201111笔译实务英译汉

类数量。生态学家鼓掌的工作。但在渔业管理科学家的反应各不相同

,< /p>

有的论者在许多叫做忿怒发布危言耸听的报告。

Among the most prominent critics was Ray Hilborn, a professor of aquatic and fishery sciences at the

University of Washington in Seattle. Yet the disagreement did not play out in typical scientific fashion with,

as Dr. Hilborn put it, “researchers firing critical papers back and forth. ” Instead, he and Dr. Worm found

themselves debating the issue on National Public Radio.

其中最著名评论家们

Hilborn

是雷教授、水产渔业科学在西雅图华盛顿

大学的。但分歧没有发 挥出的典型的科学时尚

,Hilborn

博士说

:“

研究人

员关键论文射击来回摆动。相反地

,

他发现自己和博士虫辩论这事在美

国国家公共 电台。

“We started talking and found more common ground than we had expected,” Dr. Worm said. Dr. Hilborn

recalled thinking that Dr. Worm “actually seemed like a reasonable person.”

“

我们开始说话了

,

发现更多的共同点比我们预计的还 要早

,“

虫博士说。

博

士

Hilborn

召回认为博士蠕虫

< br>”

似乎真的很像一个讲道理的人。

”

The two decided to work together on the issue. They sought and received financing and began

organizing workshops at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, an organization

sponsored by the National Science Foundation and based at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

这两个决定一起工作有关问题。

他们寻求和接受资金和开始在国家中心

< br>工作坊生态分析和合成

,

该组织由美国国家科学基金会和 建立在加州大

学圣芭芭拉。

At first, Dr. Hilborn said in an interview, “the fi

sheries management people would go to lunch and the

marine ecologists would go to lunch” —

separately. But soon they were collecting and sharing data and

recruiting more colleagues to analyze it.

首先

,Hilborn

博士在接受一次采访时表示

,“

渔业管理人 们会去吃午饭

,

海

洋生态学家就去吃午 饭呢

,”——

另行规定。

但很快

,

他们收集和共享数据

和招募更多的同事来分 析它。

Dr. Hilborn said he and Dr. Worm now understood why the ecologists and the management scientists

disagreed so sharply in the first place. For one thing, he said, as long as a fish species was sustaining

itself, management scientists were relatively untroubled if its abundance fell to only 40 or 50 percent of

what it might otherwise be. Yet to ecologists, he said, such a stock would be characterized as “depleted”

—

“a very pejorative word.”

博士说

,

他和

Hilborn

博士 虫现在终于明白了为什么生态学者和科学家们

没有达成一致

,< /p>

超出了管理放在第一位。首先

,

他说

,

只要一种鱼仍保持着

自己

,

科学家便管理其丰度相对下降到只有

40 - 50 %

的它可能。然而

,

生

态学家

,

他说

,

这样的股票会被称作是

“

贫

”——“

一个非常贬义字。

”

In the end, the scientists concluded that 63 percent of saltwater fish stocks had been depleted “below

what we think of as a target range,” Dr. Worm said.

< br>最后

,

研究人员得出结论

,63 %

盐水的鱼类已经枯竭

”

下我们认为靶 区

,“

虫

博士说。