivingly
simple and the implications are surprisingly
complex. 1 For higher education,
globalization implies the
social,
economic, and technological forces that shape the
realities of the 21st century. These
elements include
advanced information
technology, new ways of thinking about
financing higher education and a
concomitant acceptance of
market
forces
and
commercialization,
unprecedented
mobility
for students and professors, and other
developments.
Significantly, the idea
of mass access to higher education
has
meant unprecedented expansion of higher education
everywhere - there are about 134
million students in
postsecondary
education
2
worldwide,
and
many
countries
have
seen unprecedented and
sustained expansion in the past
several
decades. These global trends are for the most part
inevitable. Nations, and academic
institutions, must
constructively cope
with the implications. 3
Massification
massification 4 is without question the
most ubiquitous
global
influence
of
the
past
half
century
or
more.
5
The
United
States
had
the
first
mass
higher
education
system,
beginning
as
early
as
the
1920s.
Europe
followed
in
the
1960s,
and
parts
of Asia a decade or so later. The
developing countries were
the last to
expand. Most of the growth of the 21st century
is taking place in developing and
middle-income countries.
North America,
Europe, and a number of Pacific Rim nations
now enroll
60
percent
or
more
of
the relevant
age group 6 in
higher
education. What has massification brought?
Public
good
vs.
private
good.
7
Stimulated
in
part
by
the
financial pressures of massification
and also by broader
changes
in
economic
thinking,
including
the
neoliberal
agenda,
8 higher education
is increasingly considered in economic
terms a private good - a benefit
accruing mainly to
individuals who
should pay for it rather than a public good
that contributes benefits to society
and thus should be
financially
supported by the state. 9
Varied
funding
patterns.
For
most
countries,
the
state
has
traditionally been the main funder of
higher education.
Massification
has
placed
great
strains
on
state
funding,
and
in
all
cases
governments
no
longer
believe
they
can
adequately
fund
mass
higher
education.
Other
sources
of
funding
need
to
be
found
-
including
student
tuition
and
fees
(
typically
the
largest source) , a variety of
government-sponsored and
private
loan
programs,
university
income
generating
programs
( such as industry collaboration or
consulting) , and
philanthropic
support.
Decline
in
quality
vs.
conditions
of
study.
10
On
average
in most countries,
the quality of higher education has
declined. In a mass system, top quality
cannot be provided
to all students. 11
It is not affordable, and the ability
levels of both students and professors
necessarily become
more diverse.
University
study
and
teaching
are
no
longer
a
preserve
for
the elite - both in
terms of ability and wealth. While the
top
of
a
diversified
academic
system
may
maintain
its
quality
12 (although in some
countries the top sector has also
suffered), the system as a whole
declines.
Globalization of the Academic
Marketplace
More than 2 million students are
studying abroad, and it
is estimated
that this number will increase to 8 million in
a
few
years.
Many
others
are
enrolled
in
branch
campuses
and
twinning programs. 13
There are many thousands of visiting
scholars and postdocs studying
internationally. Most
significantly,
there is a global circulation of academics.
Ease of transportation, IT, the use of
English, and the
globalization
of
the
curriculum
have
tremendously
increased
the international
circulation of academic talent. Flows of
students
and
scholars
move
largely
from
South
to
North
-
from
the
developing countries to North America and Europe.
And
while
the
drain
of
the
past
has
become
more
of
a
exchange
forth
across
borders
and
among
societies,
the
great
advantage
still accrues to the traditional
academic centers at the
expense of the
peripheries. Even China, and to some extent
India, with both large and increasingly
sophisticated
academic systems, find
themselves at a significant
disadvantage
in
the
global
academic
marketplace.
For
much
of
Africa, the traditional brain drain
remains largely a
reality.
词汇
ization
全球化
ic
institution
学术机构
itant
相伴的,随之而来的
ty
流动性,移动性
tous
普遍存在的,无所不在的
ate
刺激,促使
(
通过自
然增长、积累
)
产生,形成
thropic
慈善的,慈善事业的
e
不同的,多种多样的,形形色色的
出类拔萃
的人
(
或物
)
,精英
drain
人才外流
exchange
人才交流
ery
外围,边缘
a
disadvantage
处于不利地位
注释
ingly
的字面意义为
“
具有欺骗性地
”
p>
,
可根据汉语习惯译为
“
< br>看
似
”
、
“
看起来似乎
”
。
< br>
condary edu
cation
意为完成中学教育之后的后续教育,可
意译为
p>
“
高等教育
”
,也
可直译为
“
中等后教育
”
,这一说法也是教育领域内通用
的专业术语。
3.
此句中
cope
with
的宾语为
the
implications
,如果机械地按照原
文
的语法结构来翻译的话,
会很别扭,
因为根据汉语的行文习惯,
“
处理、
应付
”
一词后面通常要跟上
“
情况、局势、
问题
”
这一类的词语。
ication
< br>此处实际上指的是
massification of higher
education
,为了避免不必要的误解和意义模糊,建议使用增词
法将其完整地
译为
“
高等教育大众化<
/p>
”
。
5.
英语是相对静态的语言,多用名
词,且前面可以加上若干形容词来修饰,
这样整个句子显得非常紧凑且干净利落,如此句
中的
ubiquitous global
influenc
e
。如果汉语译文也采用同样的方法来处理的话,整句话则会显得冗
长、臃肿而又晦涩难懂。因此
ubiquitous
可另起
一句译出。
relevant age group
源意为
“
相关的年龄组
”
,可译为
“
适龄人
群
”
。
good
及
private
good:
公共利益及个人利益
8.
此处介词
by
后面有两个很长的宾语,
而且第二个宾语中还带有另外的修饰成分,
如果把它们
并起来翻译为
“
在
……
和
……
的刺激下
”
,句子的意思会变得十分混乱,建
}
义将两<
/p>
部分宾语分开单独翻译,以使译文顺畅明了。
9_
此处
a private
good
和
a public good
两个名词词组后面都带有
很长的定语修饰成分,
且结构又有相
近之处。
译者在处理此句时,
应注意根据汉
语的行文习惯,将句子结构或分拆、或重新组合,以使译文结构紧凑、意思简单
明了
。
10
.
原文中
decline
这一个词就能
完美地兼顾
quality of
study
和
conditions of study
两种情况,但在译成汉语时,只能用两个不同的词分
别与
“
教学质量
”
和
“
教学环境
”
搭配,这里
可分别用
“
下降
”
和
“
退化
”
。