华东石油大学-华东石油大学
中国考博辅导首选学校
2015大连海事大学考
博英语真题阅读理解精练
“I
want
to
criticize
the
social
system,
and
to
show
it
at
< p>work,
at
its
most
in tense.”
Virginia
Woolf’s
provoca tive
statement
about
her
intentions
in
writing
Mrs.
Dalloway
has
regularly
been< /p>
ignored
by
the
critics ,
since
it
highlights
an p>
aspect
of
her
literary
< p>interests
very
different
f rom
the
traditional
picture
< p>ofthe
“poetic”
novelist p>
concerned
with
examining
st ates
of
reverie
and
vi
sion
and
with
following
th e
intricate
pathways
of
in dividual
consciousness.
But
Virginia
Woolf
was
a
reali stic
as
well
as
a
po etic
novelist,
a
satirist
and
social
critic
as
w ell
as
a
visionary:
li
terary
critics’
cavalier
dismiss al
of
Woolf’s
social
visio n
will
not
withstand
s crutiny.
In
her
novels,
< p>Woolfis
deeply
engaged
by
the
questions
of
how
individuals
are
shaped
( or
deformed)
by
their
soci al
environments,
how
histori cal
forces
impinge
on
peop le’s
lives,
how
class,
wea lth,
and
gender
help
t o
determine
people’s
fates.
< p>Mostof
her
novels
are p>
rooted
in
a
realistical ly
rendered
social
setting
and
in
a
precise
hist
orical
time.
Woolf’s
focus p>
on
society
has
not
be en
generally
recognized
beca
use
of
her
intense
antipat hy
to
propaganda
in
art. p>
The
pictures
of
reforme rs
in
her
novels
are
usually
satiric
or
sharply
< p>critical.
Even
when
Woolf< /p>
is
fundamentally
sympathetic
to
their
causes,
she
portrays
people
anxious
to
reform
their
society
and
< p>possessedof
a
message
or
program
as
arrogant
or
dishonest,
unaware
of
h ow
their
中国考博辅导首选学校
political
ideas
serve
the ir
own
psychological
needs.
< p>(HerWriter’s
Diary
notes:
“the
only
honest
people p>
are
the
artists,”
whereas p>
“these
social
reformers
and
philanthropists…
harbor…
discreditable
desires
under
th e
disguise
of
loving
their
kind…”)
Woolf
detested
< p>whatshe
called
“preaching”
in
fiction,
too,
and
< br>criticized
novelist
D.
H.
Lawrence
(among
others)
for p>
working
by
this
method.
Woolf’s
own
social
cr iticism
is
expressed
in
th e
language
of
observation
rather
than
in
direct
commentary,
since
for
her,
fiction
is
a
contemplative,
not
an
active
art.
She
describes
phenomena
and
< p>provides
materials
for
a p>
judgment
about
society
and< /p>
social
issues;
it
is p>
the
reader’s
work
to
put
the
observations
together
and
understand
the
coher ent
point
of
view
behind p>
them.
As
a
moralist,
Woolf
works
by
indirection,< /p>
subtly
undermining
officially
accepted
mores,
mocking,
suggesting,
calling
into
questi on,
rather
than
asserting,
p>
advocating,
bearing
witness:
< p>hersis
the
satirist’s
a rt.
Woolf’s
literary
models< /p>
were
acute
social
observer s
like
Chekhov
and
Cha ucer.
As
she
put
it
in
The
Common
Reader,
“It< /p>
is
safe
to
say
t
hat
not
a
single
law
has
been
framed
or
one
stone
set
upon
another
because
of
anything
Chaucer
said
or
wrote;
and
yet,
as
we
read
him,
we
are
absorbing
morality p>
at
every
pore.”
Like
Chaucer,
Woolf
chose
to
as
well
as
to
judge,
to
know
her
society
root
and
branch
—
a
decision
crucial
in< /p>
order
to
produce
art
rather
than
polemic.
(PS:Th
e
way
to
contact
yumingkao bo
TEL:si
ling
ling- liu
liu
ba-l