-
2012
年考研英语一答案
详解
Section I Use
of English
Directions:
Read the following text.
Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank
and mark A, B, C or
D on ANSWER SHEET
1. (10 points)
The ethical judgments of the Supreme
Court justices have become an important issue
recently.
The
court
cannot
_1_
its
legitimacy
as
guardian
of
the
rule
of
law
_2_
justices
behave
like
politicians.
Yet,
in
several
instances,
justices
acted
in
ways
that
_3_
the
court’s
reputation
for
being independent and
impartial.
Justice Antonin Scalia, for example,
appeared at political events. That kind of
activity makes it
less likely that the
court’s decisions will be _4_ as impartial
judgments. Part of the problem is that
the justices are not _5_by an ethics
code. At the very least, the court should make
itself _6_to the
code of conduct that
_7_to the rest of the federal judiciary.
This and other
similar cases _8_the question of whether there is
still a _9_between the court and
politics.
The framers of the Constitution
envisioned law _10_having authority apart from
politics. They
gave
justices
permanent
positions
_11_they
would
be
free
to
_12_
those
in
power
and
have
no
need
to
_13_
political
support.
Our
legal
system
was
designed
to
set
law
apart
from
politics
precisely because
they are so closely _14_.
Constitutional law is political because
it results from choices rooted in fundamental
social _15_
like
liberty
and
property.
When
the
court
deals
with
social
policy
decisions,
the
law
it
_16_
is
inescapably
political-which
is
why
decisions
split
along
ideological
lines
are
so
easily
_17_
as
unjust.
The justices
must _18_ doubts about the court’s legitimacy by
making themselves _19_ to the
code of
conduct. That would make rulings more likely to be
seen as separate from politics and,
_20_, convincing as law.
1. [A]emphasize
[B]maintain
2. [A]when
3. [A]restored
4.
[A]challenged
5. [A]advanced
6. [A]resistant
7. [A]resorts
8.
[A]evade
9.
[A]line
10.
[A]by
[B]lest
[B]weakened
[B]compromised
[B]caught
[B]subject
[B]sticks
[B]raise
[B]barrier
[B]as
[C]modify
[C]before
[C]established
[C]suspected
[C]bound
[C]immune
[C]loads
[C]deny
[C]similarity
[C]though
[D] recognize
[D] unless
[D] eliminated
[D] accepted
[D]founded
[D]prone
[D]applies
[D]settle
[D]conflict
[D]towards
11. [A]so
12.
[A]serve
13.
[A]confirm
14.
[A]guarded
15.
[A]concepts
16.
[A]excludes
17.
[A]dismissed
18. [A]suppress
19. [A]accessible
20. [A]by all mesns
Part
A
Directions:
Read the following four
texts. Answer the questions below each text by
choosing A, B, C or D.
Mark your
answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)
Text 1
Come
on
–Everybody’s
doing
it.
That
whispered
message,
half
invitation
and
half
forcing,
is
what
most
of
us
think
of
when
we
hear
the
words
peer
pressure.
It
usually
leads
to
no
good-drinking, drugs and
casual sex. But in her new book Join the Club,
Tina Rosenberg contends
that
peer
pressure
can
also be
a
positive
force
through
what
she
calls
the
social
cure,
in
which
organizations
and
officials
use
the
power
of
group
dynamics
to
help
individuals
improve
their
lives and possibly the
word.
Rosenberg, the
recipient of a Pulitzer Prize, offers a host of
example of the social cure in action:
In South Carolina, a state-sponsored
antismoking program called Rage Against the Haze
sets out
to
make
cigarettes
uncool.
In
South
Africa,
an
HIV-prevention
initiative
known
as
LoveLife
recruits young people to promote safe
sex among their peers.
The
idea seems promising
，
and
Rosenberg is a perceptive observer. Her critique
of the lameness
of many pubic-health
campaigns is spot-on: they fail to mobilize peer
pressure for healthy habits,
and
they
demonstrate
a
seriously
flawed
understanding
of
psychology.”
Dare
to
be
different,
please
don’t
smoke!”
pleads
one
billboard
campaign
aimed
at
reducing
smoking
among
teenagers-teenagers, who desire nothing
more than fitting in. Rosenberg argues
convincingly that
public-health
advocates ought to take a page from advertisers,
so skilled at applying peer pressure.
But on the general effectiveness of the
social cure, Rosenberg is less persuasive. Join
the Club is
filled
with
too
much
irrelevant
detail
and
not
enough
exploration
of
the
social
and
biological
factors
that
make
peer
pressure
so
powerful.
The
most
glaring
flaw
of
the
social
cure
as
it’s
presented here is that it doesn’t work
very well for very long. Rage Against the
Haze failed once
state
funding was cut. Evidence that the LoveLife
program produces lasting changes is limited and
[B]since
[B]satisfy
[B]express
[B]followed
[B]theories
[B]questions
[B]released
[B]exploit
[B]amiable
[B]atall costs
[C]provided
[C]upset
[C]cultivate
[C]studied
[C]divisions
[C]shapes
[C]ranked
[C]address
[C]agreeable
[C]in a word
[D]though
[D]replace
[D]offer
[D]tied
[D]conceptions
[D]controls
[D]distorted
[D]ignore
[D]accountable
[D]as a result
Section II Reading
Comprehension
mixed.
There’s
no doubt that our peer groups exert enormous
influence on our behavior. An emerging
body
of
research
shows
that
positive
health
habits-as
well
as
negative
ones-spread
through
networks
of
friends
via
social
communication.
This
is
a
subtle
form
of
peer
pressure:
we
unconsciously imitate the behavior we
see every day.
Far
less
certain,
however,
is
how
successfully
experts
and
bureaucrats
can
select
our
peer
groups
and
steer
their
activities
in
virtuous
directions.
It’s
like
the
teacher
who
breaks
up
the
troublemakers in the back row by
pairing them with better-behaved classmates. The
tactic never
really works. And that’s
the probl
em with a social cure
engineered from the outside: in the real
world, as in school, we insist on
choosing our own friends.
21. According to the first paragraph,
peer pressure often emerges as
[A] a supplement to the
social cure
[B]
a stimulus to group dynamics
[C] an obstacle to school
progress
[D] a
cause of undesirable behaviors
22. Rosenberg holds that
public advocates should
[A] recruit professional advertisers
[B] learn from
advertisers’ experience
[C] stay away from
commercial advertisers
[D] recognize the limitations of
advertisements
23. In the author’s view, Rosenberg’s
book fails to
[A] adequately probe social and
biological factors
[B] effectively evade the flaws of the
social cure
[C]
illustrate the functions of state funding
[D]produce a
long-lasting social effect
24. Paragraph 5shows that our imitation
of behaviors
[A] is harmful to our networks of
friends
[B]
will mislead behavioral studies
[C] occurs without our
realizing it
[D] can produce negative health habits
25. The author
suggests in the last paragraph that the effect of
peer pressure is
[A] harmful
[B] desirable
[C] profound
[D] questionable
Text 2
A
deal is a deal-except, apparently ,when Entergy is
involved. The company, a
major energy
supplier in New
England, provoked justified outrage in Vermont
last week when it announced it
was
reneging on a longstanding commitment to abide by
the strict nuclear regulations.
Instead, the company has
done precisely what it had long promised it would
not challenge the
constitutionality of
Vermont’s rules in the federal court, as part of a
desperate effort to keep its
Vermont
Yankee nuclear power plant running. It’s a
stunning move.
The
conflict
has
been
surfacing
since
2002,
when
the
corporation
bought
Vermont’s
only
nuclear power plant, an
aging reactor in Vernon. As a condition of
receiving state approval for the
sale,
the company agreed to seek permission from state
regulators to operate past 2012. In 2006,
the
state
went
a
step
further,
requi
ring
that
any
extension
of
the
plant’s
license
be
subject
to
Vermont legislature’s approval. Then,
too, the company went along.
Either Entergy
never really intended to live by those
commitments, or it simply didn’t foresee
what would happen next. A string of
accidents, including the partial collapse of a
cooling tower in
207 and the discovery
of an underground pipe system leakage, raised
serious questions about both
Vermont
Yankee’s
safety
and
Entergy’s
management–
especially
after
the
company
made
mislea
ding statements about
the pipe. Enraged by Entergy’s behavior, the
Vermont Senate voted
26 to 4 last year
against allowing an extension.
Now the company is suddenly
claiming that the 2002 agreement is invalid
because of the 2006
legislation, and
that only
the federal government has
regulatory power over nuclear issues. The
legal issues in the case are obscure:
whereas the Supreme Court has ruled that states do
have some
regulatory
authority
over
nuclear
power,
legal
scholars
say
that
Vermont
case
will
offer
a
precedent-setting test of
how far those powers extend. Certainly, there are
valid concerns about the
patchwork
regulations that could result if every state sets
its own rules. But had Entergy kept its
word, that debate would be beside the
point.
The
company seems to have concluded that its
reputation in Vermont is already so damaged that
it
has
noting
left
to
lose
by
going
to
war
with
the
state.
But
there
should
be
consequences.
Permission to
run a nuclear plant is a poblic trust. Entergy
runs 11 other reactors in the United
States, including Pilgrim Nuclear
station in Plymouth. Pledging to run Pilgrim
safely, the company
has
applied
for
federal
permission
to
keep
it
open
for
another
20
years.
But
as
the
Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the
company’s application, it should keep
it mind what
promises from Entergy are
worth.
26. The
phrase “reneging on”(Line .1) is closest in
meaning to
[A] condemning.
[B] reaffirming.
[C] dishonoring.
[D] securing.
27. By entering
into the 2002 agreement, Entergy intended to
[A]
obtain protection from Vermont regulators.
[B] seek favor
from the federal legislature.
[C] acquire an extension of
its business license .
[D] get permission to purchase a power
plant.
28.
According to Paragraph 4, Entergy seems to have
problems with its
[A] managerial practices.
[B] technical
innovativeness.
[C] financial goals.
[D] business vision
29. In the
author’s view, the Vermont case will
test
[A] Entergy’s capacity to fulfill all
its prom
ises.
[B] the mature of states’ patchwork
regulations.
[C] the federal authority over nuclear
issues .
[D]
the limits of states’ power over nuclear
issues.
30. It can be inferred from the last
paragraph that
[A] Entergy’s business elsewhere
might
be affected.
[B] the authority of the
NRC will be defied.
[C] Entergy will withdraw its Plymouth
application.
[D] Vermont’s reputation might be
damaged.
Text 3
In the idealized version of
how science is done, facts about the world are
waiting to be observed
and collected by
objective researchers who use the scientific
method to carry out their work. But
in
the everyday practice of science, discovery
frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated
route.
We
aim
to
be
objective,
but
we
cannot
escape
the
context
of
our
unique
life
experience.
Prior knowledge
and interest influence what we experience, what we
think our experiences mean,
and the
subsequent actions we take. Opportunities for
misinterpretation, error, and self-deception
abound.
Consequently, discovery claims should
be thought of as protoscience. Similar to newly
staked
mining
claims,
they
are
full
of
potential.
But
it
takes
collective
scrutiny
and
acceptance
to
transform a discovery claim into a
mature discovery. This is the credibility process,
through which
the individual
researcher’s me, here, now becomes the community’s
anyone, anywhere, anytime.
Objective
knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.
Once a
discovery claim becomes public, the discoverer
receives intellectual credit. But, unlike
with mining claims, the community takes
control of what happens next. Within the complex
social
structure of the scientific
community, researchers make discoveries; editors
and reviewers act as
gatekeepers by
controlling the publication process; other
scientists use the new finding to suit their
own purposes; and finally, the public
(including other scientists) receives the new
discovery and
possibly
accompanying
technology.
As
a
discovery
claim
works
it
through
the
community,
the
interaction
and
confrontation
between
shared
and
competing
beliefs
about
the
science
and
the
technology
involved
transforms
an
individual’s
discovery
claim
into
the
community’s
credible
discovery.
Two paradoxes exist throughout this
credibility process. First, scientific work tends
to focus on
some
aspect
of
prevailing
Knowledge
that
is
viewed
as
incomplete
or
incorrect.
Little
reward
accompanies
duplication
and
confirmation
of
what
is
already
known
and
believed.
The
goal
is
new-
search,
not
re-search.
Not
surprisingly,
newly
published
discovery
claims
and
credible
discoveries
that
appear
to
be
important
and
convincing
will
always
be
open
to
challenge
and
potential
modification
or
refutation
by
future
researchers.
Second,
novelty
itself
frequently
provokes
disbelief.
Nobel
Laureate
and
physiologist
Albert
Azent-Gyorgyi
once
described
discovery
as
“seeing
what
everybody
has
seen
and
thinking
what
nobody
has
thought.”
But
thinking what nobody else has thought
and telling others what they have missed may not
change
their
views.
Sometimes
years
are
required
for
truly
novel
discovery
claims
to
be
accepted
and
appreciated.
In
the
end,
credibility
“happens”
to
a
discovery
claim
–
a
process
that
corresponds
to
what
philosopher
Annette
Baier
has
described
as
the
commons
of
th
e
mind.
“We
reason
together,
challenge, revise,
and complete each other’s reasoning and each
other’s conceptions of reason.”
31. According
to the first paragraph, the process of discovery
is characterized by its
[A] uncertainty and complexity.
[B]
misconception and deceptiveness.
[C] logicality and
objectivity.
[D] systematicness and regularity.
32. It can be
inferred from Paragraph 2 that credibility process
requires
[A]
strict inspection.
[B]shared efforts.
[C] individual wisdom.
[D]persistent
innovation.
aph
3 shows that a discovery claim becomes credible
after it
[A]
has attracted the attention of the general public.
[B]has been
examined by the scientific community.
[C] has received
recognition from editors and reviewers.
[D]has been
frequently quoted by peer scientists.
34. Albert Szent-
Gy?
rgyi would most likely agree that
[A] scientific
claims will survive challenges.
[B]discoveries today
inspire future research.
[C] efforts to make discoveries are
justified.
[D]scientific work calls for a critical
mind.
of the
following would be the best title of the test?
[A] Novelty as
an Engine of Scientific Development.
[B]Collective Scrutiny in
Scientific Discovery.
[C] Evolution of Credibility in Doing
Science.
[D]Challenge to Credibility at the Gate
to Science.
Text
4
If
the trade unionist Jimmy Hoffa were alive today,
he would probably represent civil servant.
When
Hoffa’s
Teamsters
were
in
their
prime
in
1960,
only
one
in
ten
American
governm
ent
workers belonged to a union; now 36%
do. In 2009 the number of unionists in America’s
public
sector
passed
that
of
their
fellow
members
in
the
private
sector.
In
Britain,
more
than
half
of
public-sector workers but only about
15% of private-sector ones are unionized.
There are three
reasons for the public-
sector unions’
thriving. First, they can shut things down
without
suffering
much
in
the
way
of
consequences.
Second,
they
are
mostly
bright
and
well-
educated. A quarter of
America’s public
-sector workers have a
university degree. Third, they
now
dominate left-of-
centre politics. Some
of their ties go back a long way. Britain’s Labor
Party,
as its name implies, has long
been associated with trade unionism. Its current
leader, Ed Miliband,
owes his position
to votes from public-sector unions.
At
the
state
level
their
influence
can
be
even
more
fearsome.
Mark
Baldassare
of
the
Public
Policy Institute of
California points out that much of the state’s
budget is patrolled by unions. The
teachers’ unions ke
ep an eye
on schools, the CCPOA on prisons and a variety of
labor groups on
health care.
In many rich
countries average wages in the state sector are
higher than in the private one. But
the
real
gains
come
in
benefits
and
work
practices.
Politicians
have
repeatedly
“backloaded”
public-sector pay deals, keeping the
pay increases modest but adding to holidays and
especially
pensions that are already
generous.
Reform
has
been
vigorously
opposed,
perhaps
most
egregiously
in
education,
where
charter
schools,
academies
and
merit
pay
all
faced
drawn-out
battles.
Even
though
there
is
plenty
of
evidence
that
the
quality
of
the
teachers
is
the
most
important
variable,
teachers’
unions
have
fought against getting rid of bad ones
and promoting good ones.
As
the
cost
to
everyone
else
has
become
clearer,
politicians
have
begun
to
clamp
down.
In
Wisconsin
the
unions
have
rallied
thousands
of
supporters
against
Scott
Walker,
the
hardline
Republican
governor. But many within the public sector suffer
under the current system, too.
John
Donahue
at
Harvard’s
Kennedy
School
points
out
that
the
norms
of
culture
in
Western
civil services suit
those who want to stay put but is bad for high
achievers. The only American
public-
sector workers who earn well above $$250,000 a year
are university sports coaches and the
president
of
the
United
States.
Bankers’
fat
pay
packets
have
attracted
much
criticism,
but
a
public-sector
system
that
does
not
reward
high
achievers
may
be
a
much
bigger
problem
for
America.
36. It can be learned from the first
paragraph that
[A] Teamsters still have a large body
of members.
[B]
Jimmy Hoffa used to work as a civil servant.
[C] unions have
enlarged their public-sector membership.
[D]the
government has improved its relationship with
unionists.
37.
Which of the following is true of Paragraph 2?
[A] Public-
sector unions are prudent in taking actions.
[B] Education
is required for public-sector union membership.
[C] Labor Party
has long been fighting against public-sector
unions.
[D]Public-sector unions seldom get in
trouble for their actions.
38. It can be learned from Paragraph 4
that the income in the state sector is
[A] illegally secured.
[B] indirectly
augmented.
[C]
excessively increased.
[D]fairly adjusted.
39. The example of the
unions in Wisconsin shows that unions
[A]often run against the
current political system.
[B]can change people’s political
attitudes.
[C]may be a barrier to public-sector
reforms.
[D]are
dominant in the government.
40. John Donahue’s
at
titude towards the public-sector
system is one of
[A]disapproval.
[B]appreciation.
[C]tolerance.
[D]indifference.
Part
B
Directions:
In
the
following
text,
some
sentences
have
been
removed.
For
Questions
41-45,
choose
the
most
suitable one from the list A-G to fit into each of
the numbered blanks. There are two extra
choices,
which
do
not
fit
in
any
of
the
blanks.
Mark
your
answers
on
ANSWER
SHEET1.(10
points)
Think of those
fleeting moments when you look out of an aeroplane
window and realise that
you are flying,
higher than a bird. Now think of your laptop,
thinner than a brown-paper envelope,
or
your cellphone in the palm of your hand. Take a
moment or two to wonder at those marvels.
You are the lucky inheritor of a dream
come true.
The second half of the 20th century saw
a collection of geniuses, warriors, entrepreneurs
and
visionaries
labour to
create
a fabulous machine that could
function as a typewriter and printing
press,
studio
and
theatre,
paintbrush
and
gallery,
piano
and
radio,
the
mail
as
well
as
the
mail
carrier. (41)
The networked
computer is an amazing device, the first media
machine that serves as the mode
of
production,
means
of
distribution,
site
of
reception,
and
place
of
praise
and
critique.
The
computer is the 21st century's culture
machine.
But
for
all
the
reasons
there
are
to
celebrate
the
computer,
we
must
also
tread
with
caution.
(42)I call it a
secret war for two reasons. First,
most
people do not realise that there are strong
commercial agendas at work to keep them
in passive consumption mode. Second, the majority
of
people who use networked computers
to upload are not even aware of the significance
of what
they are doing.
All animals download, but
only a few upload. Beavers build dams and birds
make nests. Yet for
the most part, the
animal kingdom moves through the world
downloading. Humans are unique in
their
capacity
to
not
only
make
tools
but
then
turn
around
and
use
them
to
create
superfluous
material
goods
-
paintings,
sculpture
and
architecture
-
and
superfluous
experiences
-
music,
literature, religion
and philosophy. (43)
For all the possibilities of our new
culture machines, most people are still stuck in
download
mode. Even after the advent of
widespread social media, a pyramid of production
remains, with a
small number of people
uploading material, a slightly larger group
commenting on or modifying
that
content, and a huge percentage remaining content
to just consume. (44)
Television
is
a
one-way
tap
flowing
into
our
homes.
The
hardest
task
that
television
asks
of
anyone is to turn the
power off after he has turned it on.
(45)
What
counts
as
meaningful
uploading?
My
definition
revolves
around
the
concept
of
[A]
Of course, it is precisely these superfluous
things that define human culture and ultimately
what it is to be human. Downloading and
consuming culture requires great skills, but
failing to
move beyond downloading is
to strip oneself of a defining constituent of
humanity.
[B]
Applications
like
,
which
allow
users
to
combine
pictures,
words
and
other
media
in
creative
ways
and
then
share
them,
have
the
potential
to
add
stickiness
by
amusing,
entertaining and
enlightening others.
[C] Not only did they develop such a
device but by the turn of the millennium they had
also
managed to embed it in a worldwide
system accessed by billions of people every day.
[D] This is
because the networked computer has sparked a
secret war between downloading and
uploading
-
between
passive
consumption
and
active
creation
-
whose
outcome
will
shape
our
collective future in ways we can only
begin to imagine.
[E] The challenge the
computer mounts to television thus bears little
similarity to one format
being replaced
by another in the manner of record players being
replaced by CD players.
[F] One reason for the persistence of
this pyramid of production is that for the past
half-century,
much
of
the
world's
media
culture
has
been
defined
by
a
single
medium
-
television
-
and
television is defined by downloading.
[G]The
networked computer offers the first chance in 50
years to reverse the flow, to encourage
thoughtful downloading and, even more
importantly, meaningful uploading.
Part
C
Directions:
Read the
following text carefully and then translate the
underlined segments into Chinese. Your
translation should be written clearly
on ANSWER SHEET 2. (10 points)
Since
the
days
of
Aristotle,
a
search
for
universal
principles
has
characterized
the
scientific
enterprise. In some ways,
th
is quest for commonalities defines
science. Newton’s laws of motion and
Darwinian evolution each bind a host of
different phenomena into a single explicatory
frame work.
(
46)
In physics,
one approach takes this impulse for unification to
its extreme, and seeks a theory
of
everything
—
a single
generative equation for all we is becoming less
clear, however, that
such
a
theory
would
be
a
simplification,
given
the
dimensions
and
universes
that
it
might
entail,
nonetheless, unification of sorts
remains a major goal.
This tendency in the natural sciences
has long been evident in the social sciences too.
(
47)
Here,
Darwinism seems to offer justification
for it all humans share common origins it seems
reasonable to
suppose
that
cultural
diversity
could
also
be
traced
to
more
constrained
beginnings.
Just
as
the
bewildering
variety
of
human
courtship
rituals
might
all
be
considered
forms
of
sexual
selection,
perhaps the
world’s languages, music, social and religious
customs and even history are governed by
universal features.
(
48)
To filter out what is
unique from what is shared might enable us to
understand
how complex cultural
behavior arose and what guides it in evolutionary
or cognitive terms.
That,
at
least,
is
the
hope.
But
a
comparative
study
of
linguistic
traits
published
online
today
supplies a reality
check. Russell Gray at the University of Auckland
and his colleagues consider the
evolution of grammars in the light of
two previous attempts to find universality in
language.
The
most famous of these efforts was initiated by Noam
Chomsky, who suggested that humans are
born
with
an
innate
language
—<
/p>
acquisition
capacity
that
dictates
a
universal
grammar.
A
few
generative
rules are then sufficient to unfold the entire
fundamental structure of a language, which is
why children can learn it so quickly.
(49)
The second, by Joshua
Greenberg, takes a more empirical approach to
universality identifying
traits
(particularly in word order) shared by many
language which are considered to represent biases
that result from cognitive constraints
Gray and his
colleagues have put them to the test by examining
four family trees that between
them
represent
more
than
2,000
langua
ges.(
50)
Chomsky’s
grammar
should
show
patterns
of
language change that are independent of
the family tree or the pathway tracked through it.
Whereas
Greenbergian universality
predicts strong co-dependencies between particular
types of word-order
relations. Neither of these patterns is
borne out by the analysis, suggesting that the
structures of the
languages are lire
age-specific and not governed by universals
[NxtPage]
Section III
Writing
Part A
51. Directions:
Some internationals
students are coming to your university. Write them
an email in the name of
the Students’
Union to
1) extend your welcome and
2) provide some suggestions
for their campus life here.
You should write about 100
words on ANSWER not sign your name at the end of
the letter. Use “Li Ming”
instead.
Do not write the address(10 points)
Part B
52. Directions:
write an essay of 160-200 words based on the
following drawing. In your essay
you
should
1)
describe the drawing briefly
2) explain its intended
meaning, and
3)
give your comments
You should write neatly on ANSWER
SHEET2.(20 points)
Section
Ⅰ
Use of English
2012
年的完型填空是有关美国司法官伦理和政治关系的一篇文章，出自
New
York
Times,
June,
30th , 2011
的
“Ethics,
Politics and the Law”
一文。
选材回归
了
2000
年完型曾出过的法律类
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
上一篇：非常好听的日文歌曲合集
下一篇：4月外刊经贸知识选读自考试题