-
阅读理解
-
细节理解
三
1
、
As
the
Earth
warms
from
the
increase
of
carbon
dioxide
in
its
atmosphere,
the oceans that
cover 70 percent of its surface are warming too.
This warming will
likely benefit some
sea species at the expense of others.
A study in the
May 20 issue of the journal Nature confirmed that
there has
been
a
warming
trend
in
the
world’s
oceans
since
1993,
as
the
waters
have
absorbed
much of the extra
energy in the planet’s atmosphere.
The warming that has already occurred, and is
expected to continue in the
coming
decades, will likely spell bad news for many ocean
species, such as corals
and
species
that
live
in
the
cold
waters
of
the
planet’s
poles.
But
some
creatures
beneath the ocean
surface might actually have an advantage in the
newly wanned
waters.
A
2008
study,
for
example,
said
that
a
warming
of
just
a
few
degrees
Fahrenheit
in
Antarctic
waters
could
make
them
suitable
to
sharks,which
haven’t
lived
in
the
area
for
about
40
million
years.
It’s
easier
for
sharks
to
keep
their
high
metabo
lism
in
warmer waters. If sharks do move into the
area,they could cause damage to the
existing ecosystems of the oceans
around Antarctica.
A
study
of
starfish
found
these
typical
ocean
creatures
grew
faster
in
water
at
warmer
temperatures
and
higher
carbon
dioxide
levels
(
another
result
of
all
the
extra
greenhouse
gas
in
the
atmosphere)
than
at
normal
conditions
—
which
is
bad
news
for the shellfishes they live on.
Work by Jeremy Jackson, a professor at Scripps
Institution of Oceanography
at the
University of California at San Diego, suggests
that ocean warming
—
along
with other threats such as overfishing
and habitat
destruction
—
could change
once
complex ocean ecosystems into ones
that favor simpler species, such as microbes,
toxic algal blooms and jellyfishes.
is Paragraph 3 developed?
giving examples.
analyzing causes.
making comparisons.
making classifications.
can we know about sharks from the fourth
paragraph?
are native to Antarctic
waters.
do harm to the whole
ecosystem.
’re adaptable to warmer
water conditions.
threaten
simpler species in Antarctic waters.
will ocean warming likely bring about?
ing the growth of starfish.
ecosystem of smaller creatures.
ent
food sources for sea creatures.
ng
living places of deep-sea species.
is
the purpose of the passage?
explain
why ocean warming benefit some species.
introduce how creatures survive in
warmer oceans.
clarify some
misunderstandings about ocean warming.
show which creatures will benefit from warmer
oceans.
2
、
Steven
Weinberger
is
the
director
of
linguistics
in
the
English
Department
at
George
Mason
University
in
Fairfax,
Virginia.
He
says
students
in
his
beginning
phonetics
class
are
mostly
interested
in
teaching
English
as
a
second
language.
They
wanted to study how non-native speakers
pronounce different sounds.
we
sent
the
students
out
to
record
non-native
speakers,
and
we
compared
those speakers to each other and to
native speakers of English,” said Steven
Weinberger.
Professor
Weinberger
wrote
a
paragraph
for
all
of
the
speakers
to
read.
The
paragraph uses common
words but
contains
almost
all of the sounds
used
in English.
Here is that
sixty-nine-word paragraph:
“Please
call
Stella.
Ask
her
to
bring
these
things
with
her
from
the
store:
Six spoons
of fresh snow peas, five thick slabs of blue
cheese, and maybe a snack
for her brother Bob. We also need a
small plastic snake and a big toy frog for the
kids.
She
can
scoop
these
things
into
three
red
bags,
and
we
will
go
meet
her
Wednesday
at
the
train station.”
In 1999, Professor
Weinberger put the recordings online. The Speech
Accent
Archive is for anyone who wants
to compare and analyze the accents of different
English speakers.
Some people
think the archive would be better if it included
natural
speech-people
talking
freely,
not
just
reading
the
same
words.
Professor
Weinberger
recognizes the strengths and weaknesses
of his site.
Professor Weinberger says the site
gets a million visits a month and would
like more people to send in theirown
samples of the sixty-nine-word paragraph.
Steven Weinberger said, ‘‘Right now we
only have samples from about 350
languages,
including
English.
You
know,
there
are
6,
000
languages
in
the
world
today,
so we need lots more.
That’s why the ar
chive work will never
be finished.
did Professor Weinberger
let his students record non-native speakers?
of his students are interested in
phonetics.
pronunciation from non-
native speakers sounds strange.
were
gathering materials for the Speech Accent Archive.
wanted to know how non-native speakers
pronounce different sounds.
Speech
Accent Archive is intended for
______.
the students in Weinberger’s beginning
phonetics class
r wants to
study the accents of different English speakers
teachers
of
linguistics
in
the
English
Department
at
George
Mason
University
g money by the
rate of clicking the website
reason
why Professor Weinberger chose the words in Para.4
for all of the
speakers to read is that
_______.
words in this
paragraph are very easy to read
are
familiar with the activities included in this
paragraph
of the speakers are
interested in the information shown in this
paragraph
words are common and almost
all of the sounds used in English are contained
which part of a website
may the passage appear?
ainment.
isement.
.
ion.
3
、
Grandparents
Answer a Call
As a third-generation
native of Brownsville, Texas, Mildred Garza never
pleased move away. Even when her
daughter and son asked her to move to San Antonio
to help their children, she politely
refused . Only after a year of friendly
discussion did Ms Gaf finally say yes.
That was four years ago. Today all three
generations regard the move to a
success, giving them a closer relationship than
they would have had in separate cities.
No statistics show the
number of grandparents like Garza who are moving
closer
to
the
children
and
grandchildren.
Yet
there
is
evidence
suggesting
that
the
trend
is
growing.
Even
President
Obama’s
mother
-in-law,
Marian
Robinson,
has
agreed
to
leave Chicago and into the White House to help
care for her granddaughters.
According
to a study grandparents com. 83 percent of the
people said Mrs. Robinson
‘s
decision will influence the grandparents in the
American family. Two
-thirds
believe more families will follow the
example of Obama’s family.
“in the 1960s we were all a
little wild and couldn’t get away from home
far
enough
fast
enough
to
p
rove
we
could
do
it
on
our
own,”
says
Christine
Crosby,
publisher
of
grate
magazine
for
grandparents
.“We
now
realize
how
important
family
is and how important
to be near them, especially when you’re raining
children.”
Moving is not
for everyone. Almost every grandparent wants to be
with his
or her grandchildren and is
willing to make sacrifices, but sometimes it is
wiser
to
say
no
and
visit
frequently
instead.
Having
your
grandchildren
far
away
is
hard,
especially
knowing your
adult child
is struggling,
but giving up the life you know
may be
harder.
was Garza’s move a
success?
strengthened her
family ties.
improved her living
conditions.
enabled her make more
friends.
helped her know more new
places.
was the reaction of
the public to Mrs. Robinson’s
decision?
A.17% expressed
their support for it.
people responded
sympathetically.
C.83% believed it had
a bad influence.
majority thought it
was a trend.
did Crosby say about
people in the 1960s?
were unsure of
raise more children.
were eager to
raise more children.
wanted to live
away from their parents.
bad little
respect for their grandparent.
does
the author suggest the grandparents do in the last
paragraph?
decisions in the best
interests' of their own
their children
to pay more visits to them
ice for
their struggling children
to know
themselves better
4
、
Spending money on time-
saving services reduces stress and boosts
(
增进
)
happiness,
according to a new research, but shockingly, few
of us do it.
Whillans,
a professor at HBS
said,
“Buying time helps
to
protect
us from
the
stress in our lives caused
by time pressure, and the feeling that
we don’ t have
enough minutes in the
day to complete our tasks.’’
The
effect
was
clearest
in
the
Canadian
experiment,
in
which
60
working
adults
were
given
$$40
to
spend
in
two
different
ways.
One
weekend,
they
were
told
to
spend
the
money
on
a
material
purchase
—
a
gift
for
themselves.
The
next
weekend,
they
were
instructed to spend the $$40 on anything
that saved them time, from paying the
neighbor’s kid to run errands
(跑腿
) to taking a Uber instead of a bus.
“On the day
they made the
time-saving purchase, they felt happier, in a
better
mood,
and
lower
feelings
of
time
stress
than
on
the
day
they
bought
a
material
purchase” said
Whillans.
The
biggest
surprise
to
the
researchers
was
how
few
people
would
spend
money
on time-saving services. When they
asked 98 working adults how they would spend a
“windfall” of $$40, only two percent
named a purchase that would save them
time.
“One reason,’’
said Whillans, “is that we’re very bad at
remembering
how much we hate doing
certain tasks once the suffering has passed. That
makes us
less
likely
to
take
active
steps
to
avoid
that
over
burdened
feeling
in
the
future.”
But
another
possible
cause
is
good
old-
fashioned
guilt.
“If
you
feel
guilty
about
getting
someone
to
clean
your
house
for
you,
then
you
might
get
less
happiness
from
outsourcing that task,” said Whillans,
or you might just be less likely to spend
your money in that way. ’’
the Canadian experiment, the
participants__________.
divided into
two groups
given $$ 40 every two weeks
asked to give money to a neighbor’s
kid
asked to spend the
money in different ways
ing to the
author, what can make people less time-stressed?
much for a concert ticket.
a regular bus to get to work.
ing
someone to clean the garden.
themselves an expensive present.
it
comes to spending money on ‘‘buying time”,
_________.
people would
like to do it
B.a small percentage of
people choose to do it
people will do
it if extra money is given
people like
the idea but don’t practice it in life
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
上一篇:大学英语六级历年听力真题Word版
下一篇:英语六级真题听力原文