-
700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With
Explanations
Collected by Bunuel
Solutions by Bunuel
1. Probability
/ Combinatorics
If 2 different
representatives are to be selected at random from
a group of 10 employees
and if p is the
probability that both representatives selected
will be women, is p > 1/2
(1) More than 1/2 of the 10 employees
are women.
(2) The probability that
both representatives selected will be men is less
than 1/10
What is the
probability of choosing 2 women out of 10 people
we have
-->
So basically question asks is
(1)
not
sufficient.
this is true
only when
?
and this should
be
. (w # of women
)
. So
(2)
-->
(1)+(2)
,
not sufficient
Answer E.
You
can use Combinations, to solve as well:
# of selections of 2 women
out of
-->
,
not sufficient
employees;
total # of selections of 2 representatives out of
10 employees.
Q is
(1)
-->
, not sufficient.
-->
-->
-->
?
(2)
# of selections of 2 men out of
employees -->
--
>
-->
-->
, not sufficient
(1)+(2)
,
not
sufficient
Answer E.
Discussed at:
/forum/
2. Coordinate Geometry
If vertices of a triangle have
coordinates (-1,0), (4,0), and (0,A) , is the area
of the triangle greater
than
15?
(1) A < 3
(2)
The triangle is right
First
of all right triangle with hypotenuse 5,
doesn't mean
that we have
(3, 4, 5) right triangle. If we
are
told that values of all sides are integers, then
yes: the only integer solution for right triangle
with
hypotenuse 5 would be (3, 4, 5).
To check this: consider the
right triangle with hypotenuse 5 inscribed in
circle. We know that a right
triangle
inscribed in a circle must have its hypotenuse as
the diameter of the circle. The reverse is also
true: if the diameter of the circle is
also the triangle’s hypotenuse, then that triangle
is a right triangle.
So ANY point on circumference of a
circle with diameter
would make the
right triangle with diameter.
Not
necessarily sides to be
and
. For example we can have isosceles
right triangle, which would be
45-45-90: and the sides would be
. OR if we have 30-60-90 triangle and
hypotenuse is
, sides would
be
and
. Of
course there could be many other combinations.
Back to the original
question:
If vertices of a triangle
have coordinates (-1,0), (4,0), and (0,A) , is the
area of the triangle greater
than
15?
(1) A < 3 --> two
vertices are on the X-axis and the third vertex is
on the Y-axis, below the point (0,3).
The third vertex could be at (0,1) and
the area would be less than 15 OR the third vertex
could be at
(0,-100) and the area would
be more than 15. So not sufficient.
(2) The triangle is right. -->
Obviously as the third vertex is on the Y-axis,
the right angle must be at
the third
vertex. Which means the hypotenuse is on X-axis
and equals to 5. Again if we consider the
circle, the radius mus be 2.5 (half of
the hypotenuse/diameter) and the third vertex must
be one of
two intersections of the
circle with Y-axis. We'll get the two specific
symmetric points for the third
vertex,
hence the area would be fixed and defined. Which
means that it's possible to answer the
question whether the area is more than
15, even not calculating actual value. Sufficient.
Answer: B.
If we want to know how the area could
be calculated with the help of statement 2, here
you go:
One of the
approaches:
The equation of
a circle is
We know:
, as the hypotenuse is 5.
and
0) and (4, 0).
, where
is the center and
is the
radius.
, as the center is on the
X-axis, at the point
, half the way
between the (-1,
for the circle.
We need to determine intersection of
the circle with Y-axis, or the point
So we'll have
-->
and
. The
third vertex is either at the point
OR
. In any
case
.
Discussed at:
/forum/urgent-help-required-
?hilit=only%20integer%20solution%20triangle#p65662
8
3.
Geometry
Is the perimeter of triangle
ABC greater than 20?
(1) BC-
AC=10.
(2) The area of the triangle is
20.
This problem could be
solved knowing the following properties:
For (1):
The
length of any side of a triangle must be larger
than the positive difference of the other two
sides, but smaller than the sum of the
other two sides.
Now, as BC-AC=10 then BC>10 and also
according to the above property the third side AB
is also more
than 10, so the perimeter
is more than 20. Sufficient.
For (2):
A. For a given
perimeter equilateral triangle has the largest
area.
B. For a given area equilateral
triangle has the smallest perimeter.
Let's assume the perimeter is 20. The
largest area with given perimeter will have the
equilateral
triangle, so side=20/3.
Let's calculate the area and if the area will be
less than 20 it'll mean that
perimeter
must be more than 20.
,
(
.)
?
hence area
is more than 20.
Sufficient.
Answer: D.
Discussed at:
/forum/
4. Modulus / Inequalities
If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less
than 1?
(1) x/|x|< x
(2) |x| > x
, is
(1)
Two cases:
A.
-->
-->
. But remember that
, so
? Which means is
? (
)
B.
-->
-->
.
Two ranges
or
. Which says that
either in
the first range or in the second. Not
sufficient to answer whether
. (For instance
can be
or
)
OR:
Either
multiply both sides of inequality by
and
, so
or
-->
or
.
would be
(side note: we can safely do this as
absolute value is
-->
:
-->
.
;
non-negative and in this case we know
it's not zero too) -->
Or
and
, so
The
same two ranges:
(2)
. Well this basically tells that
is negative, as if x were positive or
zero then
equal to
. Only
one range:
, but still insufficient to
say whether
. (For
instance
can be
or
)
Or two cases again:
-->
-->
.
-->
: never correct.
(1)+(2)
Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is the
range
(
(from 2)
and
or
(from
1), hence
). Every
from
this range is definitely in the
range
. Sufficient.
Answer: C.
To
demonstrate on diagram:
Range from (1):
-----(-1)
----
(0)-
---(1)
----
Range from (2):
-----(-1)---
-
(0)----(1)----
or
,
blue area;
, green area;
From (1) and (2):
----(-1)
p>
----
(0)----(1)----
, common range of
from (1)
and (2)
(intersection of ranges from
(1) and (2)), red area.
Discussed at:
/forum/
5. Coordinate Geometry /
Modulus
On the number line shown, is
zero halfway between r and s
(1) s is to the right of zero
(2) The distance between t and r is the
same as the distance between t and -s
NOTE:
In GMAT we can often
see such statement:
is halfway between
and
. Remember this
statement can ALWAYS be expressed as:
.
Also in GMAT
we can often see another statement: The distance
between
and
is the same as
the
distance between
and
. Remember this statement can ALWAYS be
expressed
as:
.
Back to original question:
is 0 halfway between r and s?
OR is
(1)
? --> Basically the question asks is
, clearly not sufficient.
.
?
(2) The distance between
and
is the same as the
distance between
and -
:
is always positive as
is to the left of the
,
hence
;
BUT
can be positive (when
,
meaning
is to the right of
-
) or negative (when
,
meaning
is to the left of
-
, note that even in this case
would be to the left of
and relative
position of the points
shown on the diagram
still
will be the same). So we get
either
OR
.
In another words:
is the
sum of two numbers from which one
, is
greater than
. Their sum
clearly can be positive as well as
negative. Knowing that one is greater than another
doesn't help to
determine the sign of
their sum.
Hence:
-->
OR
-->
So the only thing we can
determine from (2) is:
Not sufficient.
(1)+(2)
and
.
-->
.
;
(as
is to the right of
) hence
.
Hence
. -->
-->
. Sufficient.
Answer: C.
About the relative position of the
points on diagram:
In general, you should not
trust the scale of GMAT diagrams, either in
Problem Solving or Data
Sufficiency.
It used to be
true that Problem Solving diagrams were drawn to
scale unless mentioned
otherwise, but
I've seen recent questions where that is clearly
not the case. So I'd only trust a diagram
I'd drawn myself. ...
Here I'm referring only to the scale of
diagrams; the relative lengths of line segments in
a triangle, for
example. ...
You can accept the relative ordering of
points and their relative locations as
given
(if
the vertices of a
pentagon are labeled ABCDE clockwise around the
shape, then you can take it as given
that AB, BC, CD, DE and EA are the
edges of the pentagon;
if a line is
labeled with four points in A, B,
C, D
in sequence, you can take it as given that AC is
longer than both AB and BC;
if a point
C is
drawn inside a circle, unless the
question tells you otherwise, you can assume that
C is actually within
the
circle;
if what appears to be a
straight line is labeled with three points A, B,
C, you can assume
the line is actually
straight, and that B is a point on the line
-- the GMAT would
never
include as a
trick the possibility that ABC actually
form a 179 degree angle that is imperceptible to
the eye, to give
a few examples).
So don't trust the lengths
of lines, but do trust the sequence of points on a
line, or the location of
points within
or outside figures in a drawing.
Discussed at:
/forum/
6. Inequalities
Are x and y both positive?
(1) 2x-2y=1
(2) x/y>1
(1) 2x-2y=1. Well this one
is clearly insufficient. You can do it with number
plugging OR consider the
following: x
and y both positive means that point (x,y) is in
the I quadrant. 2x-2y=1 --> y=x-1/2, we
know it's an equation of a line and
basically question asks whether this line (all
(x,y) points of this line)
is only in I
quadrant. It's just not possible. Not sufficient.
(2) x/y>1 --> x and y have
the same sign. But we don't know whether they are
both positive or both
negative. Not
sufficient.
(1)+(2) Again
it can be done with different approaches. You
should just find the one which is the less
time-consuming and comfortable for you
personally.
One of the
approaches:
-->
-->
Sufficient.
-->
substitute x -->
-->
is
positive, and as
,
is
positive too.
Answer: C.
NOTE:
does not mean that
then
.
. If both x
and y are positive, then
, BUT if both
are negative,
From (2)
, we
can only deduce that x and y have the same sigh
(either both positive or both
negative).
Discussed at:
/forum/
7. Inequalities / Word
Problem
If 20 Swiss Francs is enough to
buy 9 notebooks and 3 pencils, is 40 Swiss Francs
enough to buy 12
notebooks and 12
pencils?
(1) 20 Swiss Francs
is enough to buy 7 notebooks and 5 pencils.
(2) 20 Swiss Francs is enough to buy 4
notebooks and 8 pencils.
Given
, question is
true? Or is
true? So
basically we
are asked whether we can
substitute 3 notebooks with 3 pencils. Now if
we can easily substitute
notebooks with pencils (equal number of
notebooks with pencils ) and the sum will be lees
than 20. But
if
we won't
know this for sure.
But
imagine the situation when we are told that we can
substitute 2 notebooks with 2 pencils. In both
cases (
or
) it
would mean that we can substitute 1 (less than 2)
notebook with 1 pencil,
but we won't be
sure for 3 (more than 2).
(1)
. We can substitute 2
notebooks with 2 pencils, but this not enough. Not
sufficient.
(2)
. We can substitute 5 notebooks with 5
pencils, so in any case (
or
) we
can substitute 3
notebooks with 3 pencils. Sufficient.
Answer: B.
Discussed at:
/forum/?hilit=swiss#p674919
8. Word Problem
Ten years ago, scientists predicted
that the animal z would become extinct in t years.
What is t?
(1) Animal z
became extinct 4 years ago.
(2) If the
scientists had extended their extinction
prediction for animal z by 3 years, their
prediction
would have been incorrect by
2 years.
(1) The only thing
we can get from this statement is when animal z
actually extincted
: 4 years
ago or 6
years after the prediction.
Not sufficient.
(2) Also
not sufficient: t+3=actual extinction +/- 2.
(1)+(2) Animals extincted 6
years after the prediction: t+3=6-2 --> t=1 OR
t+3=6+2 --> t=5. Two answers,
not
sufficient.
Answer: E.
Discussed at:
/forum/
9. Modulus
If x
and y are non-zero integers and |x| + |y| = 32,
what is xy?
(1) -4x - 12y =
0
(2) |x| - |y| = 16
(1)
-->
-->
and
have opposite signs
--> so
either
either
:
Sufficient.
(2)
. Sum this one with the
equation given in the stem -->
--
>
,
.
(x and y have opposite sign) or
(x and y have the
same
sign). Multiple choices. Not sufficient.
Answer: A.
Discussed at:
/forum/
10. Number properties
If k is an integer greater than 1, is k
equal to 2^r for some positive integer r?
(1) k is divisible by 2^6
(2) k is not divisible by any odd
integer greater than 1
Given:
, question is
.
Basically we
are asked to determine whether
has
only 2 as prime factor in its prime factorization.
(1)
, if
is a power of 2 then the answer is YES
and if
is the integer other than 2 in
any
power (eg 3, 5, 12...) then the
answer is NO.
(2)
is not divisible by any odd integers
greater then 1. Hence
has only power
of 2 in its prime
factorization.
Sufficient.
Answer: B.
Discussed at:
/forum/
11. Inequalities
What is the value of integer
x?
(1) 4 < (x-1)*(x-1) < 16
(2) 4 < (x+1)*(x-1) < 16
Note:
is an
integer.
(1)
-->
-->
is a perfect
square between 4 and 16 -->
or
--
and
OR
and
:
,
-->
,
,
,
OR
, same answer.
there is only
one perfect square: 9 -->
-->
>
or
. Two
answers, not sufficient.
(2)
-->
-->
-->
-->
is
a perfect square between 5 and 17 -->
there are two perfect squares : 9 and 16
--
>
or
-->
or
or
or
. Four answers, not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Intersection of
values from (1) and (2) is
.
Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Discussed at:
/forum/tough-inequation-ds-what-is-the-
value-of-integer-x-
12.
Inequalities / Modulus
Is
x>y>z?
?
(
1) x-y = |x-z|+|z-y|
(2) x > y
(1)
First of all as RHS is the sum of two
non-negative values LHS also must be non-negative.
So
.
Now, we are
told that the distance between two points
and
, on the number line,
equals to the
sum of the distances
between
and
AND
and
.
The question is: can the points placed
on the number line as follows ---z---y---x---. If
you look at the
number line you'll see
that it's just not possible. Sufficient.
OR algebraic approach:
If
is true,
then
, will become
-->
,
which contradicts our
assumption
. So
is not
possible. Sufficient.
(2)
--> no info about
. Not
sufficient.
Answer: A.
Discussed at:
/forum/
13. Coordinate Geometry /
Algebra
In the rectangular coordinate
system, are the points (a, b) and (c, d)
equidistant from the origin?
(1)
(2)
Distance between the point
A (x,y) and the origin can be found by the
formula:
So we are asked is
(1)
(2)
(1)+(2)
From (1)
>
as
and
and
and
-->
and
. Not sufficient.
-->
.
, for some non-zero
-->
, then
.
Substitute in (2)
) --> so
and
. Not sufficient.
? Or is
?
.
--
(another solution
is not possible as
in (1)
given in
denominator and can not be
zero, so
Now square
-->
--
>
-->
cancels out -->
.
Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Discussed at:
/forum/
14. Remainders
If w, x, y, and z are the digits of the
four-digit number N, a positive integer, what is
the remainder
when N is divided by
9?
(1) w + x + y + z = 13
(2) N + 5 is divisible by 9
Remainder when a number is divided by 9
is the same as remainder when the sum of its
digits is divided
by 9:
Let's show this on our
example:
Our 4 digit number
is
When 1000w is divided by
9 the remainder is
remainder
,
remainder
.
The same with
and
So, the
remainder when
.
is divided by 9 would be:
. what is the remainder when it's
divided by 9?
:
(1) w + x + y + z = 13 -->
remainder 13/9=4, remainder N/9=4. Sufficient.
(2) N+5 is divisible by 9
--> N+5=9k --> N=9k-5=4, 13, 22, ... --> remainder
upon dividing this numbers
by 9 is 4.
Sufficient.
Answer: D.
Discussed at:
/forum/
15. Word Problem (800 level
question)
Laura sells encyclopaedias,
and her monthly income has two components, a fixed
component of
$$1000, and a variable
component of $$C for each set of encyclopaedias
that she sells in that month
over a
sales target of n sets, where n>0. How much did
she earn in March?
(1) If
Laura had sold three fewer sets in March, her
income for that month would have been $$600 lower
than it was.
(2) If Laura
had sold 10 sets of encyclopaedias in March, her
income for that month would have been
over $$4000.
Laura's income
(
-->
(1) Three cases:
, where
is number of sets
she sold and
).
is target
number
-->
-->
-->
(surplus of 600$$ was generated by
1 set);
(surplus of 600$$ was generated
by 2 set);
(surplus of 600$$ was
generated by 3 set).
If
equals to 1, 2, or 3, then income for
March will be 1600$$, BUT if
, then
income will be
more then 1600. Or
another way: if we knew that c=300 or 600, then we
couldd definitely say
that
BUT if
, then
(for
)
or more
(for
). Not
sufficient.
(2)
then
-->
. Not
sufficient.
-->
--> as the
lowest value of
,
(1)+(2) as
from (2)
, then from (1)
-->
. Sufficient.
Answer: C.
ADDITIONAL NOTES FOR (1) :
had sold
three fewer sets in
March...
and
had
, but if she
had
sold
then her income would
have been
.
Now:
If
is 1 more than
(or as I wrote
), then it
would mean that 600$$ was generated by only 1
set;
If
is 2
more than
(or as I wrote
),
then it would mean that 600$$ was generated by 2
sets;
If
is more than 3
more than
(or as I wrote
),
then it would mean that 600$$ was
generated by all 3 sets;
In first two cases income for March
will be 1600$$, BUT for third case income can be
1600$$ or more. So
this statement is not
sufficient.
Discussed at:
/forum/?hilit=laura
20. Number
properties
If p is a positive integer,
what is a remainder when p^2 is divided by
12?
(1) p>3.
(2)
p is a prime.
(1) not
sufficient
(2) not sufficient
For (1) and (2), just plug two
different integers: for (1) 4 an 5 (>3) and for
(2) 2 and 3 (primes) to see
that you'll
get two different answers for remainders.
(1)+(2) Any prime >3 when
divide by 6 can only give remainder 1 or 5
(remainder can not be 2 or 4
because
than p would be even, it can not be 3 because p
would be divisible by 3). So any prime more
than 3 can be expressed as
or
(
)
So either:
which gives remainder 1 when divided by 12,;
OR:
which also gives
remainder 1 when divided by 12.
Answer: C.
Discussed at:
/forum/
21. Coordinate Geometry
In the xy-plane, if line k has negative
slope and passes through the point (-5,r) , is the
x-intercept
of line k
positive?
(1) The slope of
line k is -5.
(2) r> 0
Let the
points
Question: is
(1)
whether
-->
or not. Not sufficient.
)
but we
intercept be the point
and
would be
?
?
? We can not determine
. Slope
is rise over run
and for two
-->
.
? --> is
(2)
and
-->
?
is some
positive value (as
don't know whether
it's more than
or not. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2)
Not
sufficient.
Answer: E.
and
-->
-->
.
can be
positive as well as negative.
This can
be done by visualizing the question. Statement (2)
tells us that the point
, as
, is
in the II quadrant.
Line with negative slope through the point in the
II quadrant can have
intercept
positive as well as negative.
Taken together: as we don't
know the exact location of the point
in II quadrant we can not say
even
knowing the slope whether the
intercept would be positive or negative.
Discussed at:
/forum/og-12-ds-question-line-concept-
very-good-one-key-
22.
Inequalities /Modulus
Is |x| + |x -1| =
1?
(1) x ≥ 0
(2) x ≤ 1
Q is
. Let's check when this
equation holds true. We should consider three
ranges (as
there are two check points
and
):
A.
-->
-->
, but this solution is not valid as we
are checking the
range
;
B.
-->
-->
, which is true.
That means that for ANY value from the
range
C.
-->
, equation
-->
holds true.
, but this solution is not valid as we
are checking the range
.
.
So we get that equation
holds true ONLY in the range
Statements:
(1)
.
Not sufficient, as
must be also
;
(2)
. Not
sufficient, as
must be also
;
(1)+(2)
, exactly the range we needed.
Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Discussion of this question
at:
/forum/
23. Number properties
Is the positive integer N a perfect
square?
(1) The number of
distinct factors of N is even.
(2) The
sum of all distinct factors of N is even.
Probably the best way of
solving would be making the chart of perfect
squares and its factors to check
both
statements, but below is the algebraic approach if
needed.
Couple of
things:
1. Note that if
is a perfect square powers of its
prime factors must be even, for
instance:
, powers of prime
factors of 2 and 3 are even.
2. There is a formula for
Finding the Number of Factors of an
Integer
:
First
make prime factorization of an integer
of
and
,
, and
are their powers.
, where
,
, and
are prime factors
The number of factors of
will be expressed by the formula
include 1 and n itself.
Example:
Finding the number
of all factors of 450:
Total number of factors of 450
including 1 and 450 itself
.
NOTE:
this will
is
factors.
3. A perfect square ALWAYS has an ODD
number of Odd-factors, and EVEN number of Even-
factors. For
instance odd factors of 36
are 1, 3 and 9 (3 odd factor) and even factors are
2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 36 (6
even
factors).
Back to the
original question:
Is the positive integer N a perfect
square?
(1) The number of
distinct factors of N is even --> let's say
factors of
is even -->
then powers of its primes
,
given that the number of
. But as we
concluded if n is a perfect square
,
, and
must be even, and in
this case number of factors would
be
.
Hence
can not
be a perfect square. Sufficient.
(2) The sum of all distinct factors of
N is even --> if n is a perfect square then
(according to 3) sum of
odd factors
would be odd and sum of even factors would be
even, so sum of all factors of perfect
square would be
. Hence
can not be a perfect square.
Sufficient.
Answer: D.
There are some tips about
the perfect square:
? The
number of distinct factors of a per
fect
square is ALWAYS ODD.
? The sum of
distinct factors of a perfect square is ALWAYS
ODD.
? A perfect square
ALWAYS has an ODD number of
Odd
-factors, and EVEN number of Even-
factors.
? Perfect square always has
even number of powers of prime factors.
Discussed at:
/forum/
24. Statistic
Lists S and T consist of the same
number of positive integers. Is the median of the
integers in S
greater than the average
(arithmetic mean) of the integers in T?
(1) The integers in S are consecutive
even integers, and the integers in T are
consecutive odd integers.
(2) The sum
of the integers in S is greater than the sum of
the integers in T.
Q: is
? Given: {# of terms in S}={# of terms
in T}, let's say N.
(1)
From this statement we can derive that
as set S and set T are evenly spaced
their medians equal
to their
means
. So from this statement question
becomes is
? But this
statement is clearly insufficient. As
we can have set S{2,4,6} and set T{21,23,25}
OR
S{20,22,24} and
T{1,3,5}.
(2)
. Also insufficient. As we can have set
S{1,1,10} (Median{S}=1) and set
T{3,3,3} (Mean{T}=3)
OR
S{20,20,20}
(Median{S}=20) and T{1,1,1} (Mean{T}=1).
(1)+(2) From (1) question
became is
? --> As there are equal # of
term in sets
and mean(average)=(Sum of
terms)/(# of terms), then we have: is
Is
? This is exactly what is
said in statement (2) that
Hence
sufficient.
Answer: C.
Discussed at:
/forum/
25. Number Properties
If n is an integer >1, is 3^n-2^n
divisible by 35?
(1) n is
divisible by 15.
(2) n is divisible by
18.
RULE: for x^n-y^n:
is ALWAYS divisible by
.
is divisible by
when n is
even.
If n is
an integer >1, is
divisible by 35?
true? -->
.
(1) n is divisible by 15. -->
--> 5m may or my not be even, so
insufficient to answer, whether it's
divisible by 27+8=35.
(2) n
is divisible by 18. -->
--> 6m is
even, so 3^(18m)-
2^(18m)=27^(6m)-8^(6m)
is divisible by 27+8=35. Sufficient.
Answer: B.
Discussed at:
/forum/
26. Geometry
The
area of the right triangle ABC is 4 times greater
than the area of the right triangle KLM. If the
hypotenuse KL is 10 inches, what is the
length of the hypotenuse AB?
(1) Angles
ABC and KLM are each equal to 55 degrees.
(2) LM is 6 inches.
Properties of Similar
Triangles:
?
Corresponding angles are the same.
? Corresponding sides are all in the
same
proportion
.
? It is only necessary to determine
that two sets of angles are identical in order to
conclude tha
t two
triangles
are similar; the third set will be identical
because all of the angles of a triangle always sum
to
180?
.
? In
similar triangles, the sides of the triangles are
in some proportion to one another. For example, a
triangle with lengths 3, 4, and 5 has
the same angle measures as a triangle with lengths
6, 8, and 10.
The two triangles are
similar, and all of the sides of the larger
triangle are twice the size of the
corresponding legs on the smaller
triangle.
? If two similar triangles
have sides
in the ratio
,
then their areas are in the ratio
.
OR in another way: in two similar
triangles, the ratio of their areas is the square
of the ratio of their
sides:
.
For more on
triangles please check Triangles chapter of the
Math Book (link in my signature).
Back to original question:
The area of the right triangle ABC is 4
times greater than the area of the right triangle
KLM. If the
hypotenuse KL is 10 inches,
what is the length of the hypotenuse AB?
(1) Angles ABC
and KLM are each equal to 55 degrees --> ABC and
KLM are similar triangles --
>
Sufficient.
, so
the sides are in ratio 2/1 --> hypotenuse KL=10
--> hypotenuse AB=2*10=20.
(2) LM is 6
inches --> KM=8 -->
-->
.
But just knowing the
are of ABC is not
enough to determine hypotenuse AB. For instance:
legs of ABC can be 96 and 2 OR 48
and 4
and you'll get different values for hypotenuse.
Not sufficient.
Answer: A.
Discussed at:
/forum/mgmat-ds-help-
?hilit=
different%20values%20for%20hypotenuse%20sufficient
.#p723237
27. Number properties
If N
is a positive integer, what is the last digit of
1! + 2! + ... +N!?
(1) N is
divisible by 4
(2) (N^2 + 1)/5 is an
odd integer.
Generally the
last digit of
can take ONLY 3 values:
A. N=1 --> last digit 1;
B.
N=3 --> last digit 9;
C. N=any other
value --> last digit 3 (N=2 --> 1!+2!=3 and for
N=4 --> 1!+2!+3!+4!=33,
the terms
after N=4 will end by 0 thus not affect
last digit and it'll remain 3).
So basically question asks whether we
can determine which of three cases we have.
(1) N is divisible by 4 --> N is not 1
or 3, thus third case. Sufficient.
(2) (N^2 + 1)/5 is an odd integer --> N
is not 1 or 3, thus third case. Sufficient.
Answer: D.
Discussed at:
/forum/
28. Remainders
The integers m and p are such that
2
is divided by m, is
r>1?
(1) the greatest common factor of
m and p is 2
(2) the least common
multiple of m and p is 30
Given:
and
.
. q:
(1) the greatest common factor of m and
p is 2 --> p and m are even (as both have 2 as a
factor) -->
even divided by even can
give only even remainder (0, 2, 4, ...), since
remainder is not zero
(as
),
then remainder must be more than 1. Sufficient.
(2) the least common
multiple of m and p is 30 --> if m=5 and p=6,
remainder=1
=1
, answer to the
question would be NO. BUT if m=10 and
p=15 remainder=5
>1
answer to
the question would be YES. Two
different answers. Not sufficient.
Answer: A.
Discussed at:
/forum/
29. Inequalities
Is
(1)
(2)
?
Is
? --> is
?
Now, nominator is non-negative, thus the fraction
to be positive
nominator must not be
zero (thus it'll be positive) and denominator mut
be positive --
>
and
.
Statement (1)
satisfies first requirement and statement (2)
satisfies second requirement, so taken
together they are sufficient.
Answer: C.
NOTE:
Never multiply or
reduce inequality by an unknown (a variable)
unless you are sure of its
sign since
you do not know whether you must flip the sign of
the inequality.
So you CAN NOT multiply
What you CAN DO is:
-->
by
since you don't know
the sign of
--> common denominator is
.
-->
-->
multiply be 3 -->
-->
.
Discussed at:
/forum/
30. Coordinate Geometry
In the xy coordinate plane, line L and
line K intersect at the point (4,3). Is the
product of their
slopes
negative?
(1) The product of
the x-intersects of lines L and K is positive.
(2) The product of the y-intersects of
lines L and K is negative.
We have two lines:
and
. The question: is
?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
上一篇:人教版八年级下英语课文3a及阅读翻译知识分享
下一篇:AMC12真题及答案